2025-11-10T02:53:50.129886

Units of hyperelliptic curves over $\mathbb{F}_2$

Chen, Muthuvel
We study unit groups of rings of the form $\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + gy + h)$, for $g, h \in \mathbb{F}_2[x]$ -- in particular, the question of (non)triviality of such unit groups. Up to automorphisms of $\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]$ we classify such rings into 3 distinct types. For 2 of the types we show that the unit group is always trivial, and conjecture that the unit group is always nontrivial for the 3rd type. We provide support for this conjecture both theoretically and computationally, via an algorithm that has been used to compute units in large degrees.
academic

Units of hyperelliptic curves over F2\mathbb{F}_2

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2306.04838
  • Title: Units of hyperelliptic curves over F2\mathbb{F}_2
  • Authors: Justin Chen, Vishal Muthuvel
  • Classification: math.AC (Commutative Algebra)
  • Publication Date: June 8, 2023
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.04838

Abstract

This paper investigates the unit group of rings of the form F2[x,y]/(y2+gy+h)\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + gy + h), where g,hF2[x]g, h \in \mathbb{F}_2[x], with particular focus on the triviality of such unit groups. Through the action of automorphisms of F2[x,y]\mathbb{F}_2[x,y], the authors classify these rings into three distinct types. For two of these types, they prove that the unit group is always trivial, and conjecture that the unit group of the third type is always nontrivial. The authors provide theoretical analysis and computational verification supporting this conjecture, including an algorithm capable of computing units of large degree.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

The central question addressed in this paper is: What rings possess trivial unit groups? That is, for a ring RR, when does R×={1}R^× = \{1\}?

Significance of the Problem

  1. Theoretical significance: The triviality of unit groups is a fundamental problem in commutative algebra, closely related to ring structure
  2. Geometric significance: The studied rings are coordinate rings of affine plane curves over F2\mathbb{F}_2 that admit 2-to-1 maps to the affine line (hyperelliptic curves)
  3. Classification value: Provides rich new examples of rings with trivial unit groups

Research Motivation

  1. Complete classification of rings with trivial unit groups is impractical in general
  2. Explicit examples are rare
  3. Studying specific categories of rings is feasible and meaningful

Core Contributions

  1. Classification result: Classifies rings of the form F2[x,y]/(y2+gy+h)\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + gy + h) into three types under automorphism action
  2. Triviality theorem: Proves that the unit groups of two types (Type 1 and Type 2) are always trivial
  3. Nontriviality conjecture: Proposes that the unit group of the third type (Type 3) is always nontrivial
  4. Computational algorithm: Develops an effective algorithm for computing fundamental units of large degree
  5. Theoretical tools: Establishes equivalence between unit groups and quadratic form representation problems

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Study the unit group R×R^× of the ring R=F2[x,y]/(y2+gy+h)R = \mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + gy + h), where g,hF2[x]g, h \in \mathbb{F}_2[x].

Theoretical Framework

1. Necessary Condition Analysis

For rings RR with trivial unit groups:

  • RR has characteristic 2 (since 1=1-1 = 1)
  • The Jacobson radical of RR is trivial
  • RR is a reduced F2\mathbb{F}_2-algebra

2. Automorphism Classification

Using the automorphism group of F2[x,y]\mathbb{F}_2[x,y], define the action:

  • ψ:xx+1,yy\psi: x \mapsto x+1, y \mapsto y
  • ϕ:xy,yx\phi: x \mapsto y, y \mapsto x
  • ϕf:xx,yy+f\phi_f: x \mapsto x, y \mapsto y+f (for fF2[x]f \in \mathbb{F}_2[x])

Define minimal representatives under the action ϕf(g,h)=(g,h+gf+f2)\phi_f \cdot (g,h) = (g, h + gf + f^2).

3. Three-Type Classification

Theorem 3.2: (g,h)(g,h) is a minimal representative if and only if it satisfies one of the following conditions:

  • Type 1: 2degg<degh2\deg g < \deg h and degh\deg h is odd
  • Type 2: 2degg=degh2\deg g = \deg h
  • Type 3: degg>degh\deg g > \deg h

Transformation from Unit Groups to Quadratic Forms

Core Theorem (Proposition 4.1): An element a+byF2[x,y]/(y2+gy+h)a + by \in \mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + gy + h) is a unit if and only if (a,b)F2[x]×F2[x](a,b) \in \mathbb{F}_2[x] \times \mathbb{F}_2[x] satisfies the quadratic equation: a2+abg+b2h=1a^2 + abg + b^2h = 1

The inverse is given by (a+by)1=(a+bg)+by(a+by)^{-1} = (a+bg) + by.

Degree Analysis

By analyzing the degree relationships among terms in the equation a2+abg+b2h=1a^2 + abg + b^2h = 1:

dega+degb+degg=deg(abg)=deg(a2+b2h+1)max{2dega,2degb+degh}\deg a + \deg b + \deg g = \deg(abg) = \deg(a^2 + b^2h + 1) \leq \max\{2\deg a, 2\deg b + \deg h\}

Theorem 4.6: If (g,h)(g,h) is a Type 1 minimal representative, or a Type 2 minimal representative with degg>0\deg g > 0, then the unit group is trivial.

Experimental Setup

Computational Method

The authors developed an algorithm based on Gröbner bases:

  1. Objective: Find minimal degree solutions (c,d)(c,d) such that Q(X,Y)=geQ(X,Y) = \frac{g}{e}, where ee is the squarefree part of gg
  2. Setup: Fix degree nn, set d=xn+i=0n1dixid = x^n + \sum_{i=0}^{n-1} d_i x^i, c=xn+hg+i=0n+hg1cixic = x^{n+h-g} + \sum_{i=0}^{n+h-g-1} c_i x^i
  3. Solution: Transform the quadratic equation into a system of quadratic equations in ci,dic_i, d_i, solved using Gröbner bases

Implementation Tools

Implemented using the Macaulay2 system, with efficiency improved through heuristic partial linearization.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Proposition 5.10: Conjecture 5.7 holds for degg4\deg g \leq 4.

Concrete Examples

Example 5.9:

  • Fundamental unit for (g,h)=(x3,x2+1)(g,h) = (x^3, x^2+1): (x,x2+1)(x, x^2+1)
  • Fundamental unit for (g,h)=(x2,x+1)(g,h) = (x^2, x+1): (x2+x+1,x3+x)(x^2+x+1, x^3+x)
  • Fundamental unit for (g,h)=(x3,x+1)(g,h) = (x^3, x+1): (x8+x7+x4+x2+1,x10+x6+x4+x2)(x^8+x^7+x^4+x^2+1, x^{10}+x^6+x^4+x^2)

Degree Growth

The degree of fundamental units grows rapidly with degg\deg g:

degg\deg gMaximum degb\deg b
23
316
452
5134

Special Cases

Proposition 5.1: For g=0g = 0:

(\mathbb{F}_2[x], +) & \text{if } \exists f \in \mathbb{F}_2[x] \text{ such that } h = f^2 \\ \{1\} & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ **Proposition 5.3**: For $g = 1$: $$(\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(y^2 + y + h))^× \cong \begin{cases} \mathbb{Z}/3\mathbb{Z} & \text{if } \exists f \in \mathbb{F}_2[x] \text{ such that } h = f^2 + f + 1 \\ \{1\} & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$$ ## Related Work ### Theoretical Foundations 1. **Van der Kulk's Theorem**: Generators of the automorphism group of $\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]$ 2. **Rosenlicht's Theorem**: Structure of unit groups over finitely generated fields 3. **Quadratic Form Theory**: Representation of quadratic forms over $\mathbb{F}_2[x]$ ### Computational Aspects - Existing methods for unit group computation - Applications of Gröbner bases in algebraic geometry - Use of symbolic computation systems ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. Completely resolves the unit group triviality problem for Type 1 and Type 2 cases 2. Provides a complete conjecture for the Type 3 case with strong supporting evidence 3. Establishes profound connections between unit group research and quadratic form representation theory ### Limitations 1. The conjecture for Type 3 remains unproven 2. Theoretical termination guarantees for the algorithm are lacking 3. Effective bounds on the degree of fundamental units remain undetermined ### Future Directions 1. **Theoretical problems**: - Prove Conjecture 5.7 - Establish effective bounds on fundamental unit degrees 2. **Computational problems**: - Improve algorithm efficiency - Extend to higher degree curves 3. **Generalization problems**: - Cases over other finite fields - More general algebraic curves ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical innovation**: Establishes the equivalence between unit groups and quadratic form representations, a profound theoretical insight 2. **Classification completeness**: Achieves complete classification through automorphism action with elegant methodology 3. **Computational breakthrough**: The developed algorithm handles large degree cases inaccessible to traditional methods 4. **Result depth**: Not only resolves 2/3 of the cases but provides strong conjecture and evidence for the remaining case ### Weaknesses 1. **Incompleteness**: The Type 3 conjecture remains unproven, leaving a theoretical gap 2. **Algorithm theory**: The computational algorithm lacks theoretical termination guarantees 3. **Complexity analysis**: Analysis of algorithm complexity is insufficiently detailed ### Impact 1. **Theoretical contribution**: Provides new research directions and tools for unit group theory in commutative algebra 2. **Computational value**: The algorithm has practical application value for related computational problems 3. **Inspirational significance**: The methodology may generalize to research on other similar algebraic structures ### Applicable Scenarios 1. Arithmetic study of hyperelliptic curves in algebraic geometry 2. Classification problems for algebraic structures over finite fields 3. Unit group computation in symbolic computation ## References The paper cites the following key references: 1. Van der Kulk's classical results on automorphisms of polynomial rings 2. Rosenlicht's work on rationality of algebraic groups 3. Authors' previous research on unit group computation for curves 4. The Macaulay2 computational algebra system --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality commutative algebra paper with important contributions in both theoretical and computational aspects. Although the main conjecture remains unproven, the existing results and supporting evidence make it a significant advance in the field.