A geometric proof of the Quasi-linearity of the water-waves system

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2002.02940
• Title: A geometric proof of the Quasi-linearity of the water-waves system
• Author: Ayman Rimah Said
• Classification: math.AP (Analysis of PDEs), math-ph (Mathematical Physics), math.MP (Mathematical Physics)
• Publication Date: December 28, 2022 (arXiv v2 version)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.02940

Abstract

This paper is divided into two main parts: The first part proves that the flow map of the Burgers equation with nonlocal term $\partial_x |D|^{\alpha-1} u$ loses uniform continuity on bounded sets from $H^s(\mathbb{D})$ to $C^0([0,T],H^s(\mathbb{D}))$, where $T>0$, $s>\frac{1}{2}+2$, $0\leq \alpha<2$, $\mathbb{D}=\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{T}$. Furthermore, it is shown that the flow map cannot be $C^1$. This result is generalized to a large class of nonlinear transport-dispersive equations, particularly including the Whitham equation and the quasi-linearity of the water-wave system. The second part applies this method to derive the quasi-linear properties of the water-wave system, which is the main result of the paper.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Traditional PDE classification divides equations into quasi-linear and semi-linear:

• Quasi-linear: Linear in the highest-order derivatives, e.g., $\partial_t u + \sum A_j(u)\partial_j u = F(u)$
• Semi-linear: The highest-order terms are linear, e.g., $\partial_t u + \sum A_j\partial_j u = F(u)$

However, this classification based on derivative order fails to accurately reflect the solvability properties of the Cauchy problem.

Motivation and Significance

1. Classification Problem: The classical KPI and KPII equations are both semi-linear by derivative counting, but Bourgain proved that KPII can be solved via iterative schemes with a regular flow map, while Moulinet et al. proved that the flow map of KPI cannot be $C^2$.
2. New Definition: The author adopts a definition based on flow map regularity:
   • Semi-linear: The flow map is at least $C^1$
   • Quasi-linear: The flow map is not $C^1$
3. Research Significance: Understanding the quasi-linear properties of the water-wave system is important for predicting its long-term behavior and numerical solution.

Core Contributions

1. Established non-uniform continuity of the flow map for dispersive Burgers equation: For dispersion order $\alpha < 2$, proved that the flow map loses uniform continuity
2. Provided optimal results: Proved that when $\alpha = 2$ on the torus, the flow map of the Benjamin-Ono equation is Lipschitz on the space of zero-mean functions
3. Technical generalization: Extended results to a large class of nonlinear transport-dispersive equations in arbitrary dimensions
4. Quasi-linearity of water-wave system:
   • Proved quasi-linearity of the water-wave system with surface tension (Theorem 1.2)
   • Proved quasi-linearity of the gravity water-wave system (Theorem 1.3)
5. Geometric method: Provided a new proof method based on geometric analysis of characteristic flows

Detailed Methodology

Core Strategy

Mimics the proof of quasi-linearity for the classical Burgers equation, but must handle technical difficulties arising from dispersive terms.

Model Equation Analysis

Consider the equation: $\partial_t v + v\partial_x v + \partial_x |D|^{\alpha-1} v = 0$

Key Lemma (Lemma 2.1)

For sequences $(\tau, \epsilon, \lambda)$ satisfying specific conditions:

1. Support Separation: The constructed solutions $u_0 \circ \chi(0,\tau,x)$ and $u_0 \circ \tilde{\chi}(0,\tau,x)$ have disjoint supports
2. Estimates: $u(\tau,x) - v(\tau,x) = u_0 \circ \chi(0,\tau,x) - u_0 \circ \tilde{\chi}(0,\tau,x) + O_{H^{s-\nu}}(\text{small terms})$

Construction Method

Ansatz Construction

• High-frequency compactly supported function: $u_0(x) = \lambda^{\frac{1}{2}-s}\omega(\lambda x)$
• Perturbation: $v_0(x) = u_0(x) + \epsilon\omega(x)$
• Parameter relations: $\lambda \to +\infty$, $\epsilon \to 0$, $\lambda\epsilon \to +\infty$

Characteristic Flow Analysis

Define the characteristic flow: $\frac{d}{dt}\chi(t,s,x) = u(t,\chi(t,s,x)), \quad \chi(s,s,x) = x$

Through change of variables: $u(t,\chi(t,0,x)) = f(t,x)$

where $f$ satisfies the pulled-back linear equation.

Time-Reversal Technique

The key innovation is using time reversibility to construct "defocused" data $u_1, v_1$ at past times from $u_0, v_0$, avoiding the support spreading caused by dispersive effects.

Technical Innovations

1. Handling dispersive terms: Time reversal construction avoids the support diffusion problem caused by dispersion
2. Geometric transport analysis: Utilizes geometric properties of characteristic flows to analyze solution behavior
3. Pseudodifferential operator techniques: Uses pseudodifferential operator theory to handle low regularity when generalizing to water-wave systems

Main Theorems

Theorem 1.1 (Model Equation)

For $\alpha \in [0,2[$, $s \in ]2+\frac{1}{2}, +\infty[$, the equation $\partial_t v + v\partial_x v + \partial_x |D|^{\alpha-1} v = 0$ has a flow map that is not uniformly continuous and is not $C^1$ under weaker control norms.

Theorem 1.2 (Water Waves with Surface Tension)

For dimension $d \geq 1$, $s \in ]2+\frac{d}{2}, +\infty[$, the flow map of the water-wave system with surface tension:

• Is not uniformly continuous
• Requires loss of at least $\frac{1}{2}$ derivatives to obtain Lipschitz control

Theorem 1.3 (Gravity Water Waves)

For the gravity water-wave system, under the Taylor symbol condition:

• The flow map is not uniformly continuous
• Requires loss of at least $\frac{1}{2}$ derivatives to obtain $C^1$ control

Technical Generalization

Theorem 3.1 (General Framework)

Generalizes results to systems of the form: $\partial_t v + T_{V(t,x,v)} \cdot \nabla v + T_{a(t,v)} v = F(t,v)$ where $a$ is an elliptic skew-symmetric symbol of order $\alpha < 2$.

Key Conditions

• Assumption H1: There exists $\omega \in C_c^{\infty}$ such that the transport term satisfies specific growth conditions
• Symbol conditions: Restrictions on the symbol class and growth of nonlinear terms

Application to Water-Wave System

Quasi-linearization and Symmetrization

After quasi-linearization and symmetrization by Alazard-Burq-Zuily, the water-wave system can be written as: $\partial_t u + T_V \cdot \nabla u + iT_\gamma u = f$

where:

• With surface tension: $\gamma$ is a symbol of order $\frac{3}{2}$
• Gravity waves: $\gamma$ is a symbol of order $\frac{1}{2}$

Preservation under Variable Change

Through carefully constructed variable transformations (introducing regularizing operators), it is proved that the quasi-linear structure is preserved under transformation.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Optimality: For dispersive terms with $\alpha < 2$, the transport nonlinearity dominates, causing the flow map to lose regularity
2. Threshold Phenomenon: $\alpha = 2$ is the boundary between semi-linear and quasi-linear behavior
3. Geometric Essence: Quasi-linearity fundamentally stems from the geometric properties of characteristic flows

Limitations

1. Regularity Requirements: Requires $s > 2 + \frac{d}{2}$, which is a technical constraint
2. Symbol Conditions: Imposes strong structural requirements on nonlinear terms
3. Local Nature: Results are local and do not address global behavior

Impact and Significance

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides a new geometric perspective for PDE quasi-linear/semi-linear classification
2. Methodological Innovation: Time-reversal technique and geometric transport analysis provide new tools for related problems
3. Applied Value: Provides guidance for water-wave numerical simulation and long-term behavior prediction

Future Directions

1. Optimality Verification: The author proved in 24 that loss of $\frac{1}{2}$ derivatives is indeed sufficient to obtain Lipschitz control
2. Generalization Possibilities: The method may apply to other physically relevant dispersive equations
3. Numerical Impact: The specific impact of quasi-linearity on numerical method design deserves further investigation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Method Originality: The geometric transport method combined with time-reversal technique is innovative
2. Result Completeness: Complete theoretical chain from model equations to actual physical systems
3. Technical Depth: Skillfully handles technical difficulties arising from dispersive terms
4. Optimality: Provides sharp results

Weaknesses

1. Technical Complexity: Proof techniques are complex with room for improved readability
2. Application Limitations: Results are primarily theoretical; practical applicability requires further verification
3. Generalization Difficulty: Method extension to other equations may face technical obstacles

This paper makes important contributions to partial differential equation theory, particularly providing new profound insights into understanding the mathematical structure of water-wave systems.