Maximizing the Maximum Degree in Ordered Nearest Neighbor Graphs

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2406.08913
• Title: Maximizing the Maximum Degree in Ordered Nearest Neighbor Graphs
• Authors: Péter Ágoston, Adrian Dumitrescu, Arsenii Sagdeev, Karamjeet Singh, Ji Zeng
• Classification: math.CO (Combinatorics), cs.CG (Computational Geometry), math.MG (Metric Geometry)
• Publication Time/Conference: CALDAM 2025 (early version), arXiv version updated October 13, 2025
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.08913

Abstract

For ordered point sets in Euclidean space or more general abstract metric spaces, ordered nearest neighbor graphs are constructed by connecting each point with a directed edge to its nearest predecessor. This paper proves that for any $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, there exists an ordering such that the corresponding ordered nearest neighbor graph has maximum in-degree at least $\log n/(4d)$. This bound is optimal up to a factor of $1/(4d)$. For the abstract setting, it is proven that for any $n$-element metric space, there exists an ordering such that the corresponding ordered nearest neighbor graph has maximum in-degree $\Omega(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

This paper investigates the maximum in-degree problem in ordered nearest neighbor graphs (ONNGs). Given a point set $P$ and an ordering on it, the ordered nearest neighbor graph is constructed by connecting each point to the nearest point among all its predecessors in the ordering.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Significance: While the maximum in-degree of traditional nearest neighbor graphs is constrained by the kissing number, the properties of the ordered version have not been sufficiently studied.
2. Practical Applications: Ordered nearest neighbor graphs have important applications in dynamic algorithms, geometric shortest path computation, and sparse graph construction.
3. Algorithm Optimization: Understanding the bounds on maximum degree provides guidance for designing efficient geometric algorithms.
4. Dual Problem: Compared to minimizing maximum degree (which easily yields path graphs), the maximization problem is more challenging.

Limitations of Existing Research

• Classical work by Eppstein et al. primarily focuses on properties of traditional nearest neighbor graphs.
• Degree bounds for the ordered version lack systematic study.
• Results for high-dimensional spaces and abstract metric spaces are even scarcer.

Core Contributions

1. One-Dimensional Optimal Result: Proves that the maximum in-degree of ordered nearest neighbor graphs for $n$ points on a line can reach $\lceil\log n\rceil$, and this bound is tight.
2. High-Dimensional Space Bounds: Constructs an ordering for $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$ achieving maximum in-degree $\log n/(4d)$.
3. Abstract Metric Spaces: Obtains a lower bound of $\Omega(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$ in general metric spaces.
4. Constructive Proofs: All results provide explicit construction algorithms rather than mere existence proofs.

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: A finite point set $P = \{p_1, p_2, \ldots, p_n\}$ in a metric space $(V,\rho)$Output: An ordering $\pi$ of the point set such that the maximum in-degree of the corresponding ordered nearest neighbor graph is as large as possible Constraint: Points are in general position (no isosceles triangles)

Core Algorithm Framework

1. Recursive Construction for One-Dimensional Case

Algorithm Order(P) for points on line:
Step 1: Let a, b be the leftmost and rightmost points of P
Step 2: Partition P into A ∪ B at the midpoint of ab, where |A| ≥ |B|
Step 3: List P in the following order:
        Center(A), b, Delete(Order(A), Center(A)), AnyOrder(B\{b})
Step 4: Center(P) ← Center(A)

Key Insight: Through recursive partitioning and careful ordering arrangement, each recursive call ensures adding one in-degree to the center point.

2. Extension Algorithm for High-Dimensional Spaces

Algorithm Order(P) for points in R^d:
Step 1: Compute diameter pair ab, assuming |ab| = 1
Step 2: Partition by distance to a, b: A = {p: |pa| ≤ |pb|}, B = {p: |pb| ≤ |pa|}
Step 3: Use Corollary 1 to partition A into at most 16^d/2 subsets with diameter < 1/2
Step 4: Select subset C containing at least n/16^d points
Step 5: List in order: Center(C), b, Delete(Order(C), Center(C)), AnyOrder(P\(C∪{b}))

Technical Key: Uses the convex set covering theorem (Theorem 4) for spatial partitioning, ensuring independence of recursive subproblems.

3. Combinatorial Method for Abstract Metric Spaces

Employs Ramsey theory and hypergraph coloring:

• Perform 3-coloring of complete 3-uniform hypergraph $K_n^{(3)}$
• Define colors based on the shortest edge of triangles
• Search for monochromatic cliques or forward star structures
• Apply He-Fox theorem to guarantee structure existence

Technical Innovations

1. Recursive Divide-and-Conquer Strategy: Ensures recursive independence through geometric partitioning.
2. Metric Constraint Utilization: Cleverly exploits distance relationships to ensure edge direction.
3. Dimension-Related Analysis: Incorporates dimension $d$ into bound analysis.
4. Combinatorial Geometry Integration: Combines Ramsey theory in abstract settings.

Experimental Setup

Theoretical Verification

This paper is primarily theoretical work, with results verified through mathematical proofs:

1. Construction Verification: Verifies algorithm correctness on small-scale instances.
2. Bound Tightness: Proves necessity of upper bounds through counterexamples.
3. Computer Search: Exhaustive verification of Problem 1 for $n \leq 5$.

Complexity Analysis

• One-Dimensional Algorithm: Time complexity $O(n\log n)$
• High-Dimensional Algorithm: Time complexity $O(n\log n + 16^d)$
• Space Complexity: All algorithms have $O(n)$ space complexity.

Main Results

Theorem 1 (One-Dimensional Optimality)

Lower Bound: For any $n$ points on a line, there exists an ordering such that maximum in-degree ≥ $\lceil\log n\rceil$Upper Bound: There exist $n$ points such that any ordering has maximum in-degree ≤ $\lceil\log n\rceil$

Construction: Recursively define point set $P_k = P_{k-1} \cup (3^k + P_{k-1})$, where $P_1 = \{0,1\}$

Theorem 2 (High-Dimensional Bounds)

For any $n$ points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, there exists an ordering such that maximum in-degree ≥ $\log n/(4d)$

Proof Highlights:

• Utilizes diameter partitioning to ensure geometric separation
• Applies convex set covering theorem to control partition quantity
• Recursive analysis yields bound $\log_{16^d} n = \log n/(4d)$

Theorem 3 (Metric Spaces)

For any $n$-element metric space, there exists an ordering such that maximum in-degree is $\Omega(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$

Key Tool: He-Fox theorem (Theorem 5) on upper bounds for hypergraph sizes avoiding monochromatic structures

Related Work

Classical Nearest Neighbor Graphs

• Eppstein, Paterson, Yao (1997): Established foundational theoretical framework
• Kissing Number Theory: Provides upper bounds on degree for traditional nearest neighbor graphs

Ordered Graph Structures

• Bose, Gudmundsson, Morin (2004): Introduced ordered Yao graphs and Theta graphs
• Dynamic Algorithm Applications: Agarwal, Eppstein, Matoušek (1992)

Ramsey Theory Applications

• He and Fox (2021): Ramsey-type results on independent sets in hypergraphs
• Coloring problems in combinatorial geometry

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Achieves optimal $\Theta(\log n)$ bounds for the one-dimensional case.
2. The $\log n/(4d)$ lower bound in high-dimensional spaces is optimal within a factor of $1/(4d)$.
3. Abstract metric spaces exhibit a significant gap: lower bound $\Omega(\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n})$ versus upper bound $O(\log n)$.

Limitations

1. Dimension Dependence: The factor $1/(4d)$ in high-dimensional results may not be tight.
2. Metric Space Gap: Significant gap between lower and upper bounds in abstract settings.
3. Construction Complexity: While polynomial-time, algorithms have large constant factors.

Future Directions

1. Improve Dimension Factor: Can the $1/(4d)$ factor be eliminated or reduced?
2. Metric Space Optimization: Narrow the gap between $\sqrt{\log n/\log\log n}$ and $\log n$.
3. Problem 1 Investigation: Explore the conjecture $\sum_v 2^{-d(v)} \leq 1$.
4. Extension to k-NN: Generalize to k-nearest neighbor cases.

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete theoretical framework from one-dimensional to high-dimensional to abstract spaces.
2. Methodological Innovation: Cleverly combines geometric partitioning, recursive construction, and Ramsey theory.
3. Result Tightness: Achieves optimality in one dimension and near-optimality in high dimensions.
4. Constructive Nature: All results provide explicit construction algorithms.

Weaknesses

1. Technical Complexity: Proofs for high-dimensional and abstract cases are complex with limited readability.
2. Practical Applicability: Primarily theoretical results; practical application value requires further exploration.
3. Existing Gaps: Significant gap between upper and lower bounds in metric spaces.

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Establishes important foundations for ordered nearest neighbor graph theory.
2. Method Value: Recursive partitioning methods may apply to other geometric optimization problems.
3. Open Problems: Proposed problems provide direction for future research.

Applicable Scenarios

1. Geometric Algorithm Design: Provides theoretical guidance for geometric algorithms requiring degree control.
2. Network Topology Optimization: Optimizes connection structures in sensor networks and similar applications.
3. Data Structure Design: Provides theoretical support for designing data structures based on nearest neighbors.

References

Major references include:

• Eppstein, Paterson, Yao (1997): Classical theory of nearest neighbor graphs
• He and Fox (2021): Latest advances in hypergraph Ramsey theory
• Rogers and Zong (1997): Geometric results on convex body covering
• Bose, Gudmundsson, Morin (2004): Foundational work on ordered geometric graphs