2025-11-17T01:10:12.200979

Ponzi schemes on coarse spaces with uniform measure

Miyauchi
Ponzi schemes, defined by Block-Weinberger(1992) and Roe(2003), give a characterization of amenability from the viewpoint of coarse geometry. We consider measures in coarse spaces, and propose a reformulation of Ponzi schemes with measures.
academic

Ponzi schemes on coarse spaces with uniform measure

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2407.03837
  • Title: Ponzi schemes on coarse spaces with uniform measure
  • Author: Shunsuke MIYAUCHI (Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo)
  • Classification: math.GN (General Topology), math.GR (Group Theory), math.MG (Metric Geometry)
  • Publication Date: July 2024, arXiv preprint
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03837

Abstract

This paper investigates Ponzi schemes as defined by Block-Weinberger (1992) and Roe (2003), which provide characterizations of amenability from the perspective of coarse geometry. The author considers measures on coarse spaces and proposes a reformulation of Ponzi schemes with measures.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problems

  1. Limitations of classical Ponzi schemes: Traditional Ponzi schemes are defined using only coarse structures and counting methods, lacking a measure-theoretic perspective
  2. Refinement of amenability characterizations: Need to revisit the concept of amenability in coarse geometry from a measure-theoretic viewpoint
  3. Unification of theoretical frameworks: Establish a bridge between Ponzi schemes and measure theory

Research Significance

  • Ponzi schemes provide important tools for characterizing amenability of groups from the coarse geometric perspective
  • Measure-theoretic methods may reveal deeper geometric structures
  • Significant for understanding discrete group actions and coarse equivalence

Limitations of Existing Methods

  • Traditional Ponzi schemes rely on counting uniformly locally finite subsets
  • Lack of organic integration with measure space theory
  • Measurability conditions are difficult to verify in certain cases

Core Contributions

  1. Introduction of uniform measure concept: Defines uniform measures on coarse spaces, establishing the foundation for measure-theoretic methods
  2. Proposal of μ-PS concept: Defines Ponzi schemes with uniform measure μ (μ-PS), generalizing traditional Ponzi schemes
  3. Establishment of equivalence theorems: Proves equivalence between Ponzi schemes and μ-PS under appropriate conditions
  4. Characterization of group amenability: Provides complete characterization of discrete group amenability and existence of μ-PS
  5. Construction of concrete examples: Provides explicit construction of μ-PS on the hyperbolic plane

Detailed Methods

Basic Definitional Framework

Coarse Spaces and Measurable Structures

The author first establishes a framework for measurable coarse spaces:

  • Coarse structure: A subfamily EP(X×X)\mathcal{E} \subset \mathcal{P}(X \times X) satisfying five axioms
  • Measurable control sets: EE(B×B)E \in \mathcal{E} \cap (\mathcal{B} \times \mathcal{B}), where B\mathcal{B} is a σ-algebra
  • Measurable coarse structure: For any EEE \in \mathcal{E}, there exists a measurable control set containing it

Uniform Measure

Definition 3.6: A measure μ is uniform with respect to a measurable coarse space E\mathcal{E} if: supxXμ(Ex)<\sup_{x \in X} \mu(E_x) < \infty holds for all measurable control sets EE(B×B)E \in \mathcal{E} \cap (\mathcal{B} \times \mathcal{B}).

Definition of μ-PS

μ-Chain Complex

  • μ-0-chains: fL(X,μ)f \in L^{\infty}(X,\mu)
  • μ-1-chains: cL(X×X,μμ)c \in L^{\infty}(X \times X, \mu \otimes \mu) with a measurable control set EcE_c such that X×XEccdμμ=0\int_{X \times X \setminus E_c} |c| d\mu \otimes \mu = 0

Boundary Operator

For a μ-1-chain cc, the boundary operator is defined as: c(x)=Xc(y,x)dμ(y)Xc(x,y)dμ(y)\partial c(x) = \int_X c(y,x) d\mu(y) - \int_X c(x,y) d\mu(y)

μ-PS Definition

Definition 4.2: A μ-1-chain cc is a μ-PS if and only if its boundary c\partial c is effective, i.e.:

  • c0\partial c \geq 0 a.e. μ
  • There exists a measurable control set EE such that Ex0cdμ1\int_{E_{x_0}} \partial c d\mu \geq 1 for all x0Xx_0 \in X

Technical Innovations

  1. Measurability concept: Distinguishes between two measurability definitions, selecting the version compatible with product spaces
  2. Well-definedness of boundary operator: Ensures existence of the boundary operator through σ-finiteness conditions
  3. Generalization of coarse equivalence: Introduces measure-effective justification conditions, making μ-PS invariant under appropriate coarse equivalences

Main Theoretical Results

Core Theorems

Theorem 6.3 (Main Result): Let (X,E)(X,\mathcal{E}) be a measurable coarse space, μ a uniform measure, and (X,μ)(X,\mu) σ-finite.

  1. If XX has a μ-PS and a quasi-lattice Λ\Lambda, then XX has a Ponzi scheme
  2. If XX has a Ponzi scheme θ\theta with suppθS×S\text{supp}\theta \subset S \times S (SS uniformly locally finite), and there exists a measurable control set EE constant on SS with respect to μ, then XX has a μ-PS

Group-Theoretic Applications

Corollary 6.4: Let a discrete group Γ\Gamma act properly and cocompactly on a locally compact, second-countable Hausdorff space XX, and let μ be a Γ\Gamma-invariant nonzero regular measure. Then Γ\Gamma is non-amenable if and only if the coarse space (X,EΓX)(X, E_\Gamma^X) has a μ-PS.

Concrete Construction Examples

μ-PS on the Hyperbolic Plane

Example 4.10: On the Poincaré disk model D2D^2 equipped with metric ds2=dx2+dy2(1x2y2)2ds^2 = \frac{dx^2 + dy^2}{(1-x^2-y^2)^2} and measure μ=4dxdy(1x2y2)2\mu = \frac{4dxdy}{(1-x^2-y^2)^2}.

Construction function: c(z,z)={1if d(z,z)1 and d(z,0)d(z,0)0otherwisec(z,z') = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if } d(z,z') \leq 1 \text{ and } d(z,0) \geq d(z',0) \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}

Using the hyperbolic law of cosines and area formulas, it is proven that: c(z)ε>0\partial c(z) \geq \varepsilon > 0 holds for all zD2z \in D^2, where ε\varepsilon is an explicitly computed positive constant.

Technical Difficulties and Solutions

Measurability Issues

  • Challenge: Different measurability definitions lead to different properties
  • Solution: Select the definition compatible with the product σ-algebra, ensuring fiber measurability

Well-definedness of Boundary Operator

  • Challenge: Convergence of infinite integrals
  • Solution: Utilize boundedness of uniform measures and σ-finiteness conditions

Preservation of Coarse Equivalence

  • Challenge: Measure structures may not be preserved under coarse equivalence
  • Solution: Introduce measure-effective justification conditions, establishing appropriate functoriality

Relationship to Classical Theory

  1. Block-Weinberger's original work: This paper generalizes the original definition on metric spaces
  2. Roe's coarse geometry theory: Introduces measure-theoretic perspective based on Roe's framework
  3. Winkel's geometric property (T): Borrows the concept of uniform measures

Innovations

  • First systematic introduction of measure theory into Ponzi scheme theory
  • Establishes bridge between discrete and continuous settings
  • Provides concrete geometric construction examples

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

  1. μ-PS provides a natural measure-theoretic generalization of Ponzi schemes
  2. Under appropriate conditions, the two concepts are equivalent
  3. This framework completely characterizes group amenability

Limitations

  1. σ-finiteness requirement: Traditional Ponzi schemes do not require countability assumptions
  2. Technical nature of conditions: Theorem conditions are relatively complex, making practical verification difficult
  3. Complexity of constructions: Concrete examples involve complex hyperbolic geometry calculations

Future Directions

  1. Possibility of relaxing σ-finiteness conditions
  2. Applications to more general geometric spaces
  3. Relationships with other coarse geometric invariants

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

  1. Strong theoretical innovation: Successfully introduces measure theory into coarse geometry, opening new research directions
  2. High mathematical rigor: Clear definitions, complete proofs, and meticulous technical treatment
  3. Good geometric intuition: The hyperbolic plane example provides excellent geometric insight
  4. Clear application value: Direct application to amenability problems in group theory

Weaknesses

  1. Condition complexity: Main theorem conditions are quite technical, limiting applicability
  2. Limited examples: Only provides one concrete example on the hyperbolic plane
  3. Computational complexity: Practical verification of μ-PS existence may be computationally difficult

Impact Assessment

  • Theoretical contribution: Provides new measure-theoretic tools for coarse geometry
  • Application prospects: May find applications in geometric group theory and harmonic analysis
  • Reproducibility: Theoretical results are reproducible, but specific calculations require specialized hyperbolic geometry knowledge

Applicable Scenarios

  1. Geometric spaces with natural measure structures
  2. Cases where group actions preserve measures
  3. Coarse geometric problems requiring fine structural analysis

Technical Details Supplement

Key Lemmas

Several key technical lemmas in the paper ensure theoretical completeness:

  • Proposition 4.7: Well-definedness of the boundary operator
  • Theorem 5.3: Invariance of μ-PS under measure-effectively justified coarse equivalence
  • Propositions 5.6-5.10: Properties of push-pull functors

Computational Techniques

The hyperbolic plane example employs:

  • Hyperbolic law of cosines for triangles
  • Hyperbolic area formula: μ()=π(α+β+γ)\mu(\triangle) = \pi - (\alpha + \beta + \gamma)
  • Polar coordinate transformations and complex integral calculations

This paper represents an important development direction in coarse geometry theory, successfully introducing measure-theoretic methods into this field and laying a solid theoretical foundation for future research.