The GPD H̃ and spin correlations in wide-angle Compton scattering

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 1703.05000
• Title: The GPD H̃ and spin correlations in wide-angle Compton scattering
• Author: P. Kroll (Universität Wuppertal)
• Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
• Publication Date: March 15, 2017
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05000

Abstract

This paper discusses wide-angle Compton scattering (WACS) within the handbag approach framework, where the scattering amplitude is given by the product of hard subprocess amplitudes and Compton-specific form factors representing 1/x moments of generalized parton distributions (GPDs). The paper examines the current state of knowledge regarding these form factors and their underlying GPDs. Detailed analysis reveals that the form factor R_A and the underlying GPD H̃ are poorly understood. The paper argues that future data on spin correlations A_ and/or K_ will allow extraction of R_A, which can subsequently constrain the large-t behavior of H̃.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Theoretical description of hard exclusive processes: Over the past two decades, hard exclusive processes have been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically. It is now established that handbag diagrams control two complementary processes: deeply virtual Compton scattering (DVCS) and wide-angle Compton scattering (WACS).
2. Importance of GPDs: Generalized parton distributions (GPDs) provide three-dimensional information about the internal structure of the proton, including the momentum distribution of partons and their transverse spatial information.
3. Imbalance in current knowledge: While through nucleon form factor analysis we have considerable understanding of GPDs H and E in the large-t region, knowledge of GPD H̃ remains poor.

Research Motivation

1. Experimental requirements: Experiments planned at Jefferson Lab require more accurate theoretical predictions for WACS.
2. Uncertainty in form factor R_A: Limited experimental information on isovector axial-vector form factors leads to large uncertainties in R_A.
3. Proposal of reverse strategy: Proposing extraction of R_A from spin correlation data rather than predicting R_A from GPDs.

Core Contributions

1. Systematic analysis of current GPD knowledge: Particularly the uncertainty of H̃ in the large-t region
2. Proposal of new research strategy: Extracting form factor R_A through spin correlations A_ or K_
3. Detailed study of spin observables: Analysis of the sensitivity of various spin correlations to R_A
4. Provision of improved GPD parameterizations: Two improved H̃ parameterization examples
5. Establishment of connection between R_A extraction and H̃ constraints: Providing pathways for improved flavor separation

Detailed Methodology

Handbag Approach Framework

Basic Assumptions

In the symmetric frame, assuming Mandelstam variables s, -t, and -u are much larger than the typical hadronic scale Λ² ≈ 1 GeV². Within this framework, the WACS amplitude can be expressed as:

M_{μ'±,μ±}(s,t) = 2παem[H_{μ'±,μ±}(ŝ,t̂)(R_V(t) ± R_A(t))]
M_{μ'-,μ+}(s,t) = παem√(-t)/m [H_{μ'+,μ+}(ŝ,t̂) + H_{μ'+,μ+}(ŝ,t̂)]R_T(t)

Compton Form Factors

Form factors are defined as 1/x moments of zero-skewness GPDs:

R^a_V(t) = ∫_{-1}^1 dx/x H^a(x,t)
R^a_A(t) = ∫_{-1}^1 dx/x sign(x)H̃^a(x,t)  
R^a_T(t) = ∫_{-1}^1 dx/x E^a(x,t)

GPD Parameterization Method

Zero-skewness GPD Parameterization

Employing exponential form parameterization:

K^a_{iv}(x,t) = k^a_i(x) exp[tf^a_i(x)]

where the profile functions are:

f^a_i(x) = (α'_i^a ln(1/x) + B^a_i)(1-x)³ + A^a_i x(1-x)²

Special Treatment of H̃

Due to scarcity of axial-vector form factor data, the paper considers three scenarios:

1. Reference case 15: Assuming f̃^a = f^a_1
2. Example #1: Using α̃'_a ≃ α̃'_a/2 (Regge cut characteristic)
3. Example #2: α̃'_u = 0.144, α̃'_d unchanged

Experimental Setup

Data Foundation

1. Axial-vector form factor data: Primarily using data from Kitagaki et al., covering -t ≤ 3 GeV²
2. Spin correlation data: From Jefferson Lab measurements of A_ and K_
3. Nucleon form factors: Existing data used to constrain GPDs H and E

Theoretical Calculation Setup

1. Factorization scale: μ_F = 2 GeV
2. Parton distributions: Using ABM11 (unpolarized) and DSSV (polarized) PDFs
3. Calculation precision: Including next-to-leading order corrections in α_s
4. Kinematic scenarios: Considering three different proton mass correction schemes

Experimental Results

Axial-vector Form Factor F_A

• All three parameterizations are consistent with experimental data
• In the range √(-t) ≈ 1-2 GeV, examples #1 and #2 are significantly larger than reference case 15
• At large √(-t), all three cases converge

Compton Form Factor R_A

• Exhibits behavior patterns similar to F_A
• Examples #1 and #2 yield larger R_A values at intermediate -t values
• This difference has important implications for spin observables

Spin Correlation Predictions

A_ = K_ Correlation

• A robust prediction within the handbag approach
• Highly sensitive to the R_A/R_V ratio
• Approximately obtained from Klein-Nishina helicity correlation diluted by:

K_LL ≈ 2(-t)/(s-u) × (R_A/R_V) × dilution factor

A_ = -K_ Correlation

• Similarly controlled by R_A/R_V ratio, but affected by factor κ_T - η
• Small at s ≈ 8 GeV², becomes larger at higher s values
• Less suitable for R_A extraction than A_/K_

Impact Parameter Distributions

• Parallel helicity u-quark distribution dominates at large x
• At small x, antiparallel helicity d-quark distribution is the second largest contribution
• Distribution narrows with increasing x, with active partons near the proton momentum center

Related Work

Other WACS Models

1. Miller model 30: Using massive point-like quarks, leading to A_ ≠ K_
2. Soft collinear effective theory approach 34: Leading contribution with R_V = R_A, R_T = 0
3. Endpoint model 35: Similar to the present approach but does not discuss spin effects

GPD-related Research

• GPD applications in DVCS and DVMP
• Transverse GPDs in meson electroproduction
• Generalization of handbag approach to other hard exclusive processes

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Current state of knowledge: GPDs H and E are relatively well understood at large-t, but H̃ remains poorly known
2. Strategy shift: Proposing extraction of R_A from WACS spin data rather than predicting R_A from GPDs
3. Experimental prospects: Future precise spin correlation data from Jefferson Lab will significantly improve constraints on H̃

Physical Significance

1. Improved flavor separation: Accurate determination of R_A will improve flavor separation of H̃
2. Sea quark information: May provide information on sea quark H̃ at large-t
3. Impact parameter distributions: Better understanding of impact parameter distributions of helicity quarks

Future Directions

1. Experimental data: Anticipating additional axial-vector form factor data from FNAL MINERVA experiment
2. Theoretical improvements: Combining spin correlations from meson photoproduction to provide additional constraints
3. Precision enhancement: More accurate knowledge of H̃ will allow more reliable impact parameter distribution studies

In-depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Systematic analysis: Comprehensive assessment of current GPD knowledge, particularly H̃ uncertainties
2. Innovative strategy: Proposes reverse extraction method for R_A with practical operability
3. Detailed calculations: Includes complete next-to-leading order corrections and multiple kinematic schemes
4. Physical insights: Deep analysis of x-t correlations and physical picture of impact parameter distributions
5. Experimental guidance: Provides clear measurement targets for future Jefferson Lab experiments

Limitations

1. Theoretical uncertainties: Limited applicability range of handbag approach (requiring s,-t,-u >> Λ²)
2. Data limitations: Existing spin correlation data does not fully satisfy kinematic conditions required by theory
3. Sea quark contributions: Treatment of sea quark GPDs remains crude
4. Higher-order corrections: Does not include α²_s corrections, potentially affecting precision

Impact

1. Theoretical development: Provides new perspectives for GPD phenomenology research
2. Experimental advancement: Clarifies measurement importance of key observables
3. Methodological innovation: Reverse extraction strategy applicable to other form factor studies
4. Long-term value: Lays foundation for GPD research at future facilities such as EIC

Applicable Scenarios

1. Jefferson Lab 12 GeV upgrade: Directly applicable to planned WACS experiments
2. Global GPD analysis: Can be incorporated into future global GPD fitting frameworks
3. Other hard exclusive processes: Methods generalizable to related processes such as DVMP
4. Theoretical benchmark testing: Provides precise tests for verifying QCD factorization

References

The paper cites 36 important references covering key areas including GPD theory development, DVCS/WACS experiments, and handbag methodology, providing a solid foundation for comprehensive review of the field.