K3 surfaces have been extensively studied from multiple perspectives, yet the positivity properties of their cotangent bundles remain insufficiently understood. This paper explores the surprisingly rich geometric structure of the projectivization of the cotangent bundle P(ΩS) of a general polarized K3 surface S of degree two. In particular, the authors describe the geometric properties of the surface DS⊂P(ΩS), which plays a role analogous to that of bitangent planes to smooth quartic surfaces in P3.
Core Problem: The positivity properties of the cotangent bundle ΩS of K3 surfaces are insufficiently understood. Although ΩS is known to be stable for every polarization, these stability results do not fully characterize the positivity properties of ΩS.
Problem Significance:
The cotangent bundle of K3 surfaces is never pseudoeffective, necessitating new methods to measure its "negativity"
The description of the pseudoeffective cone of the projectivized cotangent bundle P(ΩS) is crucial for understanding K3 surface geometry
This research helps establish connections between pseudoeffectivity and families of elliptic curves
Limitations of Existing Methods:
The embedding P(ΩS)⊂S[2] approach of Gounelas and Ottem can only determine that ζS+π∗2L is pseudoeffective, but cannot determine its extremality in Pseff(P(ΩS))
For degree two K3 surfaces, αS:=2L satisfies αS2=8, precisely corresponding to the critical case of the optimal bound
Research Motivation: To find an analogue of the theory of bitangent planes to smooth quartic surfaces in P3, establishing a corresponding geometric framework for degree two K3 surfaces.
Characterization of the Main Geometric Object: Construction and complete description of the surface DS⊂P(ΩS), which is dominated by canonical lifts of singular elliptic curves in ∣L∣, whose normalization is a smooth (non-minimal) elliptic surface.
Precise Numerical Equivalence: Proof that DS≡30ζS+54π∗L≡30(ζS+1.8π∗L).
Boundary Estimates of the Pseudoeffective Cone:
Proof of the existence of a prime divisor ZS⊂P(ΩS) such that ZS≡a(ζS+λπ∗L) with λ≤1.7952024
Establishment of the lower bound λ≥2239=1.772
Complete Description of Birational Geometry: Through analysis of birational morphisms, transfer of information from the more understandable P(f∗ΩP2) to the mysterious P(ΩS).
Study the geometric properties of the projectivized cotangent bundle P(ΩS) of a general polarized K3 surface (S,L) of degree two, where S is obtained via a double cover f:S→P2 with branch divisor a smooth degree 10 curve.
Base Change Technique: Utilization of the base change P(f∗ΩP2)⇢P(ΩS) via the exact sequence:
0→f∗ΩP2→ΩS→Ωf→0
Canonical Lifting: For an irreducible curve C⊂S, definition of the canonical lift CS⊂P(ΩS) as the image of the morphism C~→P(ΩS) corresponding to the line bundle QC.
Double Cover Analysis: Through analysis of the double cover f~Dˉ:Dˉ→T, where the branch locus BT≡4ζT+288lT.
Let (S,L) be a general polarized K3 surface of degree two, and DS⊂P(ΩS) be the surface dominated by canonical lifts of singular elliptic curves in ∣L∣. Then the normalization of DS is a smooth (non-minimal) elliptic surface, and:
DS≡30ζS+54π∗L≡30(ζS+1.8π∗L)
Geometric Characterization: Complete description of the key surface DS in the projectivized cotangent bundle of degree two K3 surfaces, which is analogous to bitangent planes to quartic surfaces but possesses more complex structure.
Numerical Bounds: Establishment of precise numerical bounds in the pseudoeffective cone, restricting possible extremal ray parameters to a small interval [1.772,1.7952024].
Elliptic Fibration: Revelation of the rich elliptic fibration structure of the normalization of DS, including 648 nodal fibers and 72 special points.
Generality Assumption: Results require K3 surfaces to be "general" to ensure Picard number equals one and the branch curve satisfies Plücker theorem conditions.
Computational Complexity: Although precise bounds are provided, determining the true extremal ray requires deeper analysis.
Generalization Questions: Whether the methods can be generalized to K3 surfaces of other degrees or other types of surfaces remains unclear.