2025-11-25T07:46:18.118060

Triangle Ramsey numbers of complete graphs

Fox, Tidor, Zhang
A graph is $H$-Ramsey if every two-coloring of its edges contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. Define the $F$-Ramsey number of $H$, denoted by $r_F(H)$, to be the minimum number of copies of $F$ in a graph which is $H$-Ramsey. This generalizes the Ramsey number and size Ramsey number of a graph. Addressing a question of Spiro, we prove that \[r_{K_3}(K_t)=\binom{r(K_t)}{3}\] for all sufficiently large $t$. We do so through a result on graph coloring: there exists an absolute constant $K$ such that every $r$-chromatic graph where every edge is contained in at least $K$ triangles must contain at least $\binom{r}{3}$ triangles in total.
academic

Triangle Ramsey numbers of complete graphs

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2312.06895
  • Title: Triangle Ramsey numbers of complete graphs
  • Authors: Jacob Fox (Stanford), Jonathan Tidor (Princeton), Shengtong Zhang (Stanford)
  • Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics)
  • Publication Date: arXiv:2312.06895v2 math.CO 1 Oct 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.06895

Abstract

A graph GG is called HH-Ramsey if every 2-coloring of its edges contains a monochromatic copy of HH. The FF-Ramsey number rF(H)r_F(H) of HH is defined as the minimum number of copies of FF in all HH-Ramsey graphs. This generalizes the concepts of Ramsey numbers and size Ramsey numbers for graphs. In response to a question posed by Spiro, the authors prove that for sufficiently large tt, rK3(Kt)=(r(Kt)3)r_{K_3}(K_t)=\binom{r(K_t)}{3}. The proof is based on a result in graph coloring: there exists an absolute constant KK such that every rr-chromatic graph in which each edge is contained in at least KK triangles contains at least (r3)\binom{r}{3} triangles in total.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Extension of Classical Ramsey Theory: Traditional Ramsey theory studies r(H)r(H) (the minimum size of a complete graph such that any 2-coloring contains a monochromatic copy of HH). This paper investigates the more general FF-Ramsey number rF(H)r_F(H) (the minimum number of copies of FF in HH-Ramsey graphs).
  2. Known Results: Chvátal proved that rK2(Kt)=(r(Kt)2)r_{K_2}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{2}, meaning the complete graph Kr(Kt)K_{r(K_t)} has the minimum number of edges among all KtK_t-Ramsey graphs.
  3. Spiro's Conjecture: For all sts \leq t, does rKs(Kt)=(r(Kt)s)r_{K_s}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{s} hold?

Research Significance

  • Theoretical Importance: This is the first study of FF-Ramsey numbers for subgraphs FF other than vertices and edges
  • Methodological Innovation: Deep integration of Ramsey theory with graph coloring theory
  • Generalization Value: Analogous to Alon-Shikhelman's generalized Turán function ex(n,F,H)ex(n,F,H)

Core Contributions

  1. Main Theorem: Proves that for sufficiently large tt, rK3(Kt)=(r(Kt)3)r_{K_3}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{3} (Theorem 1.3)
  2. Key Lemma: Establishes a connection between graph coloring and triangle counting (Theorem 1.5)
  3. Technical Innovation: Develops coloring techniques for handling locally dense graphs
  4. Methodological Contribution: Provides a framework for studying the general problem of rKs(Kt)r_{K_s}(K_t)

Methodology in Detail

Core Strategy

The proof consists of two main steps:

Step 1: Connection Between Ramsey Property and Chromatic Number (Proposition 1.4)

Key Observation:

  • If GG is KtK_t-Ramsey, then χ(G)r(Kt)\chi(G) \geq r(K_t)
  • If GG is KtK_t-Ramsey critical, then every edge of GG is contained in some KtK_t

Proof Idea: By contradiction, assuming the existence of a (r(Kt)1)(r(K_t)-1)-coloring allows construction of a 2-coloring of a KtK_t-Ramsey graph with no monochromatic KtK_t.

Step 2: Triangle Lower Bound for Locally Dense Graphs (Theorem 1.5)

Core Theorem: There exists an absolute constant KK such that every rr-chromatic graph in which each edge is contained in at least KK triangles contains at least (r3)\binom{r}{3} triangles.

Technical Framework

Fundamental Turán Argument (Section 2)

Theorem 2.2: For any rr-chromatic graph GG, t(G)+12e(G)(r3)+12(r2)t(G) + \frac{1}{2}e(G) \geq \binom{r}{3} + \frac{1}{2}\binom{r}{2}

Proof Techniques:

  1. Construct a graph sequence GG0G0G1G \supseteq G_0 \supseteq G'_0 \supseteq G_1 \supseteq \cdots
  2. Each GiG'_i is an (ri)(r-i)-critical subgraph, with IiI_i being a maximum independent set in GiG'_i
  3. Apply Turán's theorem to estimate the number of triangles containing each vertex

Coloring Theory Tools (Section 3)

  1. Gallai's Theorem: Structure of small critical graphs
  2. Vu's Theorem: Upper bounds on list chromatic number for locally sparse graphs
  3. Harris's Theorem: Upper bounds on chromatic number based on triangle count
  4. New Lemma 3.5: Improved coloring for degenerate locally sparse graphs

Main Proof Architecture

Handling Linear-Size Graphs (Section 4)

Lemma 4.1: For rr-critical graphs with O(r)O(r) vertices and clique number close to rr, the number of triangles exceeds (r3)\binom{r}{3}

Proposition 4.2: For rr-critical graphs with vertex count in the range [2r1,Cr][2r-1, Cr], the number of triangles exceeds (r3)\binom{r}{3}

General Case Proof (Section 5)

Three cases are handled:

  1. Small Clique Number Case: Application of Ramsey-Turán theorem
  2. Large Clique Number Case: Application of the linear-size result above
  3. Synthesis Argument: Weighted correction of independent set decomposition

Technical Innovations

1. Refinement of Turán Argument

  • Rather than simply applying the classical Turán theorem, precise bounds are obtained through critical graph decomposition
  • Introduction of "corrected weights" concept to handle cases containing large cliques

2. Localization to Globalization of Conditions

  • Deriving global triangle lower bounds from the local condition "each edge is in KK triangles"
  • Combining probabilistic methods with concentration inequalities (Azuma-Hoeffding, Talagrand inequalities)

3. Multi-Scale Analysis

  • Different techniques for graphs of different sizes: Gallai's theorem (small graphs), Ramsey-Turán (medium graphs), probabilistic coloring (large graphs)

Experimental Setup

This is a purely theoretical paper with no experimental verification. All results are obtained through mathematical proof.

Main Results

Core Theorem

Theorem 1.3: For sufficiently large tt, rK3(Kt)=(r(Kt)3)r_{K_3}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{3}

Supporting Results

  1. Theorem 1.5: Triangle lower bound for locally dense graphs
  2. Theorem 2.2: Improved Turán-type inequality
  3. Lemma 3.5: Improved coloring for degenerate graphs

Asymptotic Results

Corollary 2.3: rK3(Kt)(1o(1))(r(Kt)3)r_{K_3}(K_t) \geq (1-o(1))\binom{r(K_t)}{3}

Classical Results

  • Chvátal's Theorem: rK2(Kt)=(r(Kt)2)r_{K_2}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{2}
  • Ramsey Theory: Classical studies of r(Kt)r(K_t)
  • Size Ramsey Numbers: Related work on r^(H)\hat{r}(H)

Modern Developments

  • Generalized Turán Problems: Alon-Shikhelman's ex(n,F,H)ex(n,F,H)
  • Hypergraph Size Ramsey Numbers: Work by McKay and others
  • Probabilistic Methods: Rödl-Ruciński threshold functions

Technical Tools

  • Graph Coloring Theory: Molloy-Reed's coloring of locally sparse graphs
  • Ramsey-Turán Theory: Erdős-Sós theorem
  • Probabilistic Concentration: Applications of modern concentration inequalities

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Confirms the correctness of Spiro's conjecture for the case s=3s=3 with sufficiently large tt
  2. Establishes new connections between Ramsey theory and graph coloring theory
  3. Develops new techniques for handling locally dense graphs

Limitations

  1. Finiteness Restriction: Only holds for "sufficiently large tt"; small tt cases remain unresolved
  2. Special Cases: Only resolves the case s=3s=3; the general case remains open
  3. Constant Dependence: The constant KK in the proof may be large, limiting practical applications

Future Directions

  1. Complete Conjecture: Prove the general rKs(Kt)=(r(Kt)s)r_{K_s}(K_t) = \binom{r(K_t)}{s}
  2. Finite Cases: Handle small values of tt
  3. Other Graph Pairs: Study cases where (F,H)(F,H) are not complete graphs
  4. Computational Complexity: Analyze the computational complexity of computing rF(H)r_F(H)

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Depth: Skillfully combines multiple mathematical branches (Ramsey theory, graph coloring, probabilistic methods)
  2. Technical Innovation: Develops new methods for handling locally dense conditions
  3. Clear Structure: Proof proceeds in layers with rigorous logic
  4. Generality: Establishes foundations for studying broader FF-Ramsey numbers

Technical Highlights

  1. Weight Correction Technique: Introduction of corrected weights in independent set selection to handle large cliques
  2. Multi-Scale Analysis: Employs the most suitable techniques for graphs of different sizes
  3. Probabilistic Coloring: Skillfully applies probabilistic methods to deterministic problems

Shortcomings

  1. Non-Constructive: The proof is existential and does not provide explicit construction of extremal graphs
  2. Constant Estimation: Involved constants may be large, limiting practical significance
  3. Technical Complexity: The proof relies on multiple deep results, raising the barrier to understanding

Impact Assessment

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Establishes important foundations for FF-Ramsey number theory
  2. Methodological Value: The technical framework may be applicable to other combinatorial problems
  3. Follow-Up Research: Paves the way for resolving the complete Spiro conjecture

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Theoretical Research: Combinatorics and extremal graph theory
  2. Method Borrowing: Analysis of similar local-to-global problems
  3. Educational Value: Demonstrates comprehensive technical application in modern combinatorics

References

The paper cites 23 important references, covering:

  • Classical Ramsey theory (Erdős et al.)
  • Modern graph coloring theory (Alon-Krivelevich-Sudakov, Molloy-Reed)
  • Probabilistic methods (concentration inequality literature)
  • Generalized Turán problems (Alon-Shikhelman et al.)

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical paper that achieves important progress in the classical field of Ramsey theory. Although it resolves only a special case of the general conjecture, the techniques and ideas developed provide important tools for further advancement in the field. The paper demonstrates outstanding technical depth and innovation, representing a significant contribution to combinatorics.