2025-11-10T02:37:47.177008

Application of Hardy inequalities for some singular parabolic equations

Kutev, Rangelov
Boundary value problems for non-linear parabolic equations with singular potentials are considered. Existence and non-existence results as an application of different Hardy inequalities are proved. Blow-up conditions are investigated too.
academic

Application of Hardy inequalities for some singular parabolic equations

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2108.01650
  • Title: Application of Hardy inequalities for some singular parabolic equations
  • Authors: Nikolai Kutev, Tsviatko Rangelov (Institute of Mathematics and Informatics, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences)
  • Classification: math.AP (Mathematical Analysis - Partial Differential Equations)
  • Submission Date: August 2021
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.01650

Abstract

This paper investigates boundary value problems for nonlinear parabolic equations with singular potentials. By applying various Hardy inequalities, the authors establish existence and non-existence results for solutions and study blow-up conditions.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

The paper primarily studies boundary value problems for singular p-heat equations:

ut - Δpu = μW(x)|u|^(p-2)u,  x ∈ Ω, t > 0
u(x,0) = u0(x),             x ∈ Ω  
u(x,t) = 0,                 x ∈ ∂Ω, t > 0

where Δpu = div(|∇u|^(p-2)∇u) is the p-Laplacian operator, and W(x) is a weight function singular at the boundary ∂Ω or at the origin.

Research Significance

Singular potential parabolic problems have important applications in multiple fields:

  1. Molecular Physics: Electron capture problems
  2. Quantum Cosmology: Fundamental equations in quantum mechanics
  3. Porous Media Flow: Fluid diffusion in porous media
  4. Combustion Models: Critical reaction terms in reaction-diffusion problems

Limitations of Existing Research

  • The pioneering work of Baras-Goldstein only addressed the case p=2 with Hardy potential W(x)=|x|^(-2)
  • Azorero-Alonso extended results to 2<p<n, but remained limited to Hardy potentials singular at the origin
  • Lack of research on more general Hardy potentials singular at the boundary or simultaneously at the origin and boundary

Research Motivation

This paper aims to extend existing results to more general singular parabolic equations, considering four novel Hardy potentials with singularities at the boundary or simultaneously at the origin and boundary.

Core Contributions

  1. Generalization of Classical Results: Extends the results of Baras-Goldstein and Azorero-Alonso to four new Hardy potentials
  2. Establishment of Existence Theorems: Proves existence of global weak solutions when μ is less than the optimal Hardy constant
  3. Proof of Blow-up Results: Demonstrates finite-time blow-up of solutions when μ exceeds the optimal Hardy constant
  4. Introduction of Novel Hardy Potentials: Studies new singular potentials with boundary singularities, logarithmic corrections, and singularities on star-shaped domains

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Investigation of well-posedness for singular p-heat equations under four types of Hardy potentials:

Potential Function Types:

  • i) W(x) = d^(-p)(x), d(x) = dist(x,∂Ω)
  • ii) W(x) = d^(-p)(x) + (p/(2(p-1)))d^(-p)log^(-2)(d(x)/D)
  • iii) W(x) = (|x|log(R/|x|))^(-n)
  • iv) W(x) = |x|^(m-n)|φ^m(x) - |x|^m|^(-p)

Theoretical Framework

Hardy Inequality Foundations

The paper is based on four key Hardy inequalities:

  1. Boundary-Singular Hardy Inequality (potential i):
    ∫_Ω |∇u|^p dx ≥ Cp ∫_Ω |u|^p/d^p(x) dx
    

    where Cp = ((p-1)/p)^p is the optimal constant.
  2. Logarithmically Corrected Hardy Inequality (potential ii):
    ∫_Ω |∇u|^p dx ≥ C ∫_Ω |u|^p/(d^p(x)(1 + (1/2)(p/(p-1))log^(-2)(d(x)/D))) dx
    
  3. Logarithmic Hardy Inequality (potential iii):
    ∫_Ω |∇u|^n dx ≥ Cn ∫_Ω |u|^n/(|x|log(R/|x|))^n dx
    
  4. Star-Shaped Domain Hardy Inequality (potential iv):
    ∫_Ω |∇u|^p dx ≥ Cp,n ∫_Ω |u|^p/(|x|^(n-m)|φ^m(x)-|x|^m|^p) dx
    

Existence Proof Strategy

  1. Truncation Method: Introduction of truncated functions WN(x) = min{N,W(x)}
  2. Energy Estimates: Utilization of Hardy inequalities to obtain a priori estimates
  3. Monotonicity Arguments: Application of comparison principles to establish monotonicity of solution sequences
  4. Limiting Process: Passage to limits via the Boccardo-Murat theorem

Technical Innovations

  1. Unified Treatment Framework: Provides a unified analytical framework for four different types of Hardy potentials
  2. Optimal Constant Application: Fully exploits the critical nature of optimal constants in Hardy inequalities
  3. Generalized Comparison Principle: Extends comparison principles to more general singular weight functions
  4. Separation of Variables Construction: Cleverly employs separation of variables to construct blow-up subsolutions

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Methods

The paper employs purely theoretical analysis methods, verifying results through rigorous mathematical proofs:

  1. Energy Methods: Utilization of multiplier techniques and integration by parts
  2. Variational Methods: Application of Rayleigh quotients and first eigenvalue theory
  3. Comparison Principles: Construction of upper and lower solutions for comparison

Key Technical Tools

  • Truncation Techniques: Handling singularities
  • Hölder Inequality: Energy estimates
  • Young Inequality: Control of nonlinear terms
  • Eigenvalue Theory: Analysis of critical parameters

Main Results

Existence Theorems

Theorems 2.1-2.4: For four types of Hardy potentials, when μ < C (optimal Hardy constant), problem (1.1) admits a global solution

u(x,t) ∈ L^∞((0,τ), L^2(Ω)) ∩ L^p((0,τ), W^(1,p)(Ω))

Key Estimate:

∫_Ω |uN(x,T)|^2 dx + (1-μC^(-1)) ∫_0^T ∫_Ω |∇uN(x,t)|^p dxdt ≤ ∫_Ω |u0(x)|^2 dx

Blow-up Results

Theorem 3.2: When p > n ≥ 2, u0 ∈ L^∞(Ω), u0(x) > 0, and μ > C, the solution blows up in finite time.

Blow-up Mechanism:

  • Construction of separated variable subsolution v(x,t) = X(x)T(t)
  • T(t) = T01-(p-2)T0^(p-2)t^(-1/(p-2)) blows up at time t = (p-2)T0^(p-2)^(-1)
  • Comparison principle implies the original solution must also blow up

Comparison Principle

Theorem 3.1: Under appropriate boundedness conditions, establishes a comparison principle for solutions, providing a key tool for blow-up analysis.

Historical Development

  1. Baras-Goldstein (1984): Pioneering work, p=2, W(x)=|x|^(-2)
  2. Vázquez-Zuazua (2000): Complete functional framework description
  3. Azorero-Alonso (1998): Extension to p-Laplacian case
  4. Porzio (2009): Asymptotic behavior in quasilinear case

Uniqueness of This Paper's Contributions

  • Potential Function Innovation: First systematic study of boundary-singular and mixed-singular potentials
  • Relaxed Geometric Conditions: Applicability to star-shaped domains and more general geometries
  • Optimal Constant Precision: All results achieve optimal constants in Hardy inequalities

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Critical Phenomenon: μ = C is the critical value for existence versus blow-up
  2. Geometric Dependence: Results depend on geometric properties of the domain (convexity, star-shapedness, etc.)
  3. Optimality: All constants are optimal and cannot be improved

Limitations

  1. Geometric Restrictions: Some results require specific geometric conditions (e.g., convexity, star-shapedness)
  2. Dimensional Restrictions: Some results have restrictions on spatial dimension
  3. Initial Value Conditions: Blow-up results require positive initial value conditions

Future Directions

  1. More General Geometries: Study of similar problems on more general domains
  2. Critical Case: Investigation of precise behavior when μ = C
  3. Numerical Methods: Development of corresponding numerical algorithms to verify theoretical results

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete theoretical picture from existence to blow-up
  2. Method Uniformity: Offers unified treatment for different types of Hardy potentials
  3. Result Optimality: All constants are optimal with deep mathematical significance
  4. Broad Applicability: Results applicable to multiple physical and engineering fields

Weaknesses

  1. Strict Geometric Conditions: Some results require strong geometric assumptions
  2. Lack of Numerical Verification: Purely theoretical work without numerical experiments
  3. Incomplete Critical Case: Behavior when μ = C requires further investigation

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Important supplement to theory of singular parabolic equations
  2. Methodological Value: Exemplary application of Hardy inequalities in PDEs
  3. Application Potential: Provides mathematical theoretical foundation for related physical problems

Applicable Scenarios

  • Schrödinger equations in quantum mechanics
  • Reaction-diffusion equations in combustion theory
  • Fluid diffusion problems in porous media
  • Electron capture problems in molecular physics

References

The paper cites 27 important references covering classical works in Hardy inequalities, singular parabolic equations, variational methods, and other related fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.


Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality mathematical analysis paper that systematically studies parabolic equations with singular potentials through clever application of Hardy inequalities, obtaining profound mathematical results. The paper is theoretically rigorous, methodologically innovative, and possesses significant theoretical value and application prospects for related fields.