Finite symmetric groups are strongly verbally closed

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2405.01179
• Title: Finite symmetric groups are strongly verbally closed
• Authors: Olga K. Karimova, Anton A. Klyachko (Moscow State University)
• Classification: math.GR (Group Theory)
• Publication Date: December 2, 2024 (arXiv v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.01179

Abstract

This paper answers a question posed by A. V. Vasil'ev by proving that every finite symmetric group (or alternating group) $H$ is a retract of any group containing $H$ as a verbally closed subgroup.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Core Problem: The research addresses whether finite symmetric groups possess the property of being strongly verbally closed.
2. Problem Significance:
   • Verbal closure is an important concept in group theory, involving the solvability of equation systems in groups
   • Strong verbal closure is a stronger property than verbal closure, with significant implications for understanding group structure
   • As the most fundamental and important class of groups in group theory, the properties of symmetric groups are of fundamental importance
   • The study of their properties has foundational significance
3. Current State of Research:
   • Known strongly verbally closed group classes include: all abelian groups, free groups, virtually free groups, free products, etc.
   • By Theorem KMO, most finite symmetric groups are known to be strongly verbally closed
   • However, the case of $S_4$ (the symmetric group on four elements) is the most technically difficult and requires special treatment
4. Research Motivation: To directly answer the open question posed by Vasil'ev and complete the characterization of strong verbal closure for finite symmetric groups.

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves that all finite symmetric groups and alternating groups are strong retracts, and therefore also strongly verbally closed
2. Technical Innovation: Introduces and proves the Monolithic-strong-retract lemma
3. Complete Classification: Provides a complete proof of strong verbal closure for finite symmetric and alternating groups
4. Methodological Contribution: Demonstrates how to use monolithic properties and maximality of groups to prove strong retract properties

Detailed Methodology

Core Concept Definitions

Verbal Closure: A subgroup $H$ of a group $G$ is called verbally closed if for any equation of the form $w(x,y,\ldots) = h$ (where $w$ is an element of the free group and $h \in H$), whenever it has a solution in $G$, it also has a solution in $H$.

Strong Verbal Closure: A group $H$ is called strongly verbally closed if it is algebraically closed in any group containing $H$ as a verbally closed subgroup.

Strong Retract: A group $H$ is called a strong retract if for any group $G$ containing $H$ in $\text{var}H$ (the variety generated by $H$), $H$ is a retract of $G$.

Key Lemmas

Monolithic-Strong-Retract Lemma: A finite monolithic group $H$ is a strong retract if and only if it is a maximal monolithic group in the class of finite groups in $\text{var}H$.

Proof Strategy:

• "Only if" direction: The kernel of a retraction must contain the monolith of $G$, so the monolith of $G$ must intersect $H$ trivially
• "If" direction: Select a maximal normal subgroup $N$ intersecting $H$ trivially, construct the natural homomorphism $\pi: G \to G/N$, use maximality to obtain $G/N = \pi(H)$, thereby constructing a retraction

Main Theorem Proof Strategy

1. Low-Order Cases:
   • Symmetric groups for $n \leq 2$ and alternating groups for $n \leq 3$ are cyclic groups, which by Denissov's theorem are strong retracts
   • Symmetric and alternating groups for $n > 5$ have non-abelian monoliths, which by Theorem KMO are strong retracts
2. Special Cases:
   • $S_3$ and $A_4$, although having abelian monoliths, can still be handled by the second assertion of Theorem KMO
3. Critical Case $S_4$:
   • Uses the classification result from COP70: finite non-nilpotent monolithic groups in $\text{var}S_4$ are precisely $S_3, A_4, S_4$
   • Therefore $S_4$ is maximal monolithic in this class
   • Applies the Monolithic-strong-retract lemma to complete the proof

Technical Innovations

Core Technical Innovations

1. Exploitation of Monolithic Properties: Cleverly transforms the strong retract property into a maximality problem for monolithic groups
2. Application of Classification Results: Effectively utilizes the classical classification result by Cossey-Oates MacDonald-Penfold Street (1970) regarding the variety generated by $S_4$
3. Unified Framework: Provides a unified treatment of all finite symmetric and alternating groups by distinguishing different cases

Reasonableness of the Method

• Solid Theoretical Foundation: Built upon existing strong retract theory
• Complete Classification: Covers all possible cases without omissions
• Elegant Proof: Avoids complicated calculations, relying primarily on structural arguments

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Foundational Work: Myasnikov-Roman'kov (2014) first established the theory of verbal closure
2. Concept Development: Mazhuga (2018) introduced the concept of strong verbal closure
3. Classification Progress: Klyachko-Miroshnichenko-Olshanskii (2023) established the theory of strong retracts for finite groups

Known Results

Strongly verbally closed group classes include:

• All abelian groups
• All free and virtually free groups
• All free products
• Finite groups with non-abelian monoliths
• Certain dihedral groups

Positioning of This Paper's Contribution

This paper completes the characterization of strong verbal closure for the important class of finite symmetric groups, particularly resolving the technically most difficult case of $S_4$.

Experimental Results

This is pure theoretical research with no numerical experiments. The main results are rigorous mathematical theorem proofs.

Main Results

Main Theorem: All finite symmetric groups and alternating groups are strong retracts (in particular, strongly verbally closed).

Technical Results: The Monolithic-strong-retract lemma provides an effective criterion for determining whether a finite monolithic group is a strong retract.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Completely resolves Vasil'ev's question regarding strong verbal closure of finite symmetric groups
2. Proves that all finite symmetric groups and alternating groups are not only strongly verbally closed but also possess the stronger property of being strong retracts
3. Establishes a general method for determining strong retract properties through monolithic properties

Limitations

1. Scope Restriction: Results apply only to finite symmetric and alternating groups; the infinite case remains open
2. Method Dependency: Critically depends on the classification result from COP70; generalization to other group classes requires corresponding classification knowledge
3. Technical Limitations: The Monolithic-strong-retract lemma applies only to finite monolithic groups

Future Directions

The paper explicitly poses open problems:

Problem: Are infinite symmetric groups (finitary symmetric groups and full symmetric groups) and alternating groups strongly verbally closed?

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Problem Importance: Resolves a natural and important problem in group theory
2. Elegant Method: Avoids tedious calculations, completing the proof primarily through structural arguments
3. Complete Results: Provides a complete characterization of finite symmetric and alternating groups
4. Technical Contribution: The Monolithic-strong-retract lemma has general value

Weaknesses

1. Strong Dependency: Critically depends on the classical result COP70, lacking sufficient independence
2. Limited Generalizability: The method does not generalize directly to other group classes
3. Infinite Case: Does not address infinite symmetric groups

Impact

1. Theoretical Value: Completes the theory of strong verbal closure, providing important positive examples for the field
2. Methodological Significance: Demonstrates how to use structural properties of groups to study verbal closure problems
3. Subsequent Research: Provides reference for studying strong verbal closure of other group classes

Applicable Scenarios

This result applies to:

• Theoretical research on verbal closure in group theory
• In-depth analysis of finite group structure
• Related applications in group variety theory

References

The paper cites important literature in the field, including:

• MR14 Foundational work by Myasnikov-Roman'kov
• KMO23 Important results on strong retracts of finite groups
• COP70 Classical classification result on the variety generated by $S_4$
• Mazh18 Introduction of the concept of strong verbal closure

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent theoretical paper solving a concrete and important problem with elegant and concise methods and complete results, making significant contributions to the theory of strong verbal closure. Although technical innovations are relatively limited, the importance of the problem and the completeness of the solution give it considerable academic value.