Generalized (co)homology of symmetric quandles over homogeneous Beck modules

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2401.14143
• Title: Generalized (co)homology of symmetric quandles over homogeneous Beck modules
• Authors: Biswadeep Karmakar, Deepanshi Saraf, Mahender Singh
• Classification: math.QA (Quantum Algebra), math.GT (Geometric Topology)
• Publication Date: January 25, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14143

Abstract

This paper investigates quandles equipped with good involutions, termed symmetric quandles. The cohomology of symmetric quandles is known to provide strong cocycle invariants for classical links and surface links, even when they are not necessarily oriented. The paper introduces the category of symmetric quandle modules, proving that these modules completely determine Beck modules in the symmetric quandle category. This establishes appropriate coefficient objects for constructing suitable (co)homology theories. The authors develop extension theory for modules over symmetric quandles and propose a generalized (co)homology theory for symmetric quandles with coefficients in homogeneous Beck modules, which also recovers the symmetric quandle (co)homology developed by Kamada and Oshiro. The construction applies equally to symmetric racks. Finally, an explicit isomorphism is established between the second cohomology of symmetric quandles and the first cohomology of their associated groups.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Challenges with Orientation: In knot theory, the existence of orientation is often a critical prerequisite, particularly when using quandle cocycle invariants. For non-oriented links, traditional quandle theory has limitations.
2. Importance of Symmetric Quandles: Symmetric quandles, introduced by Kamada and Oshiro, address the challenge of overcoming orientation requirements by defining quandle cocycle invariants Φθ for non-oriented links and proving that Φθ coincides with the quandle cocycle invariant Φori_θ of oriented links when orientation is arbitrarily specified.
3. Theoretical Development Needs: Existing symmetric quandle theory primarily focuses on specific (co)homologies, lacking a more general coefficient module theory and corresponding (co)homology theories.

Research Motivation

1. Categorical Perspective: Inspired by 1, 11, the authors explore these objects from a categorical viewpoint, adopting an approach different from existing methods.
2. Determination of Beck Modules: Complete determination of Beck modules in the symmetric quandle category is needed to provide a general concept of coefficient modules for corresponding (co)homology theories.
3. Extension Theory: Development of extension theory for modules and establishment of connections with low-dimensional group cohomology.

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of Symmetric Quandle Module Category: Defines modules over symmetric racks and symmetric quandles, proving that these modules completely determine Beck modules in the respective categories.
2. Establishment of Categorical Equivalences: Proves equivalences between the module categories of symmetric racks (quandles) and the categories of abelian group objects in appropriate slice categories (Theorems 4.4 and 4.5).
3. Development of Extension Theory: Constructs extension theory for symmetric racks and quandles, establishing bijective correspondences between extension equivalence classes and second cohomology groups H²_SR(X,F) and H²_SQ(X,F) (Theorems 5.8 and 5.9).
4. Generalized (Co)homology Theory: Proposes a generalized (co)homology theory for symmetric quandles with coefficients in homogeneous Beck modules, recovering Kamada-Oshiro symmetric quandle (co)homology as a special case.
5. Group Cohomology Connection: Establishes an explicit isomorphism between the second cohomology of symmetric racks and the first cohomology of their associated groups (Theorem 7.1).

Methodology in Detail

Problem Formulation

Investigation of module theory and (co)homology theory for symmetric quandles, specifically including:

• Input: Symmetric quandle (X, ρX), where ρX is a good involution
• Output: Module categories, extension classifications, (co)homology groups
• Constraints: Satisfaction of symmetry conditions and quandle axioms

Core Concepts and Structures

1. Symmetric Racks and Symmetric Quandles

Definition 2.1: Let (X, ∗) be a rack (or quandle), and let the map ρX : X → X be called a good involution if:

• (S1) ρX is an involution: ρ²X = idX
• (S2) ρX(x ∗ y) = ρX(x) ∗ y
• (S3) x ∗ ρX(y) = x ∗⁻¹ y

2. Symmetric Quandle Modules

Definition 3.1: A module over a symmetric rack (X, ρX) is a trunk map F = (A,φ,ψ,η) : T(X,ρX) → Ab satisfying:

• φx,y : Ax → Ax∗y are isomorphisms
• Satisfy module axioms (M1)-(M8)
• For symmetric quandles, additionally satisfy (M9): φx,x(a) + ψx,x(a) = a

3. Semidirect Product Construction

For an (X,ρX)-module F = (A,φ,ψ,η), define the semidirect product F ⋊ X:

(a,x) ∗̃ (b,y) := (φx,y(a) + ψx,y(b), x ∗ y)
ρF⋊X((a,x)) = (ηx(a), ρX(x))

Technical Innovations

1. Application of Trunk Theory: First systematic application of Fenn-Rourke-Sanderson trunk theory to symmetric quandles, defining modules via trunk maps T(X,ρX) → Ab.
2. Characterization of Beck Modules: Complete characterization of Beck modules in the symmetric quandle category, establishing equivalence with the module category.
3. Extension Classification: Classification of extensions through factor set theory, establishing correspondence with second cohomology.
4. Algebraic Construction: Definition of symmetric rack algebra Z(X,ρX), characterizing module structure through relations (A1)-(A10).

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This paper is a pure mathematical theory research, verified primarily through:

1. Example Construction: Multiple concrete examples verify the correctness of the theory:
   • Trivial homogeneous modules
   • Good involutions on conjugacy quandles
   • Involutions on core quandles
2. Consistency Checks: Verification of consistency between new theory and known results, particularly regarding the relationship with Kamada-Oshiro theory.

Main Theorem Verification

Proof Strategy for Theorems 4.4 and 4.5

Through construction of functors T and S, prove:

SRMod(X,ρX) ≃ Ab(SR|(X,ρX))
SQMod(X,ρX) ≃ Ab(SQ|(X,ρX))

Extension Theory Verification

Through construction of factor sets and coboundaries, establish:

H²SR(X,F) ≅ {extension equivalence classes}

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Categorical Equivalence: Successfully establishes equivalence between module categories and abelian group object categories, providing complete characterization of Beck modules.
2. Extension Classification: Completely classifies abelian extensions of symmetric quandles, establishing bijective correspondence with second cohomology.
3. Cohomology Theory: Constructs generalized (co)homology theory, recovering Kamada-Oshiro theory as a special case.
4. Group Cohomology Connection: Establishes isomorphism:

   H²SR((X,ρX), A) ≅ H¹(G(X,ρX), Hom(X,A))
   

Theoretical Findings

1. Module Structure: Symmetric quandle modules are completely determined by three classes of maps (φ,ψ,η), where φ provides "twisting" action, ψ provides "mixing" action, and η handles symmetry.
2. Extension Structure: Classification of extensions is completely determined by factor sets satisfying specific cocycle conditions.
3. Cohomology Computation: Second cohomology can be computed through first cohomology of associated groups, providing practical computational tools.

Related Work

Main Research Context

1. Rack and Quandle Theory:
   • Pioneering work by Joyce 13 and Matveev 20
   • Cohomology theory by Fenn-Rourke-Sanderson 8,9
2. Symmetric Quandle Theory:
   • Foundational work by Kamada-Oshiro 14,15,16
   • Applications in non-oriented link theory
3. Categorical Methods:
   • Hopf algebra approach by Andruskiewitsch-Graña 1
   • Extension theory by Jackson 11

Advantages of This Paper

1. Systematicity: Provides a complete framework for symmetric quandle module theory
2. Generality: Generalizes existing special cases
3. Practicality: Establishes computational connections with group cohomology

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Characterization: Completely determines Beck module structure in the symmetric quandle category
2. Extension Classification: Establishes complete classification theory for extensions
3. Cohomology Theory: Constructs generalized (co)homology theory, unifying existing results
4. Computational Tools: Provides methods for computing quandle cohomology via group cohomology

Limitations

1. Computational Complexity: While establishing a theoretical framework, computation for specific symmetric quandles may remain complex
2. Application Scope: Primarily focuses on algebraic structures, with limited direct contribution to geometric applications
3. Special Cases: Some results require homogeneity assumptions, limiting generality

Future Directions

1. Geometric Applications: Apply theory to concrete topological invariant computations
2. Computational Methods: Develop more efficient computational algorithms
3. Generalizations: Extend to more general algebraic structures

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Depth: Provides deep and systematic investigation of symmetric quandle module theory, filling theoretical gaps in the field
2. Technical Innovation:
   • Clever application of trunk theory to symmetric structures
   • Establishes profound connections with Beck module theory
   • Provides complete solution to extension classification
3. Structural Completeness: Constructs a complete theoretical system from module definitions to cohomology theory
4. Computational Value: Established group cohomology connections provide tools for practical computation

Weaknesses

1. Application Orientation: As pure theoretical research, lacks direct application demonstrations to concrete topological problems
2. Technical Threshold: Requires deep background in category theory and homological algebra, potentially limiting the audience
3. Computational Examples: Lacks concrete computational examples demonstrating practical utility of the theory

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides solid algebraic foundation for symmetric quandle theory, expected to become important reference in the field
2. Theoretical Value: Established categorical equivalences and extension theory possess universality, potentially influencing research on related algebraic structures
3. Computational Tools: Group cohomology connections provide new approaches for practical computation with practical value

Applicable Scenarios

1. Knot Theory Research: Provides theoretical foundation for invariant research on non-oriented links and surface links
2. Algebraic Topology: Has application value in studying algebraic invariants of low-dimensional manifolds
3. Category Theory: Provides new examples and applications for Beck module theory and extension theory

References

The paper cites 30 important references, primarily including:

1. Foundational Theory: Joyce 13, Matveev 20 - foundations of rack/quandle theory
2. Symmetric Theory: Kamada-Oshiro 14,15,16 - symmetric quandle theory
3. Categorical Methods: Andruskiewitsch-Graña 1, Jackson 11 - categorical approaches
4. Topological Applications: Carter et al. 4, Fenn et al. 8,9 - topological invariant applications

This paper provides important algebraic foundations for symmetric quandle theory. While technically demanding, its theoretical contributions and potential application value make it a significant advance in the field.