In this paper we investigate $K$-multimagic squares of order $N$, these are $N \times N$ magic squares which remain magic after raising each element to the $k$ th power for all $2 \leqslant$ $k \leqslant K$. Given $K \geqslant 2$, we consider the problem of establishing the smallest integer $N_2(K)$ for which there exists nontrivial $K$-multimagic squares of order $N_2(K)$. Previous results on multimagic squares show that $N_2(K) \leqslant(4 K-2)^K$ for large $K$. Here we utilize the Hardy-Littlewood circle method and establish the bound
$$ N_2(K) \leqslant 2 K(K+1)+1 $$
Via an argument of Granville's we additionally deduce the existence of infinitely many nontrivial prime valued $K$-multimagic squares of order $2 K(K+1)+1$.
- Paper ID: 2406.08161
- Title: A circle method approach to K-multimagic squares
- Author: Daniel Flores
- Classification: math.NT (Number Theory), math.CO (Combinatorics)
- Publication Date: June 2024, updated version January 2025
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08161
This paper investigates K-multimagic squares, which are N×N magic squares that remain magic after raising each element to the k-th power for all 2⩽k⩽K. Given K⩾2, the author addresses the problem of determining the minimum integer N2(K) such that there exists a nontrivial K-multimagic square of order N2(K). Previous results showed N2(K)⩽(4K−2)K for large K. This paper establishes the bound N2(K)⩽2K(K+1)+1 using the Hardy-Littlewood circle method. Through Granville's argument, the paper also derives the existence of infinitely many nontrivial prime-valued K-multimagic squares of order 2K(K+1)+1.
- Problem Definition: The core problem addressed is determining the minimum order of K-multimagic squares. A K-multimagic square is an N×N matrix where each row, column, and main diagonal has equal sums after raising each element to the k-th power for 1⩽k⩽K.
- Problem Significance:
- Magic squares have a history spanning thousands of years and represent a classical problem in mathematics
- Martin Gardner's 1996 generalization of the 3×3 distinct perfect squares magic square problem remains unsolved
- Multimagic squares represent an important extension of magic square theory with profound number-theoretic significance
- Limitations of Existing Methods:
- Previous construction methods primarily relied on normal multimagic squares (elements being 1, 2, ..., N2)
- The known upper bound (4K−2)K exhibits potential exponential growth for large K
- Lack of systematic analytical methods for handling the general case
- Research Motivation:
- Need for more precise asymptotic bounds
- The Hardy-Littlewood circle method provides a powerful tool for handling such additive problems
- Aim to improve bounds from potential exponential growth to polynomial growth
- Main Theoretical Result: Proves N2(K)⩽2K(K+1)+1, which represents a significant improvement over the previous bound (4K−2)K, particularly for K⩾4.
- Methodological Innovation: First application of the Hardy-Littlewood circle method to multimagic square problems, establishing a general framework for handling diagonal systems of different degrees.
- Technical Breakthroughs:
- Relaxes the condition of matrix height non-singularity by introducing the concept of matrix "dominating functions"
- Establishes rank condition analysis applicable to coefficient matrices of multimagic squares
- Prime-Valued Results: Using Granville's argument and the Green-Tao theorem, proves the existence of infinitely many prime-valued K-multimagic squares.
Given K⩾2 and N, find an N×N matrix Z=(zi,j) such that for all 1⩽k⩽K, the matrix Z∘k:=(zi,jk) is magic. Nontrivial means using more than N distinct integers.
The K-multimagic square problem is transformed into solving a diagonal system:
∑1⩽j⩽sci,jxjk=0(1⩽i⩽r,1⩽k⩽K)
where C=(ci,j) is the coefficient matrix, and RK(P;C) denotes the number of solutions satisfying maxj∣xj∣⩽P.
Define the exponential generating function:
fK(α;C)=∏1⩽j⩽s∑∣x∣⩽Pe(∑1⩽k⩽K(αk⋅cj)xk)
By orthogonality:
RK(P;C)=∫[0,1)r×KfK(α;C)dα
- Major Arc M(Q): Region where ∣αi,k−ai,k/q∣⩽QP−k
- Minor Arc m(Q): Complementary region
- Establish asymptotic formula: RK(P;C)=SK(Q;C)JK(Q,P;C)+o(Ps−2rK(K+1))
Introduce new concept: Matrix C dominates function f if and only if for all J⊂{1,...,s}:
rank(CJ)⩾min{f(∣J∣),r}
This condition is weaker than traditional height non-singularity but remains sufficiently strong.
Define:
F(x)=max{⌊s/r⌋x−rem(s,r),⌊(s−1)/r⌋x−rem(s−1,r)}
Theorem 2.2: If K⩾2, C∈Zr×s satisfies s⩾rK(K+1) and C dominates function F(x), then:
RK(P;C)=Ps−2rK(K+1)(σK(C)+o(1))
where σK(C)>0.
For an N×N magic square, construct a 2N×N2 matrix CNmagic, where each column corresponds to a matrix position (i,j), encoding the row sum and column sum conditions of the magic square.
- Rank Analysis: Prove that CNmagic dominates function F(x)
- Nonsingular Solution Existence: Utilize the existence of doubly diagonal Latin squares (DDLS)
- Jacobian Matrix Analysis: Ensure nonsingularity of local solutions
| K | Previous Bound | This Paper | Improvement |
|---|
| 2 | 6 | 7 | Comparable |
| 3 | 12 | 19 | Slightly worse |
| 4 | 243 | 41 | Significant |
| 5 | 729 | 61 | Significant |
| 6 | 4096 | 85 | Significant |
| Large K | (4K−2)K | 2K(K+1)+1 | Exponential to quadratic |
The paper proves that for K⩾2 and N⩾2K(K+1):
MK,N(P)∼cPN(N−K(K+1))
where c>0 is a constant.
Corollary 1.3: Given K⩾2, for each N⩾2K(K+1), there exist infinitely many nontrivial prime-valued K-multimagic squares.
- Classical Constructions: Specific constructions by Wroblewski, Trump, Fengchu and others
- General Theory: (4K−2)K bound by Zhang, Chen, Li
- Circle Method Applications: Work by Brandes, Parsell on additive equations
The paper's methods relate to:
- Vinogradov's Mean Value Theorem: Used for minor arc estimates
- Additive Combinatorics: Diagonal equations of different degrees
- Algebraic Geometry: Rank analysis of Jacobian matrices
- Establishes a quadratic upper bound N2(K)⩽2K(K+1)+1 for the minimum order of K-multimagic squares
- Proves the infinite existence of prime-valued multimagic squares
- Provides a new circle method framework for handling additive problems of different degrees
- Constants: The constant 2 in the bound may not be optimal
- Lower Bounds: No corresponding lower bound estimates provided
- Computational Complexity: The method is primarily an existence proof without direct construction algorithms
- Higher-Dimensional Generalization: Extension to d-dimensional hypercubes, with expected bound Nd(K)≪dK2
- Optimal Constants: Determine optimal constant factors
- Construction Algorithms: Develop practical construction methods
- Theoretical Breakthrough: Improves from potentially exponential bounds to quadratic bounds, representing a qualitative leap
- Methodological Innovation: Successfully adapts the circle method to handle mixed-degree problems with high technical difficulty
- Completeness: Comprehensive theoretical system from existence to prime-valued results
- Rigor: Rigorous mathematical proofs with meticulous technical treatment
- Practicality: For small K values, new bounds are not always superior
- Constructivity: The method is non-constructive, unable to directly generate specific magic squares
- Complexity: Proof techniques are complex with high comprehension threshold
- Theoretical Value: Provides new analytical tools for multimagic square theory
- Methodological Significance: New application of circle method in combinatorial number theory
- Future Research: Opens new directions for related problem investigations
The method applies to:
- Existence problems for multimagic squares with large parameter K
- Other types of additive combinatorial problems
- Asymptotic counting research of combinatorial structures
The paper cites 23 important references covering:
- Recent advances in Vinogradov's mean value theorem (Bourgain, Demeter, Guth)
- Circle method applications to additive problems (Brandes, Parsell, Wooley)
- Construction theory of multimagic squares (Boyer, Trump, Zhang, et al.)
- Prime distribution theory (Granville, Green-Tao)