Ponzi schemes, defined by Block-Weinberger(1992) and Roe(2003), give a characterization of amenability from the viewpoint of coarse geometry. We consider measures in coarse spaces, and propose a reformulation of Ponzi schemes with measures.
- Paper ID: 2407.03837
- Title: Ponzi schemes on coarse spaces with uniform measure
- Author: Shunsuke MIYAUCHI (Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Tokyo)
- Classification: math.GN (General Topology), math.GR (Group Theory), math.MG (Metric Geometry)
- Publication Date: July 2024, arXiv preprint
- Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03837
This paper investigates Ponzi schemes as defined by Block-Weinberger (1992) and Roe (2003), which provide characterizations of amenability from the perspective of coarse geometry. The author considers measures on coarse spaces and proposes a reformulation of Ponzi schemes with measures.
- Limitations of classical Ponzi schemes: Traditional Ponzi schemes are defined using only coarse structures and counting methods, lacking a measure-theoretic perspective
- Refinement of amenability characterizations: Need to revisit the concept of amenability in coarse geometry from a measure-theoretic viewpoint
- Unification of theoretical frameworks: Establish a bridge between Ponzi schemes and measure theory
- Ponzi schemes provide important tools for characterizing amenability of groups from the coarse geometric perspective
- Measure-theoretic methods may reveal deeper geometric structures
- Significant for understanding discrete group actions and coarse equivalence
- Traditional Ponzi schemes rely on counting uniformly locally finite subsets
- Lack of organic integration with measure space theory
- Measurability conditions are difficult to verify in certain cases
- Introduction of uniform measure concept: Defines uniform measures on coarse spaces, establishing the foundation for measure-theoretic methods
- Proposal of μ-PS concept: Defines Ponzi schemes with uniform measure μ (μ-PS), generalizing traditional Ponzi schemes
- Establishment of equivalence theorems: Proves equivalence between Ponzi schemes and μ-PS under appropriate conditions
- Characterization of group amenability: Provides complete characterization of discrete group amenability and existence of μ-PS
- Construction of concrete examples: Provides explicit construction of μ-PS on the hyperbolic plane
The author first establishes a framework for measurable coarse spaces:
- Coarse structure: A subfamily E⊂P(X×X) satisfying five axioms
- Measurable control sets: E∈E∩(B×B), where B is a σ-algebra
- Measurable coarse structure: For any E∈E, there exists a measurable control set containing it
Definition 3.6: A measure μ is uniform with respect to a measurable coarse space E if:
supx∈Xμ(Ex)<∞
holds for all measurable control sets E∈E∩(B×B).
- μ-0-chains: f∈L∞(X,μ)
- μ-1-chains: c∈L∞(X×X,μ⊗μ) with a measurable control set Ec such that ∫X×X∖Ec∣c∣dμ⊗μ=0
For a μ-1-chain c, the boundary operator is defined as:
∂c(x)=∫Xc(y,x)dμ(y)−∫Xc(x,y)dμ(y)
Definition 4.2: A μ-1-chain c is a μ-PS if and only if its boundary ∂c is effective, i.e.:
- ∂c≥0 a.e. μ
- There exists a measurable control set E such that ∫Ex0∂cdμ≥1 for all x0∈X
- Measurability concept: Distinguishes between two measurability definitions, selecting the version compatible with product spaces
- Well-definedness of boundary operator: Ensures existence of the boundary operator through σ-finiteness conditions
- Generalization of coarse equivalence: Introduces measure-effective justification conditions, making μ-PS invariant under appropriate coarse equivalences
Theorem 6.3 (Main Result): Let (X,E) be a measurable coarse space, μ a uniform measure, and (X,μ) σ-finite.
- If X has a μ-PS and a quasi-lattice Λ, then X has a Ponzi scheme
- If X has a Ponzi scheme θ with suppθ⊂S×S (S uniformly locally finite), and there exists a measurable control set E constant on S with respect to μ, then X has a μ-PS
Corollary 6.4: Let a discrete group Γ act properly and cocompactly on a locally compact, second-countable Hausdorff space X, and let μ be a Γ-invariant nonzero regular measure. Then Γ is non-amenable if and only if the coarse space (X,EΓX) has a μ-PS.
Example 4.10: On the Poincaré disk model D2 equipped with metric ds2=(1−x2−y2)2dx2+dy2 and measure μ=(1−x2−y2)24dxdy.
Construction function:
c(z,z′)={10if d(z,z′)≤1 and d(z,0)≥d(z′,0)otherwise
Using the hyperbolic law of cosines and area formulas, it is proven that:
∂c(z)≥ε>0
holds for all z∈D2, where ε is an explicitly computed positive constant.
- Challenge: Different measurability definitions lead to different properties
- Solution: Select the definition compatible with the product σ-algebra, ensuring fiber measurability
- Challenge: Convergence of infinite integrals
- Solution: Utilize boundedness of uniform measures and σ-finiteness conditions
- Challenge: Measure structures may not be preserved under coarse equivalence
- Solution: Introduce measure-effective justification conditions, establishing appropriate functoriality
- Block-Weinberger's original work: This paper generalizes the original definition on metric spaces
- Roe's coarse geometry theory: Introduces measure-theoretic perspective based on Roe's framework
- Winkel's geometric property (T): Borrows the concept of uniform measures
- First systematic introduction of measure theory into Ponzi scheme theory
- Establishes bridge between discrete and continuous settings
- Provides concrete geometric construction examples
- μ-PS provides a natural measure-theoretic generalization of Ponzi schemes
- Under appropriate conditions, the two concepts are equivalent
- This framework completely characterizes group amenability
- σ-finiteness requirement: Traditional Ponzi schemes do not require countability assumptions
- Technical nature of conditions: Theorem conditions are relatively complex, making practical verification difficult
- Complexity of constructions: Concrete examples involve complex hyperbolic geometry calculations
- Possibility of relaxing σ-finiteness conditions
- Applications to more general geometric spaces
- Relationships with other coarse geometric invariants
- Strong theoretical innovation: Successfully introduces measure theory into coarse geometry, opening new research directions
- High mathematical rigor: Clear definitions, complete proofs, and meticulous technical treatment
- Good geometric intuition: The hyperbolic plane example provides excellent geometric insight
- Clear application value: Direct application to amenability problems in group theory
- Condition complexity: Main theorem conditions are quite technical, limiting applicability
- Limited examples: Only provides one concrete example on the hyperbolic plane
- Computational complexity: Practical verification of μ-PS existence may be computationally difficult
- Theoretical contribution: Provides new measure-theoretic tools for coarse geometry
- Application prospects: May find applications in geometric group theory and harmonic analysis
- Reproducibility: Theoretical results are reproducible, but specific calculations require specialized hyperbolic geometry knowledge
- Geometric spaces with natural measure structures
- Cases where group actions preserve measures
- Coarse geometric problems requiring fine structural analysis
Several key technical lemmas in the paper ensure theoretical completeness:
- Proposition 4.7: Well-definedness of the boundary operator
- Theorem 5.3: Invariance of μ-PS under measure-effectively justified coarse equivalence
- Propositions 5.6-5.10: Properties of push-pull functors
The hyperbolic plane example employs:
- Hyperbolic law of cosines for triangles
- Hyperbolic area formula: μ(△)=π−(α+β+γ)
- Polar coordinate transformations and complex integral calculations
This paper represents an important development direction in coarse geometry theory, successfully introducing measure-theoretic methods into this field and laying a solid theoretical foundation for future research.