Effects of quantum corrections to Lorentzian vacuum transitions in the presence of gravity

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2406.13845
• Title: Effects of quantum corrections to Lorentzian vacuum transitions in the presence of gravity
• Authors: H. García-Compeán, J. Hernández-Aguilar, D. Mata-Pacheco, C. Ramírez
• Classification: gr-qc (General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology), hep-th (High Energy Physics - Theory)
• Publication Date: June 2024 (arXiv:2406.13845v2)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13845

Abstract

This paper investigates the probability of vacuum transitions with quantum corrections. The authors first propose a general methodology to extend previous work using the Lorentzian formulation of the Wheeler-De Witt equation by incorporating higher-order terms in the semiclassical expansion. This method is in principle applicable to any model in minisuperspace and can compute quantum corrections to arbitrary order. The methodology is then applied to obtain analytical solutions for the transition probabilities of homogeneous isotropic and anisotropic universes, calculated to second-order quantum corrections. For the isotropic case, Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker metrics with positive and zero curvature are employed, while for the anisotropic case, Bianchi III and Kantowski-Sachs metrics are used. The results are interpreted as the distribution probability of creating universes of given size through vacuum decay. The general behavior found when accounting for second-order quantum corrections is the avoidance of the initial singularity. However, this result can only be realized in isotropic universes. Additionally, the effects of anisotropy on transition probabilities are investigated.

Research Background and Motivation

Research Problem

The core problem addressed in this paper is how quantum corrections affect vacuum transition probabilities in the presence of gravity, particularly how these corrections influence the initial singularity problem of the universe.

Significance

1. Cosmological Significance: Vacuum transitions are considered key processes for describing universe creation, providing a description of cosmic origins in the canonical approach to quantum gravity
2. Theoretical Completeness: Existing semiclassical approximation methods have limitations; quantum corrections must be included to obtain a more complete picture
3. Singularity Problem: The initial singularity is a fundamental problem in general relativity and cosmology; quantum effects may provide a solution

Limitations of Existing Approaches

1. Problems with Euclidean Methods: In Euclidean path integral methods, calculating quantum corrections encounters negative mode problems that may invalidate the semiclassical approximation
2. Semiclassical Limitations: Previous Lorentzian formulation studies were restricted to the semiclassical level without considering quantum corrections
3. Insufficient Anisotropic Studies: Most research focuses on isotropic FLRW metrics with limited investigation of anisotropic cases

Research Motivation

The authors' motivation is to extend the general Lorentzian formulation to include quantum corrections, thereby avoiding problems in Euclidean methods, and systematically study quantum correction effects in both isotropic and anisotropic universes.

Core Contributions

1. Proposes a general method for computing quantum corrections: Extends the WKB expansion of the Wheeler-De Witt equation to calculate quantum corrections to arbitrary order
2. Obtains analytical solutions: Derives analytical expressions including second-order quantum corrections for multiple cosmological metrics (FLRW, Bianchi III, Kantowski-Sachs)
3. Discovers singularity avoidance mechanism: Demonstrates that second-order quantum corrections can lead to avoidance of the initial singularity, but only in isotropic universes
4. Reveals anisotropy effects: Systematically studies how anisotropy affects transition probabilities, finding that anisotropy reduces transition probability
5. Provides theoretical framework: Establishes a general theoretical framework applicable to any minisuperspace model

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Study the vacuum transition probability between two minima of a scalar field potential, considering gravitational effects and quantum corrections. The input consists of cosmological metrics and scalar field potentials; the output is an analytical expression for transition probability.

Model Architecture

1. General Form of Hamiltonian Constraint

The authors begin with the general Hamiltonian constraint in ADM formulation: $H = \frac{1}{2}G^{MN}(\Phi)\pi_M\pi_N + f[\Phi] \simeq 0$

where $\Phi^M$ are superspace coordinates, $\pi_M$ are canonically conjugate momenta, and $G^{MN}$ is the inverse superspace metric.

2. Wheeler-De Witt Equation

Obtained through canonical quantization: $H\Psi[\Phi] = \left[-\frac{\hbar^2}{2}G^{MN}(\Phi)\frac{\delta}{\delta\Phi^M}\frac{\delta}{\delta\Phi^N} + f[\Phi]\right]\Psi[\Phi] = 0$

3. WKB Expansion

Using a WKB-type ansatz: $\Psi[\Phi] = \exp\left\{\frac{i}{\hbar}S[\Phi]\right\}$

where $S[\Phi]$ has an $\hbar$ expansion: $S[\Phi] = S_0[\Phi] + \hbar S_1[\Phi] + \hbar^2 S_2[\Phi] + O(\hbar^3)$

4. Equations at Each Order

• Zeroth order (classical): $\frac{1}{2}G^{MN}\frac{\delta S_0}{\delta\Phi^M}\frac{\delta S_0}{\delta\Phi^N} + f[\Phi] = 0$
• First-order quantum correction: $2G^{MN}\frac{\delta S_0}{\delta\Phi^M}\frac{\delta S_1}{\delta\Phi^N} = iG^{MN}\frac{\delta^2 S_0}{\delta\Phi^M\delta\Phi^N}$
• Second-order quantum correction: More complex expressions involving mixed terms of $S_0$, $S_1$, and $S_2$

Technical Innovations

1. Systematic Quantum Correction Calculation

• Provides a systematic method for computing quantum corrections at arbitrary order
• Gives explicit expressions for first and second-order quantum corrections: $S_1 = -iVol^2(X)\int^s \frac{ds'}{C^2(s')}\nabla^2f$$S_2 = \frac{1}{2}\int^s ds' \frac{Vol^3(X)}{C^3(s')}\nabla^2(\nabla^2f) + \frac{1}{2}\int^s ds' \frac{Vol^5(X)}{C^5(s')}[\nabla(\nabla^2f)]^2$

2. Transition Probability Calculation

Transition probability is defined as: $P(A \to B) = \exp[-2\text{Re}(\Gamma)]$ where $\Gamma = \Gamma_0 + \Gamma_1 + \Gamma_2$ includes semiclassical contributions and quantum corrections.

3. Treatment of Tension Terms

Under the thin-wall approximation, "tension terms" are introduced to handle regions where the scalar field changes discontinuously, representing contributions from quantum fluctuations.

Experimental Setup

Metric Selection

The authors study four different cosmological metrics:

1. Positively Curved FLRW Metric: Describes closed isotropic universes
2. Flat FLRW Metric: Describes flat isotropic universes
3. Bianchi III Metric: Describes anisotropic universes
4. Kantowski-Sachs Metric: Describes another type of anisotropic universe

Scalar Field Potential

A general scalar field potential $V(\phi)$ with two local minima is considered, where $V_A$ and $V_B$ represent the potential values at false and true vacua respectively.

Parameter Settings

• Natural units with $\hbar = 1$
• Specific potential parameter values chosen for numerical calculations and plotting
• Thin-wall approximation $\delta s \to 0$ is employed

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Isotropic Universes (FLRW Metrics)

• Semiclassical Contribution: Probability is maximum at the initial singularity and decreases with increasing scale factor
• First-Order Quantum Correction: Does not change the overall shape, only reduces probability values
• Second-Order Quantum Correction: Modifies ultraviolet behavior, making probability zero at the initial singularity with maximum probability shifted to a finite non-zero scale factor

2. Anisotropic Universes

• Bianchi III Metric: Exhibits behavior similar to FLRW, but the avoided point is not a true spatial singularity
• Kantowski-Sachs Metric: Shows the same general behavior, but the avoided point also does not correspond to a spatial singularity

3. Anisotropy Effects

• Increasing anisotropy parameter $\alpha$ reduces transition probability
• Anisotropy shifts the maximum probability point toward smaller scale factor values
• True singularity avoidance cannot be achieved in anisotropic cases

Key Findings

1. Singularity Avoidance Only in Isotropic Cases: This is the paper's central finding
2. Ultraviolet Dominance of Quantum Corrections: Quantum effects are primarily important in the small scale factor (ultraviolet) regime
3. Criticality of Second-Order Effects: Singularity avoidance emerges at second-order quantum corrections, consistent with quantum correction behavior in the Klein-Gordon equation

Mathematical Constraints

To obtain well-defined probabilities, constraints must be imposed on potential derivatives:

• For first-order corrections: $\frac{V_B^{(2)}}{V_B} = \frac{V_A^{(2)}}{V_A}$
• For second-order corrections: Additional higher-derivative constraints

Related Work

Historical Background

1. Coleman et al.'s Pioneering Work: Studied vacuum transitions in field theory using Euclidean techniques
2. Coleman-De Luccia: Incorporated gravitational effects into vacuum transition studies
3. Fischler-Morgan-Polchinski: First used Lorentzian formulation to study transitions between cosmological constants

Recent Developments

1. Advantages of Lorentzian Formulation: No Wick rotation required; can describe closed universes as final states
2. Minisuperspace Methods: General approach proposed in 30,31, extended in this paper
3. Anisotropic Studies: Previous work primarily focused on isotropic cases

Innovation of This Paper

Compared to negative mode problems in Euclidean methods, the Lorentzian approach naturally incorporates quantum corrections through WKB expansion, avoiding technical difficulties.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Methodological Contribution: Establishes a systematic method for computing quantum corrections to vacuum transition probabilities
2. Physical Insight: Second-order quantum corrections can avoid the initial singularity, but only in isotropic universes
3. Anisotropic Limitation: In anisotropic universes, quantum corrections cannot avoid true spatial singularities
4. Universal Behavior: Quantum corrections primarily affect ultraviolet (small-scale) behavior; infrared behavior remains essentially unchanged

Limitations

1. Minisuperspace Approximation: Restricts the number of degrees of freedom, potentially missing important quantum effects
2. Thin-Wall Approximation: Simplifies the scalar field transition process
3. Arbitrariness of Tension Terms: Introduces additional free parameters requiring deeper physical understanding
4. Factorization Dependence: Results depend on specific factorization choices of the Hamiltonian constraint

Future Directions

1. Midisuperspace Extension: Consider infinite degrees of freedom without requiring full superspace approximation
2. Comparison with Euclidean Methods: Verify whether quantum corrections are consistent with Euclidean loop corrections
3. Holographic Interpretation: Study holographic interpretations of these transitions in AdS/CFT correspondence
4. Experimental Verification: Seek possible observational signatures

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Rigor: Provides a systematic mathematical framework derived from general principles to specific results
2. Computational Completeness: Delivers complete analytical solutions for multiple metrics including second-order quantum corrections
3. Deep Physical Insight: The discovery that singularity avoidance is possible only in isotropic cases is an important theoretical finding
4. Method Universality: Framework is applicable to any minisuperspace model and arbitrary-order quantum corrections
5. Technical Innovation: Successfully avoids negative mode problems encountered in Euclidean methods

Weaknesses

1. Incomplete Physical Interpretation: The physical meaning of tension terms requires deeper understanding
2. Approximation Limitations: Minisuperspace and thin-wall approximations may be overly simplistic
3. Parameter Dependence: Results depend on choices of multiple free parameters
4. Experimental Testability: Lacks explicit observational predictions or experimental verification schemes
5. Factorization Issues: Appendix A shows results are sensitive to factorization choices of the Hamiltonian constraint

Impact

1. Theoretical Contribution: Provides new computational tools for quantum cosmology and vacuum transition theory
2. Interdisciplinary Significance: Connects quantum field theory, general relativity, and cosmology
3. Methodological Value: WKB expansion methods are applicable to other quantum gravity problems
4. Inspirational Value: Provides new perspectives for understanding how quantum effects influence early universe evolution

Application Scenarios

1. Theoretical Cosmology: Models for studying cosmic origins and early universe evolution
2. Quantum Gravity: Concrete examples for studying quantum gravity effects
3. Field Theory Applications: Extensible to other field theory models with vacuum transitions
4. Numerical Cosmology: Provides analytical benchmarks for numerical simulations

References

The paper cites 61 relevant references spanning from Coleman's pioneering work to recent quantum cosmology research. Key references include:

• Coleman & De Luccia (1980): Gravitational effects on vacuum decay
• Fischler, Morgan & Polchinski (1990): Lorentzian quantum nucleation
• García-Compeán & Mata-Pacheco (2021): Lorentzian vacuum transitions in anisotropic universes
• De Alwis et al. (2021): Recent developments in Lorentzian vacuum transitions

This paper makes important contributions to quantum cosmology, particularly in understanding how quantum corrections affect the initial singularity problem of the universe. Despite certain technical limitations, the theoretical framework and physical insights it provides are valuable for the field's development.