2025-11-18T02:43:13.746228

Energetic cost for speedy synchronization in non-Hermitian quantum dynamics

Aifer, Thingna, Deffner
Quantum synchronization is crucial for understanding complex dynamics and holds potential applications in quantum computing and communication. Therefore, assessing the thermodynamic resources required for finite-time synchronization in continuous-variable systems is a critical challenge. In the present work, we find these resources to be extensive for large systems. We also bound the speed of quantum and classical synchronization in coupled damped oscillators with non-Hermitian anti-PT-symmetric interactions, and show that the speed of synchronization is limited by the interaction strength relative to the damping. Compared to the classical limit, we find that quantum synchronization is slowed by the non-commutativity of the Hermitian and anti-Hermitian terms. Our general results could be tested experimentally and we suggest an implementation in photonic systems.
academic

Energetic cost for speedy synchronization in non-Hermitian quantum dynamics

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2305.16560
  • Title: Energetic cost for speedy synchronization in non-Hermitian quantum dynamics
  • Authors: Maxwell Aifer (University of Maryland, Baltimore County), Juzar Thingna (University of Massachusetts, Lowell & Institute for Basic Science, South Korea), Sebastian Deffner (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)
  • Classification: quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mech
  • Publication Date: May 29, 2023
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.16560

Abstract

Quantum synchronization is crucial for understanding complex dynamics and has potential applications in quantum computing and communication. Therefore, assessing the thermodynamic resources required for finite-time synchronization in continuous-variable systems represents a key challenge. This study reveals that for large systems, these resources are extensive. The research also establishes bounds on the speed of quantum and classical synchronization in coupled damped oscillators with non-Hermitian anti-PT symmetric interactions, demonstrating that synchronization speed is limited by the interaction strength relative to damping. Compared to the classical limit, quantum synchronization is slower due to the non-commutativity of Hermitian and anti-Hermitian terms. The general results can be verified experimentally and implementation in photonic systems is suggested.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Core Problem: While quantum synchronization serves as an important mechanism transitioning from disorder to order, quantitative analysis of its thermodynamic cost and timescales remains insufficient. Existing research primarily focuses on steady-state behavior, lacking systematic analysis of resources required during finite-time synchronization processes.
  2. Significance:
    • Quantum synchronization has important application prospects in quantum computing and communication
    • Synchronization is a hallmark of information flow, closely related to information theory in thermodynamics
    • Research on synchronization in continuous-variable quantum systems is relatively scarce, with most work limited to discrete systems
  3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
    • Lack of unified synchronization metrics
    • Limited understanding of finite-time synchronization processes
    • Application of quantum speed limits to synchronization problems is just beginning
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Establish scale-invariant metrics for complete synchronization in continuous-variable systems
    • Quantify minimum work and time required for synchronization
    • Compare differences and advantages between quantum and classical synchronization

Core Contributions

  1. Proposed a new synchronization metric: Defined a scale-invariant distance metric D2D^2 capable of capturing both complete synchronization and phase synchronization simultaneously
  2. Established thermodynamic lower bounds for synchronization: Proved that minimum work required for synchronization satisfies W1βχmin(N,κ,D)W \geq \frac{1}{\beta}\chi_{\min}(N,\kappa,D), revealing that resource requirements are extensive in system size
  3. Derived synchronization speed limits: Based on quantum speed limit theory, provided upper bounds on synchronization rates, revealing the impact of non-commutativity between Hermitian and anti-Hermitian terms on synchronization speed
  4. Discovered quantum advantages: In coupled waveguide models, quantum systems can achieve synchronization in parameter regions where classical systems cannot
  5. Provided experimentally verifiable theoretical framework: Suggested specific implementation schemes in photonic systems

Detailed Methodology

Task Definition

The study examines N quantum oscillators starting from an initial uncoupled thermal equilibrium state ρ^0=j=1Nρ^jeq\hat{\rho}_0 = \bigotimes_{j=1}^N \hat{\rho}_j^{eq} and achieving synchronization under anti-Hermitian coupling. Synchronization is defined as the existence of time τ\tau such that for all tτt \geq \tau, the distance metric DDsD \leq D_s.

Model Architecture

1. System Hamiltonian: H^=H^0+iH^c=j=1Nωj(n^j+12)+iH^c\hat{H} = \hat{H}_0 + i\hat{H}_c = \sum_{j=1}^N \omega_j\left(\hat{n}_j + \frac{1}{2}\right) + i\hat{H}_c

where H^c\hat{H}_c is the Hermitian anti-Hermitian coupling term.

2. Quantum Master Equation: dρ^dt=i[H^0,ρ^]+{H^c,ρ^}2H^cρ^+D[ρ^]\frac{d\hat{\rho}}{dt} = -i[\hat{H}_0, \hat{\rho}] + \{\hat{H}_c, \hat{\rho}\} - 2\langle\hat{H}_c\rangle\hat{\rho} + \mathcal{D}[\hat{\rho}]

This is a nonlinear dynamical semigroup satisfying convex quasi-linear conditions.

3. Synchronization Metric: For N oscillators: D22(1rˉ2r2)D^2 \equiv 2\left(1 - \frac{\langle\bar{r}^2\rangle}{\langle r^2\rangle}\right)

where rˉ=1Nj=1N(xj,pj)T\bar{r} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^N (x_j, p_j)^T, r2=1Nj=1Nrj2\langle r^2\rangle = \frac{1}{N}\sum_{j=1}^N\langle r_j^2\rangle.

Technical Innovations

1. Scale Invariance: The new metric D2D^2 is scale-invariant with respect to phase space coordinates, independent of observation magnification.

2. Thermodynamic Quantification: Introduced "ergotropy of synchronization" χ\chi: χminUS(ρ^ρ^G;U)\chi \equiv \min_U S(\hat{\rho}\|\hat{\rho}_{G;U})

establishing the relationship between synchronization degree and thermodynamic distance.

3. Speed Limits: Derived upper bounds on synchronization evolution rate: L˙2ΔCE+SG;E2+2β0ΔE2ΔC212[H^0,H^c]2σ0\dot{L} \leq 2\Delta_C\sqrt{\mathcal{E} + S_{G;E}^2} + 2\beta_0\sqrt{\Delta_E^2\Delta_C^2 - \frac{1}{2}|\langle[\hat{H}_0,\hat{H}_c]\rangle|^2} - \sigma_0

where the last term reflects the impact of the commutator between Hermitian and anti-Hermitian terms.

Experimental Setup

Model System

The study examined coupled waveguide models with anti-Hermitian coupling: H^c=k2(a^1a^2+a^2a^1)\hat{H}_c = \frac{k}{2}(\hat{a}_1^\dagger\hat{a}_2 + \hat{a}_2^\dagger\hat{a}_1)

Parameter Settings

  • Oscillator frequencies: ω1=2π\omega_1 = 2\pi, ω2=3π\omega_2 = 3\pi
  • Bath temperature: T=20T = 20
  • Coupling strength: γ+=0.001\gamma_+ = 0.001, γ\gamma_- determined by local detailed balance conditions

Comparative Analysis

Quantum evolution results were compared with corresponding classical Stuart-Landau oscillator systems: z˙j=[k2iωjγjzj2]+k2(z3jzj)i2γjξ(t)\dot{z}_j = \left[\frac{k}{2} - i\omega_j - \gamma_j|z_j|^2\right] + \frac{k}{2}(z_{3-j} - z_j) - i2\sqrt{\gamma_j}\xi(t)

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Extensivity of Thermodynamic Cost: For large systems, the minimum asymptotic work cost is: χmin=ln(D28κ)N\chi_{\min}^{\infty} = -\ln\left(\frac{D^2}{8\kappa}\right)N

compared to the classical case: χmin(cl)=ln(D22κ)N\chi_{\min}^{(cl)\infty} = -\ln\left(\frac{D^2}{2\kappa}\right)N

The quantum system incurs higher synchronization costs.

2. Quantum-Classical Differences in Synchronization Speed:

  • Quantum systems face additional constraints from the commutator [H^0,H^c][\hat{H}_0,\hat{H}_c] between Hermitian and anti-Hermitian terms
  • Classical systems' speed limits primarily arise from phase space geometric terms

3. Quantum Advantage Regions: In coupled waveguide models, the classical synchronization condition is kω2ω1k \geq |\omega_2 - \omega_1|, while quantum systems can achieve synchronization at smaller kk values.

Numerical Verification

Figure 2 shows that χ\chi-DD trajectories are constrained by the convex hull of random Gaussian states, validating the theoretical bounds. Figure 3 demonstrates that the quantum synchronization region indeed extends beyond classical boundaries.

Experimental Observations

  1. χ\chi typically increases monotonically, while DD may exhibit significant directional reversals
  2. When kk is insufficient for synchronization, work is still dissipated, with χ\chi continuing to increase while DD shows minimal change
  3. Quantum system trajectories remain primarily within the Gaussian state convex hull, consistent with bilinear coupling expectations

This research builds upon:

  1. Quantum Synchronization Theory: From Huygens' pendulum synchronization to modern synchronization research in quantum information
  2. Quantum Speed Limits: Mandelstam-Tamm inequalities and their extensions to open quantum systems
  3. Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics: Applications of PT and anti-PT symmetry in quantum optics
  4. Quantum Thermodynamics: Irreversible entropy production and work dissipation from information-theoretic perspectives

Compared to existing work, this study is the first to systematically apply quantum speed limit theory to synchronization problems and establish a comprehensive thermodynamic analysis framework.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Resource Extensivity: Synchronization work for large systems scales linearly with system size, indicating synchronization is an extensive process
  2. Quantum Deceleration Effect: Quantum synchronization is slower than classical synchronization due to non-commutativity
  3. Existence of Quantum Advantages: In certain parameter regions, quantum systems can achieve synchronization where classical systems cannot
  4. Experimental Feasibility: The theoretical framework can be verified in photonic systems

Limitations

  1. Analysis primarily based on continuous-variable Gaussian states with limited consideration of non-Gaussian effects
  2. Physical implementation of anti-Hermitian coupling requires special engineering design
  3. Effects of noise and decoherence on actual system performance require further investigation
  4. Numerical verification of large-N limits requires additional computational resources

Future Directions

  1. Explore synchronization behavior under non-Gaussian states
  2. Study construction and characterization of quantum advantage states
  3. Extend analysis to more complex network topologies
  4. Develop quantum information processing protocols based on synchronization

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Rigor: Complete mathematical derivations with clear logical chains from quantum master equations to thermodynamic bounds
  2. High Innovation: First systematic thermodynamic theoretical framework for quantum synchronization
  3. Deep Physical Insights: Reveals that the essential difference between quantum and classical synchronization originates from non-commutativity
  4. Practical Value: Provides actionable theoretical guidance for quantum synchronization experiments

Weaknesses

  1. Model Idealization: Neglects various noise sources and non-ideal effects in actual systems
  2. Limited Numerical Verification: Numerical verification only performed in specific parameter ranges
  3. Experimental Challenges: Implementation of anti-PT symmetric coupling presents technical difficulties
  4. Incomplete Mechanism Explanation: Physical mechanisms underlying quantum advantages require deeper explanation

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important theoretical foundation for quantum synchronization research
  2. Interdisciplinary Value: Connects quantum information, statistical mechanics, and nonlinear dynamics
  3. Experimental Guidance: Provides clear theoretical predictions for related experimental research
  4. Technology Applications: May advance development of synchronization-based quantum technologies

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Quantum Optics Experiments: Coupled optical resonators and waveguide systems
  2. Cold Atom Systems: Bose-Einstein condensates in optical lattices
  3. Superconducting Quantum Circuits: Josephson junction array systems
  4. Quantum Simulation: Synchronization phenomena in many-body quantum systems

References

The paper cites 103 relevant references spanning from classical synchronization theory to quantum speed limits, providing a solid theoretical foundation. Key references include classical works on continuous-variable quantum theory, non-Hermitian quantum mechanics, and quantum thermodynamics.


Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality paper with important theoretical contributions to the field of quantum synchronization. The authors skillfully combine quantum speed limit theory with thermodynamic analysis, providing a novel perspective on understanding the resource costs of quantum synchronization. While further experimental verification is needed, the completeness and innovation of its theoretical framework make it an important milestone in the field.