Generating Lattice Non-invertible Symmetries

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2406.05454
• Title: Generating Lattice Non-invertible Symmetries
• Authors: Weiguang Cao, Linhao Li, Masahito Yamazaki
• Classification: cond-mat.str-el (Strongly Correlated Electron Systems), hep-th (High Energy Physics Theory)
• Publication Date: June 2024 (arXiv:2406.05454v3, last updated January 1, 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.05454

Abstract

Lattice non-invertible symmetries possess rich fusion structures and play an important role in understanding various exotic topological phases. This paper explores methods for generating new lattice non-invertible transformations/symmetries from given non-invertible seed transformations/symmetries. New lattice non-invertible symmetries are constructed by combining seed transformations on different lattice sites or by sandwiching transformations on the same site with unitary transformations. Beyond the known non-invertible symmetries with Tambara-Yamagami $\mathbb{Z}_N \times \mathbb{Z}_N$-type fusion algebras, we obtain new non-invertible symmetries in models with $\mathbb{Z}_N$ dipole symmetry. We name the latter dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry, as it originates from the gauging of dipole symmetry. We further investigate the dipole Kramers-Wannier symmetry in detail, including its topological defects, anomalies, and associated generalized Kennedy-Tasaki transformations.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Importance of Non-invertible Symmetries: Non-invertible symmetries constitute an important component of generalized symmetries, where operators do not necessarily possess inverses and fusion rules are more complex than ordinary group symmetries. Such symmetries play a crucial role in understanding exotic topological phases and quantum phase transitions.
2. Rich Structure in Lattice Models: Compared to field theories, non-invertible symmetries in lattice models exhibit richer structures. For example, the fusion rules of lattice Kramers-Wannier symmetry mix with single-site translation operators, transcending the description of fusion categories.
3. Lack of Systematic Construction Methods: Although certain specific examples of non-invertible symmetries are known, systematic methods for generating new non-invertible symmetries are lacking, particularly in systems with exotic symmetries such as dipole symmetry.

Research Motivation

1. Methodological Development: Develop systematic methods to construct new lattice non-invertible symmetries and extend our understanding of such symmetries.
2. Exploration of Exotic Symmetries: Investigate non-invertible symmetries in systems with exotic symmetries like dipole symmetry, a relatively unexplored domain.
3. Theoretical Completeness: Refine the theoretical framework of lattice non-invertible symmetries through construction of new examples, particularly regarding their fusion algebra structures.

Core Contributions

1. Proposed Two Systematic Construction Methods:
   • Combining seed transformations on different lattice sites
   • Sandwiching seed transformations with unitary transformations on the same site
2. Discovered New Dipole Kramers-Wannier Symmetry:
   • Constructed new non-invertible symmetries in models with $\mathbb{Z}_N$ dipole symmetry
   • This symmetry originates from simultaneous gauging of charge and dipole symmetries
3. Revealed New Fusion Algebra Structures:
   • The fusion rules of dipole KW symmetry mix with charge conjugation symmetry rather than lattice translations
   • Provides new fusion algebras distinct from Tambara-Yamagami $\mathbb{Z}_N \times \mathbb{Z}_N$-type
4. Complete Theoretical Analysis:
   • Studied construction and movement of topological defects
   • Analyzed anomaly conditions of the symmetry
   • Constructed associated generalized Kennedy-Tasaki transformations

Detailed Methods

Task Definition

The core task of this paper is to systematically construct new lattice non-invertible symmetries from given non-invertible seed transformations and analyze their properties. Specifically:

• Input: Non-invertible seed transformations (e.g., Kramers-Wannier transformation)
• Output: New non-invertible symmetries and their complete theoretical description
• Constraints: Preserve locality and physical reasonableness of lattice models

Construction Methods

Method One: Combination on Different Lattice Sites

Taking combination on odd and even sites as an example:

• Seed transformations: $D_o$ acting on odd sites, $D_e$ acting on even sites
• New transformations: $\tilde{D} = TD_oD_e$ and $\tilde{D}' = D_oD_e$
• Fusion rules: $\tilde{D} \times \tilde{D} = \left(\sum_{k=1}^N \eta_o^k\right)\left(\sum_{k=1}^N \eta_e^k\right)$

Method Two: Sandwiching with Unitary Transformations

The core construction is the dipole Kramers-Wannier transformation: $\hat{D} := D^\dagger U^H D$

where:

• $D$ is the ordinary Kramers-Wannier transformation
• $U^H = \prod_{i=1}^L U_i^H$ is the product of global Hadamard gates
• $U_i^H = \frac{1}{\sqrt{N}}\sum_{\alpha,\beta=1}^N \omega^{-\alpha\beta}|\beta\rangle\langle\alpha|$

Properties of Dipole Kramers-Wannier Transformation

Action Rules

$\hat{D}: X_i \to Z_{i-1}(Z_i^\dagger)^2 Z_{i+1}, \quad Z_{i-1}(Z_i^\dagger)^2 Z_{i+1} \to X_i^\dagger$

Fusion Algebra

Key non-invertible fusion rules: $\hat{D} \times \hat{D} = \left(\sum_{k=1}^N \eta_Q^k\right)\left(\sum_{k=1}^N \eta_D^k\right)C$

where $C$ is the charge conjugation symmetry, representing an important distinction from conventional KW symmetry.

Bilinear Phase Map Representation

$\hat{D} = \sum_{\{s_j\},\{s'_j\}} \omega^{-\sum_{i=1}^L (s'_{i+1}+s'_{i-1}-2s'_i)s_i} |\{s'_j\}\rangle\langle\{s_j\}|$

Gauging Interpretation

The dipole KW transformation can be understood through simultaneous gauging of charge and dipole symmetries:

1. Extended Hilbert Space: Introduction of gauge variables
2. Gauss Law Constraints: $G_i = X_i^\dagger \tilde{Z}_{i-1}(\tilde{Z}_i^\dagger)^2 \tilde{Z}_{i+1} = 1$
3. Variable Redefinition: Recovery of original theory form, implementing duality mapping

Experimental Setup

Model Systems

The primary research objects are dipole Ising models: $H_{\text{dipole-Ising}} = -g^{-1}\sum_{i=1}^L Z_{i-1}(Z_i^\dagger)^2 Z_{i+1} - g\sum_{i=1}^L X_i + \text{h.c.}$

Symmetry Structure

• Charge Symmetry: $\eta_Q := \prod_{i=1}^L X_i$
• Dipole Symmetry: $\eta_D := \prod_{i=1}^L X_i^i$
• Charge Conjugation Symmetry: $C$

Boundary Conditions

Periodic boundary conditions are employed, requiring $L \equiv 0 \pmod{N}$ to preserve complete $\mathbb{Z}_N^D$ dipole symmetry.

Experimental Results

Topological Defect Construction

Topological defects of the dipole KW transformation were constructed via half-space gauging:

1. Defect Hamiltonian: $H_{\hat{D}}^{(i_0,i_0+1)} = -\sum_{i \neq i_0,i_0+1}(Z_{i-1}(Z_i^\dagger)^2 Z_{i+1} + X_i) - (\text{interface terms})$
2. Movement Operators: $U_{\hat{D}}^{i_0+1} := CZ_{i_0+1,i_0+2}(CZ_{i_0+1,l}^\dagger)^2(U_{i_0+1}^H)^\dagger S_{i_0+1,l}$
3. Fusion Rule Verification: Defect fusion reproduces the fusion algebra at the operator level.

Anomaly Analysis

For general $N$, the anomaly-free condition for dipole KW symmetry is that $-1$ must be a quadratic residue modulo $N$, i.e., there exists $k$ such that $k^2 \equiv -1 \pmod{N}$.

Specific Case: $N=3$

• Anomaly: $-1$ is not a quadratic residue modulo 3, therefore the symmetry is anomalous for $N=3$
• Phase Diagram Constraints: Anomaly forbids the system from having a unique gapped ground state at the self-dual point
• Numerical Verification: Consistent with numerical calculations on quantum torus chains, showing gapless phases and first-order transitions

Symmetry-Twisted Sector Mapping

Sector mapping under dipole KW transformation: $(\hat{u}_Q, \hat{t}_Q, \hat{u}_D, \hat{t}_D) = (t_D, u_D, -t_Q, -u_Q)$

This mapping relationship is crucial for understanding the mechanism of symmetry action.

Related Work

Non-invertible Symmetry Research

• Field Theory Developments: Starting from pioneering work by Gaiotto et al., non-invertible symmetries have been extensively studied in 2D field theories
• Lattice Model Extensions: Aasen, Fendley, and others generalized these concepts to lattice models
• Fusion Category Description: While fusion categories can be used in field theories, the lattice case is more complex

Exotic Symmetries

• Subsystem Symmetries: Symmetries in fractional subsystems
• Dipole Symmetry: Applications in topological insulators, quantum liquids, and other systems
• Multipole Symmetries: Higher-order generalizations of symmetries

Construction Methods

• Gauging Methods: Generating non-invertible symmetries through gauging discrete abelian group symmetries
• Combinatorial Construction: Combining known transformations on different degrees of freedom
• Sandwiching Construction: Novel method proposed in this paper

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Systematic Construction Methods: Provide two systematic methods for generating new non-invertible symmetries
2. New Symmetry Discovery: Dipole KW symmetry represents a new class of non-invertible symmetries
3. Innovative Fusion Structures: Discover fusion rules mixing with charge conjugation rather than translations
4. Theoretical Completeness: Provide complete theoretical description from topological defects to anomalies

Limitations

1. Scope of Applicability: Methods primarily apply to systems with specific symmetry structures
2. Boundary Condition Restrictions: Require specific boundary conditions to preserve complete symmetries
3. Anomaly Constraints: In certain cases symmetries are anomalous, limiting applications

Future Directions

1. Higher-Dimensional Generalizations: Extend construction methods to higher-dimensional systems
2. Fusion Category Data: Completely determine F-symbols and other fusion category data
3. Numerical Verification: Numerical studies of anomaly-free cases
4. Application Exploration: Applications in quantum computing and topological phases

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Innovation: Proposes systematic construction methods, with sandwiching construction being entirely novel
2. Mathematical Rigor: Employs tools such as bilinear phase maps for rigorous mathematical analysis
3. Deep Physical Insights: Connects gauging theory with non-invertible symmetries
4. Result Completeness: Provides complete theoretical framework from construction to applications

Weaknesses

1. Lack of Experimental Verification: Primarily theoretical work lacking actual numerical or experimental verification
2. Applicability Limitations: Construction methods impose strong requirements on initial conditions
3. Complexity: Certain computational processes are complex, potentially affecting generalization and application

Impact and Significance

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important theoretical tools for the non-invertible symmetry field
2. Field Advancement: Promotes development of the interdisciplinary field combining exotic and non-invertible symmetries
3. Methodological Value: Construction methods possess universality and can be applied to other systems

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Physics Research: Research in condensed matter theory and high energy physics theory
2. Topological Phase Research: Study of symmetry-protected topological phases and spontaneous symmetry breaking phases
3. Quantum Many-Body Systems: Analysis of quantum many-body systems with exotic symmetries

References

The paper cites 148 references covering important works in non-invertible symmetries, exotic symmetries, topological phases, and related fields, reflecting the broad theoretical foundation and deep academic background of this research.