A graph $G$ is called chromatic-choosable if $Ï(G)=ch(G)$. A natural problem is to determine the minimum number of vertices in a $k$-chromatic non-$k$-choosable graph. It was conjectured by Ohba, and proved by Noel, Reed and Wu that $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| \le 2k+1$ are $k$-choosable. This upper bound on $|V(G)|$ is tight. It is known that if $k$ is even, then $G=K_{3 \star (k/2+1), 1 \star (k/2-1)}$ and $G=K_{4, 2 \star (k-1)}$ are $k$-chromatic graphs with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ that are not $k$-choosable. Some subgraphs of these two graphs are also non-$k$-choosable. The main result of this paper is that all other $k$-chromatic graphs $G$ with $|V(G)| =2 k+2$ are $k$-choosable. In particular, if $Ï(G)$ is odd and $|V(G)| \le 2Ï(G)+2$, then $G$ is chromatic-choosable, which was conjectured by Noel.
- Paper ID: 2201.02060
- Title: Minimum non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number
- Authors: Jialu Zhu, Xuding Zhu
- Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
- Publication Date: September 13, 2024
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.02060
A graph G is called chromatic-choosable if χ(G)=ch(G). A natural question is to determine the minimum number of vertices among non-k-choosable graphs with chromatic number k. Ohba's conjecture, proved by Noel, Reed, and Wu, states that every k-chromatic graph G with ∣V(G)∣≤2k+1 vertices is k-choosable. This upper bound is tight. For even k, it is known that G=K3∗(k/2+1),1∗(k/2−1) and G=K4,2∗(k−1) are non-k-choosable k-chromatic graphs with 2k+2 vertices. The main result of this paper is that all other k-chromatic graphs with 2k+2 vertices are k-choosable. In particular, if χ(G) is odd and ∣V(G)∣≤2χ(G)+2, then G is chromatic-choosable, confirming Noel's conjecture.
- List Coloring Problem: List coloring is a natural generalization of classical graph coloring, independently introduced by Erdős-Rubin-Taylor and Vizing in the 1970s. For a list assignment L of graph G, G is called L-colorable if there exists a proper coloring such that each vertex v is colored with a color from L(v).
- Chromatic-Choosable Graphs: A graph G is called chromatic-choosable if its chromatic number χ(G) equals its choice number ch(G). Such graphs hold an important position in graph theory and are related to many difficult problems.
- Ohba's Conjecture: Ohba's conjecture asserts that for any positive integer k, every k-chromatic graph with at most 2k+1 vertices is k-choosable. This conjecture was ultimately proved by Noel, Reed, and Wu in 2015.
- Tightness Analysis: Although Ohba's conjecture has been proved, its tightness remains to be studied in depth. Known counterexamples are limited to the case of even k.
- Noel's Conjecture: Noel conjectured that for odd k, all k-chromatic graphs with 2k+2 vertices are k-choosable.
- Extremal Graph Theory: Determining the minimum number of vertices among non-chromatic-choosable graphs with given chromatic number is a fundamental problem in extremal graph theory.
- Complete Characterization: Completely characterizes non-k-choosable complete k-partite graphs with 2k+2 vertices, proving that only K4,2∗(k−1) and K3∗(k/2+1),1∗(k/2−1) (when k is even) are non-k-choosable.
- Confirmation of Noel's Conjecture: Proves that when k is odd, every k-chromatic graph with at most 2k+2 vertices is chromatic-choosable.
- Exact Determination of Function β(k): For the function β(k)=min{∣V(G)∣:χ(G)=k<ch(G)}, proves that2k + 2, & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \\
2k + 3, & \text{if } k \text{ is odd}
\end{cases}$$
- Technical Innovation: Introduces new concepts such as "nearly acceptable L-coloring" and "pseudo L-coloring," developing novel proof techniques.
Let G be a complete k-partite graph and L be a k-list assignment of G. The task is to determine under what conditions G is L-colorable, particularly when ∣V(G)∣=2k+2 and G=K4,2∗(k−1),K3∗(k/2+1),1∗(k/2−1) (when k is even).
- Basic Idea: Partition V(G) into a family of independent sets S, construct quotient graph G/S
- Bipartite Construction: Construct bipartite graph BS with vertex set V(G/S) and CL, edge {vS,c} exists if and only if c∈LS(vS)
- Hall's Theorem Application: If BS has a matching covering V(G/S), an L-coloring is obtained; otherwise, by Hall's theorem, there exists XS⊆V(G/S) such that ∣XS∣>∣NBS(XS)∣
Definition: A pseudo L-coloring of G is a proper coloring f satisfying:
- f(v)∈CL for all vertices v
- If f(v)=c∈/L(v), then f−1(c)={v} is a singleton f-class
Key Properties:
- If vertex v is incorrectly colored (f(v)∈/L(v)), then {v} must be a singleton color class
- This provides flexibility in constructing partial colorings
Frequent Color Definition: Color c is frequent if one of the following holds:
- ∣L−1(c)∣≥k+2
- ∣L−1(c)∩T∣≥λ (where T is the set of singleton parts)
- ∣T∣=λ−1≥1 and T⊆L−1(c)
Nearly Acceptable Coloring: A pseudo L-coloring f is nearly acceptable if every incorrectly colored vertex is colored with a frequent color.
Handle all complete multipartite graphs with part sizes at most 3 through Lemma 2.1, establishing sufficient conditions for such graphs to be g-choosable.
Assume (G,L) is a minimal counterexample to Theorem 1.2, namely:
- ∣V(G)∣ is minimal
- Under Condition 1, ∣CL∣ is minimal
- Prove there are at most k−1 frequent colors (Lemma 7.1)
- Further prove there are at most k−p1−1 frequent colors (Lemma 8.3)
- Where p1 is the number of singleton parts
Construct a case with k−p1 frequent colors, deriving a contradiction and completing the proof.
This paper is purely theoretical research, primarily verifying results through mathematical proof:
- Small-Scale Verification: For k≤7, directly verify that relevant graph classes are k-choosable
- Constructive Proof: Prove through explicit construction that certain graphs are indeed non-k-choosable
- Inductive Verification: Use mathematical induction to verify conditions in Lemma 2.1
- Lemma 3.2: If P is a 2+-part of G, then ⋂v∈PL(v)=∅
- Lemma 5.1: Upper bound on the number of singleton parts in pseudo-colorings
- Lemma 6.1: G has no nearly acceptable L-coloring
Theorem 1.2: Let G be a complete k-partite graph with ∣V(G)∣≤2k+2, and when k is even, G=K4,2∗(k−1),K3∗(k/2+1),1∗(k/2−1). If L is a k-list assignment of G, then G is L-colorable.
Corollary 1.3: If k is odd, then every k-chromatic graph with at most 2k+2 vertices is chromatic-choosable.
Corollary 1.4: The function β(k)=min{∣V(G)∣:χ(G)=k<ch(G)} satisfies:
2k + 2, & \text{if } k \text{ is even} \\
2k + 3, & \text{if } k \text{ is odd}
\end{cases}$$
### Technical Results
1. **Theorem 4.1**: Proves $G \notin \mathcal{G}_1 \cup \mathcal{G}_2$, where $\mathcal{G}_1, \mathcal{G}_2$ are specific graph families
2. **Lemma 7.1**: There are at most $k-1$ frequent colors
3. **Lemma 8.3**: There are at most $k-p_1-1$ frequent colors
### Constructive Results
- For even $k$, $K_{5,2*(k-1)}$ is not $k$-choosable
- This ensures the tightness of the lower bound for $\beta(k)$
## Related Work
### Historical Development
1. **Erdős-Rubin-Taylor & Vizing (1970s)**: Independently introduced the concept of list coloring
2. **Ohba (2002)**: Proposed the famous Ohba's conjecture
3. **Noel-Reed-Wu (2015)**: Finally proved Ohba's conjecture
4. **Noel (2013)**: Proposed the conjecture for the odd case
### Related Research Directions
1. **Special Graph Families**: List coloring properties of complete multipartite graphs
2. **Online Versions**: Online versions of Ohba's conjecture
3. **Bound Improvements**: Research beyond the bounds of Ohba's conjecture
### Technical Connections
The proof techniques in this paper are inspired by the proof of the Noel-Reed-Wu theorem, but must handle the additional complexity introduced by extra vertices.
## Conclusions and Discussion
### Main Conclusions
1. **Complete Resolution**: Completely resolves the chromatic-choosability problem for $k$-chromatic graphs with $2k+2$ vertices
2. **Noel's Conjecture**: Confirms Noel's conjecture for the odd chromatic number case
3. **Exact Bounds**: Provides exact formulas for the function $\beta(k)$
### Limitations
1. **Technical Complexity**: The proof techniques are quite complex, particularly in handling various special cases
2. **Generalization Difficulty**: The methods are difficult to directly generalize to larger graphs
3. **Computational Complexity**: No polynomial-time algorithm is provided for determining the list-colorability of general graphs
### Future Directions
1. **Larger Graphs**: Study the choice number of graphs with more than $2k+2$ vertices
2. **Algorithmic Problems**: Develop efficient algorithms for determining list-colorability of graphs
3. **Generalizations**: Extend results to other graph families
## In-Depth Evaluation
### Strengths
1. **Theoretical Completeness**: Completely resolves a fundamental extremal problem
2. **Technical Innovation**: Introduces new concepts and proof techniques
3. **Exact Results**: Provides exact bounds rather than asymptotic results
4. **Rigorous Logic**: The proof is logically clear with detailed steps
### Weaknesses
1. **Complex Proof**: The proof process is quite technical, involving numerous details
2. **Readability**: Understanding is challenging for non-specialists
3. **Limited Applications**: Results are primarily theoretical with limited practical applications
### Impact
1. **Theoretical Contribution**: Makes important contributions to extremal graph theory and list coloring theory
2. **Technical Impact**: New proof techniques may inspire solutions to related problems
3. **Completeness**: Resolves a long-standing open problem
### Applicable Scenarios
1. **Theoretical Research**: Theoretical research in graph theory and combinatorial optimization
2. **Teaching**: Serves as a classical example in extremal graph theory
3. **Further Research**: Provides foundation for research on related problems
## References
The paper cites 36 related references, primarily including:
- Proofs by Noel, Reed, and Wu on Ohba's conjecture
- Original work by Ohba and related conjectures
- Foundational literature on list coloring theory
- Specialized research on list coloring of complete multipartite graphs
---
This paper completely resolves an important extremal graph theory problem through ingenious proof techniques, making significant contributions to list coloring theory. Although the proof techniques are complex, the completeness and exactness of the results make it an important advance in the field.