Three invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2311.08541
• Title: Three invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals
• Authors: Thái Thành Nguyễn, Jenna Rajchgot, Adam Van Tuyl
• Classification: math.AC (Commutative Algebra), math.CO (Combinatorics)
• Publication Date: November 14, 2023 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08541

Abstract

This paper investigates three important invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals: Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity, multiplicity, and the a-invariant. The authors establish that these invariants can be computed recursively through the ideals appearing in the geometric vertex decomposition process. As an application, they prove that the a-invariant of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals is non-positive. The article also recovers several known results from the literature, including regularity formulas for Stanley-Reisner ideals of pure vertex decomposable simplicial complexes, and proves that certain families of well-known ideals are Hilbertian. Finally, the recursive formulas are applied to the study of toric ideals of bipartite graphs, providing new proofs for known bounds on the a-invariant of bipartite graph toric ideals.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Geometric vertex decomposition is a Gröbner degeneration technique introduced by Knutson, Miller, and Yong in their study of Schubert determinantal ideals. Klein and Rajchgot further developed the concept of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals, which generalizes Stanley-Reisner ideals of vertex decomposable simplicial complexes.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Need: Geometrically vertex decomposable ideals possess a natural recursive structure, providing an ideal inductive framework for studying their algebraic invariants
2. Applied Value: This class of ideals encompasses multiple important ideal families, such as Schubert determinantal ideals and toric ideals of bipartite graphs
3. Methodological Innovation: Utilizing the recursive nature of geometric vertex decomposition to compute algebraic invariants provides a novel research approach

Limitations of Existing Methods

Traditional computational methods often require explicit ideal representations or complex combinatorial-topological tools, whereas geometric vertex decomposition provides a more unified and recursive approach.

Core Contributions

1. Establishment of Recursive Formulas: Provides recursive computational formulas for three important invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals (regularity, multiplicity, a-invariant)
2. Proof of Non-positivity of a-Invariant: Demonstrates that the a-invariant of all geometrically vertex decomposable ideals is non-positive, making them "almost Hilbertian"
3. Unification of Known Results: Reproves multiple known results using new methods, including regularity formulas for vertex decomposable simplicial complexes
4. Application to Graph Theory: Applies results to toric ideals of bipartite graphs, obtaining new bounds and computational formulas for regularity, multiplicity, and a-invariant
5. Introduction of C-Saturation Concept: Defines C-saturated geometrically vertex decomposable ideals and proves their Hilbertian property

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Study three invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals $I \subseteq R = K[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$:

• Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity: $\text{reg}(R/I)$
• Multiplicity: $e(R/I)$
• a-invariant: $a(R/I)$

Core Theoretical Framework

Geometric Vertex Decomposition

For ideal $I$ and variable $y$, geometric vertex decomposition is expressed as: $\text{in}_y(I) = C_{y,I} \cap (N_{y,I} + \langle y \rangle)$

where:

• $C_{y,I} = \langle q_1, \ldots, q_m \rangle$ (C-ideal)
• $N_{y,I} = \langle q_i | d_i = 0 \rangle$ (N-ideal)

h-Polynomial Relations

Theorem 2.4: If the decomposition is non-degenerate, then the h-polynomial satisfies: $h_{R/I}(t) = h_{R/N_{y,I}}(t) + t h_{R/C_{y,I}}(t)$

Main Recursive Formulas

Theorem 1.1: Let $I$ be a geometrically vertex decomposable ideal with non-degenerate geometric vertex decomposition. Then:

1. Regularity: $\text{reg}(R/I) = \max\{\text{reg}(R/N_{y,I}), \text{reg}(R/C_{y,I}) + 1\}$
2. Multiplicity: $e(R/I) = e(R/N_{y,I}) + e(R/C_{y,I})$
3. a-Invariant: $a(R/I) = \max\{a(R/N_{y,I}) + 1, a(R/C_{y,I}) + 1\}$

Technical Innovations

1. Utilization of Cohen-Macaulay Property: Geometrically vertex decomposable ideals are Cohen-Macaulay, enabling $\text{reg}(R/I) = \deg h_{R/I}(t)$
2. Dimension Relations: In the non-degenerate case, $\dim(R/I) = \dim(R/C_{y,I}) = \dim(R/N_{y,I}) - 1$
3. Recursive Structure: Each decomposition reduces the problem dimension by one variable, providing a complete inductive framework

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

The paper primarily employs theoretical proofs and concrete examples to verify results, including:

1. Stanley-Reisner Ideals: Verification of known results for pure vertex decomposable simplicial complexes
2. Ferrers Graph Toric Ideals: Computation of specific regularity formulas
3. Bipartite Graph Toric Ideals: Application of recursive formulas to obtain new bounds

Concrete Examples

• Example 3.6: Regularity computation for ideal $I = \langle y(zs-x^2), ywr, wr(z^2+zx+wr+s^2) \rangle$
• Example 6.15: Verification of regularity formulas for Ferrers graphs under different cases

Experimental Results

Main Theoretical Results

1. Non-Positivity of a-Invariant

Theorem 1.2: All geometrically vertex decomposable ideals $I$ satisfy $a(R/I) \leq 0$, thus for all $t \geq 1$, $HF_{R/I}(t) = HP_{R/I}(t)$.

2. Properties of Bipartite Graph Toric Ideals

Theorem 6.7: For any subgraph $H$ of bipartite graph $G$:

• $\text{reg}(I_H) \leq \text{reg}(I_G)$
• $a(K[E(G)]/I_H) \leq a(K[E(G)]/I_G)$
• $e(K[E(G)]/I_H) \leq e(K[E(G)]/I_G)$

3. Exact Formulas for Ferrers Graphs

Theorem 6.12: For Ferrers graph $T_\lambda$, when $\lambda_2 \geq 2$: $\text{reg}(R/I_\lambda) = \min\{s-1, \{\lambda_j + j - 3 | 2 \leq j \leq s\}\}$

Application Findings

1. Hilbertian Property of Connected Bipartite Graphs: Toric ideals of all connected bipartite graphs are Hilbertian
2. Effect of Gluing Operations: When gluing an even cycle to a graph, regularity increases by $d-1$ (where $2d$ is the cycle length)
3. Monotonicity of Subgraphs: In bipartite graphs, all three invariants of subgraphs do not exceed those of the original graph

Related Work

Main Research Directions

1. Vertex Decomposability Theory: Work by Provan-Billera, Björner-Wachs, and others
2. Stanley-Reisner Ideals: Regularity formulas by Hà-Woodroofe, Moradi-Khosh-Ahang
3. Graph Toric Ideals: Research by Villarreal, Corso-Nagel, and others
4. Schubert Geometry: Foundational work by Knutson-Miller-Yong on geometric vertex decomposition

Advantages of This Work

1. Unified Framework: Unifies results from multiple fields under the geometric vertex decomposition framework
2. Novel Proof Methods: Provides new recursive-based proofs for known results
3. Extended Applications: Applies theory to graph theory, obtaining new results

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Three important invariants of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals can all be computed via recursive formulas
2. This class of ideals possesses favorable algebraic properties (non-positive a-invariant, almost Hilbertian)
3. The recursive method provides a powerful tool for studying specific ideal families

Limitations

1. Scope of Applicability: Applies only to geometrically vertex decomposable ideals
2. Computational Complexity: Efficiency of recursive computation depends on decomposition depth
3. Decomposition Choice: Different geometric vertex decompositions may lead to different computational paths

Future Directions

1. Extension to more general classes of ideals
2. Study of algorithmic complexity of geometric vertex decomposition
3. Further applications in algebraic geometry

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Establishes profound connections between geometric vertex decomposition and algebraic invariants
2. Methodological Innovation: Recursive methods provide new approaches for computing algebraic invariants
3. Broad Applicability: Uniformly handles multiple important ideal families
4. Complete Results: Not only provides formulas but also proves important properties (e.g., non-positivity of a-invariant)

Weaknesses

1. High Technical Threshold: Requires deep background in commutative algebra and combinatorial algebraic geometry
2. Relatively Few Examples: While theoretically guaranteed, concrete computational examples could be more abundant
3. Limited Algorithm Discussion: Paper focuses primarily on theory with limited discussion of algorithmic implementation

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important algebraic tools for geometric vertex decomposition theory
2. Practical Value: Offers systematic methods for concrete computation
3. Cross-disciplinary Impact: Connects algebra, combinatorics, and geometry

Applicable Scenarios

1. Study of ideal families with geometric vertex decomposability
2. Computation of algebraic invariants for complex ideals
3. Research on toric ideals in graph theory
4. Applications in Schubert geometry and algebraic combinatorics

References

The paper cites 37 related references, primarily including:

• Foundational work by Knutson-Miller-Yong on geometric vertex decomposition
• Definition of geometrically vertex decomposable ideals by Klein-Rajchgot
• Work by Hà-Woodroofe and others on regularity of Stanley-Reisner ideals
• Research by Villarreal and others on graph toric ideals

This paper makes important contributions at the intersection of commutative algebra and combinatorial algebraic geometry, providing a unified and powerful recursive tool for computing important algebraic invariants while demonstrating the practical value of the theory in graph-theoretic applications.