We prove two results on converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms over totally real fields of degree $r>1$. The first result recovers a Hilbert modular form (of some level) from an $L$-series satisfying functional equations twisted by all the unramified Hecke characters. The second result assumes both the 'unramified' functional equations and an Euler product, and recovers a Hilbert modular form of the expected level predicted by the shape of the functional equations. Our result generalizes the current converse theorems for $\mathrm{GL}_2$ in the case of Hilbert modular forms in that we completely remove the assumptions on ramified twists.
- Paper ID: 2404.01449
- Title: On converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms assuming unramified twists
- Author: Pengcheng Zhang
- Classification: math.NT (Number Theory)
- Publication Date: November 3, 2025 (v3)
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.01449
This paper establishes two results concerning converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms over totally real number fields of degree r>1. The first result recovers a Hilbert modular form of some level from an L-series satisfying functional equations for all unramified Hecke character twists. The second result, additionally assuming unramified functional equations and Euler products, recovers a Hilbert modular form of the expected level predicted by the functional equation. These results generalize current converse theorems for GL2 Hilbert modular forms by completely removing the assumption of ramified twists.
The study of converse theorems aims to recover automorphic forms from L-series, a research direction tracing back to Hecke's work. In the case of Hilbert modular forms, classical converse theorems typically require assuming functional equations for twists by all Hecke characters, including those ramified at finite primes.
- Removing the ramified twist assumption: Existing converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms depend on functional equations for twists by all Hecke characters, including those ramified at finite primes. This assumption is often difficult to verify in practical applications.
- The case of narrow class number greater than 1: When the narrow class number of the base field exceeds 1, recovering the expected level of modular forms from unramified twists alone becomes problematic.
- Theoretical refinement: Perfecting the theoretical framework of converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms
- Practical applications: Providing more general theoretical foundations for applications such as Doi-Naganuma lifting
- Technical advancement: Extending techniques from unramified converse theorems for GLn (n≥3) to the case of GL2 Hilbert modular forms
- First main result: Recovery of a Hilbert modular form of some level from functional equations for twists by unramified Hecke characters alone
- Second main result: Under the additional assumption of Euler products, recovery of a Hilbert modular form of the precise level predicted by the functional equation
- Complete removal of ramified twist assumption: A significant improvement over existing converse theorems
- Extension of Vaserstein's generation theorem: Application to the proof of converse theorems for Hilbert modular forms
- Correction of literature defects: Identification and correction of a technical flaw in BBB+18
Given an L-series L(s)=∑a∈IFA(a)⋅N(a)−s, where IF is the set of nonzero integral ideals of a totally real number field F, satisfying:
- For all unramified Hecke characters ψ, the twisted L-series L^(s,A,ψ) admits holomorphic continuation and satisfies a functional equation
- (Optionally) possesses an Euler product of a specific form
prove that L(s) is the L-function of some Hilbert modular form.
Theorem 1.1: Let F be a totally real number field of degree r>1, n a nonzero integral ideal of OF, k∈(2Z+)r, and ϵ=±1.
If for all unramified Hecke characters ψ, the completed L-series L^(s,A,ψ) satisfies the functional equation:
L^(s,A,ψ)=ϵi−∣k∣ψ(nd2)L^(k0−s,A,ψ)
then L(s) is the L-function of a Hilbert modular form of weight k and level K1(rn).
If we further assume that L(s) has an Euler product of the form, for p∤nd2:
Lp(s)=(1−A(p)N(p)−s+N(p)k0−1−2s)−1
then L(s) is the L-function of a Hilbert modular form of weight k and level K0(n).
The proof consists of four main steps:
Step 1: Characteristic function properties of the Fricke involution
- Modification of the Doi-Naganuma proof method
- Derivation of the property that f is a characteristic function of the Fricke involution from unramified functional equations
Step 2: Invariance under congruence subgroups
- Application of Vaserstein's main theorem
- Proof that each fλ is invariant under some congruence subgroup
Step 3: Characteristic functions of infinite Hecke operators
- Utilization of the specific form of Euler factors
- Proof that fλ is a characteristic function of certain "infinite Hecke operators" at specific primes
Step 4: Extension to the correct congruence subgroup
- Application of ideas from BBB+18 (with correction of its flaw)
- Extension of invariance to the correct level predicted by the functional equation
- Infinite Hecke operators: Definition of new operators Tp,F∞ to handle the Euler product condition
- Application of generation set theory: Systematic use of Vaserstein's deep results on generating sets of congruence subgroups
- Constructive selection of prime ideals: Proof of existence of prime ideals with specific properties in the appendix
- Nonvanishing of matrix determinants: Proof of the key Lemma 7.4, ensuring the nonvanishing of a certain matrix determinant
This is a pure theoretical mathematics paper with no numerical experiments. All results are rigorous mathematical proofs.
- Theorem 1.1: Complete converse theorem under unramified twist assumptions
- Corollary 5.2: Recovery of modular forms from functional equations alone
- Proposition 7.1: Recovery of precise level under additional Euler product assumptions
- Lemma 7.4: Key technical lemma on nonvanishing of exponential sum matrix determinants
- Prime ideal lemma in Appendix A: Existence result for construction of prime ideals with specific properties
- Hecke (1936): Earliest converse theorem, recovering level 1 elliptic modular forms
- Weil (1967): Generalization to arbitrary level, requiring twists by all Dirichlet characters
- Doi-Naganuma (1970): Converse theorem for Hilbert modular forms, restricted to norm-Euclidean fields
- Jacquet-Langlands (1970): General converse theorem for GL2
- Piatetski-Shapiro (1975): Results in the language of automorphic representations
- Cogdell-Piatetski-Shapiro (1994): Unramified converse theorem for GLn
This paper fills an important gap in the converse theorem theory for Hilbert modular forms, successfully applying techniques from unramified converse theorems for higher-order GLn to the case of GL2 Hilbert modular forms.
- Functional equations for twists by unramified Hecke characters suffice to recover Hilbert modular forms (of some level)
- The additional Euler product condition determines the precise level
- In the case of narrow class number 1, both results yield the same level, illustrating the trade-off between narrow class number and Euler products
- Base field restriction: Applies only to totally real number fields, cannot handle imaginary quadratic fields, etc.
- Weight restriction: Requires weights to be positive even integers
- Partial Euler products: The second result actually requires only partial Euler products at specific primes
- Generalization to more general number fields
- Investigation of more general cases with non-parallel weights
- Connection with functoriality in the Langlands program
- Theoretical breakthrough: Complete removal of the ramified twist assumption represents significant theoretical progress
- Technical innovation: Skillful combination of multiple deep number-theoretic tools
- Rigor: Complete and rigorous proofs with correction of technical flaws in the literature
- Applied value: Provides stronger theoretical foundations for applications such as Doi-Naganuma lifting
- Technical complexity: Proofs involve multiple deep tools with high barriers to understanding
- Scope of applicability: Still subject to certain technical restrictions
- Constructivity: Some existence results lack effective construction methods
- Theoretical significance: Advances the general theory of converse theorems
- Methodological contribution: Demonstrates how to organically combine different number-theoretic tools
- Foundation for future research: Establishes basis for further research in related fields
- Theoretical research on Hilbert modular forms
- Lifting theory of automorphic forms
- Study of analytic properties of L-functions
- Applications of class field theory in algebraic number theory
The paper cites 25 important references covering classical and modern results in converse theorems, Hilbert modular forms, and automorphic representation theory, reflecting the deep theoretical foundations of this research.
Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality theoretical mathematics paper achieving significant breakthroughs in converse theorem theory for Hilbert modular forms. While highly technical, it resolves an important problem in the field and possesses considerable theoretical value and application prospects.