2025-11-23T00:13:15.391562

On the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation

Schmid
This paper presents some new results on the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation. We study the angular and Coulomb spheroidal wave equation as a special case of a more general linear Hamiltonian system depending on three parameters. We prove that the eigenvalues of this system satisfy a first-order quasilinear partial differential equation with respect to the parameters. This relation offers a new insight on how the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation depend on the spheroidal parameter. Apart from analytical considerations, the PDE we obtain can also be used for a numerical computation of spheroidal eigenvalues.
academic

On the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2402.07133
  • Title: On the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation
  • Author: Harald Schmid (University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden, Germany)
  • Classification: math.AP math-ph math.CA math.MP
  • Publication Date: February 11, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07133

Abstract

This paper presents novel results concerning the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation. The author investigates the angular spheroidal wave equation and the Coulomb spheroidal wave equation as special cases of a more general linear Hamiltonian system depending on three parameters. It is proven that the eigenvalues of this system satisfy a first-order quasilinear partial differential equation with respect to the parameters. This relationship provides new insights into how the eigenvalues of the spheroidal wave equation depend on the spheroidal parameters. Beyond analytical considerations, the derived partial differential equation can be utilized for numerical computation of spheroidal eigenvalues.

Research Background and Motivation

  1. Core Problem: The spheroidal wave equation appears in numerous fields of physics and engineering, including quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, and signal processing. Computing its eigenvalues is a challenging task requiring new theoretical insights and numerical methods.
  2. Significance:
    • The angular spheroidal wave equation arises from separation of the Helmholtz equation in ellipsoidal coordinates
    • The Coulomb spheroidal wave equation provides exact wave functions in astrophysics and molecular physics, such as for single-electron diatomic molecules with fixed nuclei
    • Eigenvalue computation for these equations is crucial for solving related physical problems
  3. Limitations of Existing Methods:
    • Traditional numerical methods encounter rounding errors or digit cancellation at large parameter values
    • Lack of a unified theoretical framework describing the analytical relationship between eigenvalues and parameters
    • Existing computational methods have limited precision and efficiency
  4. Research Motivation:
    • Establish analytical relationships between eigenvalues and parameters
    • Provide new numerical computational pathways
    • Deepen understanding of the mathematical structure of spheroidal wave equations

Core Contributions

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Transforms the Coulomb spheroidal wave equation into a 2×2 linear Hamiltonian system, establishing an equivalence relationship with the original eigenvalue problem
  2. Main Theorem: Proves that the eigenvalue Λ of the Hamiltonian system satisfies a first-order quasilinear partial differential equation: 2u1u1+((Λ+2)(u1+u22)+Λ+u2+u3)Λu2+=(1+2μ2Λu2)(Λ+2)2μ2u_1\frac{\partial\Λ}{\partial u_1} + \left((Λ+2)(u_1+u_2^2)+Λ+u_2+u_3\right)\frac{\partial Λ}{\partial u_2} + \cdots = (1+2μ-2Λu_2)(Λ+2)-2μ
  3. Numerical Method: Proposes a new approach for computing spheroidal eigenvalues based on the method of characteristics for solving the partial differential equation
  4. Simplification for Special Cases: For the ellipsoidal wave equation (β=0, γ²>0), further simplifies to the form of a forced inviscid Burgers equation

Methodology Details

Problem Formulation

Investigation of the eigenvalue problem for the Coulomb spheroidal wave equation (CSWE): ddx((1x2)ddxw(x))+(λ+βx+γ2(1x2)μ21x2)w(x)=0\frac{d}{dx}\left((1-x^2)\frac{d}{dx}w(x)\right) + \left(λ+βx+γ^2(1-x^2)-\frac{μ^2}{1-x^2}\right)w(x) = 0

where one seeks to find the values of λ (eigenvalues) for which the equation admits non-trivial bounded solutions on (-1,1).

Model Architecture

1. Parameter Transformation Introduction of technical parameters:

  • u1=γ2u_1 = γ^2, u2u_2, u3u_3 with relationships to ββ, γ2γ^2, λλ: γ2=u1,β=u32(μ+1)u2,λ=u3+μ(μ+1)γ^2 = u_1, \quad β = -u_3-2(μ+1)u_2, \quad λ = u_3+μ(μ+1)
  • α:=12(μ+1)α := \frac{1}{2}(μ+1)

2. Hamiltonian System Construction Transformation of CSWE into a 2×2 differential system: (0110)y(z)(2αz+α1z+2u2u3z+2(u1+u22)2αz+α1z+2u22αz)y(z)=Λ(11z001z)y(z)\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}y'(z) - \begin{pmatrix} \frac{2α}{z}+\frac{α}{1-z}+2u_2 & \frac{u_3}{z}+2(u_1+u_2^2) \\ \frac{2α}{z}+\frac{α}{1-z}+2u_2 & \frac{2α}{z} \end{pmatrix}y(z) = Λ\begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{1-z} & 0 \\ 0 & \frac{1}{z} \end{pmatrix}y(z)

3. Self-Adjoint Operator Theory

  • Proves that the differential expression exhibits limit-point behavior at the endpoints
  • Establishes a self-adjoint operator T(u)T(u) in the Hilbert space LW2((0,1),C2)L^2_W((0,1),\mathbb{C}^2)
  • Eigenvalues are real and isolated

Technical Innovations

1. Deformation Method

  • Employs the deformation method from reference 4 to establish the partial differential equation satisfied by eigenvalues
  • Constructs a special matrix function G(z,Λ,u)G(z,Λ,u) satisfying the deformation equation
  • Eliminates the need for explicit knowledge of eigenfunctions

2. Connection Coefficient Method

  • Utilizes asymptotic behavior of fundamental solutions at singular points
  • Determines eigenvalues through zeros of connection coefficients Θ(Λ,u)Θ(Λ,u)
  • Provides recurrence formula (16) for numerical computation

3. Method of Characteristics

  • Transforms the partial differential equation into a system of ordinary differential equations
  • Traces parameter variations along characteristic curves
  • Enables computation of new eigenvalues from known ones

Experimental Setup

Numerical Implementation Details

  • Uses limit formulas from Lemma 3 to compute connection coefficients Θ(Λ,u)Θ(Λ,u)
  • Recurrence relation (16) for series coefficient calculation with precision O(kδμ2)O(k^{δ-μ-2})
  • Employs the secant method to solve Θ(Λ,u)=0Θ(Λ,u)=0
  • Uses Runge-Kutta method to solve the characteristic equation system

Test Parameters

  • μ=1μ = 1, a=5a = 5 (initial parameters)
  • High-precision internal computation with results displayed to 16 decimal places

Experimental Results

Main Results

Numerical Example (from appendix):

  • Initial conditions: μ=1μ = 1, u1(0)=5u_1(0) = 5, u2(0)=0u_2(0) = 0
  • Zero of Θ~(Λ)Θ̃(Λ) found at: Λ0=0.8417200168449013Λ_0 = -0.8417200168449013
  • Characteristic curve reaches Λ(t0)=0Λ(t_0) = 0 at t0=0.2793371978706399t_0 = 0.2793371978706399
  • Resulting spheroidal wave equation eigenvalue: λ=5.2736106330552739λ = -5.2736106330552739
  • Corresponding parameters: γ2=8.7417666942941543γ^2 = 8.7417666942941543

Theoretical Findings

1. Equivalence Theorem (Lemma 1): Λ=0Λ = 0 is an eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian system T(u1,u2,u3)T(u_1,u_2,u_3) if and only if λ=u3+μ(μ+1)λ = u_3+μ(μ+1) is an eigenvalue of the corresponding CSWE.

2. Partial Differential Equation (Theorem 2): The eigenvalue Λ(u1,u2,u3)Λ(u_1,u_2,u_3) satisfies a complex first-order quasilinear PDE (5).

3. Simplified Case (Theorem 5): For the ellipsoidal case, simplification yields a forced inviscid Burgers equation: ωt+2ωωu=2(μ+1)2tanhucosh2u+e2tsinh(2u)+etcoshu\frac{\partial ω}{\partial t} + 2ω\frac{\partial ω}{\partial u} = 2(μ+1)^2\frac{\tanh u}{\cosh^2 u} + e^{2t}\sinh(2u) + e^t\cosh u

  1. Spheroidal Function Theory: Classical works by Flammer (1957), Meixner & Schäfke (1954), and others
  2. Numerical Computation Methods: Computational techniques by Hodge (1970), Kirby (2006), Skorokhodov (2015), and others
  3. Hamiltonian Systems: Author's previous work on the Chandrasekhar-Page equation 3
  4. Deformation Method: General theoretical framework developed by the author in 4

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Establishes analytical relationships between spheroidal wave equation eigenvalues and parameters, expressed in the form of a partial differential equation
  2. Numerical Method: Provides a new computational pathway based on the method of characteristics, avoiding certain numerical difficulties of traditional methods
  3. Mathematical Insight: Reveals an unexpected connection between spheroidal wave equations and forced inviscid Burgers equations

Limitations

  1. Scope of Applicability: The method primarily applies to cases where parameters lie in the real number domain
  2. Numerical Stability: Numerical problems may still occur at very large parameter values
  3. Computational Complexity: Solving the partial differential equation itself requires numerical methods

Future Directions

  1. Generalized Applications: The method may be applicable to more general eigenvalue problems such as confluent Heun differential equations
  2. Numerical Optimization: Further improvements to the stability and efficiency of numerical algorithms
  3. Theoretical Deepening: Further investigation of analytical properties and asymptotic behavior of eigenvalues

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Theoretical Innovation: First-time establishment of a partial differential equation description for spheroidal wave equation eigenvalues, providing an entirely new theoretical perspective
  2. Rigorous Methodology: Employs rigorous functional analysis and operator theory with complete proofs
  3. Practical Value: Provides practically applicable numerical computation methods
  4. Interdisciplinary Connections: Reveals deep connections with the Burgers equation from fluid mechanics

Weaknesses

  1. Complexity: The derived partial differential equation has a complex form, requiring numerical methods for solution
  2. Limited Numerical Verification: Only one specific numerical example is provided, limiting the scope of verification
  3. Comparative Analysis: Lacks systematic comparison with existing methods in terms of precision and efficiency

Impact

  1. Theoretical Significance: Provides new mathematical tools and perspectives for spheroidal function theory
  2. Application Prospects: Holds potential value in applied fields such as quantum mechanics and electromagnetism
  3. Method Generalization: The deformation method framework may be applicable to eigenvalue problems of other special functions

Applicable Scenarios

  1. High-Precision Computation: Physics calculations requiring high-precision spheroidal eigenvalues
  2. Parameter Studies: Investigation of analytical properties of eigenvalue dependence on parameters
  3. Theoretical Analysis: Mathematical theory research on spheroidal functions

References

The paper cites 13 important references, including:

  • Classical theory of spheroidal functions (Flammer, Meixner & Schäfke)
  • Numerical computation methods (Hodge, Kirby, and others)
  • Author's previous related work (deformation method theory)
  • Operator theory foundations (Weidmann, Kato)

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality mathematical physics theory paper that makes important contributions to the theory of spheroidal wave equation eigenvalues. Although the derived partial differential equation is relatively complex, it provides a novel theoretical framework and computational pathway for this classical problem, possessing significant theoretical value and application prospects.