2025-11-15T04:58:12.581385

Minimum non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number

Zhu, Zhu
A graph $G$ is called chromatic-choosable if $χ(G)=ch(G)$. A natural problem is to determine the minimum number of vertices in a $k$-chromatic non-$k$-choosable graph. It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2k+1$ are $k$-choosable. This upper bound on $|V(G)|$ is tight. It is known that if $k$ is even, then $G=K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ and $G=K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ are $k$-chromatic graphs with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ that are not $k$-choosable. Some subgraphs of these two graphs are also non-$k$-choosable. The main result of this paper is that all other $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ are $k$-choosable. In particular, if $χ(G)$ is odd and $|V(G)| \le 2χ(G)+2$, then $G$ is chromatic-choosable, which was conjectured by Noel.
academic

Minimum non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2201.02060
  • Title: Minimum non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number
  • Authors: Jialu Zhu, Xuding Zhu
  • Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
  • Publication Date: September 13, 2024
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02060

Abstract

A graph GG is called chromatic-choosable if χ(G)=ch(G)\chi(G) = ch(G). A natural question is to determine the minimum number of vertices among non-kk-choosable graphs with chromatic number kk. Ohba's conjecture, proved by Noel, Reed, and Wu, states that every kk-chromatic graph GG with V(G)2k+1|V(G)| \leq 2k+1 vertices is kk-choosable. This upper bound is tight. For even kk, it is known that G=K3(k/2+1),1(k/21)G=K_{3*(k/2+1),1*(k/2-1)} and G=K4,2(k1)G=K_{4,2*(k-1)} are non-kk-choosable kk-chromatic graphs with 2k+22k+2 vertices. The main result of this paper is that all other kk-chromatic graphs with 2k+22k+2 vertices are kk-choosable. In particular, if χ(G)\chi(G) is odd and V(G)2χ(G)+2|V(G)| \leq 2\chi(G)+2, then GG is chromatic-choosable, confirming Noel's conjecture.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. List Coloring Problem: List coloring is a natural generalization of classical graph coloring, independently introduced by Erdős-Rubin-Taylor and Vizing in the 1970s. For a list assignment LL of graph GG, GG is called LL-colorable if there exists a proper coloring such that each vertex vv is colored with a color from L(v)L(v).
  2. Chromatic-Choosable Graphs: A graph GG is called chromatic-choosable if its chromatic number χ(G)\chi(G) equals its choice number ch(G)ch(G). Such graphs hold an important position in graph theory and are related to many difficult problems.
  3. Ohba's Conjecture: Ohba's conjecture asserts that for any positive integer kk, every kk-chromatic graph with at most 2k+12k+1 vertices is kk-choosable. This conjecture was ultimately proved by Noel, Reed, and Wu in 2015.

Research Motivation

  1. Tightness Analysis: Although Ohba's conjecture has been proved, its tightness remains to be studied in depth. Known counterexamples are limited to the case of even kk.
  2. Noel's Conjecture: Noel conjectured that for odd kk, all kk-chromatic graphs with 2k+22k+2 vertices are kk-choosable.
  3. Extremal Graph Theory: Determining the minimum number of vertices among non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number is a fundamental problem in extremal graph theory.

Core Contributions

  1. Complete Characterization: Completely characterizes non-kk-choosable complete kk-partite graphs with 2k+22k+2 vertices, proving that only K4,2(k1)K_{4,2*(k-1)} and K3(k/2+1),1(k/21)K_{3*(k/2+1),1*(k/2-1)} (when kk is even) are non-kk-choosable.
  2. Confirmation of Noel's Conjecture: Proves that when kk is odd, every kk-chromatic graph with at most 2k+22k+2 vertices is chromatic-choosable.
  3. Exact Determination of Function β(k)\beta(k): For the function β(k)=min{V(G):χ(G)=k<ch(G)}\beta(k) = \min\{|V(G)| : \chi(G) = k < ch(G)\}, proves that2k + 2, & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \\ 2k + 3, & \text{if } k \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$$
  4. Technical Innovation: Introduces new concepts such as "nearly acceptable LL-coloring" and "pseudo LL-coloring," developing novel proof techniques.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Let GG be a complete kk-partite graph and LL be a kk-list assignment of GG. The task is to determine under what conditions GG is LL-colorable, particularly when V(G)=2k+2|V(G)| = 2k+2 and GK4,2(k1),K3(k/2+1),1(k/21)G \neq K_{4,2*(k-1)}, K_{3*(k/2+1),1*(k/2-1)} (when kk is even).

Core Technical Framework

1. Bipartite Matching Method

  • Basic Idea: Partition V(G)V(G) into a family of independent sets S\mathcal{S}, construct quotient graph G/SG/\mathcal{S}
  • Bipartite Construction: Construct bipartite graph BSB_\mathcal{S} with vertex set V(G/S)V(G/\mathcal{S}) and CLC_L, edge {vS,c}\{v_S, c\} exists if and only if cLS(vS)c \in L_S(v_S)
  • Hall's Theorem Application: If BSB_\mathcal{S} has a matching covering V(G/S)V(G/\mathcal{S}), an LL-coloring is obtained; otherwise, by Hall's theorem, there exists XSV(G/S)X_\mathcal{S} \subseteq V(G/\mathcal{S}) such that XS>NBS(XS)|X_\mathcal{S}| > |N_{B_\mathcal{S}}(X_\mathcal{S})|

2. Pseudo LL-Coloring Concept

Definition: A pseudo LL-coloring of GG is a proper coloring ff satisfying:

  • f(v)CLf(v) \in C_L for all vertices vv
  • If f(v)=cL(v)f(v) = c \notin L(v), then f1(c)={v}f^{-1}(c) = \{v\} is a singleton ff-class

Key Properties:

  • If vertex vv is incorrectly colored (f(v)L(v)f(v) \notin L(v)), then {v}\{v\} must be a singleton color class
  • This provides flexibility in constructing partial colorings

3. Nearly Acceptable Coloring

Frequent Color Definition: Color cc is frequent if one of the following holds:

  1. L1(c)k+2|L^{-1}(c)| \geq k + 2
  2. L1(c)Tλ|L^{-1}(c) \cap T| \geq \lambda (where TT is the set of singleton parts)
  3. T=λ11|T| = \lambda - 1 \geq 1 and TL1(c)T \subseteq L^{-1}(c)

Nearly Acceptable Coloring: A pseudo LL-coloring ff is nearly acceptable if every incorrectly colored vertex is colored with a frequent color.

Proof Strategy

Step One: Elimination of Special Cases

Handle all complete multipartite graphs with part sizes at most 3 through Lemma 2.1, establishing sufficient conditions for such graphs to be gg-choosable.

Step Two: Proof by Contradiction Framework

Assume (G,L)(G,L) is a minimal counterexample to Theorem 1.2, namely:

  • V(G)|V(G)| is minimal
  • Under Condition 1, CL|C_L| is minimal

Step Three: Frequent Color Analysis

  • Prove there are at most k1k-1 frequent colors (Lemma 7.1)
  • Further prove there are at most kp11k-p_1-1 frequent colors (Lemma 8.3)
  • Where p1p_1 is the number of singleton parts

Step Four: Final Contradiction

Construct a case with kp1k-p_1 frequent colors, deriving a contradiction and completing the proof.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This paper is purely theoretical research, primarily verifying results through mathematical proof:

  1. Small-Scale Verification: For k7k \leq 7, directly verify that relevant graph classes are kk-choosable
  2. Constructive Proof: Prove through explicit construction that certain graphs are indeed non-kk-choosable
  3. Inductive Verification: Use mathematical induction to verify conditions in Lemma 2.1

Key Lemma Verification

  • Lemma 3.2: If PP is a 2+2^+-part of GG, then vPL(v)=\bigcap_{v \in P} L(v) = \emptyset
  • Lemma 5.1: Upper bound on the number of singleton parts in pseudo-colorings
  • Lemma 6.1: GG has no nearly acceptable LL-coloring

Experimental Results

Main Theorem Verification

Theorem 1.2: Let GG be a complete kk-partite graph with V(G)2k+2|V(G)| \leq 2k+2, and when kk is even, GK4,2(k1),K3(k/2+1),1(k/21)G \neq K_{4,2*(k-1)}, K_{3*(k/2+1),1*(k/2-1)}. If LL is a kk-list assignment of GG, then GG is LL-colorable.

Corollary 1.3: If kk is odd, then every kk-chromatic graph with at most 2k+22k+2 vertices is chromatic-choosable.

Corollary 1.4: The function β(k)=min{V(G):χ(G)=k<ch(G)}\beta(k) = \min\{|V(G)| : \chi(G) = k < ch(G)\} satisfies:

2k + 2, & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \\ 2k + 3, & \text{if } k \text{ is odd} \end{cases}$$ ### Technical Results 1. **Theorem 4.1**: Proves $G \notin \mathcal{G}_1 \cup \mathcal{G}_2$, where $\mathcal{G}_1, \mathcal{G}_2$ are specific graph families 2. **Lemma 7.1**: There are at most $k-1$ frequent colors 3. **Lemma 8.3**: There are at most $k-p_1-1$ frequent colors ### Constructive Results - For even $k$, $K_{5,2*(k-1)}$ is not $k$-choosable - This ensures the tightness of the lower bound for $\beta(k)$ ## Related Work ### Historical Development 1. **Erdős-Rubin-Taylor & Vizing (1970s)**: Independently introduced the concept of list coloring 2. **Ohba (2002)**: Proposed the famous Ohba's conjecture 3. **Noel-Reed-Wu (2015)**: Finally proved Ohba's conjecture 4. **Noel (2013)**: Proposed the conjecture for the odd case ### Related Research Directions 1. **Special Graph Families**: List coloring properties of complete multipartite graphs 2. **Online Versions**: Online versions of Ohba's conjecture 3. **Bound Improvements**: Research beyond the bounds of Ohba's conjecture ### Technical Connections The proof techniques in this paper are inspired by the proof of the Noel-Reed-Wu theorem, but must handle the additional complexity introduced by extra vertices. ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Complete Resolution**: Completely resolves the chromatic-choosability problem for $k$-chromatic graphs with $2k+2$ vertices 2. **Noel's Conjecture**: Confirms Noel's conjecture for the odd chromatic number case 3. **Exact Bounds**: Provides exact formulas for the function $\beta(k)$ ### Limitations 1. **Technical Complexity**: The proof techniques are quite complex, particularly in handling various special cases 2. **Generalization Difficulty**: The methods are difficult to directly generalize to larger graphs 3. **Computational Complexity**: No polynomial-time algorithm is provided for determining the list-colorability of general graphs ### Future Directions 1. **Larger Graphs**: Study the choice number of graphs with more than $2k+2$ vertices 2. **Algorithmic Problems**: Develop efficient algorithms for determining list-colorability of graphs 3. **Generalizations**: Extend results to other graph families ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical Completeness**: Completely resolves a fundamental extremal problem 2. **Technical Innovation**: Introduces new concepts and proof techniques 3. **Exact Results**: Provides exact bounds rather than asymptotic results 4. **Rigorous Logic**: The proof is logically clear with detailed steps ### Weaknesses 1. **Complex Proof**: The proof process is quite technical, involving numerous details 2. **Readability**: Understanding is challenging for non-specialists 3. **Limited Applications**: Results are primarily theoretical with limited practical applications ### Impact 1. **Theoretical Contribution**: Makes important contributions to extremal graph theory and list coloring theory 2. **Technical Impact**: New proof techniques may inspire solutions to related problems 3. **Completeness**: Resolves a long-standing open problem ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Theoretical Research**: Theoretical research in graph theory and combinatorial optimization 2. **Teaching**: Serves as a classical example in extremal graph theory 3. **Further Research**: Provides foundation for research on related problems ## References The paper cites 36 related references, primarily including: - Proofs by Noel, Reed, and Wu on Ohba's conjecture - Original work by Ohba and related conjectures - Foundational literature on list coloring theory - Specialized research on list coloring of complete multipartite graphs --- This paper completely resolves an important extremal graph theory problem through ingenious proof techniques, making significant contributions to list coloring theory. Although the proof techniques are complex, the completeness and exactness of the results make it an important advance in the field.