Evolution of Cooperation with the Diversity of Cooperation Tendencies

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2406.12647
• Title: Evolution of Cooperation with the Diversity of Cooperation Tendencies
• Authors: Linya Huang, Wenchen Han
• Classification: physics.soc-ph (Sociophysics)
• Publication Date: June 18, 2024 (arXiv preprint)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.12647

Abstract

Traditional evolutionary game theory typically considers only two extreme strategies: complete cooperation and complete defection. However, individual strategies in reality exhibit greater diversity. This study introduces strategy diversity into the weak prisoner's dilemma game, measured through the diversity of cooperation tendencies. Higher diversity means providing more cooperation tendency options. Complete cooperation corresponds to full cooperation tendency, complete defection corresponds to zero cooperation tendency, while agents with other cooperation tendencies act as both partial cooperators and partial defectors. Numerical simulations demonstrate that increasing the diversity of cooperation tendencies promotes cooperation levels, not only increasing the number of cooperators but also elevating the average tendency of the entire population, until diversity reaches saturation. The study further indicates that cooperation maintenance depends on cooperation efficiency approaching the cooperators' payoff, and when cooperator clusters cannot resist defector invasion, cooperation efficiency oscillates and rapidly declines to zero.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Limitations of Traditional Game Theory: Classical evolutionary game theory typically considers only two extreme strategies of complete cooperation and complete defection, whereas real-world individual behavioral strategies exhibit continuity and diversity.
2. Practical Significance of Prisoner's Dilemma: As a classical model for studying cooperation evolution, the stable equilibrium of prisoner's dilemma is mutual defection, leading to cooperator extinction. However, cooperative behavior is widespread in reality.
3. Cooperation Promotion Mechanisms: Existing research has identified five main mechanisms promoting cooperation: kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, and group selection. However, research on the effects of strategy diversity remains insufficient.

Research Motivation

• Importance of Strategy Heterogeneity: Real-world individuals are not perfectly rational and exhibit varying degrees of cooperation tendencies
• Partial Cooperation Strategies: Individuals may simultaneously possess characteristics of both cooperation and defection, requiring more nuanced modeling
• Network Effects: Investigating the mechanisms by which strategy diversity affects cooperation evolution on spatial networks

Core Contributions

1. Introduction of Cooperation Tendency Diversity Concept: Incorporating continuous cooperation tendency parameters into the weak prisoner's dilemma, allowing agents to adopt partial cooperation strategies
2. Establishment of New Evaluation Metrics: Proposing indicators such as cooperator proportion (fC), average cooperation tendency (fS), and cooperation efficiency (eC)
3. Revelation of Cooperation Promotion Mechanisms: Discovering that strategy diversity promotes cooperation maintenance by mitigating cooperation efficiency oscillations
4. Theoretical Insights: Demonstrating that the key to cooperation maintenance lies in cooperation efficiency approaching the cooperators' payoff value of 1
5. Noise Effect Analysis: Investigating the impact of decision noise on cooperation evolution under different levels of strategy diversity

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigating the cooperation evolution dynamics of the weak prisoner's dilemma in an agent population with varying cooperation tendency diversity on an L×L lattice network.

Inputs:

• Network structure (100×100 lattice)
• Cooperation tendency diversity parameter m
• Defection temptation parameter b ∈ [1,2)
• Decision noise parameter κ

Outputs:

• Cooperator proportion fC
• Average cooperation tendency fS
• Cooperation efficiency eC

Model Architecture

1. Weak Prisoner's Dilemma Setup

• Payoff Matrix: Both cooperating yields reward 1; both defecting yields punishment 0; defector facing cooperator yields temptation b; cooperator facing defector yields 0
• Network Structure: 100×100 lattice network with periodic boundary conditions; each node has degree k=4

2. Cooperation Tendency Diversity

The cooperation tendency set is defined as: $S = \{0, \frac{1}{m}, \frac{2}{m}, \ldots, 1\}$

where m is the diversity parameter. Agent i's cooperation tendency si indicates that this agent acts as a cooperator with proportion si and as a defector with proportion (1-si).

3. Payoff Calculation

The payoff between agent i and agent j is: $\Pi_{i,j} = s_i \cdot s_j + (1-s_i) \cdot s_j \cdot b$

Total payoff is: $\Pi_i = \sum_{j \in N_i} \Pi_{i,j}$

4. Strategy Update Mechanism

Employing the Fermi update rule, the probability that agent i learns strategy sj from neighbor j is: $W(s_j \leftarrow s_i) = \frac{1}{1 + \exp[(\Pi_i - \Pi_j)/\kappa]}$

where κ is the noise parameter, representing the rationality level of agents.

Technical Innovations

1. Continuous Strategy Space: Unlike traditional binary strategies, introducing continuous cooperation tendency parameters
2. Preservation of Original Payoff Matrix: No modification needed to the traditional prisoner's dilemma payoff structure
3. Multi-dimensional Evaluation System: Simultaneously considering cooperator quantity and cooperation intensity
4. Cooperation Efficiency Concept: Defining cooperation efficiency eC = ⟨Π⟩/(4fS) as a key analytical tool

Experimental Setup

Parameter Configuration

• Network Scale: N = 10,000 agents, 100×100 lattice
• Diversity Parameter: m ∈ {1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 50, 100}
• Defection Temptation: b ∈ 1.00, 1.14
• Noise Parameter: κ = 0.1 (rational agents), κ ∈ 0, 0.3 (noise analysis)
• Time Steps: 50,000 transient steps + 1,000 statistical steps
• Repetitions: 50 random initial conditions

Evaluation Metrics

1. Cooperator Proportion: $f_C = \frac{|\{j|s_j > 0\}|}{N}$
2. Average Cooperation Tendency: $f_S = \frac{\sum_j s_j}{N}$
3. Cooperation Efficiency: $e_C = \frac{⟨\Pi⟩}{4f_S}$
4. Average Tendency of Cooperators: fS/fC

Experimental Results

Main Findings

1. Strategy Diversity Promotes Cooperation

• When m=1 (traditional binary strategy), all agents choose defection when b>1.02
• When m≥2, cooperators can survive at higher defection temptation (b≈1.13)
• Higher diversity m supports populations in achieving higher overall cooperation levels

2. Optimal Selection of Cooperation Tendencies

• Agents tend to select strategies close to "saturated cooperation tendency"
• Under moderate temptation levels, partial cooperation strategies (such as s=0.5, s=0.75) become dominant
• As diversity increases, the average tendency of cooperators fS/fC tends to converge

3. Critical Role of Cooperation Efficiency

• The key to cooperation maintenance lies in cooperation efficiency eC approaching 1 (cooperators' payoff)
• When cooperator clusters cannot resist defector invasion, eC exhibits severe oscillations and rapidly declines to 0
• Strategy diversity promotes cooperation stability by mitigating eC oscillations

Ablation Studies

Noise Effect Analysis

• Higher strategy diversity expands the noise range for cooperation survival
• When m=1, cooperators completely disappear at b=1.04, regardless of rationality level
• When m=8, cooperators can survive even at high temptation b=1.42
• Surviving cooperators require higher rationality levels to distinguish between similar cooperation tendencies

Case Analysis

Snapshot analysis (Figure 2) reveals strategy distribution patterns under different parameters:

• Low temptation (b=1.01): Preference for complete cooperation s=1
• Moderate temptation (b=1.02-1.03): Mixed or partial cooperation strategies dominate
• High temptation (b=1.07): Only low cooperation tendency strategies can survive

Experimental Discoveries

1. Saturation Effect: There exists an optimal cooperation tendency level, beyond which increasing diversity yields limited effects
2. Dynamic Equilibrium: Cooperation efficiency stability around 1 is a necessary condition for cooperation maintenance
3. Rationality Requirements: Increased strategy diversity imposes higher demands on agent rationality levels

Related Work

Cooperation Evolution Mechanisms

• Classical Five Mechanisms: Kin selection, direct reciprocity, indirect reciprocity, network reciprocity, group selection
• Systematic Mechanisms: Reputation, reward and punishment, agent heterogeneity

Strategy Heterogeneity Research

• Investment Heterogeneity: Yuan et al. linked individual investment with local cooperation levels
• Connectivity Heterogeneity: Cao et al. associated investment with individual connectivity proportions
• Reputation Heterogeneity: Yan et al. proposed heterogeneous reputation evolution mechanisms
• Quasi-cooperation Strategies: Chen et al. defined quasi-cooperation strategies allowing incomplete altruism

Advantages of This Work

• Maintains the original prisoner's dilemma payoff structure unchanged
• Introduces continuous strategy space rather than discrete third strategies
• Provides a systematic theoretical analysis framework

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Strategy Diversity Significantly Promotes Cooperation: Increasing cooperation tendency diversity enhances cooperation levels, enabling cooperation to persist under higher defection temptation
2. Cooperation Efficiency is the Key Mechanism: Cooperation maintenance depends on cooperation efficiency approaching 1, with diversity functioning by mitigating efficiency oscillations
3. Saturation Threshold Exists: Cooperation promotion effects tend to saturate after reaching a certain diversity level
4. Rationality Requirements: Higher diversity requires agents to possess greater rationality levels to effectively distinguish between strategies

Limitations

1. Network Structure Constraints: Only regular lattice networks were considered; effects of other network topologies remain unexplored
2. Single Update Mechanism: Only Fermi update rule was employed; other learning mechanisms may produce different results
3. Limited Parameter Range: The parameter range for weak prisoner's dilemma is relatively constrained
4. Insufficient Theoretical Analysis: Lacks rigorous mathematical theoretical derivations

Future Directions

1. Network Topology Extension: Investigating effects on scale-free networks, small-world networks, and other complex networks
2. Multilayer Networks: Considering cooperation evolution in multiple relationship networks
3. Adaptive Networks: Allowing network structure to dynamically adjust with strategy evolution
4. Theoretical Modeling: Developing analytical theories to predict critical points and phase transition behavior

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Conceptual Innovation: The cooperation tendency diversity concept is novel, providing new perspectives for studying strategy heterogeneity
2. Methodological Simplicity: Introducing continuous strategy space while maintaining the original game structure demonstrates clever design
3. Comprehensive Analysis: Systematically analyzing cooperation evolution from multiple dimensions (cooperator proportion, average tendency, cooperation efficiency)
4. Mechanism Revelation: Revealing the underlying mechanisms of cooperation maintenance through cooperation efficiency dynamics
5. Sufficient Experimentation: Comprehensive parameter sweeping and reliable statistical analysis

Weaknesses

1. Theoretical Depth: Lacks rigorous mathematical theoretical analysis, relying primarily on numerical simulations
2. Model Simplification: Relatively simple network structure and update mechanisms, with significant gaps from real systems
3. Mechanism Explanation: Insufficient depth in explaining why strategy diversity mitigates cooperation efficiency oscillations
4. Generalizability: The universality of conclusions requires verification across more game types and network structures

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides a new modeling framework for strategy heterogeneity research in evolutionary game theory
2. Applied Value: Offers guidance for understanding cooperative behavior in real social contexts
3. Methodological Inspiration: The continuous treatment of cooperation tendency can be generalized to other game models
4. Interdisciplinary Significance: Provides insights for cooperation research in sociology, economics, biology, and other fields

Applicable Scenarios

1. Social Cooperation: Analyzing interactions among individuals with varying cooperation levels in social groups
2. Economic Behavior: Investigating partial cooperation strategies of enterprises in markets
3. Ecological Systems: Modeling cooperation-competition relationships in biological populations
4. Online Communities: Analyzing user participation and contribution behavior in network communities

References

The paper cites 51 relevant references covering multiple domains including game theory foundations, cooperation evolution mechanisms, and network science, providing a solid theoretical foundation. Particularly noteworthy are Nowak's classical work on five rules of cooperation evolution and recent cutting-edge research on strategy heterogeneity.