A note on generalized tensor CUR approximation for tensor pairs and tensor triplets based on the tubal product

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2305.00754
• Title: A note on generalized tensor CUR approximation for tensor pairs and tensor triplets based on the tubal product
• Authors: Salman Ahmadi-Asl (Innopolis University), Naeim Rezaeian (Peoples' Friendship University of Russia)
• Classification: math.NA cs.NA
• Publication Date: arXiv preprint, May 2023 (latest version January 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.00754

Abstract

This paper proposes a generalized tensor CUR (GTCUR) approximation method for tensor pairs (X,Y) and tensor triplets (X,Y,Z) based on the tubal product (t-product). The authors employ the tensor discrete empirical interpolation method (TDEIM) to implement these extensions, demonstrating how to generalize the classical tensor CUR (TCUR) approximation—which operates on a single tensor—to jointly compute TCUR for two or three tensors. The method enables sampling of relevant lateral/horizontal slices of one data tensor relative to one or two other data tensors.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: Classical CUR decomposition can only handle a single matrix or tensor and cannot simultaneously process multiple related data structures. In practical applications, it is often necessary to analyze multiple related tensor data simultaneously and extract the most discriminative features of one dataset relative to other datasets.
2. Problem Significance:
   • Real-world datasets typically possess multidimensional structures requiring preservation of tensor structure
   • Applications such as subgroup discovery, colored noise data recovery, and canonical correlation analysis require simultaneous processing of multiple tensors
   • Traditional methods cannot effectively exploit common information among multiple tensors
3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
   • Matrix CUR (MCUR) can only handle single matrices
   • Existing tensor decomposition methods such as Tucker and CP decompositions cannot provide optimal low-rank approximations upon truncation
   • Lack of a unified processing framework for multiple tensors
4. Research Motivation: Inspired by the successful application of generalized MCUR in the matrix case, the authors aim to extend this idea to the tensor setting, leveraging the favorable properties of tensor SVD based on t-product to develop GTCUR methods capable of simultaneously handling multiple tensors.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Generalized Tensor CUR (GTCUR) Method: First extension of CUR approximation from single tensors to tensor pairs and tensor triplets
2. Developed TDEIM-based Sampling Strategy: Utilizes tensor discrete empirical interpolation method to select optimal lateral/horizontal slices
3. Established Theoretical Connections: Proved that GTCUR degenerates to classical TCUR in special cases, analogous to the matrix case
4. Provided Efficient Algorithms: Presented fast algorithms for computing GTCUR, including efficient implementation in the Fourier domain
5. Extended Tensor Decomposition Theory: Established a complete theoretical framework based on generalized tensor SVD (GTSVD) and restricted tensor SVD (t-RSVD)

Methodology Details

Task Definition

GTCUR for Tensor Pairs: Given two tensors $\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{I_1 \times I_2 \times I_3}$ and $\mathbf{Y} \in \mathbb{R}^{I_4 \times I_2 \times I_3}$, find approximations: $\mathbf{X} \approx \mathbf{C}_1 \ast \mathbf{U}_1 \ast \mathbf{R}_1, \quad \mathbf{Y} \approx \mathbf{C}_2 \ast \mathbf{U}_2 \ast \mathbf{R}_2$

GTCUR for Tensor Triplets: Given three tensors $\mathbf{X} \in \mathbb{R}^{I_1 \times I_2 \times I_3}$, $\mathbf{Y} \in \mathbb{R}^{I_1 \times I_4 \times I_3}$, $\mathbf{Z} \in \mathbb{R}^{I_5 \times I_2 \times I_3}$, find corresponding approximations.

Model Architecture

1. Fundamental Tensor Operations

The paper defines a series of tensor operations based on the tubal product (t-product):

• t-product: $\mathbf{C} = \mathbf{X} \ast \mathbf{Y} = \text{fold}(\text{circ}(\mathbf{X}) \cdot \text{unfold}(\mathbf{Y}))$
• Tensor transpose: Transpose all frontal slices and reverse their order
• Orthogonal tensor: Satisfies $\mathbf{X}^T \ast \mathbf{X} = \mathbf{X} \ast \mathbf{X}^T = \mathbf{I}$

2. Tensor SVD (t-SVD)

$\mathbf{X} \approx \mathbf{U} \ast \mathbf{S} \ast \mathbf{V}^T$ where $\mathbf{U}$ and $\mathbf{V}$ are orthogonal tensors and $\mathbf{S}$ is an f-diagonal tensor.

3. TDEIM Algorithm

The core idea is to construct a tensor interpolation projection operator: $\mathbf{P} = \mathbf{U} \ast (\mathbf{S}^T \ast \mathbf{U})^{-1} \ast \mathbf{S}^T$

Sampling process:

1. Select the first tubal structure with maximum Euclidean norm
2. Iteratively select indices with maximum norm in the residual slices
3. Use the projection operator to eliminate the influence of already-selected directions

Technical Innovations

1. Unified Multi-tensor Processing Framework: Achieves joint decomposition of multiple tensors through shared factor matrices
2. Index Selection Based on GTSVD: Utilizes common factors provided by generalized tensor SVD for consistent slice sampling
3. Efficient Fourier Domain Computation: All operations can be executed in parallel in the frequency domain, significantly improving computational efficiency
4. Theoretical Guarantees: Provides error bounds $\|\mathbf{X}-\mathbf{C} \ast \mathbf{U} \ast \mathbf{R}\|_F^2 \leq (\tilde{\eta}_p + \tilde{\eta}_q)\sum_{i=1}^{I_3}\sum_{t>R}(\sigma_t^i)^2$

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

The paper primarily provides theoretical analysis and algorithmic framework, including:

Evaluation Metrics

• Theoretical upper bounds on approximation error
• Computational complexity analysis
• Condition number control

Comparison Methods

• Classical tensor CUR (TCUR)
• Sampling methods based on leverage scores
• Uniform sampling methods

Implementation Details

• Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) implementation of t-product
• Randomized GTSVD to reduce computational complexity
• MATLAB-style algorithm descriptions

Experimental Results

Main Results

The paper primarily provides theoretical results:

1. Theorem 1: Error upper bound for TCUR approximation with TDEIM sampling
2. Theorem 3: Connection between tensor pair GTCUR and classical TCUR
3. Theorem 4: Special case analysis for tensor triplet GTCUR

Theoretical Findings

1. When $\mathbf{Y} = \mathbf{I}$, GTCUR degenerates to classical TCUR
2. For invertible tensor $\mathbf{Y}$, GTCUR is equivalent to TCUR of $\mathbf{X} \ast \mathbf{Y}^{-1}$
3. Condition number is controlled by $\tilde{\eta}_p$ and $\tilde{\eta}_q$

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Matrix CUR Decomposition: Classical work by Goreinov et al.
2. Tensor Decomposition: Tucker decomposition, CP decomposition, tensor-train decomposition
3. t-product-based Methods: Framework pioneered by Kilmer et al.
4. Generalized SVD: GSVD and RSVD in the matrix case

Novelty of This Work

Compared to existing work, this paper is the first to:

• Extend CUR decomposition to multi-tensor settings
• Establish a complete theoretical framework based on t-product
• Provide efficient TDEIM sampling algorithms

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successfully extended CUR approximation from single tensors to tensor pairs and triplets
2. TDEIM provides optimal sampling strategy
3. Complete theoretical framework including error analysis and connections to special cases
4. Efficient algorithms enabling parallel computation in the Fourier domain

Limitations

1. Lack of Numerical Experiments: The paper is primarily theoretical without specific numerical verification
2. Computational Complexity: GTSVD computation remains challenging for large-scale tensors
3. Application Scenarios: Lacks detailed analysis of specific application scenarios
4. Parameter Selection: No discussion of strategies for selecting rank parameter R

Future Directions

1. Verify method effectiveness in practical applications
2. Develop more efficient randomized algorithms
3. Study adaptive strategies for parameter selection
4. Extend to higher-order tensor cases

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Significant Theoretical Contribution: First to establish a complete theoretical framework for multi-tensor CUR decomposition
2. Novel Methodology: Cleverly leverages common factors of GTSVD for joint multi-tensor processing
3. Efficient Algorithms: FFT-based implementation ensures computational efficiency
4. Rigorous Theory: Provides complete error analysis and convergence guarantees
5. Clear Presentation: Well-structured paper with rigorous mathematical derivations

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Validation: As a theoretical note, lacks numerical experiments to verify practical effectiveness
2. Insufficient Application Motivation: While mentioning some applications, lacks in-depth discussion of specific scenarios
3. Scalability Issues: GTSVD computation remains a bottleneck for very large-scale tensors
4. Parameter Sensitivity: No discussion of method sensitivity to parameter choices

Impact

1. Theoretical Value: Provides new theoretical tools for multi-tensor analysis
2. Practical Potential: Shows application prospects in image processing, signal analysis, etc.
3. Reproducibility: Provides detailed algorithm descriptions facilitating implementation
4. Foundation for Future Research: Establishes basis for further research in related fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Multi-modal Data Analysis: Scenarios requiring simultaneous processing of multiple related tensor data
2. Feature Selection: Extracting discriminative features of one dataset relative to others
3. Noisy Data Recovery: Utilizing common structure among multiple tensors for data recovery
4. Dimensionality Reduction: Reducing dimensions while preserving tensor structure

References

The paper cites 24 important references, primarily including:

• Classical work on CUR decomposition by Goreinov et al.
• Pioneering research on t-product by Kilmer et al.
• Recent work on matrix GMCUR by Gidisu and Hochstenbach
• Related literature on various tensor decomposition methods

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical paper that successfully extends CUR decomposition to multi-tensor settings and establishes a complete theoretical framework. Although lacking numerical experiments, it makes significant theoretical contributions and provides new tools for multi-tensor analysis. The paper's primary value lies in theoretical innovation and methodological contributions, establishing a solid foundation for subsequent practical application research.