2025-11-21T18:16:15.986180

A hyperdeterminant on Fermionic Fock Space

Holweck, Oeding
Twenty years ago Cayley's hyperdeterminant, the degree four invariant of the polynomial ring $\mathbb{C}[\mathbb{C}^2\otimes\mathbb{C}^2\otimes \mathbb{C}^2]^{{\text{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})}^{\times 3}}$, was popularized in modern physics as separates genuine entanglement classes in the three qubit Hilbert space and is connected to entropy formulas for special solutions of black holes. In this note we compute the analogous invariant on the fermionic Fock space for $N=8$, i.e. spin particles with four different locations, and show how this invariant projects to other well-known invariants in quantum information. We also give combinatorial interpretations of these formulas.
academic

A Hyperdeterminant on Fermionic Fock Space

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2301.10660
  • Title: A Hyperdeterminant on Fermionic Fock Space
  • Authors: Frédéric Holweck, Luke Oeding
  • Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics), math.AG (Algebraic Geometry), math.RT (Representation Theory)
  • Publication Date: January 25, 2023
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.10660

Abstract

This paper computes an analogue of the Cayley hyperdeterminant invariant on fermionic Fock space, with particular focus on the N=8 case (corresponding to spin particles at four distinct locations). The authors demonstrate how this invariant projects onto other known invariants in quantum information theory and provide combinatorial interpretations of these formulas. This work generalizes the Cayley hyperdeterminant from the three-qubit Hilbert space to fermionic Fock space, providing new algebraic-geometric tools for studying fermionic entanglement classification.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Core Problem: Computing hyperdeterminant invariants on fermionic Fock space, which represents a natural generalization of the Cayley hyperdeterminant to fermionic systems.
  2. Significance:
    • The Cayley hyperdeterminant is used in quantum information theory to distinguish genuine entanglement classes of three-qubit systems
    • This invariant is related to black hole entropy formulas and plays an important role in the black hole/qubit correspondence
    • Entanglement classification for fermionic systems is an important problem in quantum information theory
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Traditional Cayley hyperdeterminants apply only to three-qubit systems
    • Lack of systematic invariant theory on fermionic Fock space
    • Algebraic-geometric description of fermionic entanglement remains incomplete
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Unify entanglement classification theory for many-body quantum systems
    • Establish connections between fermionic, bosonic, and multi-qubit systems
    • Provide geometric and algebraic tools for fermionic entanglement

Core Contributions

  1. Computed the Hyperdeterminant on F₈⁺ under Spin(16,ℂ) Action: This is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 240, serving as the analogue of the Cayley hyperdeterminant on fermionic Fock space.
  2. Established Projection Relationships: Demonstrated how the fermionic hyperdeterminant projects to:
    • The degree 63 invariant of 4-fermion 8-single-particle-state systems
    • The four-qubit hyperdeterminant
    • The 4-boson qubit discriminant
  3. Provided Combinatorial Interpretations: Used planes in finite geometric cubic spaces to give combinatorial representations of the polynomials.
  4. Constructed Theoretical Framework: Implemented the computational method based on the Z₂-graded realization of the exceptional Lie algebra e₈.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Compute the dual variety equations for Spin(16,ℂ) orbits on fermionic Fock space F₈⁺ = ∧•V (where V = ℂ⁸ = ℂ⁴ ⊗ ℂ²), namely the fermionic hyperdeterminant HDetSpin(16,ℂ).

Theoretical Framework

1. Spin Group Action on Fermionic Fock Space

  • Fock Space Construction: F = ∧*H, where H = ℂᴺ is the N-single-particle-state Hilbert space
  • Clifford Algebra: V = H ⊕ H* equipped with quadratic form g, generating Clifford algebra C(V,Q)
  • Spin Representation: The action of Spin(2N,ℂ) on F±ₙ preserves the parity of particle number

2. Z₂-Grading of e₈ Lie Algebra

The key theoretical tool is the decomposition of the exceptional Lie algebra e₈:

e₈ = so(16,ℂ) ⊕ F₈⁺

This grading allows application of E₈ adjoint orbit theory to Spin(16,ℂ) orbits.

3. Cartan Subalgebra Method

Select a Cartan subalgebra h ⊂ e₈, whose projection into F₈⁺ is an 8-dimensional space spanned by basis elements |E₁⟩,...,|E₈⟩:

|E₁⟩ = (p₁p₂p₃p₄ + p₅p₆p₇p₈)|0⟩ |E₂⟩ = (p₁p₂p₅p₆ + p₃p₄p₇p₈)|0⟩ ...

Technical Innovations

  1. Projection Technique: Utilizing the method established by the authors in 13, restricting the E₈ discriminant to the submodule F₈⁺.
  2. Root System Computation: Computing the hyperdeterminant through the product of 240 roots of E₈:
    ΔE₈|c = ∏α∈R α
    
  3. Variable Transformation: Establishing linear relationships between xᵢ and yⱼ, implementing transformation from standard Cartan to fermionic Cartan.

Experimental Setup

Computational Tools

  • Macaulay2: For symbolic computation and polynomial operations
  • Root System Theory: Based on the root system structure of the E₈ Lie algebra

Verification Methods

  1. Degree Verification: Confirming the resulting polynomial has degree 240
  2. Projection Consistency: Verifying projection relationships to subspaces
  3. Combinatorial Structure: Checking correspondence with geometric objects

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Explicit Expression of Fermionic Hyperdeterminant

HDetSpin(16,ℂ)(Ψ) = (∏yᵢ · ∏planes(yᵢ₁ ± yᵢ₂ ± yᵢ₃ ± yᵢ₄))²

This is a homogeneous polynomial of degree 240, containing the square of 120 linear factors.

2. Projection to ∧⁴ℂ⁸

HDetSpin(16,ℂ)|∧⁴ℂ⁸(Ψ) = Q²T⁴

Where:

  • Q is a degree 63 polynomial, corresponding to the restriction of the E₇ discriminant to ∧⁴ℂ⁸
  • T is a degree 28 polynomial, another SL₈(ℂ) invariant

3. Further Projection to Four-Qubit

Eliminating additional variables yields the 2×2×2×2 hyperdeterminant:

Δ(y₁,y₂,y₃,y₄) = ∏(yᵢ±yⱼ)²

Combinatorial Interpretations

1. (ℤ₂)³ Cubic Structure

  • 8 Vertices: Corresponding to variables y₁,...,y₈
  • 28 Lines: Generating quadratic terms
  • 14 Planes: Generating quartic terms

2. Fano Plane Projection

Eliminating y₈ yields the structure of the projective plane PG(2,2) (Fano plane):

  • 7 Points: y₁,...,y₇
  • 7 Lines: Collinearity relations
  • Plane Structure: Affine plane correspondence

3. Affine Plane

Further reduction yields an affine plane of four points, corresponding to the four-qubit system.

Historical Development

  1. Cayley (1845): First introduced the concept of hyperdeterminant
  2. Miyake (2003): Applied Cayley hyperdeterminant to three-qubit entanglement classification
  3. Duff (2007): Established connection with black hole entropy
  4. Holweck-Oeding (2022): Developed general theory of projection from E₈ discriminant
  1. Many-Body Entanglement Classification: Using invariant theory to classify quantum states
  2. Algebraic-Geometric Methods: Applying geometric tools to quantum information
  3. Black Hole/Qubit Correspondence: Deep connections between gravity and quantum information

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Successful Computation: First complete expression of hyperdeterminant on fermionic Fock space
  2. Unified Framework: Established unified description of fermionic, bosonic, and qubit systems
  3. Geometric Insights: Provided rich combinatorial and geometric interpretations

Limitations

  1. Computational Complexity: The explicit expression of degree 240 polynomial is extremely complex
  2. Fundamental Invariant Representation: Method for expressing hyperdeterminant using fundamental invariants remains elusive
  3. Physical Interpretation: Further research needed on physical meaning and applications

Future Directions

  1. Generalization to Other Cases: Consider fermionic systems with different N values
  2. Numerical Computation: Develop efficient numerical evaluation methods
  3. Physical Applications: Explore applications in condensed matter physics and quantum computing
  4. Fundamental Invariant Decomposition: Seek representation using 8 fundamental invariants

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Rigor: Based on solid Lie algebra and algebraic geometry theory
  2. Computational Innovation: Cleverly utilizes E₈ grading to avoid direct computation difficulties
  3. Geometric Beauty: Provides rich combinatorial-geometric interpretations
  4. Unified Perspective: Connects seemingly unrelated mathematical objects

Weaknesses

  1. Limited Practicality: The degree 240 polynomial may be too complex for practical applications
  2. Physical Meaning: Physical significance of fermionic hyperdeterminant requires further clarification
  3. Computational Efficiency: Lacks efficient numerical computation methods

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important tools for fermionic entanglement theory
  2. Interdisciplinary Value: Connects quantum information, algebraic geometry, and representation theory
  3. Inspirational Significance: Provides new perspectives for related research

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Research: Classification and measurement of fermionic entanglement
  2. Mathematical Physics: Studying algebraic structures of quantum systems
  3. Computational Algebra: Concrete implementation of invariant theory

References

The paper cites 24 important references, spanning from Cayley's original work to modern quantum information theory developments, particularly:

  • Cayley (1845): Foundational work on hyperdeterminants
  • Miyake (2003): Pioneering work on quantum entanglement applications
  • Duff (2007): Important discovery of black hole entropy connection
  • Authors' Previous Work: Provides critical technical foundation for this paper

This paper makes important contributions in both theoretical depth and technical innovation, providing powerful algebraic-geometric tools for understanding the entanglement structure of fermionic systems and establishing deep connections with other quantum systems.