2025-11-10T03:13:50.540037

A note on $L^p$-factorizations of representations

Ganguly, Krötz, Kuit
In this paper we give an overview on $L^p$-factorizations of Lie group representations and introduce the notion of smooth $L^p$-factorization.
academic

A note on LpL^p-factorizations of representations

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2311.18591
  • Title: A note on LpL^p-factorizations of representations
  • Authors: Pritam Ganguly, Bernhard Krötz, Job J. Kuit (Universität Paderborn)
  • Classification: math.RT (Representation Theory)
  • Publication Date: May 17, 2024 (arXiv v2)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18591

Abstract

This paper provides a survey of LpL^p-factorizations of representations of Lie groups and introduces the concept of smooth LpL^p-factorizations.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This paper investigates the LpL^p-factorization phenomenon for representations of Lie groups, with particular focus on generalizations of the Kunze-Stein phenomenon to symmetric spaces.

Historical Background

  1. Kunze-Stein Phenomenon: In 1960, Kunze and Stein discovered that for semisimple Lie groups GG, the convolution product Cc(G)×L2(G)L2(G)C_c(G) \times L^2(G) \to L^2(G) can be extended to a continuous map Lp(G)×L2(G)L2(G)L^p(G) \times L^2(G) \to L^2(G) for 1p<21 \leq p < 2.
  2. Gelfand Duality: The paper is dedicated to the memory of Gerrit van Dijk, who made profound contributions to Gelfand duality theory, particularly for non-compact symmetric subgroups.
  3. Symmetric Spaces: Special attention is given to hyperbolic spaces Xn=SO0(n,1)/SO0(n1,1)X_n = SO_0(n,1)/SO_0(n-1,1), which are the only rank-one symmetric spaces that do not satisfy the Gelfand property.

Research Motivation

To explore whether the Kunze-Stein phenomenon can be generalized to symmetric spaces G/HG/H, i.e., whether the natural convolution map Cc(G)×L2(G/H)L2(G/H)C_c(G) \times L^2(G/H) \to L^2(G/H) can be extended to a continuous map Lp(G)×L2(G/H)L2(G/H)L^p(G) \times L^2(G/H) \to L^2(G/H).

Core Contributions

  1. Introduction of Smooth LpL^p-Factorization: Proposes a refined definition of smooth LpL^p-factorization compared to traditional LpL^p-factorizations
  2. Establishment of Theoretical Framework: Provides equivalent characterizations and fundamental properties of LpL^p-factorizations
  3. Proof of Negative Results: Demonstrates that L2(Xn)L^2(X_n) does not admit smooth LpL^p-factorizations when p>n1n2p > \frac{n-1}{n-2}
  4. Provision of Positive Examples: Proves that the Harish-Chandra Schwartz space admits smooth LpL^p-factorizations

Detailed Methodology

Core Definitions

Definition 3.1 (LpL^p-Factorization): A representation (π,E)(π, E) admits an LpL^p-factorization if the natural map Cc(G)×EE,(f,v)π(f)vC_c(G) \times E \to E, \quad (f, v) \mapsto π(f)v extends to a continuous bilinear map Lp(G)×EEL^p(G) \times E \to E.

Definition 4.1 (Smooth LpL^p-Factorization): A representation (π,E)(π, E) admits a smooth LpL^p-factorization if the natural map Cc(G)×EE,(f,v)π(f)vC_c^\infty(G) \times E^\infty \to E^\infty, \quad (f, v) \mapsto π(f)v extends to a continuous bilinear map Lp(G)×EEL^p(G)^\infty \times E^\infty \to E^\infty.

Key Equivalence Characterizations

Proposition 3.2: For a Banach representation (π,E)(π, E) and 1p<1 \leq p < \infty with 1p+1p=1\frac{1}{p} + \frac{1}{p'} = 1, the following are equivalent:

  1. (π,E)(π, E) admits an LpL^p-factorization
  2. For all λEλ \in E' and vEv \in E, mλ,vLp(G)m_{λ,v} \in L^{p'}(G)
  3. There exists a constant C>0C > 0 such that mλ,vpCλEvE\|m_{λ,v}\|_{p'} \leq C\|λ\|_{E'}\|v\|_E

Technical Tools

  1. Bernstein Invariant Sobolev Lemma: Provides key estimates for the analysis of smooth LpL^p-factorizations
  2. Harish-Chandra ΞΞ-Function: Used in the analysis of Schwartz spaces
  3. Direct Integral Theory: Handles decompositions of unitary representations

Main Results

Positive Results

Corollary 4.4: For 1p<21 \leq p < 2, the Harish-Chandra Schwartz space (L,C(G))(L, C(G)) admits a smooth LpL^p-factorization.

Theorem 1.1 (Samei-Wiersma): Let X=G/HX = G/H where GG is semisimple and HGH \subseteq G is a reductive subgroup. Then there exists 1<pX<21 < p_X < 2 such that L2(X)L^2(X) admits an LpL^p-factorization for all p<pXp < p_X.

Negative Results

Theorem 5.1: L2(Xn)L^2(X_n) does not admit a smooth LpL^p-factorization for p>n1n2p > \frac{n-1}{n-2}.

Proof Strategy:

  1. Consider KK-spherical discrete series EL2(X)E \subset L^2(X) with spectral parameter 0<λ<ρ0 < λ < ρ
  2. Assume L2(X)L^2(X) admits a smooth LpL^p-factorization for p>n1n2p > \frac{n-1}{n-2}
  3. Through the action of the Casimir operator and the Paley-Wiener theorem, derive a contradiction

Corollary 3.8: Unitary representations of type I Lie groups with non-compact center do not admit LpL^p-factorizations for p>1p > 1.

Technical Innovations

1. Smooth Factorization Concept

The introduction of smooth LpL^p-factorization provides a more tractable concept than traditional LpL^p-factorizations, offering new technical pathways for investigation.

2. Geometric Analysis Methods

Combines:

  • Lie group representation theory
  • Harmonic analysis
  • Geometric analysis (Sobolev embeddings)
  • Symmetric space theory

3. Counterexample Construction

Through detailed analysis of hyperbolic spaces, provides explicit counterexamples showing that the Kunze-Stein phenomenon does not directly generalize to non-Riemannian symmetric spaces.

Theoretical Significance

Revelation of Limitations

Demonstrates that the Kunze-Stein phenomenon from groups G=G/{e}G = G/\{e\} to homogeneous spaces X=G/HX = G/H, particularly non-Riemannian symmetric spaces, does not admit direct generalizations.

New Research Directions

  1. Open Problem: Do unitary representations that admit smooth LpL^p-factorizations also admit LpL^p-factorizations?
  2. Precise Thresholds: Determine the LpL^p-factorization thresholds for various symmetric spaces

Application Prospects

  1. Provides new tools for convolution estimates in harmonic analysis
  2. Potential applications to noncommutative geometry and quantum group theory
  3. Offers new perspectives for studying function spaces on homogeneous spaces

Classical Theory

  • Kunze-Stein (1960): Original results for SL2(R)SL_2(\mathbb{R})
  • Cowling (1978): General case for semisimple Lie groups
  • Harish-Chandra: Schwartz space theory

Modern Developments

  • Benoist-Kobayashi (2015): Temperedness of reductive homogeneous spaces
  • Samei-Wiersma (2024): Singular CC^*-algebras of geometric groups

Conclusions and Perspectives

Main Conclusions

  1. Smooth LpL^p-factorization provides new tools for studying factorization properties of representations
  2. The hyperbolic space example shows that the Kunze-Stein phenomenon cannot be simply generalized
  3. There exists a precise threshold phenomenon: factorization fails when p>n1n2p > \frac{n-1}{n-2}

Future Directions

  1. Determine LpL^p-factorization thresholds for more symmetric spaces
  2. Investigate the relationship between smooth factorizations and traditional factorizations
  3. Explore generalizations in other geometric contexts

Technical Challenges

  1. Precise analysis in the non-compact case
  2. Deeper understanding of discrete series representations
  3. Treatment of more general homogeneous spaces

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Conceptual Innovation: The smooth LpL^p-factorization concept fills a theoretical gap
  2. Technical Depth: Synthesizes profound results from multiple mathematical branches
  3. Complete Results: Provides both positive and negative results, offering a complete picture
  4. Novel Methods: The application of Bernstein's lemma demonstrates the power of geometric analysis

Limitations

  1. Limited Applications: Primarily theoretical results; practical applications require further development
  2. High Technical Threshold: Requires deep background in Lie groups and harmonic analysis
  3. Computational Complexity: Specific calculations involve intricate integral estimates

Academic Impact

  1. Provides new tools for cross-disciplinary research between representation theory and harmonic analysis
  2. May inspire similar investigations for other geometric objects
  3. Offers new perspectives for understanding the function-theoretic properties of homogeneous spaces

This paper represents an important contribution to the intersection of representation theory and harmonic analysis. Through the introduction of smooth LpL^p-factorization and detailed analysis of hyperbolic spaces, it provides a new theoretical framework and technical tools for understanding the factorization properties of Lie group representations.