Economics of Integrated Sensing and Communication service provision in 6G networks

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2405.09963
• Title: Economics of Integrated Sensing and Communication service provision in 6G networks
• Authors: Luis Guijarro (Universitat Politècnica de València), Maurizio Naldi (LUMSA, Italy), Vicent Pla (Universitat Politècnica de València), José-Ramón Vidal (Universitat Politècnica de València)
• Classification: cs.NI (Network and Internet Architecture), econ.TH (Economic Theory)
• Publication Date: May 16, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09963

Abstract

In beyond-5G and 6G networks, sensing capabilities will play a more important role than ever before. Based on this trend, Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) focuses on unifying sensing and communication functions, seeking direct trade-offs between them as well as mutual performance gains. This paper analyzes the resource trade-off between sensing and communication functions within an economic framework. The study establishes a model of service provision by operators to users, where user utility derives from both sensing and communication functions. The resource allocation trade-off between sensing and communication functions is analyzed from the perspectives of service pricing, quantity, and profit. The paper demonstrates the existence of equilibrium quantity and price, and provides relevant recommendations for implementing power and bandwidth regulatory constraints.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed by this research is: How to optimize resource allocation trade-offs between sensing and communication functions from an economic perspective in the provision of Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) services in 6G networks?

Significance

1. Technology-driven trends: The importance of sensing capabilities in 6G networks is increasingly prominent, with ISAC technology becoming a key enabling technology
2. Resource scarcity: Wireless resources (power, bandwidth) compete between sensing and communication functions, requiring optimized allocation
3. Business model innovation: Traditional purely technical optimization approaches overlook economic factors, necessitating an economic framework to guide resource allocation

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Technology-oriented: Existing ISAC research primarily optimizes from a technical performance perspective, lacking economic considerations
2. Single-objective focus: Traditional radar system design only considers technical dimensions, without addressing cost or pricing factors
3. Research gap: No existing research analyzes ISAC service provision from an economic perspective regarding integrated sensing and communication

Research Motivation

The authors identified a research gap and made the first attempt to analyze ISAC service provision within an economic framework, where both communication and sensing resource procurement and service provision are regulated through price mechanisms.

Core Contributions

1. Pioneering economic framework: First to place ISAC service provision within an economic framework, establishing a resource allocation model incorporating price mechanisms
2. Equilibrium existence proof: Proves the existence of equilibrium quantity and price for ISAC services under monopoly scenarios
3. Resource control mechanisms: Discovers that power and bandwidth prices can effectively control resource consumption, providing theoretical basis for regulatory policies
4. Differentiated sensitivity analysis: Reveals that communication function resources are more price-sensitive than sensing function resources
5. Regulatory policy recommendations: Provides more flexible and effective tools for implementing power and bandwidth regulatory constraints

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Inputs:

• System parameters: channel gains (γc, γt), noise power density (N0), false alarm probability (PFA)
• Economic parameters: user utility weights (α, β), resource unit prices (wp, ww)

Outputs:

• Optimal resource allocation: sensing power (Pr), communication power (Pc), bandwidth (Wc)
• Service pricing: sensing service price (p1), communication service price (p2)
• Economic indicators: operator profit, user utility

Model Architecture

1. System Model

Based on joint communication and passive radar systems, employing orthogonal frequency resource scheduling to avoid interference:

Communication metric: According to the Shannon-Hartley theorem, the bit rate is: $R_c = W_c \log_2\left(1 + \frac{P_c\gamma_c^2}{N_0W_c}\right) = W_c \log_2\left(1 + \frac{P_c\tilde{\gamma}_C}{W_c}\right)$

Sensing metric: Radar detection probability is: $P_D = Q_1\left(\sqrt{2P_r\gamma_T}, \sqrt{2\gamma}\right)$

where $Q_1(a,b)$ is the first-order Marcum Q-function, $\gamma = -\log P_{FA}$, and $\gamma_T = \frac{\gamma_t^2}{N_0W_r}$.

2. Economic Model

User demand model: Employing a quasi-linear utility function: $U = \alpha\theta(P_r) + \beta\eta(R_c) - p_1P_r - p_2R_c$

where:

• Sensing metric: $\theta(P_r) = Q_1(\sqrt{2P_r\gamma_T}, \sqrt{2\gamma})$
• Communication metric: $\eta(R_c) = \log(1 + R_c)$

Operator supply model: Operator profit function: $\Pi(P_r, P_c, W_c) = p_1(P_r)P_r + p_2(\rho(P_c, W_c))\rho(P_c, W_c) - w_p(P_r + P_c) - w_wW_c$

where the production function: $\rho(P_c, W_c) = W_c \log_2\left(1 + \frac{P_c\tilde{\gamma}_C}{W_c}\right)$

Technical Innovations

1. Dual-commodity model: Models ISAC services as two commodities (radar transmission power and communication bit rate) with different production characteristics
2. Separable optimization: Leverages separability of utility and profit functions to decompose complex optimization into independent subproblems
3. Inverse demand functions: Derives inverse demand functions through first-order conditions, establishing price-quantity relationships
4. Comparative static analysis: Systematically analyzes the impact of key parameter changes on equilibrium

Experimental Setup

Parameter Configuration

System parameters:

• γ = 5, γT = 1, γ̃C = 1 (reference: Chalise et al. 2017)
• α = 1, β = 1 (utility weights)
• wp = 0.01, ww = 0.01 (default resource prices)

Comparative Static Analysis

Three groups of parameter sensitivity analyses:

1. Power price effect: wp ∈ 0.001, 0.055
2. Bandwidth price effect: ww ∈ 0.001, 0.055
3. Sensing preference effect: α ∈ 0.1, 2

Evaluation Metrics

• Input factor quantities: Pr, Pc, Wc
• Product quantities: Pr, Rc
• Service quality: θ (detection probability), η (communication quality)
• Commodity prices: p1, p2
• Operator profit: Π

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Power Price Effect (wp variation)

• Resource consumption: Increased wp leads to decreased Pr and Pc, with Pc declining more significantly
• Service quality: Communication quality η decreases substantially, sensing quality θ decreases marginally
• Price mechanism: Communication service price p2 rises, but operator profit declines
• Regulatory effect: Power price is more effective for controlling communication function resources

2. Bandwidth Price Effect (ww variation)

• Selective impact: Only affects communication-related variables; sensing function remains unaffected
• Resource substitution: Increased bandwidth price leads to decreased Wc, subsequently affecting Rc
• Quality trade-off: Communication quality decreases, price increases, profit declines

3. Sensing Preference Effect (α variation)

• Non-linear response: Increased α significantly enhances sensing quality and resource utilization at low values
• Price elasticity: Sensing service price p1 continuously rises, driving profit growth
• Saturation effect: At high α values, Pr and θ tend toward saturation

Key Findings

1. Differentiated sensitivity: Communication function resources (Pc, Wc) are more price-sensitive than sensing function resources (Pr)
2. Effective regulatory mechanisms: Resource prices can serve as regulatory tools, enabling more flexible control than traditional constraints
3. Functional independence: Sensing and communication functions exhibit certain independence at the economic level
4. Non-linear effects: User preference changes produce non-linear impacts on resource allocation

Related Work

ISAC Technology Research

• Resource sharing optimization: Time-division multiplexing optimization (Xie et al. 2023), signal design (Wu et al. 2023)
• Power allocation: Optimal power allocation between sensing and communication tasks (Liu et al. 2022)
• Rate-distortion trade-off: Capacity-distortion trade-off in memoryless channels (Kobayashi et al. 2018)
• Limitations: Existing research optimizes only from technical performance perspective, lacking economic considerations

Communication Economics

• Mature field: Long history of economic analysis in communication services with well-established theoretical frameworks
• Representative works: Courcoubetis & Weber (2003), Maillé & Tuffin (2014)

Radar System Economics

• Research gap: Traditional radar system design overlooks economic dimensions
• Emerging trend: Economic advantages of passive/bistatic radar drive research interest
• Existing limitations: Only considers equipment placement optimization, not system characteristic optimization

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Equilibrium existence: Under monopoly scenarios, equilibrium quantity and price for ISAC services exist
2. Effective regulatory tools: Resource price mechanisms are more flexible and effective than traditional regulatory constraints
3. Differentiated control: Control over communication function resources is more effective than sensing function resources
4. Policy guidance: Provides theoretical support for power and bandwidth regulatory policy formulation

Limitations

1. Monopoly assumption: Only considers single-operator scenarios, not competitive markets
2. Orthogonal resources: Assumes sensing and communication use orthogonal frequency resources, simplifying interference issues
3. Static analysis: Employs static economic models, not considering dynamic games
4. Parameter sensitivity: Some results depend on specific parameter settings, with limited generalizability

Future Directions

1. Competitive market analysis: Extension to multi-operator competitive scenarios
2. Dynamic game models: Consideration of dynamic optimization with temporal dimensions
3. Interference management: Relaxation of orthogonal resource assumptions to study resource allocation under interference
4. Empirical validation: Verification of theoretical models through actual data

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Pioneering research: First application of economic theory to ISAC service analysis, filling an important research gap
2. Theoretical rigor: Mathematically well-formulated with correct optimization problem-solving methods
3. Practical value: Provides theoretical tools for regulatory policy formulation with real-world guidance significance
4. Systematic analysis: Comprehensive revelation of key parameter impact mechanisms through comparative static analysis
5. Interdisciplinary integration: Successful combination of communication technology and economic theory, demonstrating cross-disciplinary research value

Shortcomings

1. Model simplification: Orthogonal resource assumption is overly idealized; actual ISAC systems involve complex interference
2. Insufficient validation: Lacks empirical data verification; practical applicability of theoretical results requires further testing
3. Scenario limitations: Only considers monopoly markets; multi-operator competition is more common in reality
4. Parameter dependence: Some conclusions depend on specific parameter settings; universality requires further verification
5. Dynamic absence: Static analysis cannot capture market dynamics and learning effects

Impact

1. Academic contribution: Establishes foundation for ISAC economics research, expected to stimulate subsequent studies
2. Policy guidance: Provides theoretical basis for 6G network regulatory policy formulation
3. Industrial value: Provides reference framework for operator ISAC service pricing strategies
4. Methodological significance: Cross-disciplinary research methods have promotion value

Applicable Scenarios

1. 6G network planning: Operators' ISAC service resource allocation and pricing decisions
2. Regulatory policy formulation: Government agencies' spectrum and power management policy development
3. Technology standardization: Reference for economic factors in ISAC technology standards
4. Academic research: Provides theoretical foundation and research directions for related researchers

References

The paper cites 48 related references, primarily including:

ISAC Technology:

• Liu, F., et al. (2022). Integrated sensing and communications: Towards dual-functional wireless networks for 6G and beyond.
• Chalise, B. K., et al. (2017). Performance tradeoff in a unified passive radar and communications system.

Economic Theory:

• Courcoubetis, C. & Weber, R. (2003). Pricing communication networks: economics, technology and modelling.
• Mas-Colell, A., et al. (1995). Microeconomic theory.

Techno-economic Analysis:

• Guijarro, L., et al. (2021). Competition between service providers with strategic resource allocation.

This paper holds pioneering significance in ISAC economics research. While subject to certain theoretical assumptions and limitations, it establishes an important foundation for the development of this emerging field, demonstrating substantial academic and practical value.