Geometric invariant decomposition of SU(3)

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2102.11940
• Title: Geometric invariant decomposition of SU(3)
• Author: Martin Roelfs (KU Leuven Campus Kortrijk–Kulak)
• Classification: math-ph math.MP
• Publication Date: February 23, 2021 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.11940

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel invariant decomposition method that decomposes diagonalizable $n \times n$ matrices into $n$ mutually commuting matrices. This decomposition is subsequently applied to decompose the fundamental representation of $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ Lie algebra elements into at most three commuting elements of $\mathfrak{u}(3)$. Consequently, the exponential function of $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ Lie algebra elements can be decomposed into a product of three commuting generalized Euler formulas, or conversely, Lie group elements can be factorized into at most three generalized Euler formulas. Upon completing the factorization, the logarithmic operation follows directly.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: This research aims to identify quantities that remain invariant under SU(3) transformations and describe how these quantities act as generators of transformations. Specifically, it seeks to decompose traceless anti-Hermitian $3 \times 3$ matrices ($\mathfrak{su}(3)$ elements) into mutually commuting simple components.
2. Problem Significance: The SU(3) group plays a central role in quantum chromodynamics (QCD), and the computation of its exponential and logarithmic functions has important applications in both theoretical physics and numerical calculations. Although closed-form expressions exist, they lack intuitive geometric interpretation.
3. Limitations of Existing Methods: While closed-form expressions for the exponential function of SU(3) elements have been published, these methods lack intuitiveness and are not easily inverted to obtain closed-form logarithms.
4. Research Motivation: To provide an intuitive method for handling SU(3) calculations that is not only easy to understand but also easily invertible, while providing strong geometric interpretation for the invariants $b_i$.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed a New Invariant Decomposition Theorem: Proved that any diagonalizable $3 \times 3$ matrix can be decomposed into at most three mutually commuting normal matrices, with the method generalizable to the $n \times n$ case.
2. Established a Geometric Decomposition Framework for SU(3): Decomposed $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ elements as $B = b_1 + b_2 + b_3$, where each $b_i$ satisfies $b_i^2 = \lambda_i \mathbf{1}$ ($\lambda_i \leq 0$).
3. Provided an Intuitive Method for Exponential Computation: Through decomposition, achieved $U = e^B = e^{b_1}e^{b_2}e^{b_3} = \prod_{i=1}^3[\mathbf{1}\cos\beta_i + \hat{b}_i\sin\beta_i]$.
4. Constructed a Complete Factorization and Logarithm Algorithm: Provided algorithms for recovering the decomposition from group elements $U$ and computing the principal logarithm accordingly.
5. Application to Gell-Mann Matrices: Detailed analysis of how Gell-Mann matrices behave under this decomposition, establishing connections with geometric algebra.

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

Given a $\mathfrak{su}(3)$ Lie algebra element $B$ (traceless anti-Hermitian $3 \times 3$ matrix), decompose it as: $B = b_1 + b_2 + b_3$ where $b_i$ mutually commute and $b_i^2 = \lambda_i \mathbf{1}$ ($\lambda_i \in \mathbb{R}, \lambda_i \leq 0$).

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Invariant Decomposition Theorem (Theorem 2.1)

For a diagonalizable $3 \times 3$ matrix $B = PDP^{-1}$, where $D = \text{diag}(\alpha_1, \alpha_2, \alpha_3)$, construct:

$P^{-1}b_1P = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha_1 - \text{tr}[B])\text{diag}(+1,-1,-1)$$P^{-1}b_2P = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha_2 - \text{tr}[B])\text{diag}(-1,+1,-1)$$P^{-1}b_3P = \frac{1}{2}(\alpha_3 - \text{tr}[B])\text{diag}(-1,-1,+1)$

This ensures that $B = \sum_{i=1}^3 b_i$, $b_i^2 = \frac{1}{4}(\alpha_i - \text{tr}[B])^2\mathbf{1}$, and $[b_i, b_j] = 0$.

2. Exponential Function Computation

Define $\beta_i := \sqrt{-\lambda_i}$, then $\hat{b}_i := b_i/\beta_i$ satisfies $\hat{b}_i^2 = -\mathbf{1}$, thus: $U = e^B = \prod_{i=1}^3[\cos(\beta_i)\mathbf{1} + \hat{b}_i\sin(\beta_i)]$

3. Factorization Algorithm

For a given $U \in SU(3)$, define: $c(B) := \frac{1}{2}[U + U^\dagger], \quad s(B) := \frac{1}{2}[U - U^\dagger]$

Through "grade" decomposition: $\langle U\rangle_0 := \frac{1}{4}\mathbf{1} + \frac{1}{4}\text{tr}[c(B)]\mathbf{1}$$\langle U\rangle_2 := s(B) - \langle U\rangle_6$$\langle U\rangle_4 := c(B) - \langle U\rangle_0$$\langle U\rangle_6 := \frac{1}{4}\text{tr}[s(B)]\mathbf{1}$

Technical Innovations

1. Geometric Intuitiveness: Unlike traditional algebraic methods, this decomposition provides clear geometric interpretation, with each $b_i$ being an invariant of the transformation.
2. Exploitation of Commutativity: By ensuring commutativity of decomposition components, complex non-Abelian group calculations are transformed into Abelian cases.
3. Bidirectional Algorithm: Capable of computing group elements from Lie algebra elements and conversely recovering Lie algebra structure from group elements.
4. Alternative Method Without Diagonalization: When all $\lambda_i$ are distinct, provides computational formulas avoiding matrix diagonalization (Equation 14).

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This work is primarily theoretical, with correctness verified through:

1. Mathematical Proof: Constructive proofs establish existence and uniqueness of the decomposition.
2. Consistency Checks: Verification that results align with known SU(3) exponential function formulas.
3. Gell-Mann Matrix Application: Application of the method to standard Gell-Mann matrices to verify correctness.

Comparative Verification

• Comparison with results from Curtright and Zachos (2015)
• Comparison with matrix exponential methods from Van Kortryk (2016)
• Verification of consistency with logarithmic function properties in complex analysis

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Gell-Mann Matrix Decomposition: Successfully represented all Gell-Mann matrices $\lambda_a$ ($a=1,2,\ldots,7$) as: $\lambda_a = \frac{1}{2}\rho_{+a} + \frac{1}{2}\rho_{-a}$ where $\rho_{\pm a}$ are Hermitian matrices satisfying $\rho_{\pm a}^2 = \mathbf{1}$.
2. Exponential Function Verification: For $\lambda_a$ ($a = 1,2,\ldots,7$), obtained: $e^{i\theta\lambda_a} = (\mathbf{1} - \lambda_a^2) + \lambda_a^2\cos\theta + i\lambda_a\sin\theta$ This is in complete agreement with Equation (7) in reference 2.
3. Logarithmic Function: The principal logarithm computation formula is: $\text{Ln}U_i = \hat{s}(b_i)\arccos\left(\frac{1}{3}\text{tr}[c(b_i)]\right)$

Theoretical Findings

1. Connection with Geometric Algebra: Discovered correspondence with the even subalgebra of geometric algebra $G(6)$, comprising 16 Hermitian matrices $\{\mathbf{1}, \rho_{\pm a}\}$ squaring to $\mathbf{1}$ and 16 anti-Hermitian matrices $\{i\mathbf{1}, i\rho_{\pm a}\}$ squaring to $-\mathbf{1}$.
2. Invariance Properties: Each $b_i$ remains invariant under transformation $U b_i U^\dagger$, explaining the nomenclature "invariant decomposition."
3. Parametrization: The three-parameter family $U(\theta_1, \theta_2, \theta_3) = e^{\theta_1 b_1}e^{\theta_2 b_2}e^{\theta_3 b_3}$ preserves $B$.

Related Work

1. SU(3) Exponential Functions: Curtright & Zachos (2015) and Van Kortryk (2016) provided closed-form expressions for exponential functions of SU(3) elements.
2. Geometric Algebra Methods: Doran et al. (1993) demonstrated that the even subalgebra of geometric algebra $G(6)$ can be used to describe SU(3).
3. Lattice Quantum Chromodynamics: Traceless projection methods used in lattice QCD are related to but distinct from the grade decomposition in this work.
4. Clifford Algebra: The bivector orthogonal decomposition by Hestenes & Sobczyk (1984) provides theoretical foundation for the matrix representation in this paper.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Universal Decomposition: Proved that any diagonalizable $n \times n$ matrix can be decomposed into $n$ commuting matrices.
2. SU(3) Application: Successfully applied this decomposition to SU(3), achieving intuitive exponential and logarithmic computations.
3. Geometric Interpretation: Provided clear geometric invariant interpretation for SU(3) transformations.
4. Computational Advantages: Transformed non-Abelian calculations into Abelian intuition, simplifying complex computations.

Limitations

1. Diagonalizability Restriction: Method applies only to diagonalizable matrices; defective matrices require special treatment.
2. Numerical Stability: When $\langle U\rangle_0 = 0$, matrix inversion is required, potentially affecting numerical stability.
3. Uniqueness Issues: When eigenvalues are degenerate, the decomposition is no longer unique.
4. Higher-Dimensional Generalization: While generalization to $n > 3$ is proposed, its properties require further investigation.

Future Directions

1. Geometric Algebra Connections: Deeper investigation of connections with geometric algebra $G(6)$.
2. Higher-Dimensional Cases: Complete study of all properties of invariant decomposition for $n > 3$.
3. Numerical Algorithms: Development of more stable numerical implementation algorithms.
4. Physical Applications: Exploration of applications in quantum chromodynamics and other physical theories.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Proposes a novel matrix decomposition method with clear geometric interpretation.
2. Mathematical Rigor: Establishes theoretical foundation through constructive proofs with rigorous mathematical derivations.
3. Practical Value: Provides an intuitive and efficient method for SU(3) calculations.
4. Clear Presentation: Well-structured paper with clear progression from general theory to specific applications.
5. Interdisciplinary Significance: Connects Lie group theory, geometric algebra, and physical applications.

Shortcomings

1. Limited Experimental Verification: Primarily theoretical work lacking large-scale numerical experiments.
2. Limited Application Scope: Detailed treatment only for SU(3) case; higher-dimensional generalization incomplete.
3. Computational Complexity: Algorithm computational complexity not thoroughly analyzed.
4. Degenerate Case Handling: Insufficient treatment of degenerate cases and numerical boundary conditions.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new decomposition tools for Lie group theory.
2. Practical Value: Potential applications in quantum chromodynamics numerical calculations.
3. Inspirational Significance: Provides insights for studying similar decompositions of other Lie groups.
4. Reproducibility: Clear theoretical methods, easily implementable and verifiable.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Physics: Quantum chromodynamics, standard model particle physics calculations
2. Numerical Computation: Scenarios requiring efficient SU(3) exponential and logarithmic operations
3. Geometric Algebra: Research related to Clifford algebras
4. Lie Group Theory: Study of general Lie group decomposition methods

References

The paper cites the following key references:

1. Curtright & Zachos (2015): Fundamental results for SU(3) fundamental representation
2. Van Kortryk (2016): Matrix exponentials, SU(N) group elements and real polynomial roots
3. Hestenes & Sobczyk (1984): Clifford algebra to geometric calculus
4. Doran et al. (1993): Lie groups as spinor groups
5. Lattice QCD related literature: DeGrand & DeTar (2006), Mandula & Ogilvie (1987), etc.

This paper presents an elegant mathematical framework that transforms complex SU(3) calculations into intuitive geometric problems, possessing significant value at both theoretical and applied levels. While numerical verification and higher-dimensional generalization require further refinement, its core ideas demonstrate strong inspirational and practical value.