Quantitative estimates for bending energies and applications to non-local variational problems

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 1801.01418
• Title: Quantitative estimates for bending energies and applications to non-local variational problems
• Authors: Michael Goldman, Matteo Novaga, Matthias Röger
• Classification: math.AP (Mathematics - Analysis of Partial Differential Equations)
• Submission Date: January 4, 2018; Revised October 14, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.01418

Abstract

This paper investigates a variational model composed of a weighted sum of perimeter, bending energy, and Riesz interaction energy, which can be viewed as a toy model for charged elastic droplets. Different energy terms have competing preferences for strong localization and maximum dispersal structures. The dependence of the energy landscape on the magnitude of "charge" (i.e., the weight of Riesz interaction energy) is studied. In the two-dimensional case, it is first proven that for simply connected sets with small elastic energy, elastic defects control isoperimetric defects. Based on this result, it is shown that for small charge, the unique minimizer of the complete variational model is either a ball or an annulus centered at the origin. These statements are complemented by non-existence results in the large charge regime. In three dimensions, area and diameter bounds for configurations with small Willmore energy are established, and it is shown that for sufficiently small charge, the ball is the unique minimizer of the variational model.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Competing Interaction Problems: In recent years, variational models involving competition between perimeter-type energy and long-range repulsive terms have received widespread attention. Such problems arise in multiple physical contexts, including the Gamow liquid drop model in nuclear physics and the Ohta-Kawasaki model for diblock copolymers.
2. Effects of Higher-Order Interface Energy: Existing research has primarily focused on competition between perimeter energy and non-local interactions, while the effects of higher-order interface energy (such as two-dimensional Euler elasticity or three-dimensional Willmore energy) have not been adequately studied.
3. Charged Droplet Model: This model can be viewed as a prototype for charged elastic vesicles, where Willmore energy represents the bending energy of a fluid membrane, and Coulomb self-interaction represents the energy of a uniformly charged body.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Completeness: To fill the theoretical gap regarding higher-order interface energy in competing interaction problems
2. Physical Applications: To provide mathematical theoretical foundations for physical systems such as charged elastic droplets
3. Mathematical Challenges: To establish quantitative stability estimates, which are of significant importance in variational problems

Core Contributions

1. Quantitative Elasticity Estimates: In the two-dimensional case, for simply connected sets with small elastic energy, quantitative inequalities are established showing that elastic defects control isoperimetric defects
2. Characterization of Minimizers: Complete description of minimizers of the variational problem in the small charge regime (balls or centered annuli)
3. Phase Diagram Analysis: Detailed phase diagram of the parameter space in the two-dimensional case, including regions for balls, annuli, and non-existence
4. Three-Dimensional Results: Proof of the unique minimality of the ball in the three-dimensional case for small charge
5. Non-Existence Results: Proof of non-existence of minimizers in the large charge regime

Detailed Methodology

Problem Formulation

Consider the functional defined on sets $E \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ ($d=2,3$): $F_{\lambda,Q}(E) = \lambda P(E) + W(E) + Q V_\alpha(E)$

where:

• $P(E) = \mathcal{H}^{d-1}(\partial E)$ is the perimeter
• $W(E)$ is the elastic energy (in 2D) or Willmore energy (in 3D)
• $V_\alpha(E) = \iint_{E \times E} \frac{1}{|x-y|^{d-\alpha}} dx dy$ is the Riesz interaction energy

The objective is to minimize this functional subject to the volume constraint $|E| = |B_1|$.

Core Technical Methods

1. Quantitative Stability Estimates

Theorem 2.3 (Quantitative Elasticity Estimate): There exists a constant $c_0 > 0$ such that for any $E \in M_{sc}(|B_R|)$: $R(W(E) - W(B_R)) \geq c_0 \left(\min_{x \in \mathbb{R}^2} \frac{|E \triangle B_R(x)|}{|B_R|}\right)^2$

Proof Strategy:

• Taylor expansion analysis for near-spherical sets
• Fourier analysis and energy estimates
• Proof by contradiction and compactness arguments

2. Classification of Minimizers

By analyzing different parameter regions:

• Small Charge Region: Quantitative estimates are used to prove optimality of balls or annuli
• Large Charge Region: Competing sequences are constructed to prove non-existence

3. Three-Dimensional Analysis

Rigidity estimates for Willmore energy from De Lellis-Müller and Li-Yau inequalities are utilized to establish area and diameter bounds.

Technical Innovations

1. Quantitative Methods: First establishment of quantitative inequalities showing that elastic energy defects control geometric defects
2. Unified Framework: Both two-dimensional and three-dimensional cases are incorporated into a unified analytical framework
3. Refined Phase Diagram: Precise partition of parameter space and estimation of critical values
4. Variational Compactness: Development of variational compactness theory for handling sequences with vanishing volume

Main Results

Two-Dimensional Results

1. Zero Charge Case ($Q = 0$)

Theorem 2.7: There exists a threshold $\bar{\lambda} > 0$ such that:

• When $\lambda \in (0, \bar{\lambda})$, the minimizer is an annulus with inner radius $r_\lambda$
• When $\lambda > \bar{\lambda}$, the minimizer is a ball

2. Small Charge Case

Theorem 3.8: For $\lambda \in [\lambda_*, \bar{\lambda}]$, there exists $Q(\lambda_*)$ such that when $Q < Q(\lambda_*)$, the minimizer is a centered annulus.

Corollary 3.9: There exist $Q_2 > 0$ and $\lambda_0 > 0$ such that when $\lambda \in (0, \lambda_0]$ and $Q \leq Q_2 \lambda^{\frac{3+\alpha}{2}}$, the minimizer is a centered annulus.

3. Non-Existence Results

Proposition 3.14: For $\alpha \in (1,2)$, there exists $Q_3(\alpha)$ such that when $Q \geq Q_3(\alpha)(\lambda + \lambda^{\frac{\alpha-1}{2}})$, no minimizer exists.

Three-Dimensional Results

Theorem 4.6: For $\alpha \in (1,3)$, there exists $Q_4 > 0$ such that when $Q < Q_4$, the ball is the unique minimizer.

Proposition 4.11: For $\alpha \in (2,3)$, when $Q \geq Q_5(\lambda^{-\frac{3-\alpha}{2}} + \lambda^{\frac{3+\alpha}{2}})$, no minimizer exists.

Technical Details and Proof Methods

1. Near-Spherical Analysis

For near-spherical sets $\partial E = \{R(1+\phi(\theta))e^{i\theta}\}$, a Taylor expansion of the energy is established: $W(E) - W(B_R) = R^{-1} \int_0^{2\pi} \left(\ddot{\phi}^2 + \phi^2 + \frac{3}{2}\dot{\phi}^2 - \phi + 4\phi\ddot{\phi}\right) + o(\|\phi\|_{W^{2,2}}^2)$

2. Variational Compactness

Lemma 4.4: For sequences with vanishing volume, uniformly bounded perimeter and Willmore energy, the limit measure has even density properties.

3. Riesz Energy Estimates

Lemma 3.13: For an annulus $B_1 \setminus B_{1-\varepsilon}$: