2025-11-20T11:10:13.966694

K-stability for varieties with a big anticanonical class

Xu
We extend the algebraic K-stability theory to projective klt pairs with a big anticanonical class. While in general such a pair could behave pathologically, it is observed in this note that K-semistability condition will force them to have a klt anticanonical model, whose stability property is the same as the original pair.
academic

K-stability for varieties with a big anticanonical class

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2210.16631
  • Title: K-stability for varieties with a big anticanonical class
  • Author: Chenyang Xu (Princeton University)
  • Classification: math.AG (Algebraic Geometry), math.DG (Differential Geometry)
  • Published Journal: Épijournal de Géométrie Algébrique, Special volume in honour of C. Voisin, Article No. 7 (2023)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16631

Abstract

This paper extends the theory of algebraic K-stability to projective klt pairs with a big anticanonical class. Although such pairs may exhibit pathological behavior in general, the paper observes that the K-semistability condition forces them to possess a klt anticanonical model whose stability properties coincide with those of the original pair.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Success of K-stability theory: Significant progress has been made in the algebraic K-stability theory for log Fano pairs, which provides an algebraic approach to studying the existence of Kähler-Einstein metrics.
  2. Need for extension: Recent work DZ22 and DR22 has considered the Kähler-Einstein problem for Kähler manifolds (X,ω)(X,ω) where KX-K_X is big, particularly DZ22 proved a transcendental Yau-Tian-Donaldson theorem for twisted big Kähler-Einstein metrics.
  3. Pathological phenomena: For projective varieties XX with big anticanonical class KX-K_X, pathological examples may exist, such as the anticanonical ring R(X,KX)=mNH0(X,mKX)R(X,-K_X) = \bigoplus_{m \in \mathbb{N}} H^0(X,-mK_X) not necessarily being finitely generated.

Research Motivation

This paper aims to demonstrate that for projective klt pairs with a big anticanonical class, K-stability theory essentially reduces to the original (log) Fano case, meaning that K-stability conditions force these pairs to possess log Fano-type properties.

Core Contributions

  1. Established the connection between K-semistability and log Fano type: Proved that if (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is a klt projective pair with big KXΔ-K_X-\Delta and δ(X,Δ)1\delta(X,\Delta) \geq 1, then there exists an effective Q-divisor Γ\Gamma such that (X,Δ+Γ)(X,\Delta+\Gamma) is a log Fano pair.
  2. Proved finite generation: Under K-semistability conditions, the anticanonical ring R(X,r(KX+Δ))R(X,-r(K_X+\Delta)) is finitely generated.
  3. Established equivalence of stability: Proved that (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) and its anticanonical model (Z,ΔZ)(Z,\Delta_Z) possess the same K-stability properties.
  4. Unified stability concepts: Proved that for such pairs, uniform K-stability is equivalent to K-stability.

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

Study K-stability of projective klt pairs (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) with a big anticanonical class, where KXΔ-K_X-\Delta is big but not necessarily ample.

Core Technical Framework

Definition of S-invariant

For an nn-dimensional projective normal pair (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) such that KXΔ-K_X-\Delta is big, for any prime divisor EE appearing on a birational model μ:YX\mu: Y \to X, the S-invariant is defined as:

SX,Δ(E):=1vol(KXΔ)0vol(μ(KX+Δ)tE)dtS_{X,\Delta}(E) := \frac{1}{\text{vol}(-K_X-\Delta)} \int_0^{\infty} \text{vol}(-\mu^*(K_X+\Delta)-tE) dt

δ-invariant

If (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is klt, define: δ(X,Δ):=infEAX,Δ(E)SX,Δ(E)\delta(X,\Delta) := \inf_E \frac{A_{X,\Delta}(E)}{S_{X,\Delta}(E)}

where EE ranges over all valuations on (X,Δ)(X,\Delta), and AX,Δ(E)A_{X,\Delta}(E) is the log discrepancy.

Key parameter a(X,Δ)a(X,\Delta)

Define the constant a(X,Δ)a(X,\Delta) as: a(X,Δ)=sup{tR: ample divisor A such that At(KX+Δ) is ample and KXΔA is pseudoeffective}a(X,\Delta) = \sup\{t \in \mathbb{R} : \exists \text{ ample divisor } A \text{ such that } A-t(K_X+\Delta) \text{ is ample and } -K_X-\Delta-A \text{ is pseudoeffective}\}

Proof Strategy for Main Theorems

Proof Strategy for Theorem 1.1

  1. Direct case: When δ(X,Δ)>1\delta(X,\Delta) > 1, directly apply Lemma 3.1 via the log canonical threshold of the base divisor.
  2. Perturbation argument: When δ(X,Δ)1\delta(X,\Delta) \leq 1 but condition (3.2) is satisfied, use an ample divisor AA for perturbation and construct appropriate Q-complements to obtain log Fano properties.

Core of Theorem 1.2's Proof

Using a common resolution YY, establish the relationship: π(KZ+ΔZ)μ(KX+Δ)=B0\pi^*(K_Z+\Delta_Z) - \mu^*(K_X+\Delta) = B \geq 0

Prove that for any prime divisor EE:

  • AX,Δ(E)=AZ,ΔZ(E)+ordE(B)A_{X,\Delta}(E) = A_{Z,\Delta_Z}(E) + \text{ord}_E(B)
  • SX,Δ(E)=SZ,ΔZ(E)+ordE(B)S_{X,\Delta}(E) = S_{Z,\Delta_Z}(E) + \text{ord}_E(B)

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This is primarily theoretical work, with results verified through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Construction of Counterexamples

Example 3.8: Constructs a concrete counterexample illustrating pathological phenomena:

  • Let SS be the blowup of P2\mathbb{P}^2 at nine very general points
  • KS-K_S is nef but not semiample
  • Construct X=PS(E)X = \mathbb{P}_S(\mathcal{E}), where E:=OS+OS(H)\mathcal{E} := \mathcal{O}_S + \mathcal{O}_S(H)
  • Prove that KX-K_X is big but the corresponding algebra is not finitely generated
  • Direct computation verifies δ(X)<35<1\delta(X) < \frac{3}{5} < 1

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 3.4 (Finite Generation)

Let (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) satisfy Assumption 3.3, namely: δ(X,Δ)>n+1n+1+a0\delta(X,\Delta) > \frac{n+1}{n+1+a_0} where a0=a(X,Δ)a_0 = a(X,\Delta). Then (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is of log Fano type, and in particular, any Cartier divisor EE satisfies that R(X,E):=mNH0(X,mE)R(X,E) := \bigoplus_{m \in \mathbb{N}} H^0(X,mE) is finitely generated.

Corollary 3.5 (Properties of Anticanonical Model)

Under the conditions of Theorem 3.4, the anticanonical model (Z,ΔZ)(Z,\Delta_Z) is a log Fano pair.

Stability Equivalence Results

Theorem 1.2: (X,Δ)(X,\Delta) is K-semistable (resp. K-stable, uniformly K-stable) if and only if (Z,ΔZ)(Z,\Delta_Z) is K-semistable (resp. K-stable, uniformly K-stable).

Technical Results

Lemma 2.6: If AA is an effective ample Q-divisor on XX such that KXΔA-K_X-\Delta-A is pseudoeffective, then SX,Δ(A)1n+1S_{X,\Delta}(A) \geq \frac{1}{n+1}.

Development of K-stability Theory

  1. Classical theory: The Fujita-Li criterion Fuj19, Li17, BX19 established the equivalence between K-stability defined using valuations and the original definition via test configurations.
  2. Big anticanonical class case: DZ22 formulated the current definition for the case of big anticanonical class.
  3. Ding stability: DR22 developed the concept of Ding stability for projective klt pairs with big KXΔ-K_X-\Delta.

Birational Geometry Techniques

Utilizes finite generation results from BCH+10 and standard techniques from the minimal model program.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. K-semistability conditions force klt pairs with big anticanonical class to possess log Fano-type properties
  2. The K-stability problem for such pairs reduces to the corresponding problem for their anticanonical models
  3. For such pairs, uniform K-stability is equivalent to K-stability

Theoretical Significance

The results in this paper demonstrate that, despite the potential pathological behavior of pairs with big anticanonical class, K-stability conditions provide sufficient constraints to ensure good geometric properties.

Application Prospects

These results provide a theoretical foundation for applying existing birational geometry techniques to study K-stability problems in more general settings.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical depth: Successfully extends K-stability theory to more general geometric settings
  2. Technical innovation: Cleverly reduces pathological cases to the classical log Fano case
  3. Completeness: Provides a complete theoretical framework, including finite generation and stability equivalence
  4. Rigor: Mathematical arguments are rigorous and logically clear

Technical Contributions

  1. Introduction of parameter a(X,Δ)a(X,\Delta): Provides an effective tool for quantifying the degree of "bigness"
  2. Perturbation techniques: The perturbation arguments used in the proofs have general value
  3. Unified framework: Unifies different stability concepts within a single framework

Limitations

  1. Restrictive conditions: Main results require relatively strong hypotheses
  2. Concrete computations: Verification of conditions may be difficult for specific examples
  3. Scope of applications: Primarily theoretical results; practical applications require further development

Impact

This paper makes important contributions to the development of K-stability theory, particularly by providing theoretical foundations for handling more general geometric objects. It is expected to have sustained impact on the fields of algebraic geometry and complex geometry.

References

  • BJ20 H. Blum and M. Jonsson, Thresholds, valuations, and K-stability
  • DZ22 T. Darvas and K. Zhang, Twisted Kähler-Einstein metrics in big classes
  • DR22 R. Dervan and R. Reboulet, Ding stability and Kähler-Einstein metrics on manifolds with big anticanonical class
  • LXZ22 Y. Liu, C. Xu, and Z. Zhuang, Finite generation for valuations computing stability thresholds and applications to K-stability