On Solving Reachability in Grid Digraphs using a Pseudoseparator

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 1902.00488
• Title: On Solving Reachability in Grid Digraphs using a Pseudoseparator
• Authors: Rahul Jain, Raghunath Tewari
• Classification: cs.CC (Computational Complexity), cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms)
• Publication Date/Venue: Theory of Computing, Volume 19 (2), 2023 (conference version published at FSTTCS 2019)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00488

Abstract

The reachability problem in directed graphs asks whether there exists a path from one vertex to another. In grid digraphs, vertices are points on a two-dimensional rectangular grid, and edges can only exist between a vertex and its horizontal and vertical neighbors. Asano and Doerr (CCCG'11) first provided simultaneous time-space bounds for the reachability problem in grid digraphs, solving it in polynomial time using $O(n^{1/2+ε})$ space. In 2018, Ashida and Nakagawa (SoCG'18) improved the space complexity to $\tilde{O}(n^{1/3})$. This paper proves the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm that solves the reachability problem in grid digraphs with $n$ vertices using $O(n^{1/4+ε})$ space. We define and construct a new separator device called a pseudoseparator, and develop a divide-and-conquer algorithm that solves the reachability problem in a space-efficient manner.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: The reachability problem in directed graphs is NL-complete, capturing the complexity of nondeterministic logarithmic space, which is fundamentally important to computational complexity theory
2. Practical Value: Many network-related algorithms use it as a subroutine
3. Algorithmic Challenge: Standard traversal algorithms (DFS, BFS) require linear space, while Savitch's algorithm, though requiring only $O(\log^2 n)$ space, has time complexity $n^{O(\log n)}$

Limitations of Existing Methods

1. General Directed Graphs: Barnes et al.'s algorithm achieves $n/2^{\Theta(\sqrt{\log n})}$ space and polynomial time, but cannot answer Wigderson's question of whether there exists a polynomial-time algorithm using $O(n^{1-ε})$ space
2. Planar Digraphs: Imai et al. provided an $O(n^{1/2+ε})$ space algorithm; Asano et al. improved it to $\tilde{O}(n^{1/2})$ space
3. Grid Digraphs: As a subclass of planar digraphs, the Asano-Doerr algorithm achieves $O(n^{1/2+ε})$ space, while Ashida-Nakagawa improved it to $O(n^{1/3})$ space

Research Motivation

This paper aims to further improve the space complexity of the reachability problem in grid digraphs by introducing the new concept of pseudoseparators, achieving a breakthrough to $O(n^{1/4+ε})$ space complexity.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theoretical Result: Proves the existence of a polynomial-time algorithm using $O(n^{1/4+ε})$ space to solve the reachability problem in grid digraphs with $n$ vertices
2. New Concept Introduction: Defines and constructs the pseudoseparator concept, a new separator device
3. Innovative Algorithm Design: Develops a divide-and-conquer algorithm based on pseudoseparators that effectively exploits the crossing properties of auxiliary graphs
4. Technical Breakthrough: Significantly improves upon existing best results, advancing from $O(n^{1/3})$ to $O(n^{1/4+ε})$

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Input: An $m×m$ grid digraph $G$ where the vertex set is $[m]×[m] = \{0,1,...,m\}×\{0,1,...,m\}$, edge $(u,v)$ exists if and only if $|u_1-v_1|+|u_2-v_2|=1$, and two query vertices $s,t$

Output: Determine whether there exists a directed path from $s$ to $t$

Constraints: The algorithm must complete in polynomial time with space usage $O(n^{1/4+ε})$, where $n=(m+1)^2$

Core Technical Architecture

1. Auxiliary Graph Construction

Partition the $m×m$ grid digraph $G$ into $m^{2α}$ subgrids, each of size $m^{1-α}×m^{1-α}$:

• For subgrid $G[i,j]$, construct auxiliary graph $Aux_α(G)[i,j]$ with vertex set as boundary vertices
• If a path exists from $u$ to $v$ within the subgrid, add edge $(u,v)$ to the auxiliary graph
• The final auxiliary graph $Aux_α(G)$ contains auxiliary graphs from all subgrids

2. Pseudoseparator Definition and Construction

Definition 4.1: For an induced subgraph $H$ of auxiliary graph $Aux_α(G)$, subgraph $Q$ is an $f(h)$-pseudoseparator if and only if each connected component in $H⋄Q$ has size at most $f(h)$, where $H⋄Q$ denotes the graph obtained by removing vertices in $Q$ and edges intersecting edges in $Q$ from $H$.

Construction Process:

1. Construct $planar(H)$: select the maximum subset of non-crossing edges in $H$
2. Use Algorithm 1 to complete boundaries, then triangulate to obtain $\tilde{H}$
3. Apply the planar separator algorithm from Imai et al. to obtain vertex set $S$
4. Construct pseudoseparator $psep(H)$ containing vertices in $S$ and related shielding edges

3. Key Properties

Lemma 3.5: If two edges $e_1=(u_1,v_1)$ and $e_2=(u_2,v_2)$ in the auxiliary graph cross, then the auxiliary graph also contains edges $(u_1,v_2)$ and $(u_2,v_1)$.

Lemma 3.6: If both $e_1$ and $e_2$ cross edge $f=(x,y)$, and $e_1$ is closer to $x$ than $e_2$, then edge $(u_1,v_2)$ is also in the auxiliary graph.

Algorithm Flow

AuxReach Algorithm

Input: Induced subgraph H of auxiliary graph, query vertices x,y
1. If |H| ≤ m^{1/8}, solve directly using DFS
2. Otherwise:
   a. Construct h^{1-β}-pseudoseparator Q
   b. Maintain visited array marking vertices and edges in Q
   c. Initialize visited[x] := 1
   d. Perform h iterations, updating visited array each time
   e. Return whether visited[y] equals 1

GridReach Algorithm

Input: Grid digraph G, query vertices s,t
1. If G is smaller than m^{1/8}×m^{1/8}, use DFS
2. Otherwise call ImplicitAuxReach(Aux_α(G),s,t)
3. When querying edges in auxiliary graph, recursively call GridReach

Technical Innovation Points

1. Pseudoseparator Concept: Extends traditional separators by allowing edges to "separate" graphs, exploiting crossing properties of auxiliary graphs
2. Crossing Property Exploitation: Cleverly utilizes Lemmas 3.5 and 3.6, so that when paths cross different components, only a small number of vertices need to be stored
3. Recursive Structure Design: Achieves space complexity optimization through appropriate parameter selection for $α$ and $β$
4. Implicit Graph Representation: Rather than explicitly storing the auxiliary graph, compute edge existence recursively on demand

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Analysis Framework

This paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis, establishing algorithm correctness and complexity bounds through mathematical proofs.

Complexity Analysis

• Space Complexity: $S(m) = S(m^{1-α}) + O((m^{1+α})^{1/2+β/2})$
• Time Complexity: $T(m) = q(m)·T(m^{1-α}) + p(m)$, where $p(m)$ and $q(m)$ are polynomials
• Parameter Selection: For any constant $ε > 0$, select appropriate $α$ and $β$ such that space complexity is $O(m^{1/2+ε})$

Correctness Proof

Proves the correctness of the AuxReach algorithm through induction, with the key being to prove that when paths transition from one component to another, the algorithm correctly marks corresponding vertices or edges.

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.1: For every $ε > 0$, there exists a polynomial-time algorithm using $O(n^{1/4+ε})$ space to solve the reachability problem in grid digraphs with $n$ vertices.

Complexity Improvements

• Space Complexity: Improved from previous $O(n^{1/3})$ to $O(n^{1/4+ε})$
• Time Complexity: Remains polynomial time
• Recursion Depth: Constant depth, ensuring effective space reuse

Key Lemma Verification

1. Lemma 4.8: Proves that the constructed $psep(H)$ is indeed an $h^{1-β}$-pseudoseparator
2. Lemma 5.1: Proves the correctness of the AuxReach algorithm
3. Lemma 5.2: Establishes space and time complexity bounds for the algorithm

Related Work

General Directed Graph Reachability

• Savitch's Algorithm: $O(\log^2 n)$ space, $n^{O(\log n)}$ time
• Barnes et al.: $n/2^{\Theta(\sqrt{\log n})}$ space, polynomial time

Special Graph Classes

1. Planar Digraphs:
   • Imai et al.: $O(n^{1/2+ε})$ space
   • Asano et al.: $\tilde{O}(n^{1/2})$ space
2. Other Graph Classes:
   • Higher Genus Graphs: $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3}g^{1/3})$ space
   • $H$-minor-free Graphs: $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ space
   • Hierarchical Planar Graphs: $O(n^ε)$ space

Development Timeline for Grid Digraphs

1. Asano-Doerr (2011): $O(n^{1/2+ε})$ space
2. Ashida-Nakagawa (2018): $O(n^{1/3})$ space
3. This Paper (2023): $O(n^{1/4+ε})$ space

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

This paper successfully improves the space complexity of the reachability problem in grid digraphs from $O(n^{1/3})$ to $O(n^{1/4+ε})$, representing a significant improvement in the space complexity of this problem.

Technical Contributions

1. Pseudoseparators: Provide a new graph decomposition tool applicable to non-planar graphs
2. Crossing Property Exploitation: Cleverly utilizes structural properties of auxiliary graphs
3. Algorithm Design: Demonstrates how to significantly reduce space usage while maintaining polynomial time

Limitations

1. Constant Factors: The algorithm involves multiple constants, and actual constants may be large
2. Scope of Applicability: Only applicable to grid digraphs, cannot be directly generalized to general planar graphs
3. Missing Lower Bounds: Does not provide corresponding lower bound results

Future Directions

1. Generalization to Planar Graphs: While grid graph reachability can be reduced to planar graphs, direct improvement of planar graph algorithms may be more effective due to quadratic blowup
2. Lower Bound Research: Establish space lower bounds for the grid graph reachability problem
3. Practical Algorithms: Develop practical algorithms with better constant factors

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Breakthrough: Achieves significant complexity improvement on an important problem
2. Technical Innovation: The pseudoseparator concept is original and provides new insights for related problems
3. Rigorous Proofs: Mathematical proofs are complete and rigorous with careful handling of technical details
4. Clear Presentation: Paper structure is clear with accurate concept definitions

Weaknesses

1. Limited Practicality: The algorithm is complex with potentially large constant factors, limiting practical value
2. Difficult Generalization: The method is difficult to directly generalize to more general graph classes
3. Lack of Experiments: Pure theoretical work without practical performance evaluation

Impact

1. Academic Value: Makes important contributions to computational complexity theory
2. Technical Impact: The pseudoseparator concept may inspire related research
3. Foundation for Future Work: Provides basis for further improvements

Applicable Scenarios

Primarily applicable to theoretical computer science research, particularly:

1. Space complexity theory research
2. Graph algorithm design
3. Geometric algorithm analysis

References

The paper cites 22 important references covering reachability problems, planar graph algorithms, separator theory, and other related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

This paper achieves an important theoretical breakthrough on the reachability problem in grid digraphs. While its practical value is limited, its technical innovations and theoretical contributions are significant to computational complexity theory. The pseudoseparator concept and related techniques may inspire further research in this area.