Classical Representation of Local Clifford Operators

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2303.13304
• Title: Classical Representation of Local Clifford Operators
• Authors: Cai-Hong Wang, Jiang-Tao Yuan, Zhi-Hao Ma, Shao-Ming Fei, Shang-Quan Bu
• Classification: quant-ph (Quantum Physics)
• Publication Date: October 15, 2025 (arXiv version)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.13304v3

Abstract

It is well-known that every (single-qubit) Clifford operator maps the complete set of generalized Pauli matrices (GPMs) to itself under unitary conjugation, which represents an important quantum operation in quantum computation and information. However, in many quantum information processing tasks, it is necessary to map a specific GPM set to another such set, rather than the entire set. This paper formalizes this concept by introducing local Clifford operators, which map a given n-GPM set to another such set under unitary conjugation. We establish necessary and sufficient conditions for such operators to transform a pair of GPMs, prove that these local Clifford operators possess classical matrix representations analogous to the classical (or symplectic) representations of standard (single-qubit) Clifford operators. Furthermore, we demonstrate that any local Clifford operator acting on an n-GPM (n≥2) set can be decomposed as a product of standard Clifford operators and local Clifford operators acting on pairs of GPMs.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of Clifford Operators: Clifford operators play a central role in quantum information processing, serving as fundamental building blocks for fault-tolerant quantum computation, with critical applications in quantum error correction and entanglement distillation protocols.
2. Limitations of Existing Approaches: Traditional Clifford operator research focuses on mapping the entire Pauli group to itself, but in many practical quantum information tasks, only subsets of generalized Pauli matrices need to be considered.
3. Practical Requirements: In quantum protocols, two locally unitary equivalent (LU-equivalent) generalized Bell state sets exhibit identical effectiveness and utility, with completely identical distinguishability under local operations and classical communication (LOCC).
4. Research Motivation: Due to the one-to-one correspondence between generalized Bell states (GBS) and GPMs, the LU equivalence of GBS sets is typically determined by the unitary equivalence (U-equivalence) of corresponding GPM sets.

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of Local Clifford Operator Concept: Formally defines local Clifford operators that map n-GPM sets to other n-GPM sets.
2. Establishment of Classical Representation Theory: Proves that local Clifford operators possess classical matrix representations analogous to standard Clifford operators.
3. Decomposition Theorem: Demonstrates that any local Clifford operator acting on an n-GPM set can be decomposed as a product of standard Clifford operators and local Clifford operators acting on 2-GPM sets.
4. Complete Classification Framework: Provides a complete procedure for determining U-equivalence classes of n-GPM sets and verifies the completeness of 31 equivalence classes of 4-GBS sets in C⁶⊗C⁶.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: An n-GPM set M = {X^(s₁)Z^(t₁), X^(s₂)Z^(t₂), ..., X^(sₙ)Z^(tₙ)} on a d-dimensional Hilbert space Output: Another n-GPM set N such that there exists a unitary operator U satisfying UMU† ≈ N (up to global phase) Objective: Find all such unitary operators U (local Clifford operators) and provide their classical representations

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Definition of Local Clifford Operators

Definition 1: Let M = {X^(s₁)Z^(t₁), X^(s₂)Z^(t₂), ..., X^(sₙ)Z^(tₙ)} be a GPM set on Cᵈ. A local Clifford operator acting on M is a unitary operator on Cᵈ that maps M to an n-GPM set (up to global phase).

2. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for 2-GPM Sets

Lemma 2: If both a and b are positive divisors of d, then two non-trivial GPMs X^a and Z^b are respectively UC-equivalent to X^(ua) and Z^b through a unitary operator W if and only if:

• gcd(u, d/a) = 1
• uab ≡ ab (mod d)

Theorem 1: For positive divisors a and b, two non-trivial GPMs X^a and Z^b are respectively UC-equivalent to X^(u₁a)Z^(v₁a) and X^(u₂b)Z^(v₂b) if and only if:

• gcd(u₁, v₁, d/a) = gcd(u₂, v₂, d/b) = 1 (2)
• (u₁v₂ - u₂v₁)ab ≡ ab (mod d) (3)
• gcd(u₁v₂ - u₂v₁, d/a, d/b) = 1 (4)

3. Decomposition of General n-GPM Sets

For an arbitrary n-GPM set M, each local Clifford operator has the following form:

L_(a,b) ∘ C_m ∘ ... ∘ C_0  (5)

where C_i are Clifford operators and L_(a,b) is a local Clifford operator acting on {X^a, Z^b}.

Technical Innovations

1. Preservation of Essential Powers and Commutation Relations: Local Clifford operators preserve the essential power Pe(X^s Z^t) = gcd(s,t,d) of GPMs and the commutation coefficients between two GPMs.
2. Classical Representation Matrix: The classical representation of a local Clifford operator is a 2×2 matrix u₁ u₂; v₁ v₂ satisfying specific modular arithmetic conditions.
3. Divide-and-Conquer Strategy: Complex n-GPM problems are decomposed into combinations of standard Clifford operators and simple 2-GPM local Clifford operators.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis and proofs, verifying the correctness of the proposed theory through mathematical derivations.

Application Cases

Matlab implementation of classification methods based on Clifford operators, verifying 31 equivalence classes of 4-GBS sets in C⁶⊗C⁶.

Specific Examples

Example 1: Derivation of classical representation for GPM set M = {X²Z², Z³, X⁴Z⁸, X⁶} in quantum system C¹². Example 2: Local Clifford operator representation in dimension d = 3⁴. Example 3: Decomposition process for d = 3×5.

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Completeness Verification: Proves that the 31 4-GBS equivalence classes in C⁶⊗C⁶ are indeed distinct under LU equivalence, confirming the completeness of the classification.
2. Equivalence Class Comparison:
   • For GPM set M = {I,X³,Z³} in C³⁴, the U-equivalence class contains 52,488 standard GPM sets
   • The equivalence class based on Clifford operators contains only 17,496 standard GPM sets
   • U-equivalence classes are strictly larger than Clifford operator equivalence classes

Case Analysis

Example 4: Verifies that the 31 GPM sets in Table I are pairwise U-inequivalent, demonstrating through Program 2 step by step.

Example 5: Demonstrates a concrete example where U-equivalence classes are strictly larger than Clifford operator equivalence classes, showing that local Clifford operators provide finer classification.

Related Work

Traditional Clifford Operator Theory

• Gottesman-Knill Theorem: Pure Clifford gate circuits can be efficiently simulated on classical computers
• Symplectic Representation Theory: 2×2 symplectic matrix representation of single-qubit Clifford operators
• Applications in fault-tolerant quantum computation

Quantum Information Processing Applications

• Quantum error correction codes
• Entanglement distillation
• Magic state distillation
• Local distinguishability problems

Bell State Classification

• LU-equivalence research of generalized Bell states
• Classification methods based on Clifford operators
• Distinguishability under local operations and classical communication

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Local Clifford operators possess a complete classical matrix representation theory
2. Any n-GPM local Clifford operator can be decomposed as a product of standard Clifford operators and 2-GPM local Clifford operators
3. A complete procedure for determining U-equivalence classes is provided
4. The completeness of known Bell state classifications is verified

Limitations

1. Open Problems: The exact conditions under which the two equivalence classes (U-equivalence and Clifford operator equivalence) coincide remain undetermined
2. Computational Complexity: For large-dimensional systems, complete enumeration of all equivalence classes may face computational challenges
3. Practical Implementation: The transition of the theoretical framework to practical quantum systems requires further research

Future Directions

1. Determine conditions for coincidence of U-equivalence and Clifford operator equivalence classes
2. Extension to many-body quantum systems
3. Applications in quantum nonlocality problems
4. Further resolution of quantum state local discrimination problems

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete mathematical theoretical framework for local Clifford operators
2. Practical Value: Solves practical classification problems in quantum information processing
3. Methodological Innovation: Decomposes complex problems into tractable subproblems
4. Sufficient Verification: Validates the correctness and practicality of the theory through concrete examples

Weaknesses

1. Computational Complexity: Complete classification for high-dimensional systems may incur significant computational overhead
2. Physical Implementation: Lacks specific physical implementation schemes for local Clifford operators
3. Application Scope: Primarily focused on Bell state classification, with insufficient exploration of other application domains

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Extends Clifford operator theory, providing new tools for quantum information theory
2. Practical Application: Provides systematic solutions for quantum state classification and local distinguishability problems
3. Subsequent Research: Establishes theoretical foundations for further research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Classification and characterization of quantum entangled states
2. Equivalence analysis in quantum protocols
3. Construction and analysis of quantum error correction codes
4. Research on resource states in quantum computation

References

The paper cites 31 related references, covering multiple important research directions including quantum computation, Clifford operator theory, quantum error correction, and Bell state classification, providing comprehensive theoretical foundations and background support for this field.