Observations in statistically homogeneous, locally inhomogeneous cosmological toy-models without FLRW backgrounds

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2008.07108
• Title: Observations in statistically homogeneous, locally inhomogeneous cosmological toy-models without FLRW backgrounds
• Author: S. M. Koksbang (Department of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, University of Helsinki)
• Classification: astro-ph.CO (Cosmology and Non-Galactic Astrophysics)
• Published Journal: MNRAS (Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society)
• Preprint Date: September 14, 2020
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.07108

Abstract

This paper investigates observational issues in toy models constituting exact cosmological solutions to Einstein's equations. These models are statistically homogeneous but locally inhomogeneous, without a priori FLRW background, and exhibit relatively slow "structure" evolution. The author compares the average redshift-distance relations and redshift drift from 500 light rays in each of two models with relations based on spatial averaging. The spatially-averaged relations reproduce the average redshift-distance relations well, particularly in the model where kinematic backreaction is at the sub-percent level. In both models, the average redshift drift differs significantly from the drift of average redshift, suggesting that redshift drift may be an important tool for testing the backreaction conjecture, as it can distinguish between local and global effects.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

Modern cosmology is based on the FLRW (Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker) solution, which assumes the universe is perfectly homogeneous and isotropic at large scales. However, the real universe is at best statistically homogeneous and isotropic, and this distinction may be crucial.

Cosmic Backreaction Problem

In general relativity, spatial averaging and time derivatives generally do not commute, causing the spatial average expansion of a general inhomogeneous universe to deviate from FLRW evolution, a deviation termed cosmic backreaction.

Research Motivation

1. Quantifying the importance of backreaction: It remains unclear how cosmic backreaction affects the large-scale/average evolution of the universe
2. Need for observational verification: Observations are needed to quantify the importance of backreaction in our universe
3. Necessity for method validation: Existing methods linking spatially-averaged quantities to observations need to be tested using exact solutions not based on FLRW backgrounds

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Conventional Swiss-cheese constructions and relativistic codes based on weak-field approximations rely on a presupposed FLRW background
• Lack of truly FLRW-background-free, exact, inhomogeneous, statistically homogeneous cosmological models to test theoretical predictions

Core Contributions

1. Construction of novel cosmological models: Created exact, inhomogeneous, statistically homogeneous cosmological models without a priori FLRW background
2. Development of redshift drift calculation method: Proposed an intuitive and easily generalizable method for calculating redshift drift applicable to general spacetimes
3. Validation of spatial averaging method: Verified the validity of spatially-averaged redshift-distance relations through exact calculations of 500 light rays
4. Discovery of redshift drift's discriminative power: Demonstrated that redshift drift can distinguish between local and global effects, providing a new tool for testing the backreaction conjecture

Methodology Details

Model Construction

Bianchi I Basic Module

The author employs the model type introduced by Hellaby (2012), tiling space with cubic blocks of specific types of homogeneous Bianchi I models (generalized Kasner models):

Local line element:

ds² = -dt² + (t/t₀)^(2α)dx² + (t/t₀)^(2β)dy² + (t/t₀)^(2γ)dz²

where α, β, γ are constants and t₀ is the present time.

Basic Block Structure

• Eight cubes arranged into a "fundamental" block
• Used to tile the entire space to construct a statistically homogeneous inhomogeneous cosmological model
• Satisfies Darmois junction conditions: metric parameters perpendicular to the junction surface must remain constant across the junction surface

Model Parameters

The paper investigates two specific models:

Model 1:

• Parameter values chosen to produce late-time average accelerated expansion but no local accelerated volume expansion
• Kinematic backreaction ΩQ ≈ 0.001 (at present time)
• Objective: maintain "structure" evolving slowly during the light ray's traversal of the homogeneity scale

Model 2:

• No average accelerated expansion
• Kinematic backreaction ΩQ ∈ 0.04, 0.1
• Stronger backreaction effects

Light Propagation Calculation

Geodesic Equation

Light paths are calculated via the geodesic equation:

d/dλ(gₐᵦkᵦ) = (1/2)gₘᵥ,ₐkᵐkᵥ

Boundary Treatment

At junctions between different Bianchi I cubes, metric components contain delta functions describing changes in α, β, or γ across the junction surface. The treatment involves renormalizing momentum components to preserve the null property of geodesics.

Angular Diameter Distance

Calculated via the transport equation:

d²Dₐᵇ/dλ² = Tₐᶜ Dᶜᵇ

where the tidal matrix Tₐᵦ contains contributions from the Ricci tensor and Riemann tensor.

Redshift Drift Calculation

Innovative Method

The author proposes a general method for calculating redshift drift:

δz/δt₀ = dz/dt₀ = d/dt₀((kᵘuᵘ)ₑ/(kᵅuᵅ)₀)

After expansion:

δz/δt₀ = -((1+z)/(k^t₀)²)[dk^t/dλ - k^ik^t,ᵢ]|₀ + (1/(k^t₀k^tₑ))(1/(1+z))[dk^t/dλ - k^ik^t,ᵢ]|ₑ

Technical Features

• General method applicable to arbitrary spacetimes
• Depends not only on integrals along the light ray but also on local properties of spacetime
• Boundary terms reflect the importance of local effects

Experimental Setup

Computational Configuration

• Number of light rays: 500 per model
• Observer location: Random spatial positions (avoiding bias toward specific local Bianchi I models)
• Observation direction: Random directions (eliminating statistical anisotropy effects)
• Redshift drift calculation: Using δt₀ = 30 years

Comparison Benchmarks

Exact calculation results are compared with predictions based on spatial averaging:

• Average redshift-distance relation: Based on formulas from Räsänen (2009, 2010)
• Average redshift drift: δzD := δt₀((1 + zD)H⁰D - HD)

Model Parameters

Experimental Results

Redshift-Distance Relation

1. Model 1: Spatial averaging method agrees almost perfectly with average observational results
2. Model 2: Spatial averaging method provides good but clearly only approximate agreement
3. Key finding: The smaller the backreaction, the higher the accuracy of the spatial averaging method

Redshift Drift Results

1. Significant differences: In both models, average redshift drift differs significantly from the drift of average redshift
2. Sign differences:
   • Average redshift drift is negative
   • Drift of average redshift is positive
3. Large scatter: The scatter in δz is very large, possibly due to model anisotropy and large local effects

Quantitative Results

• Model 1: Kinematic backreaction ΩQ ≈ 0.001, redshift-distance relation matches almost perfectly
• Model 2: Kinematic backreaction ΩQ ∈ 0.04, 0.1, observable deviations exist

Related Work

Theoretical Foundation

• Buchert equations: Fundamental theoretical framework describing average evolution of inhomogeneous universes
• Backreaction research: Pioneering work by Buchert & Räsänen (2012), Clarkson et al. (2011), etc.
• Observational testing methods: FLRW assumption observational tests proposed by Clarkson, Basset & Lu (2008), Räsänen (2014), etc.

Model Construction Methods

• Hellaby (2012): Original proposer of the Bianchi I tiling method adopted in this paper
• Swiss-cheese models: Limitations of traditional methods due to presupposed FLRW background

Computational Methods

• Geodesic calculations: Based on standard general relativistic geodesic equations
• Redshift drift: Classical theoretical foundation from Sandage (1962), McVittie (1962)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Validity of spatial averaging method: When kinematic backreaction is small, spatially-averaged methods can well describe average redshift-distance relations
2. Discriminative power of redshift drift: Redshift drift can distinguish between local and global effects, with significant differences between average redshift drift and drift of average redshift
3. Backreaction testing tool: Redshift drift can serve as an important observational tool for testing the backreaction conjecture

Physical Significance

• Local vs. global effects: Redshift drift is sensitive to local spacetime properties, while redshift-distance relations more reflect global average properties
• Observational strategy: Combining redshift-distance relation and redshift drift observations may provide more complete cosmological information

Limitations

1. Non-realistic parameters: Model parameters do not correspond to realistic density and pressure values, with some regions even exhibiting negative density
2. Anisotropy: Model anisotropy leads to large observational scatter; the real universe would not exhibit such large local effects
3. Toy model nature: Models are primarily for studying light propagation principles rather than accurate descriptions of the real universe

Future Directions

1. More realistic models: Development of models with realistic density and pressure distributions
2. Observational applications: Application of methods to real cosmological observational data analysis
3. Method generalization: Generalization of redshift drift calculation methods to more general spacetime geometries

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Methodological Innovation:
   • First construction of truly FLRW-background-free exact inhomogeneous cosmological models
   • Proposal of redshift drift calculation method applicable to general spacetimes
   • Innovative combination of exact solutions and large-sample ray tracing
2. Technical Rigor:
   • Rigorous treatment of junction conditions and delta functions between different regions
   • Simultaneous solution of geodesic equations, transport equations, and derivative equations
   • Detailed numerical implementation and boundary condition handling
3. Physical Insight:
   • Discovery of redshift drift's ability to distinguish local/global effects
   • Validation of spatial averaging method's validity under specific conditions
   • Provision of new observational testing pathways for the backreaction problem
4. Experimental Design:
   • Use of 500 random light rays ensures statistical reliability
   • Two models with different backreaction strengths provide comparison
   • Comprehensive comparison of multiple observational quantities

Shortcomings

1. Model Limitations:
   • Parameter choices lead to non-physical negative density regions
   • Strong anisotropy inconsistent with real universe observational constraints
   • Toy model nature limits generalizability of conclusions
2. Experimental Scope:
   • Only two specific models tested
   • Relatively limited redshift range (z < 1)
   • Lack of direct comparison with real observational data
3. Theoretical Analysis:
   • Insufficient deep theoretical explanation for why redshift drift is more sensitive to local effects
   • Insufficient analysis of physical reasons for large scatter

Impact Assessment

1. Academic Contribution:
   • Provides important theoretical tools for cosmic backreaction research
   • Advances development of non-FLRW cosmological models
   • Provides theoretical foundation for future precision cosmological observations
2. Practical Value:
   • Redshift drift calculation method directly applicable to other research
   • Provides theoretical predictions for next-generation cosmological observation projects
   • Model construction methods generalizable to other problems
3. Reproducibility:
   • Detailed method descriptions facilitate reproduction
   • Relatively intuitive numerical implementation
   • Author commits to providing code and data

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical cosmology research: Testing various backreaction theories and non-standard cosmological models
2. Observational cosmology: Providing theoretical expectations for redshift drift observation projects
3. Numerical relativity: Providing methodological reference for light propagation calculations in complex spacetimes
4. Precision cosmology: Assessing impact of FLRW assumptions on observational quantity predictions

References

This paper cites key literature in the field, including:

• Buchert (2001): Foundational work on backreaction theory
• Hellaby (2012): Original literature on Bianchi I tiling methods
• Räsänen (2009, 2010): Theoretical foundation for spatial averaging and observational relations
• Sandage (1962), McVittie (1962): Classical theory of redshift drift

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with important contributions to theoretical cosmology. The author skillfully combines exact general relativistic solutions, numerical ray tracing, and statistical analysis to provide new research tools and physical insights for the long-standing cosmic backreaction problem. Despite certain idealized limitations of the model, its methodological innovation and physical discoveries have significant implications for advancing the field.