The Third Workshop on Extremely Precise Radial Velocities: The New Instruments

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 1801.05383
• Title: The Third Workshop on Extremely Precise Radial Velocities: The New Instruments
• Authors: Jason T. Wright, Paul Robertson
• Classification: astro-ph.IM (Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods)
• Conference Dates: August 14-17, 2016
• Conference Location: Penn Stater Conference Center and Hotel, State College, Pennsylvania, USA
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.05383

Abstract

The Third Workshop on Extremely Precise Radial Velocities was held August 14-17, 2016, in State College, Pennsylvania, USA, attracting over 120 participants from around the world. This paper provides a brief description of the workshop, including its format, topics, and chairs. Twenty-three instrument teams presented at plenary sessions, and the paper provides detailed tables containing the fundamental characteristics of these new precision Doppler spectrographs.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Context

The radial velocity method is one of the core technologies for exoplanet detection, discovering planets by measuring minute velocity changes in stars caused by planetary gravitational effects. With growing demand for detecting Earth-sized planets—particularly those in habitable zones—there is a need to advance radial velocity measurement precision to unprecedented levels.

Research Significance

1. Scientific Demand: Detecting Earth-like planets requires achieving sub-meter-per-second radial velocity precision
2. Technological Development Needs: Existing instruments face challenges from stellar activity noise and instrumental stability
3. Community Communication Necessity: Promoting technical exchange and experience sharing among different teams

Existing Challenges

1. Radial velocity variations caused by stellar activity (stellar jitter)
2. Long-term stability issues of instrumental systems
3. Effects of atmospheric conditions on observations
4. Limitations in data processing and statistical methods

Core Contributions

1. Comprehensive Survey: Provides a complete overview of 23 next-generation extremely precise radial velocity instruments globally as of 2016
2. Standardized Information Framework: Establishes a standardized descriptive framework for instrument characteristics, facilitating comparison and evaluation
3. Technology Development Roadmap: Demonstrates technological trends and directions in the field
4. Community Resource: Provides important reference data and technical exchange platform for the research community

Methodology Details

Workshop Organization Structure

Workshop Format Design

• Plenary Sessions: Including historical overview (presented by Paul Butler) and technical presentations
• Poster Presentations: Daily 15-minute "poster pops" sessions
• Breakout Sessions: Five continuous breakout sessions, 90 minutes each

Technical Breakout Sessions

1. Hardware Challenges and Comprehensive Error Budgets
   • Chairs: Sam Halverson, Arpita Roy
   • Focus: Instrumental hardware design and error analysis
2. Stellar Photospheres and Modeling Jitter
   • Chair: Heather Cegla
   • Focus: Effects of stellar activity on radial velocity measurements
3. Statistical Methods
   • Chair: Rodrigo Diaz
   • Focus: Data analysis and statistical processing techniques
4. Computational Methods
   • Chairs: Eric Ford, Benjamin Nelson
   • Focus: Algorithm optimization and computational techniques
5. Observational Strategies
   • Chair: Jennifer Burt
   • Focus: Observational planning and strategy optimization

Data Collection Methods

Technical parameters from instrument teams were collected through standardized tables, including:

• Expected first light and full operational timelines
• Wavelength coverage ranges
• Expected precision targets
• Telescope information
• Technical characteristic descriptions

Experimental Setup

Survey Scope

• Geographic Coverage: Major observatories worldwide
• Technology Types: Optical and near-infrared radial velocity instruments
• Development Stages: Next-generation instruments in design, construction, and commissioning phases

Data Standardization

Established a unified parameter description framework:

• Timeline milestones (first light, full operational capability)
• Technical specifications (wavelength, precision, resolution)
• Telescope configuration (aperture, location, availability)
• Technical features (calibration methods, stabilization techniques)

Experimental Results

Instrument Technology Development Trends

Precision Target Distribution

• Sub-meter-per-second Level: Multiple instruments targeting precision < 0.5 m/s
• Highest Precision: ESPRESSO targeting 0.1 m/s, G-CLEF targeting 0.1 m/s
• Near-Infrared Breakthrough: Multiple NIR instruments targeting ~1 m/s

Technical Characteristic Statistics

Wavelength Coverage:

• Optical Band: 380-900 nm (mainstream)
• Near-Infrared: 970-2350 nm (emerging)
• Broad Band: Some instruments covering visible to near-infrared spectrum

Telescope Configuration:

• Large Aperture Advantage: 8-10m class telescopes (Gemini, Keck, Subaru, VLT)
• Dedicated Medium Aperture: 3-4m class specially optimized telescopes
• Extremely Large Telescopes: G-CLEF on GMT represents future direction

Key Technical Innovations

Stabilization Technologies

1. Environmental Control: Temperature stability to mK level, vacuum environment
2. Fiber Optics: Octagonal fibers, dual scrambler, pupil slicer
3. Calibration Systems: Laser frequency comb, Fabry-Perot etalon, simultaneous calibration

Instrument Design Features

• ESPRESSO: Can utilize combined observations from VLT's four 8m telescopes
• NEID: Optimized for follow-up observations of exoplanets discovered by TESS
• MAROON-X: Specially optimized for M-dwarf observations
• SPIROU: Near-infrared spectrograph with integrated polarimetry capabilities

Geographic Distribution Analysis

• North America: 9 projects with diverse technologies
• Europe: 8 projects with ESO facilities playing important roles
• Other Regions: South Africa, Australia, India representing emerging forces

Related Work

Historical Development Context

1. First-Generation Precision Radial Velocity: HIRES, HARPS achieving 1 m/s precision
2. Technology Improvement Needs: Fischer et al. (2016) white paper summarizing technical challenges
3. Next-Generation Goals: Sub-meter-per-second precision for detecting Earth-like planets

Comparison with Prior Work

• Pepe et al. (2014): Early instrument development review
• This Work Supplements: More comprehensive and updated instrument information
• Technical Progress: Transition from conceptual design to actual construction

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

Technological Maturity

Twenty-three next-generation instrument projects demonstrate the activity level and maturity of technological development in this field, with most projects expected to become operational between 2017-2020.

Precision Target Achievement

Multiple projects have set precision targets of 0.1-0.5 m/s, providing technological foundation for detecting Earth-like planets.

Technological Diversification

Different technical approaches (optical vs. near-infrared, different calibration methods, different stabilization strategies) provide risk mitigation through technological diversification.

Technology Development Directions

Rise of Near-Infrared Technology

Multiple NIR projects optimized for M-dwarfs, expanding the target star range for habitable planet searches.

Large Telescope Advantages

High light-gathering capability of 10m-class telescopes enables precision measurements of fainter stars.

Systems Engineering Maturity

Transition from isolated technical breakthroughs to comprehensive engineering solutions.

Limitations Analysis

Instrument Information Timeliness

Based on 2016 information, actual progress of some projects may differ from expectations.

Performance Prediction Uncertainty

Many precision targets are based on theoretical expectations, requiring in-orbit verification of actual performance.

Stellar Noise Challenge

Improved instrumental precision makes stellar activity itself the primary limiting factor.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

Comprehensiveness and Systematicity

• Covers nearly all relevant projects globally
• Provides standardized comparison framework
• Scientific and rigorous information collection methodology

High Practical Value

• Provides important reference resource for researchers
• Facilitates project planning and collaboration decisions
• Aids in judging technological development trends

Promotes Academic Exchange

• Establishes technical exchange platform
• Promotes "open" technical discussion culture
• Lays foundation for subsequent development

Limitations

Limited Technical Details

• Primarily provides overview information, lacking in-depth technical analysis
• Insufficient discussion of critical technical challenges
• Lacks comparative analysis of technical solutions' advantages and disadvantages

Prediction Accuracy

• Limited timeliness based on 2016 information
• Some project progress may differ from expectations
• Performance predictions lack uncertainty analysis

Analysis Depth

• Primarily information compilation, lacking in-depth technical analysis
• Relatively conservative predictions of technological development trends
• Insufficient discussion of technical pathway selection

Impact Assessment

Academic Value

• Provides important reference benchmark for radial velocity field
• Promotes international cooperation and technical exchange
• Advances standardization processes

Practical Application

• Guides subsequent instrument development planning
• Provides decision reference for funding agencies
• Promotes rational allocation of technical resources

Long-term Significance

• Records important development milestones in the field
• Provides valuable materials for technology history research
• Establishes foundation for continuous tracking

Applicable Scenarios

Researchers

• Instrument selection and observation time proposals
• Understanding technological development trends
• Identifying collaboration opportunities

Engineers and Technical Personnel

• Technical solution references
• Performance benchmark comparison
• Engineering experience borrowing

Management and Decision-Making

• Project investment decisions
• Strategic planning formulation
• Resource allocation optimization

References

1. Fischer, D. A., et al. 2016, PASP, 128, 066001 - Extremely Precise Radial Velocity Technology White Paper
2. Pepe, F., Ehrenreich, D., & Meyer, M. R. 2014, Nature, 513, 358 - Early Instrument Development Review
3. SPIE Conference Papers from Various Instrument Projects - Providing detailed technical specifications and design concepts

Summary: As an important technical survey report, this paper comprehensively documents the state of development in the extremely precise radial velocity instrument field at the 2016 timepoint. Although primarily informational in nature, its systematic and comprehensive approach provides an important reference benchmark for the field's development, possessing significant academic and practical value. As these instruments become operational, the survey's prediction accuracy and technological development trend assessments will be validated.