Congruence counting in Schottky and continued fractions semigroups of $\operatorname{SO}(n, 1)$

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2108.00545
• Title: Congruence counting in Schottky and continued fractions semigroups of $\operatorname{SO}(n, 1)$
• Author: Pratyush Sarkar
• Classification: math.NT (Number Theory), math.DS (Dynamical Systems), math.SP (Spectral Theory)
• Publication Date: November 21, 2025 (arXiv v3)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.00545v3

Abstract

This paper studies two important classes of semigroups: Zariski-dense Schottky semigroups $\Gamma < \operatorname{SO}(n, 1)$ and Zariski-dense continued fractions semigroups $\Gamma < \operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$. Under both settings, the author establishes uniform asymptotic counting formulas for the corresponding congruence subsemigroups, generalizing the work of Magee-Oh-Winter in $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ to higher dimensions. The proof employs two independent strategies: the Golsefidy-Varjú expansion mechanism based on work of Bourgain-Gamburd-Sarnak, and the Dolgopyat method. The higher-dimensional setting presents several challenges: first, applying the expansion mechanism requires critical inputs—Zariski density of return orbit subgroups and complete trace field properties; second, one must adapt the Stoyanov version of the Dolgopyat method, with the main difficulty being the proof of the local non-integrability condition (LNIC) and non-concentration property (NCP).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Setting

The core problem addressed in this paper is: How to perform uniform asymptotic counting of congruence subsemigroups for Schottky semigroups and continued fractions semigroups in hyperbolic space $\mathbb{H}^n$. Specifically, given a semigroup $\Gamma$ and its congruence subsemigroup $\Gamma_q$ (satisfying congruence conditions modulo $q$), one needs to count elements satisfying specific conditions and provide error estimates uniform in $q$.

Research Significance

This problem has important implications across multiple mathematical fields:

1. Number-Theoretic Connections: Continued fractions semigroups are intimately related to Zaremba's conjecture. Zaremba's conjecture predicts the existence of a bounded set $A$ of integers such that all positive integers can be represented as continued fractions with denominators containing only elements from $A$. Bourgain-Kontorovich BK14 achieved major progress by proving a density-one result, and the counting results in this paper can be used to further improve error terms.
2. Dynamical Systems: Counting problems relate to deep properties of hyperbolic flows such as mixing properties and spectral gaps.
3. Group Theory and Algebra: The work involves strong approximation theorems for algebraic groups, expander graph theory, and other core topics.

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Dimensional Restriction: The results of Magee-Oh-Winter MOW19 apply only to the case $n=2$ ($\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{R})$)
• Technical Obstacles: In higher dimensions, proving the local non-integrability condition (LNIC) becomes extremely difficult; Naud's two-dimensional proof Nau05 does not directly generalize
• Expansion Mechanism: New concepts (return orbit subgroups) are needed to apply the Golsefidy-Varjú high-dimensional expansion theory

Research Motivation

The starting point of this paper is to generalize the successful two-dimensional theory to arbitrary dimensions $n \geq 2$, which requires:

1. Developing new geometric and algebraic tools to handle high-dimensional complexity
2. Proving Zariski density of return orbit subgroups
3. Establishing LNIC and NCP in the high-dimensional setting

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves that for Schottky semigroups of $\operatorname{SO}(n,1)$ and continued fractions semigroups of $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$, there exists $\epsilon \in (0, \delta_\Gamma)$ such that $\#(\Gamma_q \cap B_R(e)) = C_0 \frac{R^{2\delta_\Gamma}}{\#\tilde{G}_q} + O(N(q)^C R^{2(\delta_\Gamma - \epsilon)})$ where $\delta_\Gamma$ is the Hausdorff dimension and $q$ is squarefree and coprime to $q_0$.
2. Zariski Density: First proves Zariski density of high-dimensional return orbit subgroups (Theorem 7.2), which is crucial for applying the expansion mechanism. For continued fractions semigroups, also proves the complete trace field property (Theorem 7.5).
3. High-Dimensional Extension of LNIC: Overcomes major technical difficulties to prove that the time-distance function satisfies the local non-integrability condition in arbitrary dimension $n \geq 2$ (Proposition 11.6), which is the core input for the Dolgopyat method.
4. Unified Framework: Establishes a unified theoretical framework for handling both Schottky semigroups and continued fractions semigroups, demonstrating that despite different geometric backgrounds, the same analytical tools apply.
5. Technical Innovations:
   • Employs the Stoyanov version of the Dolgopyat method, avoiding technical difficulties with triadic partition propositions
   • Develops a new $L^2$-flattening lemma (Lemma 8.1) for handling congruence transfer operators
   • Establishes a general proof of the non-concentration property (Proposition 11.8)

Methods in Detail

Task Definition

Input:

• Semigroup $\Gamma < G$ (Schottky or continued fractions semigroup)
• Congruence parameter $q \in \mathcal{O}$ ($\mathcal{O} = \mathbb{Z}$ or $\mathbb{Z}[i]$)
• Lipschitz function $F \in L_\star(\mathbb{H}^n \cup \mathbb{R}^{n-1}, \mathbb{R})$
• Element $\gamma_0 \in \Gamma$, $x \in \tilde{\Gamma}$

Output: Weighted counting formula $\sum_{\substack{\|\gamma\gamma_0\|/\|\gamma_0\| \leq R \\ \pi_q(\tilde{\gamma}) = \pi_q(x)}} F(\gamma\gamma_0 o)$ with leading term and error estimate.

Constraints:

• $\Gamma$ must satisfy Zariski density
• $q$ is squarefree and coprime to $q_0$
• Asymptotic behavior as $R \to +\infty$

Core Architecture: Transfer Operator Method

The overall proof strategy is based on spectral analysis of congruence transfer operators:

1. Dynamical Systems Coding (Section 3)

Define the map $T: D \to \mathbb{R}^{n-1}$: $T(u) = g_j^{-1} \cdot u, \quad \forall u \in D_j$

where $D = \bigcup_{j=1}^N D_j$ is a disjoint union of Euclidean balls. Key properties:

• Markov Property: $\text{int}(D_j) \cap T(\text{int}(D_k)) \neq \emptyset \Rightarrow D_j \subset T(D_k)$
• Hyperbolicity (Lemma 3.1): There exist $\kappa_2 > \kappa_1 > 1$ such that $c_0\kappa_2^k \leq \|(dT^k)_u\|_{op} \leq c_0^{-1}\kappa_1^k$

2. Congruence Transfer Operator (Section 4)

Define $M_{\xi,q}: C(\Lambda, L^2(\tilde{G}_q)) \to C(\Lambda, L^2(\tilde{G}_q))$: $M_{\xi,q}(H)(u) = \sum_{u' \in T^{-1}(u)} e^{(f^{(a)} - ib\tau)(u')} c_q(u') H(u')$

where:

• $\xi = a + ib \in \mathbb{C}$ is the complex parameter
• $c_q: D \to \tilde{G}_q$ is the congruence cocoon map
• $\tau$ is the distortion function
• $f^{(a)}$ is the normalized potential function

Core Technical Theorem (Theorem 4.5): There exist $\eta > 0$, $C \geq 1$ such that:

1. Small Frequencies ($|b| \leq b_0$): For squarefree $q$, $\|M_{\xi,q}^k(H)\|_{\text{Lip}} \leq CN(q)^C e^{-\eta k} \|H\|_{\text{Lip}}$
2. Large Frequencies ($|b| > b_0$): For all nonzero $q$, $\|M_{\xi,q}^k(H)\|_{\text{Lip}} \leq C_\sigma |b|^{1+\sigma} e^{-\eta_\sigma k} \|H\|_{\text{Lip}}$

Technical Route Decomposition

Strategy One: Expansion Mechanism (Sections 5-8, handling small frequencies)

Key Steps:

1. Return Orbit Subgroups (Definition 7.1): For $p \in \mathbb{N}$ and $(y,z) \in A^2$, define $H_p(y,z) = \left\langle \prod_{j=1}^p g_{\alpha_j} \prod_{j=1}^p g_{\tilde{\alpha}_{p+1-j}}^{-1} \right\rangle$
2. Zariski Density Proof (Theorem 7.2):
   • Core Idea: Prove that the limit set $\Lambda(H_p(y,z))$ is not contained in any $(n-2)$-sphere
   • Technical Tools: Karpelevič-Mostow theorem; if $H < G$ is not Zariski dense, then $\Lambda(H)$ is contained in an $(n-2)$-sphere
   • Construction: Select $n+1$ limit points not on an $(n-2)$-sphere, constructed via attractive fixed points of hyperbolic elements
3. $L^2$-Flattening Lemma (Lemma 8.1): For $r \in l\mathbb{Z}$ with $r \geq C_0\log(N(q))$, $\|\mu_{\xi,q,x}^{(\alpha_s,...,\alpha_{r+1})} * \phi\|_2 \leq CN(q)^{-1/3} \|\nu_{a,q,x}^{(\alpha_s,...,\alpha_{r+1})}\|_1$
4. Spectral Gap (Lemma 8.7):
   • Apply strong approximation theorem (Weisfeiler Wei84): $\pi_q(\Omega) = H(\mathcal{O}/q\mathcal{O})$
   • Apply expansion mechanism (Golsefidy-Varjú GV12): Cayley graphs form expanders
   • Obtain spectral gap $\epsilon \in (0,1)$ on $L^2_0(\tilde{G}_q)$

Strategy Two: Dolgopyat Method (Sections 10-13, handling large frequencies)

Key Inputs:

1. Local Non-Integrability Condition (LNIC) (Proposition 11.6): There exist $\alpha, \beta \in \Sigma$, $k \in A$, $u_0, u_0' \in C[k]$ such that $\nabla \phi_{\alpha,\beta,u_0'}(u_0) \neq 0$ where $\phi_{\alpha,\beta}$ is the time-distance function.
   Proof Strategy (Proposition 11.5):
   • Assume $\tau$ is cohomologous to a locally constant function
   • Derive the identity (Eq. 7): $\ell(h_1^{p_1}h_2^{p_2}) = \ell(h_1^{p_1}) + \ell(h_2^{p_2})$
   • Analyze in the $(h_1, h_2)$-$\mathbb{H}^3$-arrangement
   • Use Lemma 11.4 (hyperbolic function identities) and Poincaré recurrence theorem
   • Derive the circle equation $|ad| = |bc+1| = 1$ (Eq. 15)
   • Prove this leads to contradiction: attractive fixed point must satisfy $\Re(\xi) = 1/2$
   • Use geometric argument (two cases) to show impossibility
2. Non-Concentration Property (NCP) (Proposition 11.8): There exists $\delta \in (0,1)$ such that for all $x \in \Lambda$, cylinder $C \subset \Lambda$, unit vector $w$, there exists $y \in C \setminus B^E_{\text{diam}(C)/4}(x)$ satisfying $|\langle y-x, w \rangle| \geq \delta \cdot \text{diam}(C)$
3. Dolgopyat Operator Construction (Section 12): Define $N_{a,J}(h) = L_a^m(\beta_J h)$ where $\beta_J = \chi_U - \mu \sum_{(j,k) \in J} \chi_{X_{j,k}(b)}$ is a "hole-drilling" function.
4. Spectral Contraction (Theorem 10.3): There exists $\eta \in (0,1)$ such that $\|N_{a,J}(h)\|_2 \leq \eta \|h\|_2$ for all $h \in C_{E|b|}(\Lambda)$ and $J \in \mathcal{J}(b)$.

Technical Innovation Points

1. Proof of High-Dimensional LNIC:
   • Naud's two-dimensional proof relies on the special property $\mathbb{H}^2 = \mathbb{H}^3$
   • This paper analyzes the $(h_1,h_2)$-$\mathbb{H}^3$-arrangement, utilizing 3-dimensional submanifolds preserved by $\operatorname{SO}(n,1)$
   • Key innovation: Use Poincaré recurrence theorem to handle the rotation part $m_j \in M$
   • Establish refined estimates for hyperbolic functions (Eqs. 10-14)
2. Adoption of Stoyanov Version:
   • Avoids triadic partition proposition
   • Directly uses Gibbs measure properties rather than Federer/doubling properties
   • Introduces new distance function $d$ (Section 10) making the proof clearer
3. Complete Trace Field for Return Orbit Subgroups:
   • For continued fractions semigroups, requires $\mathbb{Q}(\text{tr}(H_p(y,z))) = \mathbb{Q}(i)$
   • Achieved by computing traces of various elements (5 cases, Theorem 7.5)
   • Uses Zariski density and the assumption $A \not\subset \mathbb{N}$
4. Unified Congruence Handling:
   • Local constancy and unitarity of cocoon maps make congruence parameter $q$ handling unified
   • First observed in OW16, generalized to high dimensions in this paper

Experimental Setup

This is a pure mathematics theoretical paper with no numerical experiments or computational verification. All results are rigorous mathematical proofs.

Theoretical Verification

The paper verifies theoretical correctness through:

1. Consistency with Special Cases:
   • For $n=2$, recovers results of Magee-Oh-Winter MOW19
   • Schottky subgroup case agrees with known results from Sarkar Sar22, Edwards-Oh EO21, etc.
   • Continued fractions case agrees with applications in Bourgain-Kontorovich BK14
2. Completeness of Logical Chain:
   • Theorem 1.1 ← Theorem 4.5 ← Theorems 5.1 & 10.3
   • Theorem 5.1 ← Lemmas 8.1, 9.2
   • Theorem 10.3 ← Propositions 11.6, 11.8

Parameter Settings

Selection of key constants (Section 12):

• $b_0 = 1$ (frequency threshold)
• $E > \max(1, 2A_0)$ (Lipschitz constant)
• $m > m_0$ satisfying $\kappa_2^m > \max(8A_0, \frac{4E\rho^{p_1}\epsilon_1}{c_0}, \frac{4 \cdot 128E}{c_0\delta_0\rho})$
• $\mu < \min(\frac{2E\epsilon_1 c_0\rho^{p_0p_1+1}}{\kappa_1^m}, \frac{1}{4}, \frac{1}{16 \cdot 16e^{2mT_0}}(\frac{\delta_0\rho\epsilon_1}{64})^2)$

These constant choices ensure:

• Lasota-Yorke type estimates (Lemma 12.2)
• Contractivity of Dolgopyat operator (Lemma 13.3)
• Effectiveness of LNIC and NCP

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Theorem): There exist $\epsilon \in (0, \delta_\Gamma)$, $C > 0$, $q_0 \in \mathcal{O}$ such that for all $F \in L_\star(\mathbb{H}^n \cup \mathbb{R}^{n-1}, \mathbb{R})$, $\gamma_0 \in \Gamma$, $x \in \tilde{\Gamma}$, squarefree $q$ coprime to $q_0$, as $R \to +\infty$:

$\sum_{\substack{\|\gamma\gamma_0\|/\|\gamma_0\| \leq R \\ \pi_q(\tilde{\gamma}) = \pi_q(x)}} F(\gamma\gamma_0 o) = C_0 \frac{R^{2\delta_\Gamma}}{\#\tilde{G}_q} + O(N(q)^C R^{2(\delta_\Gamma - \epsilon)}(\|F\|_\infty + \text{Lip}(F|_{\mathbb{R}^{n-1}})))$

Corollary 1.2: Taking $F = \chi_{\mathbb{H}^n \cup \mathbb{R}^{n-1}}$, $\gamma_0 = e$, $x = e$ yields:

$\#(\Gamma_q \cap B_R(e)) = C_0 \frac{R^{2\delta_\Gamma}}{\#\tilde{G}_q} + O(N(q)^C R^{2(\delta_\Gamma - \epsilon)})$

Comparison with Existing Results

Verification of Key Lemmas

1. Zariski Density (Theorem 7.2):
   • For all $(y,z) \in A^2$, there exists $p_0$ such that for $p > p_0$, $H_p(y,z)$ is Zariski dense
   • Proof constructs $n+1$ limit points not on an $(n-2)$-sphere
2. LNIC (Proposition 11.6):
   • Proves $\tau$ is not cohomologous to a locally constant function
   • Key is deriving contradiction: attractive fixed point satisfies impossible geometric constraints
3. Spectral Gap (Theorem 4.5):
   • Small frequencies: $\eta > 0$ independent of $q$
   • Large frequencies: $\eta_\sigma > 0$ for any $\sigma > 0$

Application: Progress on Zaremba's Conjecture

Conjecture 1.5 (Generalized Zaremba's Conjecture): There exists a bounded set $A \subset \mathbb{N} + i\mathbb{Z}$ such that $D_A = \mathbb{N} + i\mathbb{Z}$.

Current Best Result (combining Huang Hua15 and this paper): $\#(D_{\{1,2,3,4,5\}} \cap [1,N]) = N + O(N^{1-\epsilon})$ for some $\epsilon \in (0,1)$.

Contribution of This Paper: Improves error term from $O(Ne^{-c\sqrt{\log N}})$ (Bourgain-Kontorovich) to $O(N^{1-\epsilon})$.

Related Work

History of Counting Problems

1. Classical Results:
   • Lalley Lal89: Renewal theorem for non-congruence case
   • Bowen Bow79: Relationship between Hausdorff dimension and critical exponent
2. Congruence Counting:
   • Gamburd Gam02: Case $\delta_\Gamma > 5/6$ in $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{Z})$
   • Bourgain-Gamburd-Sarnak BGS11: Improved to $\delta_\Gamma > 1/2$
   • Magee-Oh-Winter MOW19: No dimension restriction, $n=2$ case
3. High-Dimensional Generalizations:
   • Mohammadi-Oh MO15: Via uniform exponential mixing of frame flow
   • Sarkar Sar22: High-dimensional generalization of frame flow method
   • This paper: High-dimensional generalization of transfer operator method

Expander Graph Theory

1. Foundational Work:
   • Bourgain-Gamburd BG08: Uniform expansion in $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$
   • Bourgain-Gamburd-Sarnak BGS10: Affine sieve
2. High-Dimensional Generalizations:
   • Golsefidy-Varjú GV12: Expansion in general semisimple groups
   • Bourgain-Varjú BV12: Expansion in $\operatorname{SL}_d(\mathbb{Z}/q\mathbb{Z})$
   • He-de Saxcé HdS22: Removing squarefree assumption

Dolgopyat Method

1. Original Work:
   • Dolgopyat Dol98: Correlation decay for Anosov flows
2. Application to Transfer Operators:
   • Naud Nau05: Expanding maps on Cantor sets
   • Stoyanov Sto11: Ruelle transfer operators for Axiom A flows
   • Oh-Winter OW16: Application in congruence setting
3. Contribution of This Paper:
   • Adopts Stoyanov version avoiding technical difficulties
   • First proof of high-dimensional LNIC
   • Unified treatment of Schottky and continued fractions semigroups

Continued Fractions and Number Theory

1. Zaremba's Conjecture:
   • Zaremba Zar72: Original conjecture
   • Bourgain-Kontorovich BK14: Density-one result, $A=50$
   • Huang Hua15: Improved to $A=5$
2. Number-Theoretic Applications of This Paper:
   • Improves error terms in Bourgain-Kontorovich
   • Provides tools for generalized Zaremba's conjecture

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Uniform Counting Formula: For Schottky semigroups of $\operatorname{SO}(n,1)$ and continued fractions semigroups of $\operatorname{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})$, establishes asymptotic counting formulas uniform in congruence parameter $q$, with error term $O(N(q)^C R^{2(\delta_\Gamma - \epsilon)})$.
2. Methodological Breakthrough:
   • First proof of Zariski density of return orbit subgroups in high dimensions
   • First establishment of LNIC in high dimensions
   • Successful adaptation of Stoyanov version of Dolgopyat method
3. Application Prospects: Provides new tools for generalized Zaremba's conjecture, potentially leading to further number-theoretic applications.

Limitations

1. Squarefree Assumption:
   • Theorem 1.1 requires $q$ squarefree (except for $n=3$)
   • Stems from limitations of Golsefidy-Varjú expansion mechanism
   • Recent results of He-de Saxcé HdS22 may remove this restriction ($n \neq 3$)
2. Function Class Restriction:
   • Requires $F \in L_\star(\mathbb{H}^n \cup \mathbb{R}^{n-1}, \mathbb{R})$ (locally constant)
   • MOW19 handles $C^1$ functions, not generalized to high dimensions in this paper
3. Constant Dependence:
   • Specific values of $\epsilon$ and $C$ not made explicit
   • Depend on complex selection of multiple intermediate constants
4. Special Nature of $n=3$:
   • $\operatorname{SO}(3,1) \cong \operatorname{PSL}_2(\mathbb{C})$ is not absolutely simple
   • Some results (e.g., removing squarefree assumption) do not apply

Future Directions

1. Function Class Generalization:
   • Extend to $C^1$ or smoother functions
   • Study other function spaces (Hölder, Sobolev, etc.)
2. Removing Restrictions:
   • Use HdS22 to remove squarefree assumption
   • Study non-Zariski-dense cases
3. Number-Theoretic Applications:
   • Further progress on Zaremba's conjecture
   • Study Diophantine approximation over Gaussian integers
4. Dynamical Systems Applications:
   • Study more general hyperbolic flows
   • Establish connections with quantum chaos
5. Computational Aspects:
   • Numerical verification for small parameters
   • Estimate actual values of constants $\epsilon$ and $C$

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Major Theoretical Breakthrough:
   • Successfully generalizes profound two-dimensional theory to arbitrary dimensions, which is non-trivial in geometry and dynamical systems
   • High-dimensional LNIC proof (Proposition 11.5) is technically masterful, involving deep integration of hyperbolic geometry, Lie group theory, and complex analysis
2. Methodological Innovation:
   • Introduces return orbit subgroup concept and proves its Zariski density—an original contribution
   • Adopts Stoyanov version avoiding triadic partition proposition, simplifying proof structure
   • Unified treatment of two seemingly different semigroup classes (Schottky and continued fractions)
3. Technical Rigor:
   • Complete proof chain with clear logical flow from main theorem to various lemmas
   • Constant selection (Section 12), though complex, is justified and ensures compatibility of all steps
   • Careful attention to detail (discussions in Remarks)
4. Writing Quality:
   • Clear structure progressing from background to proofs
   • Abundant Remarks providing intuition and connections to related work
   • Technical appendices (e.g., Lemma 11.4) presented independently for clarity
5. Potential Impact:
   • Provides new tools for number theory (Zaremba's conjecture)
   • Opens new directions in high-dimensional dynamical systems and spectral theory
   • Methods potentially applicable to other groups and spaces

Weaknesses

1. Readability Challenges:
   • Extremely high technical density requiring deep background in multiple fields (number theory, dynamical systems, Lie groups, spectral theory)
   • LNIC proof (Proposition 11.5) spans large scope; careful tracking needed from Eq. (7) to Eq. (16)
   • Some notation (e.g., $\alpha^l_j$, $\alpha^{(l-p)1}_j$) is cumbersome
2. Non-Explicit Constants:
   • $\epsilon$ and $C$ in main theorem not given explicit values or bounds
   • Practical applications (e.g., Zaremba's conjecture) may require numerical bounds on these constants
3. Restrictive Conditions:
   • Squarefree assumption, while possibly removable, still present
   • Locally constant function restriction is strong, limiting application scope
4. Abbreviated Proofs:
   • Multiple instances of "proved as in XXX" without full proofs (e.g., Lemmas 9.1, 13.5)
   • May cause difficulty for non-experts
5. Absence of Numerical Verification:
   • Understandable for pure theoretical work, but numerical verification of small parameter cases would strengthen credibility
   • Quantitative comparison with known special cases insufficient

Impact Assessment

1. Academic Contribution:
   • Importance: ★★★★★ (5/5)
     • Solves core high-dimensional congruence counting problem
     • Methods are pioneering and broadly applicable
   • Technical Difficulty: ★★★★★ (5/5)
     • High-dimensional LNIC proof is technical masterpiece
     • Requires deep integration across multiple fields
2. Practical Value:
   • Number-Theoretic Applications: ★★★★☆ (4/5)
     • Directly improves progress on Zaremba's conjecture
     • May inspire solutions to other Diophantine problems
   • Dynamical Systems: ★★★★☆ (4/5)
     • Provides new perspective on mixing properties
     • Important generalization of transfer operator methods
3. Reproducibility:
   • Theoretical Verifiability: ★★★★★ (5/5)
     • Proof logic complete, verifiable by experts
   • Computational Implementability: ★★☆☆☆ (2/5)
     • Complex constant selection makes numerical implementation difficult
     • Further work needed for computational feasibility
4. Potential for Follow-Up Research:
   • High: Multiple directions worth exploring (function class generalization, removing restrictions, new applications)
   • Methods potentially applicable to other groups and manifolds

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research:
   • Spectral theory of hyperbolic flows
   • Counting problems in homogeneous dynamics
   • Arithmetic properties of Lie groups
2. Number-Theoretic Applications:
   • Zaremba-type conjectures
   • Diophantine approximation
   • Distribution of continued fraction expansions
3. Geometric Topology:
   • Geometry of hyperbolic manifolds
   • Geodesic counting
   • Fractal properties of limit sets
4. Quantum Chaos:
   • Via spectral theory connections
   • Applications to Selberg zeta functions

Inapplicable Scenarios:

• Low-regularity problems (requiring $C^1$ or Lipschitz)
• Non-hyperbolic systems
• Numerical computations requiring explicit constants

Key References

1. MOW19 Magee-Oh-Winter: Uniform congruence counting for Schottky semigroups in SL₂(ℤ) - Two-dimensional result directly generalized by this paper
2. GV12 Golsefidy-Varjú: Expansion in perfect groups - Theoretical foundation of expansion mechanism
3. Dol98 Dolgopyat: On decay of correlations in Anosov flows - Original Dolgopyat method
4. Sto11 Stoyanov: Spectra of Ruelle transfer operators for axiom A flows - Dolgopyat method version adopted in this paper
5. Nau05 Naud: Expanding maps on Cantor sets and analytic continuation of zeta functions - Two-dimensional LNIC proof
6. BK14 Bourgain-Kontorovich: On Zaremba's conjecture - Major progress on Zaremba's conjecture
7. Wei84 Weisfeiler: Strong approximation for Zariski-dense subgroups - Strong approximation theorem
8. Sar22 Sarkar: Generalization of Selberg's 3/16 theorem - Author's prior work introducing return orbit subgroups

Summary

This is a pure mathematics paper of extreme technical depth that successfully generalizes two-dimensional congruence counting theory to arbitrary dimensions. Main innovations include: (1) proving Zariski density of return orbit subgroups; (2) establishing high-dimensional LNIC; (3) adapting Stoyanov version of Dolgopyat method. The paper solves core problems at the intersection of number theory, dynamical systems, and spectral theory, providing new tools for applications such as Zaremba's conjecture. Despite high technical barriers and non-explicit constants, the originality of methods and theoretical depth make it an important contribution to the field with anticipated lasting impact.