Spectral flow construction of mirror pairs of CY orbifolds

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2208.11612
• Title: Spectral flow construction of mirror pairs of CY orbifolds
• Author: Sergej Parkhomenko (Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics)
• Classification: hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: August 2022 (arXiv:2208.11612v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11612

Abstract

This paper investigates Calabi-Yau (CY) orbifold spaces associated with products of N=(2,2) supersymmetric minimal models. Using spectral flow construction and its mirror counterpart, the author explicitly demonstrates that these CY orbifold spaces can be canonically combined into mirror pairs of isomorphic models, which are associated with mutually dual admissible group pairs in the Berglund-Hubsch-Krawitz sense.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

1. String theory compactification: Ten-dimensional superstring theory requires compactification to four-dimensional spacetime to obtain theories with spacetime supersymmetry, which is crucial for phenomenological studies
2. Construction of mirror symmetry: How to explicitly construct mirror symmetry for Calabi-Yau manifolds, particularly for Fermat-type CY orbifold spaces
3. Application of spectral flow method: How to utilize spectral flow techniques to explicitly construct the complete state space of orbifold models

Research Significance

• Theoretical unification: Superstring theory is a candidate theory for unifying the Standard Model and quantum gravity
• Mirror symmetry: This is an important property of CY manifolds, reflecting the conjectured isomorphism of σ-models for each pair of mirror CY manifolds
• Explicit construction: Provides an explicit method to understand mirror symmetry from the perspective of N=(2,2) superconformal field theory

Limitations of Existing Methods

• Gepner's early work was based on observations of partition functions but lacked explicit construction of state spaces
• Borisov's vertex algebra approach is more rigorous but more abstract for concrete calculations
• Lacks a systematic method to construct mirror pairs directly from the spectral flow perspective

Core Contributions

1. Mirror spectral flow construction: Proposes a novel mirror spectral flow construction method, starting from anti-chiral states rather than chiral states
2. Explicit isomorphism proof: Explicitly proves that CY orbifold models with admissible group G_adm are isomorphic to mirror orbifold models with dual group G*_adm
3. Chiral ring correspondence: Demonstrates that (c,c) rings of the original orbifold correspond to (a,c) rings of the mirror orbifold, and vice versa
4. Berglund-Hubsch-Krawitz duality: Establishes direct connection between spectral flow construction and BHK dual group theory

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Construct mirror pairs of N=(2,2) superconformal field theory models for Fermat-type Calabi-Yau orbifold spaces and prove their isomorphism.

Fundamental Theoretical Framework

N=(2,2) Minimal Models

Minimal superconformal models M_k are labeled by positive integers k, with central charge: $c = \frac{3k}{k+2}$

The commutation relations of the N=2 super-Virasoro algebra are: $[L_n, L_m] = (n-m)L_{n+m} + \frac{c}{12}(n^3-n)\delta_{n+m,0}$$[J_n, J_m] = \frac{c}{3}n\delta_{n+m,0}$$\{G^+_r, G^-_s\} = L_{r+s} + \frac{r-s}{2}J_{r+s} + \frac{c}{6}(r^2-\frac{1}{4})\delta_{r+s,0}$

Composite Models

Consider the tensor product of five N=(2,2) minimal models: $M_{\vec{k}} = \prod_{i=1}^5 M_{k_i}$ The total central charge is 9, corresponding to a CY threefold.

Admissible Groups

The admissible group is defined as: $G_{adm} = \{\vec{w} = \sum_{a=0}^{K-1} m_a\vec{\beta}_a, m_a \in \mathbb{Z}, \sum_i \frac{\beta_{ai}}{k_i+2} \in \mathbb{Z}\}$

Original Spectral Flow Construction

Spectral Flow Transformation

The spectral flow is given by a parametric family of automorphisms: $\tilde{G}^{\pm}_r = U^{-t}G^{\pm}_r U^t = G^{\pm}_{r \pm t}$$\tilde{J}_n = U^{-t}J_n U^t = J_n + \frac{c}{3}t\delta_{n,0}$$\tilde{L}_n = U^{-t}L_n U^t = L_n + tJ_n + \frac{c}{6}t^2\delta_{n,0}$

State Construction

The original spectral flow construction begins with chiral ground states: $V_{l,t} = (UG^-_{-1/2})^t \Phi^c_l, \quad 0 \leq t \leq l$$V_{l,t} = (UG^-_{-1/2})^{t-l-1}U(UG^-_{-1/2})^l \Phi^c_l, \quad l+1 \leq t \leq k+1$

Mirror Spectral Flow Construction

Core Innovation

The mirror spectral flow construction starts from anti-chiral ground states: $V_{l,t} = (U^{-1}G^+_{-1/2})^{l-t}\Phi^a_l, \quad 0 \leq t \leq l$$V_{l,t} = (U^{-1}G^+_{-1/2})^{k+1-t}U^{-1}(U^{-1}G^+_{-1/2})^l\Phi^a_l, \quad l+1 \leq t \leq k+1$

Involution Transformation

Through the involution transformation: $G^{\pm}(z) \rightarrow G^{\mp}(z), \quad J(z) \rightarrow -J(z), \quad U(z) \rightarrow U^{-1}(z)$

The mirror construction is transformed into standard form, but the twist vector becomes: $w^*_i = l_i - 2t_i - w_i$

Technical Innovations

1. Dual spectral flow method: Simultaneously employs forward and reverse spectral flows, revealing the intrinsic symmetry of orbifold models
2. Mutual locality conditions: Naturally leads to BHK duality conditions through mutual locality requirements
3. Explicit state mapping: Provides explicit correspondence between states in the original and mirror orbifolds

Main Results

Core Theorem

Proposition: For each N=(2,2) superconformal orbifold model M_{\vec{k}}/G_, the mirror spectral flow construction defines a new admissible group G and orbifold model M{\vec{k}}/G_, such that:

1. The group G* is the Berglund-Hubsch-Krawitz dual of G
2. The model M_{\vec{k}}/G* is isomorphic to M{\vec{k}}/G_
3. The (c,c) ring of M_{\vec{k}}/G* coincides with the (a,c) ring of M{\vec{k}}/G_

Proof Outline

Duality Proof

The mutual locality condition: $\sum_i \frac{w_i w^*_i}{k_i+2} \in \mathbb{Z}, \quad \vec{w} \in G_{adm}$

This is precisely the defining condition for BHK dual groups.

Chiral Ring Correspondence

The (c,c) field condition for the mirror model: $w^*_i = 0 \Leftrightarrow w_i = l_i$$w^*_i = l_i + 1 \Leftrightarrow w_i = k_i + 1$

These are exactly the (a,c) field conditions of the original model.

Physical Significance

New Understanding of Mirror Symmetry

This paper provides a new perspective on understanding mirror symmetry from the spectral flow viewpoint, demonstrating that mirror symmetry is not only a geometric property but is deeply rooted in the algebraic structure of conformal field theory.

Connection to Geometry

Although the spectral flow construction is based on specific points in moduli space (orbifold points), the results necessarily extend to all nearby points in moduli space, ensuring the completeness of geometric mirror symmetry.

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Gepner construction: First established the connection between CY compactification and N=(2,2) conformal field theory
2. Greene-Plesser: Constructed mirror pairs through additional Z_{k+2} orbifoldization
3. Borisov method: Used the rigorous mathematical framework of vertex algebras

Contribution of This Work

Compared to the Greene-Plesser method, the spectral flow construction in this paper is more direct and natural, avoiding intermediate orbifoldization steps, and can be generalized to non-Fermat-type polynomials.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully establishes explicit spectral flow construction of mirror pairs for CY orbifold spaces
2. Proves the equivalence between the spectral flow method and BHK duality
3. Provides explicit correspondence between chiral rings

Limitations

1. The construction is based on specific Fermat-type CY manifolds
2. The analysis is primarily conducted at orbifold points; while results can be extended, explicit treatment of the full moduli space is lacking
3. Only considers A-series minimal models

Future Directions

1. Generalization to more general types of CY manifolds
2. Extension to D and E series minimal models
3. Investigation of connections with topological string theory
4. Exploration of applications in phenomenological model construction

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical rigor: Provides rigorous algebraic proof of mirror symmetry
2. Methodological innovation: Mirror spectral flow construction is an important technical innovation
3. Explicit construction: Provides complete explicit description of state spaces
4. Unified framework: Unifies spectral flow methods with BHK theory

Weaknesses

1. Limited scope: Primarily restricted to Fermat-type CY orbifold spaces
2. Computational complexity: Calculations may become difficult for complex orbifold groups
3. Physical applications: Lacks discussion of phenomenological applications

Impact

This work provides new tools for understanding mirror symmetry in string theory, with important value for:

• Mirror symmetry research in mathematical physics
• Construction of string phenomenology models
• Study of algebraic structures in conformal field theory

Applicable Scenarios

1. Classification and study of CY orbifold spaces
2. Construction of string theory compactification models
3. Theoretical research on mirror symmetry
4. Applications of N=(2,2) superconformal field theory

References

The paper cites key works in the field, including:

• Candelas et al.'s pioneering work on CY compactification
• Gepner's minimal model theory
• Greene-Plesser's mirror construction
• Borisov's vertex algebra method
• Berglund-Hubsch-Krawitz's dual group theory

This paper makes important contributions at the intersection of theoretical physics and mathematical physics, providing new algebraic tools and geometric insights for understanding mirror symmetry in string theory.