Generalising multipartite concentratable entanglement for practical applications: mixed, qudit, and optical states

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2112.04333
• Title: Generalising multipartite concentratable entanglement for practical applications: mixed, qudit, and optical states
• Authors: Steph Foulds, Oliver Prove, Viv Kendon
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Published Journal: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A (2024)
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0411
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.04333

Abstract

The controlled SWAP test (c-SWAP test) applied to entanglement detection and quantification of pure qubit states exhibits robustness to small errors in the states and is efficient for large multipartite systems. This paper extends the test methodology and the associated concentratable entanglement (CE) measure to enable important practical applications in quantum information processing. Lower bounds for mixed-state concentratable entanglement are investigated, and an upper bound conjecture for mixed-state CE that is robust to c-SWAP test errors is proposed. Since experimental states are always slightly mixed, this work makes the c-SWAP test and CE measure applicable to experimental characterization of entanglement. Furthermore, CE for key high-dimensional states (such as qudit states and entangled optical states) is demonstrated, validating CE as an effective measure for high-dimensional entanglement.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of Multipartite Entanglement: Multipartite entanglement is an important resource in quantum information with unique applications such as quantum teleportation via multipartite entanglement channels and network coding for secure key distribution.
2. Limitations of Existing Detection Methods:
   • Quantum state tomography requires measurements on large ensembles of identical states, with complexity growing exponentially with system size
   • Entanglement witnesses require optimization for specific states
   • Multipartite entanglement measures are often mathematically abstract, lacking clear operational significance
3. Challenges of Experimental Reality: Quantum states in experiments are always slightly mixed, while existing c-SWAP tests are primarily designed for pure states.

Research Motivation

This paper aims to extend the concentratable entanglement measure to practical application scenarios, including mixed states, high-dimensional qudit states, and optical states, making it practically valuable in experiments.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Upper Bounds for Mixed-State CE: Defined upper bounds for mixed-state concentratable entanglement $C_\rho^u(S) = P(Z_1^{even})$, forming a complete boundary framework with known lower bounds
2. Extension to High-Dimensional Systems: Successfully extended the c-SWAP test and CE measure to qudit states and optical coherent states
3. Enhanced Experimental Applicability: Addressed handling of non-identical inputs and mixed states, making the test method applicable to actual experimental conditions
4. Theoretical Analysis: Provided detailed error analysis and convergence proofs, including performance evaluation under different purity and fidelity conditions
5. Optical Implementation Scheme: Proposed specific experimental apparatus designs for optical c-SWAP tests

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigation of detection and quantification of entanglement in multipartite quantum states, with input being ensembles of quantum states and output being entanglement measure values and their confidence intervals.

Theoretical Foundations of Concentratable Entanglement (CE)

For pure states $|\psi\rangle$, CE is defined as: $C_\psi(s) = 1 - \frac{1}{2^{c(s)}} \sum_{\alpha \in P(s)} \gamma_\alpha$

where $\gamma_\alpha = \text{Tr}[\rho_\alpha^2]$ is the purity of the reduced state, and $s$ is the set of qubit labels.

c-SWAP Test Mechanism

1. Test Circuit: Uses controlled SWAP gates to operate on each subsystem of two input state copies
2. Measurement Results: Obtains probability distribution through measurement of the control qubit
3. Entanglement Relation: $C_\psi(s) = P(Z_1^{even}(s))$, i.e., the probability of measuring an even number of 1s

Mixed State Extension

Upper and Lower Bound Definitions

• Lower Bound: $C_\rho^l(S) = \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} - \frac{1}{2^n}\text{tr}\rho^2 - \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{\alpha \in P(S)}\text{tr}\rho_\alpha^2$
• Upper Bound: $C_\rho^u(S) = \frac{1}{2}(1 + \text{tr}\rho^2) - \frac{1}{2^n}\sum_{\alpha \in P(S)}\text{tr}\rho_\alpha^2$

Non-Identical Input Handling

For input states $\rho = \rho_\psi(p)$ and $\rho' = \rho_\psi(q)$, test results can be expressed as: $X_i(\rho,\rho') = \frac{1}{2}[X_i(\rho,\rho) + X_i(\rho',\rho')] - \frac{1}{2}\epsilon_i\delta^2$

where $\delta = q-p$ and $|\epsilon_i| < 1$.

High-Dimensional Extension

Qudit States

For D-dimensional qudit states, the CE formula maintains its form, but the implementation of SWAP operations requires modification. The CE of maximally entangled 2-qudit states is: $C_\psi = \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2D}$

Optical Coherent States

For entangled coherent states $|\text{ECS}_{\alpha,\beta}\rangle$, the CE expression is: $C_\psi = \frac{N_{\alpha,\beta}^4}{4}(1-|\langle\alpha|\beta\rangle|^2)^2|A_{\alpha\alpha}A_{\beta\beta} - A_{\alpha\beta}A_{\beta\alpha}|^2$

Experimental Setup

Numerical Simulation Parameters

• Werner states used to simulate mixed states: $\rho = (1-p)|\psi\rangle\langle\psi| + p\frac{I_N}{N}$
• Testing different purity parameters $p \in [0,1]$
• Considering 2-5 qubit systems
• Measurement rounds $M = 10$ to $10^4$

Evaluation Metrics

1. Average Error: $\text{Err}(M,P(x)) = \sum_{k=0}^M f(k,M,P(x))\frac{|\frac{k}{M} - P(x)|}{P(x)}$
2. Fidelity: $F = [\text{tr}\sqrt{\sqrt{\rho}\rho'\sqrt{\rho}}]^2$
3. Separability Criterion: Separability threshold for Werner states $\gamma_{\text{separable}} = \frac{2^n+8}{(2^n+2)^2}$

Optical Experimental Apparatus

Proposed optical c-SWAP test apparatus based on phase-shift beam splitters (PSBS) and spatial path exchange, where the detection probability of detector C corresponds to the probability of measuring $|1\rangle_C$ in the quantum circuit.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Mixed State Boundary Performance

1. Convergence: When the state is pure, upper and lower bounds converge: $C_\rho^u \to C_\rho^l \to C_\psi$
2. Separability Detection: For separable states, $C_\rho^l \approx 0$, while $C_\rho^u > 0$ but close to zero
3. Error Estimation: Average error satisfies $\text{Err}(M,P(Z_1^{even})) \approx 3^{-\log_{10}(M)}(1.1-2\log_{10}(\gamma))$

Non-Identical Input Effects

• For parameter difference $\delta = q-p$, the deviation in test results is approximately $\frac{1}{2}\epsilon\delta^2$
• When $\delta$ is small, $P(Z_1^{even})$ remains a valid upper bound estimate
• Purity estimation: $\tilde{\gamma} = 1 - 2P(Z_1^{odd})$

High-Dimensional State Results

1. Qudit States: CE increases with dimension D, but the growth rate is smaller than the effect of increasing qubit numbers
2. Optical States:
   • CE of entangled coherent states has similar shape to entanglement entropy but smaller numerical values
   • For small amplitude coherent states ($\alpha < 0.5$), the test is infeasible (error > 0.1)
   • Qudit approximation of two-mode squeezed vacuum states has limitations

Ablation Studies

By comparing results with different Werner parameters, different qubit numbers, and different measurement rounds, the following were verified:

1. Tightness of upper bound estimates
2. Convergence of error with measurement rounds
3. Scalability of the method with system size

Related Work

Entanglement Detection Methods

• Quantum State Tomography: Complete but high complexity
• Entanglement Witnesses: Efficient but requires optimization
• SWAP Test Variants: Including quantum fingerprinting and state comparison

Entanglement Measures

• Concurrence: Standard measure for bipartite entanglement
• n-tangle: Multipartite entanglement measure
• Entanglement Entropy: Based on von Neumann entropy of reduced states

Optical Entanglement

• Squeezed States: Continuous variable realization of EPR paradox
• Entangled Coherent States: Macroscopic quantum superposition states
• Cat States: Important resources in quantum computing

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully established a complete boundary framework for mixed-state CE, with upper and lower bounds converging for pure states
2. c-SWAP test can be effectively extended to high-dimensional qudit and optical coherent states
3. Effects of non-identical inputs are controllable, with error growing as the square of input difference
4. Provided practical purity estimation methods

Limitations

1. Optical State Limitations: CE estimation for small amplitude coherent states is infeasible
2. Squeezed State Issues: Qudit approximation of two-mode squeezed vacuum states performs poorly
3. Experimental Complexity: High-dimensional states require more complex SWAP operation implementations
4. Statistical Requirements: Low entanglement states require more measurement rounds

Future Directions

1. Improve test methods for small amplitude optical states
2. Develop test protocols better suited for squeezed states
3. Extend to more general continuous variable systems
4. Optimize resource requirements for experimental implementation

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete theoretical framework for mixed-state CE, filling an important gap
2. Practical Value: Addresses key issues in actual experiments (mixed states, non-identical inputs)
3. Strong Extensibility: Successfully extends to multiple physical systems (qudits, optical states)
4. Error Analysis: Provides detailed error estimation and convergence analysis
5. Experimental Feasibility: Proposes concrete optical implementation schemes

Weaknesses

1. Optical State Limitations: Limited effectiveness for certain important optical states (small amplitude states, squeezed states)
2. Complexity: Implementation complexity for high-dimensional systems remains high
3. Approximation Accuracy: Precision of qudit approximation of optical states needs improvement
4. Experimental Verification: Lacks actual experimental verification, primarily based on numerical simulations

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important supplement to multipartite entanglement theory, particularly for mixed state handling
2. Practical Value: Makes c-SWAP test more suitable for actual quantum information experiments
3. Interdisciplinary Connection: Bridges quantum information theory and quantum optics experiments
4. Reproducibility: Provides open-source code for result reproduction and further research

Application Scenarios

1. Quantum Computing: Entanglement verification in multipartite qubit systems
2. Quantum Communication: Quality assessment of entanglement resources
3. Quantum Optics: Characterization of continuous variable entanglement
4. Quantum Simulation: Entanglement analysis in high-dimensional quantum systems

References

This paper cites 52 relevant references covering multiple fields including quantum entanglement theory, test methods, and optical quantum states, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an important contribution to the field of quantum entanglement detection, successfully extending theoretical methods to practical application scenarios and providing valuable tools for quantum information experiments. Although there remain limitations in handling certain special states, the work overall advances the development of the field.