The Principle of Uncertain Maximum Entropy

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2305.09868
• Title: The Principle of Uncertain Maximum Entropy
• Authors: Kenneth Bogert, Matthew Kothe (University of North Carolina Asheville)
• Classification: cs.IT cs.CV cs.LG math.IT
• Publication Date: October 16, 2025 (arXiv v5)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09868

Abstract

The maximum entropy principle is a rigorous technique for estimating unknown distributions given partial information while minimizing bias. However, a critical requirement for applying this principle is that the available information must be error-free (Jaynes 1982). This paper uses memoryless communication channels as a framework to relax this requirement and derives a new, more general principle. The research demonstrates that the new principle provides an upper bound on the entropy of unknown distributions, and the amount of information lost due to the given communication channel can only be determined when the entropy of the unknown distribution is also known. Using the new principle, the authors provide new interpretations of the classical principle and experimentally demonstrate its performance relative to the classical principle and other general solutions.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The traditional maximum entropy principle requires that the empirical feature expectations used for constraints are known and error-free. However, in many real-world scenarios, this requirement often cannot be satisfied due to noise or other uncertainty mechanisms.

Research Motivation

1. Practical Necessity: In domains with significant noise or uncertainty, error-free sample information cannot be obtained
2. Theoretical Limitations: Existing methods assume uncertainty originates from latent variables and use expectations to fill missing information, lacking generality
3. Practical Applications: A more general principle is needed that maintains the desirable properties of the classical principle even when communication channels contain noise

Innovation Points

The paper uses a memoryless communication channel model as a framework to formally model noise and uncertainty, thereby deriving a new principle that preserves the desirable properties of the classical maximum entropy principle.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Derives the new principle as an application of the classical principle over noisy communication channels
2. Algorithmic Contribution: Proposes the new principle in hierarchical convex programming form and its solution algorithm
3. Theoretical Analysis: Proves that the new principle generalizes earlier principles and provides new interpretations of the classical principle
4. Bounds Analysis: Proves that the new principle produces an upper bound on the entropy of unknown distributions and quantifies information loss
5. Experimental Verification: Provides extensive experimental results demonstrating performance and approximation methods for finite samples

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Given samples received through a noisy communication channel, estimate the parameters of an unknown probability distribution P₀(W) while leveraging additional information about the distribution structure (feature functions).

Communication Channel Model

Uses discrete memoryless communication channels for modeling:

• Transmitter: Message w is sampled from unknown distribution P₀(W)
• Encoding: w is encoded as x using P(X|W)
• Transmission: Through channel P(Y|X), x is received as y
• Receiver: Aims to estimate parameters of P₀(W)

Uncertain Maximum Entropy Principle

Mathematical Formulation

When P̃(W) is uncertain, all possible P̃(W) must satisfy:

∑_{w∈W} P̃r(w) ∑_{x∈X} Pr(x|w)Pr(y|x) = P̃r(y) ∀y

Core Idea

Select the distribution with maximum entropy among all distributions satisfying:

1. Membership in the set of maximum entropy distributions under given feature constraints
2. The corresponding P̃(W) can produce the observed P̃(Y)

Hierarchical Convex Programming Form

max -∑_{w∈W} P̃r(w) log P̃r(w)
subject to:
    ∑_{w∈W} P̃r(w) = 1
    ∑_{w∈W} P̃r(w) ∑_{x∈X} Pr(x|w)Pr(y|x) = P̃r(y) ∀y
    P̃(W) = M_φ(P̃(W))

where M_φ is the function applying the classical maximum entropy principle.

Algorithm Implementation

uMaxEnt Algorithm

1. Initialize Pr(w) = 1/|W| ∀w
2. Solve convex program to obtain new P̃(W):
   min ∑_w P̃r(w) log(P̃r(w)/Pr(w))
   subject to: communication channel constraints
3. Apply classical maximum entropy principle to obtain new P(W)
4. Repeat until convergence

Technical Innovations

1. Theoretical Innovation: First formal incorporation of communication channel noise into the maximum entropy framework
2. Algorithmic Innovation: Bilevel optimization structure with outer entropy maximization and inner constraint satisfaction
3. Multi-channel Extension: Natural extension to multi-channel scenarios for improved estimation accuracy
4. Finite Sample Approximation: Provides ε-bounds based on the law of large numbers for handling finite samples in practical applications

Experimental Setup

Experimental Configuration

• State Space: |W| = 10 (all experiments)
• Number of Features: |φ| ∈ {1,2,...,9}
• Signal Space: |Y| ∈ {2,3,...,10}
• Number of Experiments: 77,760 randomly generated configurations

Data Generation

1. Model Generation: Sparse feature sets with true weights λₖ = U(-1,1) × α
2. Channel Generation: Randomly generated P(X|W) and P(Y|X)
3. Sample Generation: 1,048,576 samples for approximation experiments

Comparison Methods

• uMaxEnt: Proposed uncertain maximum entropy method
• MaxEnt: Classical maximum entropy (using true P̃(W), serves as best-case baseline)
• mlMaxEnt: Estimation using most likely w
• dMaxEnt: First estimate P̃(W) using maximum entropy, then apply classical maximum entropy

Evaluation Metrics

Kullback-Leibler divergence D_KL(P_λ,φ(W) ∥ P₀(W)) is used to measure accuracy.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Impact of Feature Count

• Low Features (<5): uMaxEnt significantly outperforms dMaxEnt with median D_KL values several orders of magnitude smaller
• High Features (≥5): Most solutions fall into high-error regime
• Mechanism: Fewer features lead to tighter feasible sets, which uMaxEnt exploits to find lower entropy solutions

Impact of Signal Space Size

• Small |Y| (<6): Most solutions in high-error regime
• Large |Y| (≥6): Most solutions in low-error regime
• Consistency: uMaxEnt shows more consistency than dMaxEnt at |Y|=10

Multi-channel Performance

• Significant Improvement: Adding just one additional channel substantially improves performance
• Information Recovery: Multi-channel constraints reduce the feasible set and minimize information loss
• Practicality: Provides solutions for single-channel cases with high D_KL

Numerical Results

Finite Sample Approximation

• Convergence: D_KL reduction becomes apparent around N=500
• Asymptotic Performance: Continuous improvement with increasing sample size, while dMaxEnt approaches maximum performance at N=10⁶
• Practicality: Median D_KL consistently superior to or equal to dMaxEnt

Theoretical Analysis

Convexity Proofs

Theorem 1: The feasible set of Program 7 is convex Theorem 2: Program 7 is convex Corollary: Uniqueness and optimality of solutions

Generalization Relationships

Theorem 3: The classical maximum entropy principle is a special case of the uncertain maximum entropy principle when only one P̃(W) satisfies the constraints Theorem 4: The latent maximum entropy principle is a special case of the uncertain maximum entropy principle

Information-Theoretic Bounds

• Entropy Upper Bound: H(P₀(W)) ≤ H(U_φ,P(Y|W)(P̃(Y)))
• Information Loss: E_φ(W;Y) = H(U_φ,P(Y|W)(P̃(Y))) - H(P₀(W))
• Practical Significance: Quantifies information loss caused by communication channels

Related Work

Classical Maximum Entropy Principle

• Foundational work by Jaynes (1957) and Shannon (1948)
• Limitation requiring error-free constraint information

Methods for Handling Uncertainty

• Latent variable approaches (Wang et al., 2012; Bogert et al., 2016)
• Minimum cross-entropy principle (Shore and Johnson, 1980)
• The proposed method is more general without assuming specific uncertainty sources

Information Geometry

• Leverages convex optimization theory
• Bilevel optimization applications in machine learning

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Successfully incorporates noisy communication channels into the maximum entropy framework
2. Practical Value: Outperforms existing methods across various experimental configurations
3. Generalization Capability: Unifies multiple existing principles
4. Information-Theoretic Insights: Provides quantitative analysis of information loss

Limitations

1. Assumptions: Assumes φ and P(Y|W) are known
2. Computational Complexity: Bilevel optimization increases computational cost
3. Finite Sample Performance: Limited improvements in small sample cases
4. Multimodal Results: 42% of configurations produce high error, 53% produce low error

Future Directions

1. Relaxing Assumptions: Handle cases where φ is incompletely known
2. Noisy Features: Consider noise in feature functions
3. Tighter Bounds: Improve ε-bounds for finite sample cases
4. Computational Optimization: Enhance algorithm efficiency

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete mathematical derivations and proofs
2. Strong Practicality: Provides a general framework for handling real-world noise
3. Comprehensive Experiments: Large-scale random experiments validate method effectiveness
4. High Innovation: First combination of communication channel theory with maximum entropy principle

Weaknesses

1. Computational Complexity: Bilevel optimization may be inefficient for large-scale problems
2. Parameter Sensitivity: Performance depends on feature count and signal space size
3. Real-world Validation: Lacks verification on real-world datasets
4. Convergence Analysis: Finite sample approximation convergence analysis is insufficient

Impact

1. Theoretical Value: Provides new perspectives on the intersection of information theory and machine learning
2. Application Potential: Applicable to communication, signal processing, machine learning, and other domains
3. Methodological Contribution: Bilevel optimization framework may inspire solutions to other problems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Communication Systems: Parameter estimation with noisy channels
2. Sensor Networks: Multi-sensor data fusion
3. Machine Learning: Distribution estimation with noisy labels
4. Signal Processing: Signal recovery under imperfect observations

References

1. Jaynes, E. T. (1957). Information theory and statistical mechanics. Physical Review.
2. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal.
3. Wang, S., Schuurmans, D., & Zhao, Y. (2012). The latent maximum entropy principle. ACM TKDD.
4. Shore, J. & Johnson, R. (1980). Axiomatic derivation of the principle of maximum entropy. IEEE TIT.

Summary: This is a high-quality paper balancing theory and practice, successfully extending the classical maximum entropy principle to handle noisy environments. While there is room for improvement in computational complexity and real-world application validation, its theoretical contributions and methodological innovations provide valuable tools and insights for related fields.