Following the concentration of the measure theory formalism, we consider the transformation $Φ(Z)$ of a random variable $Z$ having a general concentration function $α$. If the transformation $Φ$ is $λ$-Lipschitz with $λ>0$ deterministic, the concentration function of $Φ(Z)$ is immediately deduced to be equal to $α(\cdot/λ)$. If the variations of $Φ$ are bounded by a random variable $Î$ having a concentration function (around $0$) $β: \mathbb R_+\to \mathbb R$, this paper sets that $Φ(Z)$ has a concentration function analogous to the so-called parallel product of $α$ and $β$. With this result at hand (i) we express the concentration of random vectors with independent heavy-tailed entries, (ii) given a transformation $Φ$ with bounded $k^{\text{th}}$ differential, we express the so-called "multi-level" concentration of $Φ(Z)$ as a function of $α$, and the operator norms of the successive differentials up to the $k^{\text{th}}$ (iii) we obtain a heavy-tailed version of the Hanson-Wright inequality.
This paper investigates the concentration properties of transformations Φ(Z) of random variables Z with general concentration functions α within the framework of measure concentration theory. When the transformation Φ is a deterministic λ-Lipschitz function, the concentration function of Φ(Z) is α(⋅/λ). When the variation of Φ is bounded by a random variable Λ with concentration function β:R+→R, the paper proves that Φ(Z) possesses a concentration function analogous to the "parallel product" of α and β. Based on this result, the paper: (i) characterizes the concentration of random vectors with independent heavy-tailed components; (ii) expresses "multi-level" concentration of Φ(Z) for transformations Φ with bounded k-th order derivatives; (iii) obtains a heavy-tailed version of the Hanson-Wright inequality.
A fundamental result in measure concentration theory states that for a Gaussian random vector Z∼N(0,In) and any 1-Lipschitz mapping f:Rn→R with respect to the Euclidean norm:
∀t≥0:P(∣f(Z)−E[f(Z)]∣>t)≤2e−t2/2
When the transformation F is λ-Lipschitz, the concentration function of F(Z) is α(⋅/λ). However, when λ is not a constant but a random variable Λ(Z), how can we characterize the concentration properties of F(Z)?
Establishes a theoretical framework for concentration inequalities under random Lipschitz constants, generalizing classical results to cases where Λ is a random variable
Introduces parallel operations of maximal monotone operators, providing mathematical tools for operating on concentration functions
Develops concentration theory for heavy-tailed random vectors, systematically studying concentration properties of vectors with independent heavy-tailed components
Establishes multi-level concentration inequalities, characterizing concentration for functions with bounded higher-order derivatives
Obtains a heavy-tailed generalization of the Hanson-Wright inequality, extending concentration results for quadratic forms
Theorem 0.1: Let (E,d), (E′,d′) be metric spaces, Z∈E a random variable, and Λ:E→R a measurable mapping. If there exist strictly decreasing mappings α,β:R+→R+ such that for any 1-Lipschitz mapping f:E→R and independent copy Z′ of Z:
P(∣f(Z)−f(Z′)∣>t)≤α(t),P(Λ(Z)>t)≤β(t)
and the transformation Φ:E→E′ satisfies:
d′(Φ(z),Φ(z′))≤max(Λ(z),Λ(z′))⋅d(z,z′)
then for any 1-Lipschitz mapping g:E′→R:
P(∣g(Φ(Z))−g(Φ(Z′))∣>t)≤3(α−1⋅β−1)−1(t)
Proposition 2.21: Consider a random vector X=(X1,…,Xn) where Xi=ϕi(Zi) with Zi independent bilateral Laplace random variables. Define:
h(t)=sup∣u−v∣≤t,i∈[n]∣u−v∣∣ϕi(u)−ϕi(v)∣
For any 1-Lipschitz mapping f:Rn→R:
P(∣f(X)−f(X′)∣>t)≤3CE1∘min((Id⋅h)−1(2ct),2h(logn)ct)
The paper cites 48 important references, covering:
Classical literature in measure concentration theory (Ledoux, Talagrand, etc.)
Monotone operator theory in functional analysis (Bauschke & Combettes, etc.)
Concentration inequalities in probability theory (Adamczak, Boucheron, etc.)
Related research on heavy-tailed probabilities (Cattiaux, Gozlan, etc.)
Overall Assessment: This is a theoretically profound probability theory paper that provides new mathematical tools for measure concentration theory through the introduction of parallel operations. The paper excels in theoretical innovation and systematicity, but has room for improvement in readability and practical application verification. For researchers in probability theory and functional analysis, this paper offers valuable theoretical contributions.