Non-compact symmetries cannot be fully broken by randomness since non-compact groups have no invariant probability distributions. In particular, this makes trickier the "Copernican" random choice of the place of the observer in infinite cosmology models.
This problem may be circumvented with what topologists call Pointed Spaces. Then randomness will be used only in building (infinite) models around the pre-designated "observance point", that thus would not need to be randomly chosen.
Additional complications come from the original randomness possibly being hidden. P. Gacs and A. Kucera proved that every sequence can be algorithmically generated from a random one. But Vladimir V'yugin discovered that randomized algorithms can with positive probability generate uncomputable sequences not algorithmically equivalent to any random ones.
Assumptions of Randomness in Cosmology Models
- Paper ID: 1707.03262
- Title: Assumptions of Randomness in Cosmology Models
- Author: Leonid A. Levin (Boston University)
- Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology)
- Publication Date: July 2017 (Last Updated: October 2025)
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.03262
This paper explores fundamental mathematical issues concerning assumptions of randomness in infinite cosmological models. The author demonstrates that non-compact symmetries cannot be completely broken by randomness, since non-compact groups lack invariant probability distributions. This complicates the random selection of observer locations in infinite cosmological models. The paper proposes using the topological concept of "pointed spaces" to circumvent this problem—namely, first designating an observation point, then constructing the infinite model around that point. Additionally, it discusses the problem of hidden complexity in primordial randomness.
- Random Selection of Observer Location in Infinite Universes: In infinite cosmological models, randomly selecting an observer's location becomes a mathematical challenge, as infinite space lacks a uniform probability distribution.
- Breaking Non-Compact Symmetries: Non-compact groups (such as symmetry groups of infinite Euclidean space) lack invariant probability distributions, making it impossible to break these symmetries through randomness.
- Hidden Nature of Randomness: Physical laws permit various events and histories; in infinite universe models, each scenario occurs infinitely many times, requiring us to assume that observer locations are relatively generic.
This problem is of fundamental importance to modern cosmological theory because:
- Many cosmological models involve infinite or quasi-infinite structures
- The choice of observer location directly affects theoretical predictions
- It involves the definition and role of observers in quantum mechanics
- Identifies fundamental mathematical difficulties in infinite cosmological models: The problem that non-compact symmetries cannot be completely broken by randomness
- Proposes a "pointed spaces" solution: First designate an observer, then construct the infinite universe around that observer
- Discusses complexity of algorithmic randomness: Introduces cosmological significance of the Gács-Kučera theorem and V'yugin results
- Analyzes deeper problems in observer definition: Re-examines the observer concept from information-theoretic and thermodynamic perspectives
The author's main technical innovation employs the topological concept of "pointed spaces":
- Problems with Traditional Approaches:
- First construct an infinite universe
- Then randomly select observer location
- But infinite space lacks uniform distribution
- Pointed Spaces Method:
- First designate observer location
- Then construct infinite universe around observer
- Avoids uniform distribution problems in infinite domains
Gács-Kučera Theorem: Any sequence can be computed from some algorithmically random sequence
- Significance: All physical processes may originate from certain random events
- Problem: Requires explicit specification of which events are random
V'yugin Results: Randomized algorithms can generate non-computable sequences with positive probability
- Significance: Observational results may have very different algorithmic invariance properties
- Challenge: Completeness requirements of theory
An observer must possess the following characteristics:
- Data Replication Capability: Ability to reliably replicate, store, and transmit observational data
- Error Correction Mechanism: Sufficient complexity for error correction and self-preservation
- Free Energy Consumption: Requires free energy flow; gravity may play a role
- Observer must discard part of system to enter mixed state
- Consumes free energy and expels heat to some horizon
- Generates entropy of observer and horizon (if considered separately)
The author demonstrates that randomly placing observers only in finite regions cannot provide a complete infinite universe model, because:
- Certain global properties do not manifest in any finite region
- Compact event X is the intersection of monotone families of clopen (finite) events Xi
- Its probability is inf Prob(Xi), but Xi must be consistent on observer's surrounding environment
For probability calculation of compact events:
P(X)=infiP(Xi)
where X=⋂iXi, and Xi is a monotone decreasing family of clopen events.
- Minimum complexity C of self-replicating systems may be large
- Probability of spontaneous generation P may be extremely small: 1/P ~ exp(C)
- May exceed cosmological scales
- Fine-Tuning of Physical Laws: May be necessary to increase probability of life emergence
- Complexity Transfer: Fine-tuning itself requires high complexity, merely shifting the small probability problem
The author provides a unique interpretation of free will in footnotes:
- Modeling Impossibility: Inability to establish appropriate models is expressed as system's free will
- Complexity Limitation: Modeling entity requires greater complexity than modeled object
- Contagiousness: Free will extends to anything interacting with free-willed entity
Learning about oneself through observing one's own unpredictable behavior, and thereby learning about other humans with similar origins and environments; this learning changes the probability distribution of the environment.
- Kolmogorov Complexity Theory: Provides mathematical foundation for randomness
- Algorithmic Randomness: Does not guarantee compliance with all mathematical laws holding with probability 1, only computable laws
- Anthropic Principle: Author avoids this "popular but unclear terminology"
- Observer in Quantum Mechanics: Macroscopic systems entangled with observed microscopic variables
- Validity of Pointed Spaces Method: Designating observer before constructing universe circumvents probability distribution problems in infinite domains
- Importance of Observer Definition: Observer choice is essential component of complete model
- Reasonableness of Approximate Theories: For practical purposes, physical laws need only hold approximately
- Technical Challenges in Implementation: Requires extending universe to observer's entire past (if causal relations exist)
- Ambiguity in Observer Definition: "Macroscopic" is vague term with unclear relevance
- Incompleteness of Theory: Theory may become incomprehensible when negligible possibilities must be considered
- Precise Observer Definition: Need more precise definition of what constitutes an observer
- Study of Finite Approximations: Investigate when finite approximations suffice
- Multi-Observer Systems: Consider interactions between multiple observers
- Mathematical Rigor: Transforms profound physical problems into rigorous mathematical formulations
- Interdisciplinary Integration: Successfully combines algorithmic information theory, topology, and cosmology
- Conceptual Innovation: Pointed spaces method offers new approach to classical problems
- Philosophical Depth: Provides information-theoretic perspective on observer, free will, and related concepts
- Theoretical Contribution: Provides new mathematical framework for infinite cosmological models
- Limited Practical Applicability: Application of proposed solutions to actual cosmological models remains unclear
- Insufficient Technical Detail: Some key concepts (e.g., "macroscopic" observer) remain vaguely defined
- Difficulty in Empirical Verification: Theoretical predictions are difficult to verify through observation
- Theoretical Contribution: Provides new mathematical framework for infinite cosmological models
- Cross-Disciplinary Impact: May influence development of quantum mechanics foundations and algorithmic information theory
- Conceptual Clarification: Helps clarify conceptual confusion regarding observers in cosmology
- Construction of infinite or quasi-infinite cosmological models
- Study of observer problems in quantum cosmology
- Probability calculations in multiverse theory
- Application of algorithmic information theory in physics
This paper cites important literature in algorithmic information theory, topology, and cosmology, particularly:
- Kolmogorov's foundational work on algorithmic information theory
- Gács and Kučera's important theorems on random sequences
- V'yugin's discoveries on non-computable sequences
These citations demonstrate the author's deep expertise across multiple mathematical and physical fields, and a unique perspective on integrating these disciplines into cosmological research.