2025-11-25T19:16:18.116286

The role of the GPD E in the determination of the parton angular momenta

Kroll
For the generalized parton distribution (GPD) E, extracted from hard exclusive processes and the Pauli form factor of the nucleon, the second moments for quarks and gluons at $t=0$ are calculated and their scale dependence analyzed. The parton angular momenta are subsequently determined and compared with other results.
academic

The role of the GPD E in the determination of the parton angular momenta

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2001.01919
  • Title: The role of the GPD E in the determination of the parton angular momenta
  • Author: P. Kroll (Fachbereich Physik, Universität Wuppertal, Germany)
  • Classification: hep-ph (High Energy Physics - Phenomenology)
  • Publication Date: December 10, 2019
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01919

Abstract

This paper calculates the second moments at t=0t=0 of the generalized parton distributions (GPD) E for quarks and gluons extracted from hard exclusive processes and nucleon Pauli form factors, and analyzes their scale dependence. Subsequently, the parton angular momenta are determined and compared with other results.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This research addresses the "spin crisis" in high energy physics, namely determining the distribution of parton angular momenta through hard exclusive processes. The fundamental issue concerns how the proton's spin of 1/2 is distributed among its constituent quarks and gluons.

Significance

  1. Resolution of the Spin Crisis: Early deep inelastic scattering experiments revealed that the quark spin contribution to the proton spin is far smaller than expected, leading to the famous "spin crisis"
  2. QCD Theory Verification: Precise measurement of parton angular momenta can verify predictions of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)
  3. Understanding Nucleon Structure: Deepening our understanding of the internal structure and dynamics of nucleons

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • Traditional deep inelastic scattering provides only information about GPD H (corresponding to ordinary parton densities)
  • Information about GPD E comes primarily from hard exclusive processes, with relatively scarce experimental data and large uncertainties
  • Information about sea quark and gluon GPD E is extremely limited

Research Motivation

Ji's theorem states that the total parton angular momentum is given by half the sum of the second moments of GPD H and E at t=0t=0, ξ=0\xi=0: Ja+aˉ=1211dxx[Ha(x,ξ=t=0)+Ea(x,ξ=t=0)]J^{a+\bar{a}} = \frac{1}{2}\int_{-1}^{1} dx \, x[H^a(x,\xi=t=0) + E^a(x,\xi=t=0)]

Core Contributions

  1. Systematic Extraction of GPD E: Systematically extracted valence quark GPD E from nucleon form factor data and hard exclusive process data
  2. Constraining Sea Quark Contributions: Utilized positivity boundary conditions to constrain the GPD E contribution of strange quarks
  3. Scale Evolution Analysis: Detailed analysis of the renormalization group evolution of GPD E second moments
  4. Parton Angular Momentum Calculation: Provided numerical results for the angular momenta of various quark flavors and gluons with their scale dependence
  5. Theoretical Consistency Verification: Verified the validity of relevant sum rules at all energy scales

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Determine the angular momentum carried by various partons (u, d, s quarks and their antiparticles, and gluons) inside the proton. Input: experimentally measured form factors and hard exclusive process data. Output: angular momentum distributions of various partons at different energy scales.

Theoretical Framework

Parametrization of GPD E

The zero-skewness GPD E is parametrized in factorized form: Ea(x,ξ=0,t)=ea(x)exp[tga(x)]E^a(x,\xi=0,t) = e^a(x) \exp[tg^a(x)]

where the forward limit is: ea(x)=Naxαa(1x)βa(1+γax)e^a(x) = N^a x^{-\alpha^a}(1-x)^{\beta^a}(1+\gamma^a\sqrt{x})

and the profile function is: ga(x)=(Ba+αaln(1/x))(1x)3+Aax(1x)2g^a(x) = (B^a + \alpha'^a \ln(1/x))(1-x)^3 + A^a x(1-x)^2

Form Factor Relations

The nucleon's Pauli form factor is related to GPD E through: F2(t)=aveaF2a(t)F_2(t) = \sum_{a^v} e^a F_2^a(t)F2a(t)=01dxEav(x,ξ=0,t)F_2^a(t) = \int_0^1 dx \, E^{a^v}(x,\xi=0,t)

Sum Rules

  • Angular Momentum Sum Rule: aJa(μ)+Jg(μ)=1/2\sum_a J^a(\mu) + J^g(\mu) = 1/2
  • Momentum Sum Rule: aq20a(μ)+g20(μ)=1\sum_a q_{20}^a(\mu) + g_{20}(\mu) = 1
  • GPD E Sum Rule: ae20a(μ)+e20g(μ)=0\sum_a e_{20}^a(\mu) + e_{20}^g(\mu) = 0

Evolution Equations

The second moments of GPD E satisfy the same evolution equations as parton densities. For the flavor singlet combination, the evolution equation is: ddt(Σee20g)=β0αs4π[D(0)+αs4πD(1)](Σee20g)\frac{d}{dt}\begin{pmatrix}\Sigma^e \\ e_{20}^g\end{pmatrix} = -\beta_0\frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}\left[D^{(0)} + \frac{\alpha_s}{4\pi}D^{(1)}\right]\begin{pmatrix}\Sigma^e \\ e_{20}^g\end{pmatrix}

Technical Innovations

  1. Positivity Boundary Constraints: Utilized Burkardt-Diehl-Kugler boundary conditions to constrain strange quark GPD E
  2. Double Distribution Ansatz: Used to generate skewness dependence of GPDs
  3. Multi-source Information Combination: Systematically combined form factor, DVCS, and DVVP data

Experimental Setup

Data Sources

  1. Nucleon Form Factor Data: Used to extract valence quark GPD E
  2. HERMES DVCS Data: Measurements of AUTsin(ϕϕs)A_{UT}^{\sin(\phi-\phi_s)} asymmetry
  3. COMPASS and HERMES DVVP Data: Transverse spin asymmetries in ρ0\rho^0 production

Parameter Settings

  • Initial Scale: μ0=2\mu_0 = 2 GeV
  • Active Flavors: nf=4n_f = 4 (accounting for charm quark threshold)
  • QCD Parameters: ΛQCD=270\Lambda_{QCD} = 270 MeV
  • Renormalization Scheme: MS\overline{MS} scheme

Uncertainty Treatment

Error propagation methods were employed to handle experimental uncertainties. For sea quark contributions lacking precise data, upper and lower bound estimates were provided.

Experimental Results

Main Results

GPD E Second Moments (at μ0=2\mu_0 = 2 GeV)

  • u valence quark: e20uv=0.1630.032+0.018e_{20}^{u^v} = 0.163_{-0.032}^{+0.018}
  • d valence quark: e20dv=0.1220.033+0.028e_{20}^{d^v} = -0.122_{-0.033}^{+0.028}
  • Total valence: e20v=0.0410.053+0.011e_{20}^v = 0.041_{-0.053}^{+0.011}
  • Sea quarks: e20sea=0.073±0.073e_{20}^{sea} = -0.073 \pm 0.073

Parton Angular Momenta (at μ0=2\mu_0 = 2 GeV)

J^{u+\bar{u}} = 0.249_{-0.036}^{+0.022}
J^{d+\bar{d}} = 0.024_{-0.033}^{+0.033}
J^{s+\bar{s}} = 0.005_{-0.014}^{+0.014}
J^g = 0.221_{-0.067}^{+0.084}

Scale Evolution Behavior

  • High-scale Limit: All GPD E moments tend toward zero
  • Angular Momentum Redistribution: u quarks and gluons nearly equally share the proton spin at intermediate scales (~10 GeV²)
  • Asymmetric Evolution: u quark angular momentum decreases with increasing scale, while gluon angular momentum increases

Comparison with Other Results

The results of this paper are generally consistent with analyses by Bacchetta, Wakamatsu, and others, but show discrepancies with certain lattice QCD calculations, particularly regarding gluon angular momentum values.

Main Research Directions

  1. Lattice QCD Calculations: Direct first-principles calculations of parton angular momenta
  2. Phenomenological Analysis: GPD extraction based on experimental data
  3. Sivers Function Correlations: Studying orbital angular momentum through transverse momentum distributions

Advantages of This Work

  • Systematic combination of multiple experimental data sources
  • Rigorous theoretical consistency verification
  • Detailed uncertainty analysis
  • Complete treatment of scale evolution

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Angular Momentum Distribution: At intermediate scales, u quarks and gluons each carry approximately 0.22-0.25 of the angular momentum, nearly equally sharing the proton spin
  2. d Quark Contribution: The d quark's angular momentum contribution is small, resulting from nearly complete cancellation between orbital and spin angular momenta
  3. Evolution Effects: Scale evolution explains the "spin crisis," with significantly different angular momentum distributions at different scales

Limitations

  1. Sea Quark Uncertainties: Due to large errors in DVCS data, sea quark GPD E uncertainties are substantial
  2. Model Dependence: The parametrization form of GPDs introduces certain model dependence
  3. Higher-Order Corrections: Only next-to-leading order QCD corrections were considered

Future Directions

  1. More Precise DVCS Measurements: Upgraded Jefferson Lab experiments will provide more precise data
  2. Improved Lattice QCD: More accurate lattice calculations can provide independent verification
  3. J/Ψ Photoproduction: May provide direct information about gluon GPD E

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Rigor: Strictly adheres to QCD sum rules and evolution equations
  2. Data Comprehensiveness: Systematically utilizes all available experimental information
  3. Uncertainty Treatment: Detailed analysis of various uncertainty sources
  4. Physical Insight: Provides deep understanding of proton spin structure

Weaknesses

  1. Experimental Data Limitations: Information about sea quark and gluon GPD E remains very limited
  2. Parametrization Assumptions: Certain parametrization forms may be oversimplified
  3. High-Scale Extrapolation: Extrapolation to high scales may contain theoretical uncertainties

Impact

This work provides an important phenomenological framework for understanding proton spin structure, with significant implications for both future experimental design and theoretical development.

Applicable Scenarios

  • Theoretical analysis of hard exclusive processes
  • Phenomenological studies of parton angular momenta
  • Theoretical predictions for future electron-ion collider experiments

References

The paper cites over 50 relevant references, covering GPD theory, experimental measurements, lattice QCD calculations, and other aspects, reflecting a comprehensive research landscape in this field.


Summary: This is a theoretically and phenomenologically significant work in parton physics. By systematically analyzing the role of GPD E in determining parton angular momenta, it makes important contributions to solving the proton spin structure problem. Despite limitations such as experimental data constraints, its theoretical framework and analytical methods provide a solid foundation for further development in this field.