2025-11-16T18:13:19.971421

Effective module lattices and their shortest vectors

Gargava, Serban, Viazovska et al.
We prove tight probabilistic bounds for the shortest vectors in module lattices over number fields using the results of arXiv:2308.15275. Moreover, establishing asymptotic formulae for counts of fixed rank matrices with algebraic integer entries and bounded Euclidean length, we prove an approximate Rogers integral formula for discrete sets of module lattices obtained from lifts of algebraic codes. This in turn implies that the moment estimates of arXiv:2308.15275 as well as the aforementioned bounds on the shortest vector also carry through for large enough discrete sets of module lattices.
academic

Effective module lattices and their shortest vectors

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2402.10305
  • Title: Effective module lattices and their shortest vectors
  • Authors: Nihar Gargava, Vlad Serban, Maryna Viazovska, Ilaria Viglino
  • Classification: math.NT (Number Theory), cs.IT (Information Theory), math.IT (Mathematical Information Theory)
  • Publication Date: arXiv preprint, submitted February 2024, updated October 2025
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10305v2

Abstract

This paper leverages results from prior work 1 to establish tight probabilistic bounds on the shortest vectors of module lattices over number fields. Furthermore, by establishing asymptotic formulas for counting fixed-rank matrices with algebraic integer entries and bounded Euclidean length, the authors prove an approximate Rogers integral formula for discrete families of module lattices obtained from algebraic code lifts. This consequently implies that the moment estimates in 1 and the aforementioned shortest vector bounds also apply to sufficiently large discrete families of module lattices.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

  1. Core Problem in Lattice Cryptography: The Shortest Vector Problem (SVP) is central to lattice cryptography, seeking the length of the shortest nonzero vector in a lattice. The existence of fast algorithms remains an open problem, with public challenges inviting researchers to submit algorithms.
  2. Known Results for Random Lattices: For Haar-random lattices, Theorem 1 provides precise predictions for the shortest vector length: 1loglogddλ1(Λ)γ(d)1+loglogdd1-\frac{\log\log d}{d} \leq \frac{\lambda_1(\Lambda)}{\gamma(d)} \leq 1+\frac{\log\log d}{d} where γ(d)d2πe\gamma(d) \approx \sqrt{\frac{d}{2\pi e}} is the radius of the unit volume ball in dd dimensions.
  3. Specificity of Module Lattices: Module lattices are lattices with additional algebraic structure, widely applied in efficient cryptographic implementations, such as Ring Learning With Errors (Ring-LWE) and Short Integer Solution (SIS) problems.
  4. Research Challenges: Establishing asymptotic estimates similar to Theorem 1 for module lattices is more difficult, as it requires understanding behavior as the degree of the number field grows.

Core Contributions

  1. Probabilistic Bounds for Shortest Vectors of Module Lattices: Proves tight probabilistic bounds similar to random lattices for module lattices of rank tt when t27t \geq 27 (Theorem 3).
  2. Effective Rogers Integral Formula: Establishes an approximate Rogers integral formula for discrete families of module lattices constructed from algebraic code lifts (Theorem 15).
  3. Asymptotic Formula for Matrix Counting: Generalizes Katznelson's result to general number fields, providing asymptotic formulas for counting fixed-rank matrices (Theorem 4).
  4. Bridge Between Theory and Practice: Proves that theoretical results also apply to effective constructions from algebraic codes, with computational and coding-theoretic significance.

Detailed Methodology

Problem Definition

Study the probability distribution of the shortest vector length λ1(Λ)\lambda_1(\Lambda) in module lattices ΛKtR\Lambda \subseteq K^t \otimes \mathbb{R} of rank tt over a number field KK, particularly the asymptotic behavior as the degree of the number field grows.

Core Theoretical Framework

1. Moduli Space of Module Lattices

Module lattices are defined for pairs (g,M)(g,M), where gGLt(KR)g \in GL_t(K \otimes \mathbb{R}), MKtM \subseteq K^t is a finitely generated OKO_K-module, satisfying: vol(KtR/(g1M))=1\text{vol}(K^t \otimes \mathbb{R}/(g^{-1} \cdot M)) = 1

equipped with inner product: x,y=ΔK2degKtr(xyˉ)\langle x,y \rangle = |\Delta_K|^{-\frac{2}{\deg K}} \text{tr}(x\bar{y})

2. Steinitz Class Classification

Each module lattice has a Steinitz class [Λ]cl(K)[\Lambda] \in \text{cl}(K), given by fractional ideal classes: [Λ]=[I]cl(K)[\Lambda] = [I] \in \text{cl}(K) where II is generated by all determinants of tt-tuples of vectors in MM.

3. Lifting Construction from Algebraic Codes

For an unramified prime ideal POKP \subseteq O_K and dimension ss, define: L(P,s)={βπP1(S)SkPt is an s-dimensional kP-subspace}L(P,s) = \{\beta\pi_P^{-1}(S) | S \subseteq k_P^t \text{ is an } s\text{-dimensional } k_P\text{-subspace}\} where β=N(P)(1st)1[K:Q]\beta = N(P)^{-(1-\frac{s}{t})\frac{1}{[K:\mathbb{Q}]}} ensures unit covolume.

Technical Innovations

1. Effectivization of Rogers Integral Formula

The key technique is proving that for sufficiently large N(P)N(P): 1#L(P,s)ΛL(P,s)(vΛng(v))m=0nDMm×n(K)rk(D)=mD row-reduced echelonD(D)txKRt×mg(xD)dx\frac{1}{\#L(P,s)} \sum_{\Lambda \in L(P,s)} \left(\sum_{v \in \Lambda^n} g(v)\right) \to \sum_{m=0}^n \sum_{\substack{D \in M_{m \times n}(K) \\ \text{rk}(D)=m \\ D \text{ row-reduced echelon}}} \mathcal{D}(D)^{-t} \int_{x \in K_R^{t \times m}} g(xD)dx

2. Handling Rank Drop Phenomena

Lemma 13 addresses the critical rank drop problem: when xMt×n(OK)x \in M_{t \times n}(O_K) satisfies rk(πP(x))<rk(x)\text{rk}(\pi_P(x)) < \text{rk}(x), we have: xCN(P)1m[K:Q]\|x\| \geq C N(P)^{\frac{1}{m[K:\mathbb{Q}]}}

This ensures that for sufficiently large N(P)N(P), rank-deficient matrices are pushed outside the support of function gg.

3. Refined Analysis of Matrix Counting

Proposition 19 establishes the key asymptotic estimate: AMt×n(OK)rk(A)=mg(βA)βmtdDRm,n(K)1D(D)tMt×m(KR)g(xD)dxβδ\left|\sum_{\substack{A \in M_{t \times n}(O_K) \\ \text{rk}(A)=m}} g(\beta A)\beta^{mtd} - \sum_{D \in R_{m,n}(K)} \frac{1}{\mathcal{D}(D)^t} \int_{M_{t \times m}(K_R)} g(xD)dx\right| \ll \beta^\delta

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification Framework

This is primarily a theoretical work, but provides the following verification:

  1. Number Field Selection: Primarily considers cyclotomic fields K=Q(μk)K = \mathbb{Q}(\mu_k), as they satisfy the Bogomolov property.
  2. Parameter Ranges:
    • Rank t27t \geq 27 (technical limitation, possibly not tight)
    • Dimension ss satisfying 1st<1n1-\frac{s}{t} < \frac{1}{n}
  3. Asymptotic Regime: Considers behavior as kk \to \infty, corresponding to degree d=ϕ(k)d = \phi(k) \to \infty.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 3 (Shortest Vector Bounds for Module Lattices)

For fixed t27t \geq 27, cyclotomic field K=Q(μk)K = \mathbb{Q}(\mu_k), d=tdegK=tϕ(k)d = t \cdot \deg K = t\phi(k), Haar-random unit covolume module lattice ΛKtR\Lambda \subseteq K^t \otimes \mathbb{R} satisfies:

As kk \to \infty, with probability 1o(1)1-o(1): 1loglogkdk1dλ1(Λ)γ(d)1+loglogkd1-\frac{\log\log k}{d} \leq \frac{k^{-\frac{1}{d}}\lambda_1(\Lambda)}{\gamma(d)} \leq 1+\frac{\log\log k}{d}

Theorem 4 (Asymptotic Formula for Matrix Counting)

For mn<tm \leq n < t, let N(T;m,n,t,K)N(T;m,n,t,K) denote the number of n×tn \times t matrices with coefficients in OKO_K, rank mm, and each entry having norm bounded by TT, then: N(T;m,n,t,K)=CTmtdegK+O(TmtdegK1+ε)N(T;m,n,t,K) = C \cdot T^{mt \deg K} + O(T^{mt \deg K - 1 + \varepsilon})

Moment Estimate Results

Theorem 38 (General Moment Estimates)

For number field classes SS satisfying the Bogomolov property, there exist explicit constants such that the nn-th moment satisfies: ωKnmn(VωK)E[(#BΛ{0})n]ωKnmn(VωK)+En,t,K(V+1)n1\omega_K^n \cdot m_n\left(\frac{V}{\omega_K}\right) \leq \mathbb{E}[(\#B \cap \Lambda \setminus \{0\})^n] \leq \omega_K^n \cdot m_n\left(\frac{V}{\omega_K}\right) + E_{n,t,K} \cdot (V+1)^{n-1}

where the error term En,t,KC(td)(n2)/2ωKn2/4Z(K,t,n)eεd(tt0)E_{n,t,K} \leq C \cdot (td)^{(n-2)/2} \cdot \omega_K^{n^2/4} \cdot Z(K,t,n) \cdot e^{-\varepsilon \cdot d(t-t_0)}.

Proposition 39 (Exact Results for Second Moment)

For cyclotomic fields Ki=Q(ζki)K_i = \mathbb{Q}(\zeta_{k_i}), t27t \geq 27, ball BB of volume VV: V2+VkiE[(#BΛ{0})2]V2+Vki(1+Ceεdi(tt0))V^2 + V \cdot k_i \leq \mathbb{E}[(\#B \cap \Lambda \setminus \{0\})^2] \leq V^2 + V \cdot k_i \cdot (1 + C \cdot e^{-\varepsilon \cdot d_i(t-t_0)})

Classical Results

  1. Rogers (1947): First considered effective versions of Siegel's mean value theorem
  2. Katznelson (1994): Counting fixed-rank matrices over Q\mathbb{Q}
  3. Schmidt (1967): Height estimates for algebraic subspaces

Modern Developments

  1. Lattice Reduction Algorithms: Complete analysis of BKZ algorithm
  2. Module Lattice Cryptography: Ring-LWE and module LWE problems
  3. Equidistribution Theory: Equidistribution of Hecke points

Positioning of This Work's Contributions

This paper generalizes the classical Rogers integral formula to effective constructions of module lattices, establishing a bridge between theory and computation.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. Theoretical Breakthrough: First establishes shortest vector probabilistic bounds for module lattices similar to random lattices
  2. Methodological Innovation: Develops new techniques for handling algebraic code lifts
  3. Application Value: Provides theoretical foundation for lattice cryptography

Limitations

  1. Technical Constraints: The condition t27t \geq 27 may not be tight, with room for improvement
  2. Number Field Restrictions: Main results target number fields satisfying the Bogomolov property
  3. Computational Complexity: Constants in practical computation may be large

Future Directions

  1. Improved Bounds: Reduce the requirement on tt to more practical values (e.g., 3, 4, 5)
  2. Extended Number Field Classes: Consider more general number fields
  3. Algorithmic Applications: Transform theoretical results into practical lattice reduction algorithms

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Technical Depth: Skillfully handles technical challenges such as rank drop phenomena
  2. Theoretical Completeness: Establishes a complete framework from theory to application
  3. Novelty: First effectivization of Rogers integral formula for module lattices
  4. Practicality: Provides important theoretical tools for lattice cryptography

Weaknesses

  1. Parameter Restrictions: The requirement t27t \geq 27 may be too strong for practical applications
  2. Proof Complexity: Technical proofs are complex, with room for improved readability
  3. Numerical Verification: Lacks concrete numerical experiments verifying theoretical results

Impact

  1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides important progress in module lattice theory
  2. Application Prospects: Significant implications for lattice cryptography and coding theory
  3. Methodological Value: Developed techniques may apply to other related problems

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Lattice Cryptography: Analyzing security of cryptographic systems based on module lattices
  2. Coding Theory: Constructing efficient error-correcting codes
  3. Number-Theoretic Applications: Studying Diophantine approximation problems over number fields

References

This paper primarily builds on the authors' prior work 1 Gargava, Serban, Viazovska. "Moments of the number of points in a bounded set for number field lattices" (arXiv:2308.15275v2, 2023), and cites classical works by Rogers (1947), Katznelson (1994), Schmidt (1967), and others.


Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper that achieves important progress in module lattice theory. While technically demanding and subject to certain parameter restrictions, it provides an important theoretical foundation for lattice cryptography and related fields. The paper's primary value lies in establishing a bridge between theory and practical constructions, which is significant for the development of this field.