Autonomous Constellation Fault Monitoring with Inter-satellite Links: A Rigidity-Based Approach

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2406.09759
• Title: Autonomous Constellation Fault Monitoring with Inter-satellite Links: A Rigidity-Based Approach
• Authors: Keidai Iiyama, Daniel Neamati, Grace Gao (Stanford University)
• Classification: cs.RO (Robotics)
• Publication Time/Conference: 2024 ION GNSS+ Conference
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.09759

Abstract

To meet the requirements for robust positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) services in the lunar environment, this paper proposes a novel framework for satellite constellation fault detection using inter-satellite ranging (ISR). Traditionally, navigation satellites can rely on robust ground station networks for fault monitoring. However, due to cost constraints, establishing a comprehensive ground segment for lunar constellations is impractical. The proposed method leverages 2-vertex redundantly rigid graphs to detect faults without relying on precise ephemerides. The satellite constellation is modeled as a graph where satellites are vertices and inter-satellite links are edges. Faults are identified through the singular values of the Gram-centered Euclidean distance matrix (GCEDM) of 2-vertex redundantly rigid subgraphs. The method is validated through simulations of constellations around the Moon under various configurations.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

The core problem addressed in this research is how to achieve autonomous fault detection of satellite constellations in the lunar environment lacking ground monitoring stations. Specifically, it includes:

1. Absence of Ground Monitoring Stations: The lunar surface cannot establish a monitoring station network similar to Earth's SBAS system
2. Difficulty in Obtaining Precise Ephemerides: Due to limited monitoring stations and lower stability of onboard clocks, obtaining precise ephemerides is challenging
3. Circular Dependency Problem: If ISR measurements are used for orbit determination and time synchronization (ODTS) to generate ephemerides, this creates a circular dependency between ODTS and fault detection

Research Significance

This research has important implications for future lunar exploration missions:

1. LunaNet Support: Providing reliable PNT services for NASA's LunaNet network
2. Safety-Critical Missions: Ensuring reliable operation of lunar navigation satellites is critical for safety-critical missions
3. Cost-Effectiveness: Providing economical fault monitoring solutions in resource-limited lunar environments

Limitations of Existing Methods

Traditional satellite fault monitoring methods have the following limitations:

1. Dependence on Precise Ephemerides: Requires accurate orbital information to compute expected distances
2. Strong Assumptions: Assumes ISR measurements are sufficiently accurate, well-calibrated, and fault-free
3. Ground Dependence: Requires support from ground monitoring station networks

Core Contributions

1. Proposed an online fault detection framework based on rigidity theory: No need for precise ephemerides or ground monitoring station observations
2. Determined the graph topology conditions required for fault detection: Proved that graphs must be 2-vertex redundantly rigid to detect faulty satellites
3. Provided mathematical theoretical support for EDM and GCEDM rank: Established the mathematical foundation for fault detection using the fourth and fifth singular values of GCEDM
4. Validated lunar constellation simulations: Demonstrated the effects of hyperparameters and fault magnitudes on detection performance

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Input: Bidirectional inter-satellite ranging measurements $r_{ij}$Output: Identification and localization of faulty satellites Constraints: No precise ephemerides, limited ground support

Theoretical Foundation

Graph-Theoretic Modeling

The satellite constellation is modeled as a weighted graph $G = \langle V, E, W \rangle$:

• Vertices $V$: Satellites
• Edges $E$: Inter-satellite links
• Weights $W$: Ranging values

Distance Measurement Model

$r_{ij} = \begin{cases} \|x_i - x_j\| + w_{ij} + f_{ij} = \frac{c}{2}\tau_{ij} & (i \neq j) \\ 0 & (i = j) \end{cases}$

Where:

• $w_{ij} \sim N(0, \sigma_w)$: Measurement noise
• $f_{ij} = f_i + f_j$: Fault bias
• $f_k = \begin{cases} \bar{f} & \text{satellite k is faulty} \\ 0 & \text{satellite k is normal} \end{cases}$

Core Rigidity Theory Theorem

Theorem II.4: Given a weighted graph G, G is fault-falsifiable if and only if G is k-vertex redundantly rigid (k≥2) and if and only if G is k-edge redundantly rigid (k≥2).

Gram-Centered Euclidean Distance Matrix (GCEDM)

Construction Method

1. Construct EDM: $D_{ij} = r_{ij}^2$
2. Gram-centering: $G = -\frac{1}{2}J^n D J^n$
3. Where $J^n = I_n - \frac{1}{n}11^T$ is the Gram-centering matrix

Key Properties

Proposition III.1: The rank of EDM satisfies $\text{rank}(D_{n,d,m}) \leq \min(d + 2 + 2m, n)$

Proposition III.2: The rank of GCEDM satisfies $\text{rank}(G_{n,d,m}) \leq \min(d + 2m, n-1)$

Where m is the number of faulty satellites and d=3 for three-dimensional space.

Fault Detection Algorithm

Test Statistic

$\gamma_{\text{test}} = \frac{\lambda_4 + \lambda_5}{\lambda_1}$

Where $\lambda_i$ is the i-th singular value of GCEDM.

Algorithm Flow

1. Clique Detection: Use the Chiba-Nishizeki algorithm to find all k-clique subgraphs (k≥5)
2. Online Detection:
   • Construct GCEDM for each k-clique
   • Compute test statistic $\gamma_{\text{test}}$
   • If $\gamma_{\text{test}} > \bar{\gamma}_{\text{test}}$, mark as faulty subgraph
   • Determine faulty satellite by the maximum element of the fourth singular vector $u_4$
3. Fault Confirmation: Count how many times each satellite is marked as faulty; satellites exceeding the threshold are identified as faulty

Key Hyperparameters

• Clique Size k: Recommended k=6 for improved faulty satellite identification accuracy
• Detection Interval DI: Controls the number of time steps used for fault identification
• Minimum Faulty Subgraph Count $\delta_{nf}$: Avoids fault determination from limited samples
• Minimum Fault Detection Ratio $\delta_{rf}$: Must satisfy $\delta_{rf} < \frac{1}{n_{fs,max}}$
• Test Statistic Threshold $\bar{\gamma}_{\text{test}}$: Controls the trade-off between TPR and FPR

Experimental Setup

Constellation Configuration

Employs an Elliptical Lunar Frozen Orbit (ELFO) constellation:

• Number of Satellites: 12 satellites uniformly distributed across 4 orbital planes
• Orbital Parameters:
  • Semi-major axis: 6142.4 km
  • Eccentricity: 0.6
  • Inclination: 57.7°
  • Right ascension of ascending node: -90°, 0°, 90°, 180°

Simulation Parameters

• Measurement Noise: $\sigma_w = 1$ m
• Number of Faults: 1, 2, 3 faulty satellites
• Fault Magnitude: $\bar{f} = 5, 8, 10, 15, 20$ m
• Detection Time Interval: DI = 1, 2, 3, 5
• Threshold Settings: 95%, 99%, 99.9% quantiles

Evaluation Metrics

1. True Positive Rate (TPR): $\frac{TP}{TP + FN}$
2. False Positive Rate (FPR): $\frac{FP}{FP + TN}$
3. P4 Metric: $\frac{4 \cdot TP \cdot TN}{4 \cdot TP \cdot TN + (TP + TN) \cdot (FP + FN)}$

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Effect of Fault Magnitude: As fault magnitude increases, TPR, FPR, and P4 values all improve
2. TPR Upper Limit: TPR reaches approximately 0.92, as approximately 8.3% of satellites near perilune have limited self-contained subgraph counts due to occlusion
3. Threshold Trade-off:
   • Lowering threshold $\bar{\gamma}_{\text{test}}$: TPR increases, FPR increases
   • Increasing detection length DI: TPR increases, FPR increases

Key Findings

1. Geometric Effects: Detection performs better when satellites are distributed in 3D space; detection is difficult when non-faulty satellites are in the same plane
2. Effect of Fault Count: Detection performance improves with fewer faulty satellites
3. Parameter Optimization:
   • Small fault magnitude: High threshold + long detection time performs better
   • Large fault magnitude: Low threshold + short detection time performs better

Performance Results

For single faulty satellite example:

• Fault magnitude 20m, 99% threshold, DI=1: TPR=0.900, FPR=0.006, P4=0.952
• Fault magnitude 5m, 99.9% threshold, DI=5: TPR=0.124, FPR=0.005, P4=0.345

Related Work

Traditional Fault Monitoring Methods

1. SBAS Systems: Rely on ground monitoring station networks
2. RAIM Algorithm: Receiver autonomous integrity monitoring
3. ISR Methods: Work by Wolf (2000) and Rodríguez-Pérez et al. (2011)

Advantages of This Work

1. No Need for Precise Ephemerides: Addresses the main limitation in lunar environments
2. Solid Theoretical Foundation: Provides mathematical guarantees based on rigidity theory
3. Adaptive to Dynamic Topology: Enhanced robustness through multi-subgraph detection

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Proposed the first autonomous fault detection framework for satellite constellations based on rigidity theory
2. Proved that 2-vertex redundant rigidity is necessary and sufficient for fault detection
3. Validated the effectiveness of the GCEDM singular value method in lunar constellations

Limitations

1. Geometric Constraints: Requires satellites distributed in 3D space; detection is difficult for planar distributions
2. Multi-Fault Detection: Greedy algorithm performance degrades with multiple faults
3. Computational Complexity: The clique detection algorithm has high complexity

Future Directions

1. Distributed Implementation: Develop distributed fault detection algorithms
2. Multi-Method Fusion: Combine residual methods to enhance robustness
3. Predictive Models: Develop predictive models for non-faulty statistic distributions
4. Subgraph Selection Optimization: Reduce computational burden through effective subgraph selection

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Strong Theoretical Innovation: First application of rigidity theory to satellite fault detection, providing a complete mathematical theoretical framework
2. High Practical Value: Addresses practical engineering problems in lunar environments with important implications for future deep space exploration
3. Complete Methodology: Forms a complete research chain from theoretical proof to algorithm implementation to simulation validation
4. Mathematical Rigor: Provides strict proofs for EDM and GCEDM rank, filling theoretical gaps

Weaknesses

1. Assumption Limitations: Assumes faults are constant biases; actual faults may be more complex
2. Geometric Sensitivity: High requirements for satellite geometric distribution; practical applications may be limited
3. Experimental Limitations: Validated only in simulation environments; lacks real-world testing
4. Computational Efficiency: Clique detection algorithm has high complexity; real-time performance needs improvement

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Introduces new theoretical tools to the satellite fault detection field
2. Engineering Value: Provides important reference for future lunar navigation system design
3. Reproducibility: Detailed algorithm descriptions facilitate reproduction and improvement

Applicable Scenarios

1. Deep Space Exploration: Lunar, Martian, and other environments lacking ground infrastructure
2. Autonomous Systems: Satellite constellations requiring highly autonomous operation
3. Resource-Constrained Environments: Scenarios with limited computational and communication resources

References

This paper cites 81 relevant references covering important works in rigidity theory, graph theory, satellite navigation, fault detection, and other fields, providing a solid theoretical foundation for the research.

Overall Assessment: This is an excellent paper with significant value in both theoretical innovation and practical application. The authors ingeniously introduce rigidity theory into the satellite fault detection field, addressing practical engineering problems in the lunar environment. While there are limitations in certain aspects, its pioneering theoretical contributions and practical value make it an important advancement in the field.