2025-11-21T00:25:22.424479

Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties with cohomology rings generated in degree two

Masuda, Sato
A regular semisimple Hessenberg variety $\mathrm{Hess}(S,h)$ is a smooth subvariety of the flag variety determined by a square matrix $S$ with distinct eigenvalues and a Hessenberg function $h$. The cohomology ring $H^*(\mathrm{Hess}(S,h))$ is independent of the choice of $S$ and is not explicitly described except for a few cases. In this paper, we characterize the Hessenberg function $h$ such that $H^*(\mathrm{Hess}(S,h))$ is generated in degree two as a ring. It turns out that such $h$ is what is called a (double) lollipop.
academic

Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties with cohomology rings generated in degree two

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2301.03762
  • Title: Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties with cohomology rings generated in degree two
  • Authors: Mikiya Masuda, Takashi Sato
  • Classification: math.AG (Algebraic Geometry), math.AT (Algebraic Topology), math.SG (Symplectic Geometry)
  • Publication Date: November 11, 2025 (arXiv v4)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.03762

Abstract

Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties Hess(S,h)\mathrm{Hess}(S,h) are smooth subvarieties of flag varieties, determined by a square matrix SS with distinct eigenvalues and a Hessenberg function hh. The cohomology ring H(Hess(S,h))H^*(\mathrm{Hess}(S,h)) is independent of the choice of SS, but has not been explicitly described except in rare cases. This paper characterizes the Hessenberg functions hh for which H(Hess(S,h))H^*(\mathrm{Hess}(S,h)) as a ring is generated in degree two, showing that such hh are precisely the so-called (double) lollipop-type functions.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Research Problem

This paper investigates the cohomology ring structure of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties, particularly characterizing which Hessenberg functions hh make the cohomology ring H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) generated in degree two (i.e., all generators come from degree two cohomology).

2. Problem Significance

  • Deep connections with combinatorics: Hessenberg varieties are related to the symmetric group SnS_n through Tymoczko's point action. The Shareshian-Wachs conjecture, resolved by Brosnan-Chow and Guay-Paquet, connects H(Hess(S,h))H^*(\mathrm{Hess}(S,h)) as an SnS_n-module to chromatic symmetric functions of graphs.
  • Stanley-Stembridge conjecture: Studying the geometry and topology of Hessenberg varieties has opened avenues for proving the famous Stanley-Stembridge conjecture in graph theory.
  • Foundational nature of ring structure: Understanding when the cohomology ring is generated in degree two is fundamental to studying its more complex algebraic structures.

3. Limitations of Existing Methods

  • For general Hessenberg functions hh, the ring structure of H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) remains explicitly undescribed.
  • Known results are limited to special cases:
    • h=(n,...,n)h = (n,...,n) corresponds to the flag variety Fl(n)\mathrm{Fl}(n)
    • h=(2,3,...,n,n)h = (2,3,...,n,n) corresponds to the permutohedron variety (a toric variety)
    • h=(h(1),n,...,n)h = (h(1),n,...,n): results in 2 show the ring is generated in degree two only when h(1)=2h(1)=2 or nn

4. Research Motivation

Based on patterns in known special cases, a natural question arises: for general Hessenberg functions hh, when is H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) generated in degree two? This paper provides a complete answer by synthesizing Morse-Bott theory, GKM theory, and fibration techniques.

Core Contributions

  1. Complete Characterization Theorem (Main Theorem 1.1): For connected regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties (i.e., h(j)j+1h(j) \geq j+1 for all j[n1]j \in [n-1]), H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) is generated in degree two if and only if hh has the following "double lollipop" form:a+1 & (1 \leq j \leq a) \\ j+1 & (a < j < b) \\ n & (b \leq j \leq n) \end{cases}$$ where $1 \leq a < b \leq n$
  2. Geometric proof of sufficiency: When hh is double lollipop-type, X(h)X(h) is a fibration over a compact smooth toric variety with fibers being products of flag varieties, hence the cohomology ring is generated in degree two.
  3. Topological proof of necessity: Using Morse-Bott functions and surjectivity of restriction maps, inductive arguments eliminate all non-double-lollipop cases.
  4. Technical contributions:
    • Explicit generators of H2(X(h))H^2(X(h)) via GKM theory
    • Fine calculations of Hilbert series proving non-generation in degree two for certain cases
    • Establishment of fibration relationships between Hessenberg varieties

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

Input: Hessenberg function h:[n][n]h: [n] \to [n], monotone non-decreasing with h(j)jh(j) \geq j

Output: Determine whether H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) as a ring is generated in degree two

Constraints: Assume h(j)j+1h(j) \geq j+1 for all j[n1]j \in [n-1] (ensuring X(h)X(h) is connected)

Theoretical Framework

1. GKM Theory and Equivariant Cohomology

Regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties X(h)X(h) are GKM manifolds with algebraic torus T=(C)nT = (\mathbb{C}^*)^n acting on them. The fixed point set is: X(h)T=Fl(n)TSnX(h)^T = \mathrm{Fl}(n)^T \cong S_n

Equivariant cohomology HT(X(h))H^*_T(X(h)) embeds via localization: HT(X(h))wSnZ[t1,...,tn]H^*_T(X(h)) \hookrightarrow \bigoplus_{w \in S_n} \mathbb{Z}[t_1,...,t_n]

The image is characterized by graph cohomology conditions: {fMap(Sn,Z[t1,...,tn])f(w)f(w(i,j))(tw(i)tw(j)),wSn,j<ih(j)}\{f \in \mathrm{Map}(S_n, \mathbb{Z}[t_1,...,t_n]) \mid f(w) - f(w(i,j)) \in (t_{w(i)} - t_{w(j)}), \forall w \in S_n, j < i \leq h(j)\}

2. Explicit Generators of Degree Two Cohomology

According to Ayzenberg-Masuda-Sato 4, H2(X(h))H^2(X(h)) is generated by:

  • xkx_k (k[n]k \in [n]): xk(w)=tw(k)x_k(w) = t_{w(k)}, corresponding to first Chern classes of tautological line bundles
  • yj,ky_{j,k} (j(h),k[n]j \in \bot(h), k \in [n]): yj,k(w)={tktw(j+1)k{w(1),...,w(j)}0otherwisey_{j,k}(w) = \begin{cases} t_k - t_{w(j+1)} & k \in \{w(1),...,w(j)\} \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} where (h)={j[n1]h(j1)=h(j)=j+1}\bot(h) = \{j \in [n-1] \mid h(j-1) = h(j) = j+1\}
  • τA\tau_A (AL(h)|A| \in L(h)): τA(w)={tw(A)tw(A+1){w(1),...,w(A)}=A0otherwise\tau_A(w) = \begin{cases} t_{w(|A|)} - t_{w(|A|+1)} & \{w(1),...,w(|A|)\} = A \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} where L(h)={j[n1]h(j1)=j,h(j)=j+1}L(h) = \{j \in [n-1] \mid h(j-1) = j, h(j) = j+1\}

Necessity Proof Strategy (Section 3)

Key Lemma 3.1 (Morse-Bott Function)

Construct the moment map fh:X(h)Rf_h: X(h) \to \mathbb{R} whose critical point sets are X(h1)X(h_1) and X(hn)X(h_n), where hjh_j is the Hessenberg function obtained by deleting row and column jj from hh's configuration.

Using Morse-Bott theory (Tolman-Weitsman 19), prove that the restriction maps: H(X(h);Q)H(X(h1);Q),H(X(h);Q)H(X(hn);Q)H^*(X(h);\mathbb{Q}) \to H^*(X(h_1);\mathbb{Q}), \quad H^*(X(h);\mathbb{Q}) \to H^*(X(h_n);\mathbb{Q}) are both surjective.

Corollary 3.2: If hh' is a minor of hh (obtained by repeatedly taking h1h_1 or hnh_n) and H(X(h);Q)H^*(X(h);\mathbb{Q}) is generated in degree two, then H(X(h);Q)H^*(X(h');\mathbb{Q}) is also generated in degree two.

Proposition 3.3 (Combinatorial Characterization)

hh is double lollipop-type if and only if hh contains no minors of the following types:

  • (α,β,...,β)(\alpha, \beta,...,\beta) or (β1,...,β1,β,...,β)(\beta-1,...,\beta-1, \beta,...,\beta) (α\alpha times), where 3α<β3 \leq \alpha < \beta
  • (2,γ1,...,γ1,γ,γ)(2, \gamma-1,...,\gamma-1, \gamma, \gamma), where γ5\gamma \geq 5

The first two cases were already excluded in 2; the key is handling the third case.

Proof of Proposition 3.4 (Technical Core)

For h=(2,n1,...,n1,n,n)h = (2, n-1,...,n-1, n, n) (n5n \geq 5), prove that H(X(h);Q)H^*(X(h);\mathbb{Q}) is not generated in degree two through:

Step 1: Use Theorem 2.1(4) to compute the recursion formula for Poincaré polynomials (Lemma 3.7): Pn(q)=(1+q)2[n2]q!+(n2)(q+q2)[n3]q[n3]q!+P_n(q) = (1+q)^2[n-2]_q! + (n-2)(q+q^2)[n-3]_q[n-3]_q! + \cdots

Step 2: Prove that the coefficient of Pn(q)P_n(q) at degree n3n-3 is (Lemma 3.8): (n2)+n(n3)/2\binom{n}{2} + n(n-3)/2

Step 3: Calculate the upper bound for the Hilbert series of the subring R(h)R(h) generated by H2(X(h))H^2(X(h)):

  • Introduce auxiliary elements ρk\rho_k, rewrite generators as xk,τk,ρkx_k, \tau_k, \rho_k
  • Decompose R(h)R(h) as direct sum A(h)B(h)C(h)D(h)A(h) \oplus B(h) \oplus C(h) \oplus D(h) (as A(h)A(h)-modules)
  • Compute Hilbert series bounds for each part separately (formulas 3.23-3.27)

Step 4: Prove that the coefficient of Hilb(R(h),q)\mathrm{Hilb}(R(h), \sqrt{q}) at degree n3n-3 is: (n2)\binom{n}{2} strictly less than the corresponding coefficient of Pn(q)P_n(q), a contradiction!

Sufficiency Proof Strategy (Section 4)

Fibration Construction

For double lollipop-type hh, define the map: π[a,b]:Fl(n)Fl[a,b](n)\pi_{[a,b]}: \mathrm{Fl}(n) \to \mathrm{Fl}_{[a,b]}(n)π[a,b](V1Vn)=(VaVa+1Vb)\pi_{[a,b]}(V_1 \subset \cdots \subset V_n) = (V_a \subset V_{a+1} \subset \cdots \subset V_b)

Key observation: VX(h)V_\bullet \in X(h) if and only if π[a,b](V)\pi_{[a,b]}(V_\bullet) satisfies SVkVk+1SV_k \subset V_{k+1} (akb1a \leq k \leq b-1)

Define: Y[a,b]={(VaVb)SVkVk+1,akb1}Y_{[a,b]} = \{(V_a \subset \cdots \subset V_b) \mid SV_k \subset V_{k+1}, a \leq k \leq b-1\}

Then π[a,b]\pi_{[a,b]} restricted to X(h)X(h) gives a fibration: Fl(a)×Fl(nb)X(h)π[a,b]Y[a,b]\mathrm{Fl}(a) \times \mathrm{Fl}(n-b) \to X(h) \xrightarrow{\pi_{[a,b]}} Y_{[a,b]}

Lemma 4.1 (Toric Variety Structure)

Prove that Y[a,b]Y_{[a,b]} is a compact smooth toric variety of dimension n1n-1:

  • Construct (C)n(\mathbb{C}^*)^n-orbits by choosing special vectors g=(g1,...,gn)(C)ng = (g_1,...,g_n) \in (\mathbb{C}^*)^n
  • Use Vandermonde determinants to prove the orbit has dimension n1n-1

Conclusion: Since both the base space Y[a,b]Y_{[a,b]} (toric variety) and fiber Fl(a)×Fl(nb)\mathrm{Fl}(a) \times \mathrm{Fl}(n-b) (product of flag varieties) have cohomology rings generated in degree two, the Serre spectral sequence of the fibration implies H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) is also generated in degree two.

Experimental Setup

This is a pure mathematics theoretical paper with no numerical experiments. All results are derived through rigorous mathematical proofs.

Computational Verification

  • Explicit Poincaré polynomial calculations for small values of nn (such as n=3,4,5n=3,4,5)
  • Concrete computations of degree two cohomology generators via GKM theory (Examples 2.1, 2.2)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 1.1 (Main Theorem): Assume h(j)j+1h(j) \geq j+1 for all j[n1]j \in [n-1]. Then H(X(h))H^*(X(h)) is generated in degree two if and only if there exist 1a<bn1 \leq a < b \leq n such that:

a+1 & (1 \leq j \leq a) \\ j+1 & (a < j < b) \\ n & (b \leq j \leq n) \end{cases}$$ **Special Cases**: - $(a,b) = (n-1, n)$: $X(h) = \mathrm{Fl}(n)$ (flag variety) - $(a,b) = (1, n)$: $X(h)$ is the permutohedron variety (toric variety) ### Concrete Example Analysis **Example 2.2**: For $h = (4,4,4,5,6,7,11,11,11,11)$ ($n=11$, $(a,b)=(3,7)$): - $\bot(h) = \{3, 10\}$, $L(h) = \{4,5,6\}$ - $H^2(X(h))$ is generated by: - $x_k$ ($k \in [11]$) - $y_{3,k}$ ($k \in [11]$) (or equivalently $y^*_{8,k}$) - $\tau_A$ ($|A| = 4, 5, 6$) ### Theoretical Findings 1. **Geometric meaning of double lollipop structure**: The configuration graph exhibits a "thick at both ends, thin in the middle" shape, corresponding to a fibration structure of two flag variety fibers over a toric variety base. 2. **Explicit description of invariant subrings**: Prove (formula 2.9): $$H^*(X(h))^{S_n} \otimes \mathbb{Q} = \mathbb{Q}[x_1,...,x_n]/(f_{h(1),1},...,f_{h(n),n})$$ where $f_{h(j),j}$ are specific symmetric polynomials. 3. **Hilbert series formula**: The Hilbert series of the invariant subring is: $$\mathrm{Hilb}(H^*(X(h))^{S_n}, \sqrt{q}) = \prod_{j=1}^{n-1} [h(j)-j]_q$$ ## Related Work ### Main Research Directions 1. **Classification of Hessenberg varieties**: - Springer fibers ($A$ nilpotent, $h = (1,2,...,n)$) - Peterson varieties ($A$ regular nilpotent, $h = (2,3,...,n,n)$) - Permutohedron varieties ($A$ regular semisimple, $h = (2,3,...,n,n)$) 2. **Cohomology structure research**: - Tymoczko [20]: Defined the point action of $S_n$ on $H^*(X(h))$ - Brosnan-Chow [5], Guay-Paquet [10]: Resolved the Shareshian-Wachs conjecture - Chow [7], Cho-Hong-Lee [6]: Described the $S_n$-module structure of $H^2(X(h))$ - Ayzenberg-Masuda-Sato [4]: Provided additive generators of $H^2(X(h))$ 3. **Special cases of ring structure**: - Abe-Harada-Horiguchi-Masuda [1]: Regular nilpotent Hessenberg varieties - Abe-Horiguchi-Masuda [2]: The case $h = (h(1), n,...,n)$ ### Innovations of This Paper - **Complete characterization**: First to provide necessary and sufficient conditions for generation in degree two - **Synthetic methodology**: Combines tools from algebraic topology, algebraic geometry, and combinatorics - **Unification of combinatorics and geometry**: Connects combinatorial conditions (double lollipop) with geometric structures (fibrations) ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. The cohomology ring of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties is generated in degree two if and only if the Hessenberg function is double lollipop-type 2. This algebraic property has a clear geometric interpretation: $X(h)$ can be expressed as a fibration over a toric variety 3. The necessary and sufficient conditions can be characterized through combinatorial properties of minors ### Limitations 1. **Coefficient ring restriction**: The necessity proof requires rational coefficients ($\mathbb{Q}$), while sufficiency holds for integral coefficients 2. **Connectivity assumption**: The theorem requires $h(j) \geq j+1$; disconnected cases need separate treatment (but decompose as products of connected components) 3. **Explicit ring presentation**: While we know generation in degree two, the complete set of relations remains undescribed ### Future Directions 1. **Explicit presentation**: The authors will provide complete presentations of cohomology rings for double lollipop-type $h$ in [17] 2. **Generalizations**: Study analogous problems for other types of Hessenberg varieties (e.g., regular nilpotent cases) 3. **Applications**: Use results to study the Stanley-Stembridge conjecture and chromatic symmetric functions ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Important and natural problem**: Generation in degree two is a fundamental property in algebraic topology; complete characterization of Hessenberg varieties with this property is natural and significant. 2. **Clever methodology**: - The use of Morse-Bott functions in the necessity proof is elegant, cleverly reducing problem complexity through induction on minors - Identifying the fibration structure in the sufficiency proof demonstrates profound geometric insight - Fine Hilbert series calculations (Lemmas 3.7-3.8) are technically sophisticated 3. **Complete results**: Provides both necessary and sufficient conditions with complete theoretical coverage 4. **Clear exposition**: - Configuration diagrams intuitively display Hessenberg functions - Detailed examples aid understanding - Logical structure is clear ### Weaknesses 1. **High technical barrier**: Requires background in GKM theory, Morse theory, equivariant cohomology, and other fields; difficult for general readers to fully understand 2. **Complex calculations**: Section 3.2 on $h = (2, n-1,...,n-1, n, n)$ involves extensive computations; while rigorous, somewhat lengthy 3. **Insufficient geometric intuition**: Although fibration proofs are provided, deeper geometric intuition for why precisely double lollipop-type functions suffice could be developed further 4. **Generalizability**: Unclear whether methods extend to other Hessenberg variety types (e.g., nilpotent cases) ### Impact 1. **Theoretical contribution**: - Completely resolves a natural and important problem - Methods (Morse theory + GKM theory + fibrations) may inspire research on related problems - Establishes foundation for subsequent research on explicit ring structures 2. **Practical value**: - Provides combinatorial criteria for determining cohomology ring complexity - Connects combinatorics (double lollipop), algebraic topology (cohomology rings), and algebraic geometry (fibrations) 3. **Reproducibility**: - Proofs are completely rigorous and verifiable - Small example calculations can be independently verified - Theoretical results are precise and unambiguous ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Direct applications**: - Study cohomology ring structures of Hessenberg varieties - Compute topological invariants of specific Hessenberg varieties - Study connections to chromatic symmetric functions 2. **Methodological borrowing**: - Study cohomology rings of other GKM manifolds - Apply Morse theory to study topology of algebraic varieties - Use fibration decomposition to study complex varieties 3. **Theoretical extensions**: - Generalize to other Lie types - Study broader classes of Hessenberg varieties - Connect to other problems in representation theory and combinatorics ## Key References [2] H. Abe, T. Horiguchi, and M. Masuda, The cohomology rings of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties for h = (h(1), n, ..., n), J. Comb. 10.1 (2019) [4] A. Ayzenberg, M. Masuda, and T. Sato, The second cohomology of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties from GKM theory, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 2022 [5] P. Brosnan and T. Chow, Unit interval orders and the dot action on the cohomology of regular semisimple Hessenberg varieties, Adv. Math. 329 (2018) [20] J. Tymoczko, Permutation actions on equivariant cohomology of flag varieties, Contemp. Math., 460, 2008 --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality pure mathematics paper that completely resolves a natural and important problem. The methodology synthesizes tools from algebraic topology, algebraic geometry, and combinatorics with rigorous and complete proofs. The results not only provide explicit necessary and sufficient conditions but also reveal profound geometric structures (fibrations). The paper makes substantial contributions to Hessenberg variety theory and establishes foundations for subsequent research.