The exclusive limit of the pion-induced Drell-Yan process

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 1506.04619
• Title: The exclusive limit of the pion-induced Drell-Yan process
• Authors: S.V. Goloskokov (JINR Dubna), P. Kroll (Universität Wuppertal & Universität Regensburg)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: June 15, 2015
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04619

Abstract

Based on previous studies of hard exclusive lepton production induced by pions, which highlighted the importance of the pion pole and transverse generalized parton distributions (GPDs), this paper presents predictions for four partial cross sections of the exclusive Drell-Yan process π⁻p → l⁻l⁺n.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The central problem addressed in this research is predicting the cross section of the exclusive Drell-Yan process π⁻p → l⁻l⁺n, which is a hard exclusive process involving a timelike virtual photon.

Significance

1. Theoretical Verification: Testing the validity of QCD factorization in the timelike region, which is crucial for understanding strong interaction theory
2. GPD Universality: Exploiting the universal properties of GPDs, where GPDs extracted from pion-induced lepton production can be used to predict other hard exclusive processes
3. Experimental Opportunity: The high-energy pion beam at J-PARC provides experimental possibilities for measuring this process

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. Berger et al. Study: Provided only longitudinal cross section predictions at leading-twist accuracy, neglecting proper treatment of the pion pole
2. Complexity of Timelike Region: Physical processes in the timelike region are often difficult to understand, such as the lack of explanation for hadronic timelike electromagnetic form factors
3. Factorization Assumption: The factorization of process amplitudes for timelike photons remains an assumption lacking rigorous proof

Research Motivation

Based on the authors' findings in analyzing pion-induced lepton production—the importance of pion pole contributions and the necessity of transverse GPDs—these insights are applied to predictions of the exclusive Drell-Yan process.

Core Contributions

1. Complete Cross Section Predictions: First complete predictions of four partial cross sections (σL, σT, σLT, σTT) for the π⁻p → l⁻l⁺n process
2. Proper Treatment of Pion Pole: The pion pole is treated as a single-particle exchange (OPE) term rather than calculated from GPD Ẽ
3. Inclusion of Transverse GPDs: Contributions from transversely polarized photons are considered, requiring transverse GPDs HT and ĒT
4. Use of Experimental Form Factors: Experimentally measured pion timelike electromagnetic form factors are employed rather than leading-twist theoretical results
5. Comparison with Existing Predictions: Longitudinal cross section predictions are approximately 40 times larger than Berger et al.'s results

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Calculate the differential cross section of the exclusive Drell-Yan process π⁻p → l⁻l⁺n within the handbag approximation framework, where:

• Input: π⁻ meson and proton
• Output: Lepton pair (l⁻l⁺) and neutron
• Constraints: Large Mandelstam variable s, large photon virtuality Q'², small τ = Q'²/(s-m²)

Theoretical Framework

Handbag Approximation

In the generalized Bjorken region (large Q'² and large s with fixed x-Bjorken), QCD factorization is assumed:

$M_{\lambda\lambda',\nu\nu'} = \int dx \, H_{\lambda\lambda'}(x,\xi,Q'^2,t) \, \text{GPD}(x,\xi,t)$

where helicity amplitudes are expressed as convolutions of GPDs with hard subprocess amplitudes.

Key Helicity Amplitudes

For the five independent helicity amplitudes of the π⁻p → γ*n process:

$M_{0+,0+} = \frac{\sqrt{1-\xi^2} e_0}{Q'} \left[\langle\tilde{H}^{(3)}\rangle - \frac{\xi^2}{1-\xi^2}\langle\tilde{E}^{(3)}_{n.p.}\rangle + \frac{2\xi m}{1-\xi^2}\frac{\varrho_\pi}{t-m_\pi^2}\right]$

$M_{0-,0+} = \frac{\sqrt{-t'}}{2m}\frac{e_0}{Q'} \left[\xi\langle\tilde{E}^{(3)}_{n.p.}\rangle - 2m\frac{\varrho_\pi}{t-m_\pi^2}\right]$

$M_{--,0+} = \frac{\sqrt{1-\xi^2} e_0}{Q'^2} \mu_\pi\langle H_T^{(3)}\rangle$

where the pion pole residue is: $\varrho_\pi = \sqrt{2}g_{\pi NN}F_{\pi NN}(t)Q'^2F_\pi(Q'^2)$

Technical Innovations

1. OPE Treatment of Pion Pole

• Innovation: The pion pole is treated as an OPE term using the complete timelike electromagnetic form factor
• Comparison: Berger et al. calculated from GPD Ẽ, obtaining only leading-order perturbative results
• Impact: Results in approximately 40-fold increase in longitudinal cross section

2. Introduction of Transverse GPDs

• Physical Motivation: Transversely polarized photons require helicity-flip subprocess amplitudes
• GPD Types: Includes HT and combination ĒT = 2H̃T + ET
• Suppression Factor: Transverse amplitudes are suppressed relative to longitudinal amplitudes by factor μπ/Q'

3. Modified Perturbative Approach

• k⊥ Effects: Retain quark transverse momentum, accounting for Sudakov suppression
• Impact Parameter Space: Calculations performed in b-space to effectively handle Sudakov factors
• NLL Precision: Sudakov factors include next-to-leading-log resummation of gluon radiation

Experimental Setup

Kinematic Range

• Center-of-Mass Energy: s = 20 GeV² (main results), s = 30 GeV² (comparison)
• Photon Virtuality: 2 GeV² ≤ Q'² ≤ 8 GeV²
• Momentum Transfer: 0 ≤ -t' ≤ 0.5 GeV²
• Skewness Parameter: ξ ≈ τ/(2-τ), τ = Q'²/(s-m²)

Input Parameters

GPD Parameterization

• Forward Limit: K(x,ξ=0,t) = k(x)expt(b + α'ln x)
• H̃: Based on nucleon form factor analysis using DSSV polarized PDFs
• Transverse GPDs: Based on lattice QCD results and fits to pion-induced lepton production data

Form Factors and Coupling Constants

• Pion Form Factor: Q'²|Fπ(Q'²)| = 0.88 ± 0.04 GeV²
• Phase: δ = 1.014π + 0.195(Q'²/GeV²-2) - 0.029(Q'²/GeV²-2)²
• πNN Coupling: gπNN = 13.1 ± 0.3
• Chiral Mass: μπ = 2 GeV (+0.55/-0.15)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Longitudinal Cross Section (σL)

• Q'² = 4 GeV²: Peak value approximately 180 pb/GeV⁴ (at t' = 0)
• Pion Pole Dominance: Accounts for ~90%, H̃ contribution ~10%
• Comparison with Leading-Twist: Approximately 40 times larger than leading-twist results
• Interference Terms: Positive values arising from imaginary parts

Transverse Cross Section (σT)

• Magnitude: Approximately 5 times smaller than longitudinal cross section
• HT Dominance: Main contribution from transverse GPD HT
• Pion Pole: Smaller contribution in transverse cross section
• Uncertainties: Large and asymmetric errors due to μπ uncertainty

Longitudinal-Transverse Interference Cross Section (σLT)

• Magnitude: Comparable to transverse cross section
• Contributions: Both interference terms contribute significantly
• Uncertainties: Error band width approximately half that of transverse cross section

Transverse-Transverse Interference Cross Section (σTT)

• Magnitude: Very small, < 0.3 pb/GeV⁴

Energy Dependence

• s = 30 GeV²: Cross sections reduced compared to s = 20 GeV²
• High Energy Limit: At s ≈ 360 GeV², longitudinal cross section ~30 fb/GeV², possibly too small to measure

Decomposition Analysis

Longitudinal cross section can be decomposed as:

• Pion pole contribution: Dominant term (~90%)
• H̃ GPD contribution: ~10%
• Interference terms: Positive values, relatively small

Transverse cross section decomposition: $\frac{d\sigma_T}{dtdQ'^2} = \kappa[|M_{--,0+}|^2 + 2|M_{++,0+}(\pi)|^2 + 2|M_{++,0+}(\bar{E}_T)|^2]$

Related Work

Theoretical Development

1. GPD Theory: Theoretical framework for hard exclusive processes based on QCD factorization and handbag method
2. Pion-Induced Lepton Production: HERMES and CLAS experimental data analysis revealing importance of pion pole and transverse GPDs
3. Timelike DVCS: Theoretical predictions for timelike deeply virtual Compton scattering

Experimental Background

1. HERMES Data: π⁺ lepton production cross sections and transverse target spin asymmetries
2. CLAS Measurements: π⁰ lepton production supporting necessity of transverse GPDs
3. J-PARC Prospects: High-energy pion beam providing opportunities for exclusive Drell-Yan measurements

Comparison with Berger et al. Work

• Scope: Berger et al. calculated only longitudinal cross section; this work provides four partial cross sections
• Pion Pole: Different treatment methods lead to 40-fold difference
• Transverse Contributions: This work first includes transverse GPD contributions

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Pion Pole Dominance: Longitudinal cross section primarily determined by pion pole contributions
2. Transverse GPDs Important: Transverse cross section requires transverse GPDs, particularly HT
3. Measurability: Cross sections are sufficiently large at J-PARC energies (s ≈ 20-30 GeV²) to potentially be measured
4. Factorization Test: Future data can test factorization hypothesis for timelike photon processes

Limitations

1. Factorization Assumption: Factorization for timelike photons remains an assumption lacking rigorous proof
2. Sudakov Factor: Uncertainty in handling Sudakov factors in timelike region
3. GPD Uncertainties: Large uncertainties in transverse GPDs
4. Higher-Order Corrections: Only leading-order perturbative calculations considered, neglecting higher-order QCD corrections

Future Directions

1. Experimental Verification: π⁻p → l⁻l⁺n measurements at J-PARC
2. Theoretical Improvements: Better understanding of timelike Sudakov factors
3. GPD Refinement: Improved transverse GPDs through additional experimental data
4. Generalization: Extension to other processes such as K⁻p → l⁻l⁺Λ

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: First complete theoretical predictions for exclusive Drell-Yan process
2. Physical Insights: Correct identification of pion pole importance and treatment method
3. Experiment-Oriented: Predictions directly aimed at measurements by J-PARC and similar facilities
4. Systematicity: Systematic study based on existing pion-induced lepton production analysis
5. Technical Innovation: OPE treatment of pion pole and introduction of transverse GPDs

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Foundation: Rigor of timelike factorization remains to be proven
2. Parameter Uncertainties: Some parameters (e.g., μπ) have large and asymmetric errors
3. Sudakov Treatment: Controversial aspects in handling timelike Sudakov factors
4. High-Energy Behavior: Reliability of predictions in high-energy region (s > 100 GeV²) questionable

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical framework for understanding timelike hard exclusive processes
2. Experimental Guidance: Provides theoretical basis for design and data analysis of J-PARC and similar experiments
3. Method Demonstration: OPE treatment of pion pole can be generalized to other processes
4. GPD Development: Promotes theoretical and phenomenological research on transverse GPDs

Applicable Scenarios

1. Experimental Design: J-PARC, COMPASS, and other high-energy pion beam experiments
2. Theoretical Research: Theoretical analysis of timelike hard exclusive processes
3. GPD Extraction: Constraining GPD parameters through multiple processes
4. QCD Tests: Verifying validity of QCD factorization in timelike region

References

The paper contains 34 references covering important work in GPD theory, pion-induced lepton production experiments, Drell-Yan process theory, QCD factorization, and related fields. Key references include experimental data from HERMES and CLAS, theoretical developments in GPDs, and phenomenological analysis of hard exclusive processes.