The dispersion of $E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm iso}$ correlation of long gamma-ray bursts is partially due to assembling different sources

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2403.11923
• Title: The dispersion of $E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm iso}$ correlation of long gamma-ray bursts is partially due to assembling different sources
• Authors: M. Maistrello, R. Maccary, C. Guidorzi, L. Amati
• Classification: astro-ph.HE (High Energy Astrophysics)
• Publication Date: March 19, 2024
• Journal: Astronomy & Astrophysics
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11923

Abstract

This study investigates the origin of intrinsic dispersion in the $E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm iso}$ correlation through time-resolved spectral analysis of 20 long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The research reveals that the dispersion within individual GRBs is significantly smaller than that of the overall sample (at 4.2σ confidence level), confirming that the correlation dispersion is partially due to the combined effect of different GRB sources. The collimation-corrected correlation does not exhibit reduced dispersion, indicating that the jet opening angle is not the primary source of dispersion.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

Gamma-ray bursts represent the most violent transient phenomena in the universe, with their prompt emission exhibiting multiple empirical correlations, among which the most important are the Amati correlation ($E_{\rm p,i}$-$E_{\rm iso}$) and the Yonetoku correlation ($E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm p,iso}$). These correlations exist not only between different GRBs but are also observable in time-resolved spectra of individual GRBs.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Significance: Understanding the origin of correlation dispersion is crucial for revealing the prompt emission mechanism of GRBs
2. Practical Value: Reducing dispersion helps develop GRBs as powerful standard candles for cosmological studies
3. Unresolved Mystery: The physical origin of intrinsic correlation dispersion remains unclear

Limitations of Existing Research

• Lack of quantitative studies on the difference between dispersion within individual GRBs and overall sample dispersion
• Controversial role of jet opening angle in contributing to dispersion
• Unclear relationship between dispersion and other key physical parameters (Lorentz factor, jet opening angle, etc.)

Core Contributions

1. First Quantitative Proof: Intrinsic dispersion within individual GRBs is significantly smaller than overall sample dispersion (at 4.2σ confidence level)
2. Exclusion of Sample Size Effects: Strict statistical analysis rules out the influence of sample size differences on results
3. Confirmation that Jet Opening Angle is Not the Primary Factor: Collimation-corrected correlation shows no reduced dispersion, indicating that jet opening angle is not the main source of dispersion
4. Establishment of Analytical Framework: Provides a systematic methodology for studying GRB correlation dispersion

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigate the intrinsic dispersion characteristics of the $E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm iso}$ correlation, quantitatively compare the difference between dispersion within individual GRBs and overall sample dispersion, and explore the relationship between dispersion and key physical parameters.

Sample Selection

Selection of 20 long-duration Type II GRBs detected by Fermi-GBM, all possessing:

• Known redshift $z$
• Estimated jet half-opening angle $\theta_j$ (ISM and wind environments)
• Estimated Lorentz factor $\Gamma_0$

Data Analysis Methods

Time-Resolved Spectral Analysis

1. Data Processing: TTE data utilized with the two brightest NaI detectors selected
2. Time Binning: Bayesian Blocks method employed to determine time intervals
3. Count Requirements: Minimum 1000 counts per interval to ensure statistical quality
4. Spectral Fitting: Band function used with high-energy index $\beta = -2.3$ fixed

Correlation Modeling

D'Agostini likelihood method employed within a Bayesian framework:

$\log\left(\frac{E_{p,i}}{\text{keV}}\right) = m \log\left(\frac{L_{iso}}{10^{52} \text{erg s}^{-1}}\right) + q$

where $m$, $q$, and $\sigma_{int}$ represent the power-law index, normalization constant, and intrinsic dispersion, respectively.

Statistical Testing Method

Null hypothesis $H_0$ (all GRBs have identical dispersion) tested via Monte Carlo simulation:

1. Random Reassignment: Overall sample randomly redistributed among individual GRBs
2. Repeated Simulations: $10^4$ simulations performed
3. Test Statistic Construction: $X = \prod_{j=1}^{20} p_j$ defined, where $p_j$ is the probability for the $j$-th GRB
4. Significance Calculation: Final significance computed using gamma distribution

Experimental Setup

Dataset Characteristics

• Sample Size: 20 long-duration GRBs
• Time-Resolved Spectra: 793 total
• Redshift Range: 0.33-4.62
• Time Span: 2009-2022

Evaluation Metrics

• Intrinsic dispersion $\sigma_{int}$
• Power-law index $m$ and normalization $q$
• Statistical significance level

Comparative Analysis

1. Individual GRB vs. Overall Sample dispersion comparison
2. Isotropic vs. Collimation-Corrected correlation comparison
3. Different Environmental Models (ISM vs. wind) comparison

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Overall Sample Parameters

• $\sigma_{int,t} = 0.24^{+0.01}_{-0.01}$
• $m_t = 0.46^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$
• $q_t = -21.4 \pm 0.9$

2. Individual GRB Dispersion Significantly Smaller

• Nearly all individual GRBs show dispersion less than or equal to overall sample dispersion
• Strict statistical test rejects $H_0$ hypothesis at 4.2σ confidence level
• Final probability $P_t = 2.69 \times 10^{-5}$

3. Limited Effect of Collimation Correction

Collimation-corrected correlation parameters:

• ISM environment: $\sigma_{coll}^{(ISM)} = 0.29^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$
• Wind environment: $\sigma_{coll}^{(W)} = 0.25^{+0.02}_{-0.02}$

Both are not smaller than isotropic dispersion, indicating that jet opening angle is not the primary source of dispersion.

Correlation Search Results

No significant correlation found between intrinsic dispersion and:

• Jet opening angle $\theta_j$
• Lorentz factor $\Gamma_0$
• Minimum Variability Timescale (MVT)
• Position in the $E_{p,i}$-$L_{iso}$ plane

Robustness Tests

1. Spectral Model Dependence: Band function vs. truncated power-law model results consistent
2. Detector Selection Impact: Results including BGO data consistent with NaI-only data
3. Time Binning Sensitivity: Different binning strategies yield compatible results

Related Work

Historical Development

• Amati et al. (2002): First discovery of $E_{p,i}$-$E_{iso}$ correlation
• Yonetoku et al. (2004): Discovery of $E_{p,i}$-$L_{p,iso}$ correlation
• Ghirlanda et al. (2004): Proposal of collimation-corrected correlation

Time-Resolved Studies

• Ghirlanda et al. (2010): Confirmation of correlation within individual GRBs
• Lu et al. (2012): Systematic study of time-resolved correlations
• Frontera et al. (2012): Analysis of correlation parameter consistency

Dispersion Origin Theory

• Jet opening angle effects (Ghirlanda et al. 2004)
• Viewing angle effects (Salafia et al. 2015)
• Jet precession effects (Gottlieb et al. 2022)

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Dual Origin of Dispersion: The $E_{\rm p,i}$-$L_{\rm iso}$ correlation dispersion is partially, but not entirely, due to the combination of different GRB sources
2. Jet Opening Angle Not the Primary Factor: Collimation correction does not significantly reduce dispersion
3. Intrinsic Physical Processes: Non-negligible dispersion remains within individual GRBs, suggesting the existence of intrinsic physical mechanisms

Physical Interpretation

Dispersion may originate from:

• Intrinsic differences among different GRBs
• Variations in viewing angle
• Complexity of jet internal structure
• Stochasticity of radiation mechanisms

Limitations

1. Limited Sample Size: Only 20 GRBs, statistical power constrained
2. Parameter Estimation Uncertainty: Significant errors in jet parameter estimates
3. Model Dependence: Dependent on specific afterglow modeling results

Future Directions

1. Sample Expansion: Future missions such as SVOM and THESEUS will provide larger samples
2. Multi-Wavelength Observations: Coverage of broader energy bands to better constrain spectral parameters
3. Theoretical Modeling: Development of more precise jet and radiation models

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Rigorous Methodology: Bayesian statistical methods employed with strict control of statistical significance
2. Clear Conclusions: First quantitative proof of dual origin of dispersion
3. Comprehensive Analysis: Multiple possible systematic effects considered
4. Practical Value: Provides important insights for GRB standard candle applications

Weaknesses

1. Sample Bias: Limited to bright sources detected by Fermi-GBM
2. Parameter Dependence: Relies on jet parameter estimates from literature
3. Physical Mechanism: Unable to identify specific physical origin of dispersion

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important empirical results for GRB physics research
2. Application Prospects: Helps improve GRB cosmological applications
3. Methodological Value: Establishes standard methodology for studying correlation dispersion

Applicable Scenarios

• GRB prompt emission mechanism research
• Cosmological parameter measurement
• Standard candle methodology improvement
• Multi-messenger astronomy applications

References

Key references include:

• Amati et al. (2002): Original Amati correlation discovery
• Yonetoku et al. (2004): Yonetoku correlation
• Ghirlanda et al. (2004, 2010): Collimation correction and time-resolved studies
• Lu et al. (2012): Systematic study of time-resolved correlations
• Camisasca et al. (2023a): Minimum variability timescale correlation

Summary: Through rigorous statistical analysis, this paper provides the first quantitative proof of the dual origin of dispersion in the GRB $E_{p,i}$-$L_{iso}$ correlation, offering important insights for understanding GRB physics and improving its cosmological applications. The research methodology is rigorous, conclusions reliable, and findings represent a significant contribution to the field.