Beam Stacking Experiment at a Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Accelerator

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2407.13962
• Title: Beam Stacking Experiment at a Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Accelerator
• Authors: T. Uesugi, Y. Ishi, Y. Kuriyama, Y. Mori (Kyoto University), C. Jolly, D. J. Kelliher, J.-B. Lagrange, A. P. Letchford, S. Machida, D. W. Posthuma de Boer, C. T. Rogers, E. Yamakawa (STFC ISIS), M. Topp-Mugglestone (University of Oxford)
• Classification: physics.acc-ph (Accelerator Physics)
• Publication Date: July 22, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.13962

Abstract

A critical challenge in particle accelerators is achieving high peak intensity. Space charge effects are particularly pronounced at low energies, such as during injection, and typically limit achievable peak intensities. Beam stacking techniques can overcome this limitation by accumulating beams at high energies, where space charge effects are weaker. In beam stacking, one particle beam is injected and accelerated to high energy, where it continues to circulate, while second and subsequent beams are accelerated and merged into the first beam. This also allows separation of user cycles and acceleration cycles, which is often valuable. Beam stacking is impossible in time-varying magnetic fields, but fixed-field machines such as Fixed Field Alternating Gradient (FFA) accelerators do not require magnetic field scanning. This paper describes an experimental demonstration of two-beam stacking performed at the KURNS FFA at Kyoto University. Momentum spread and intensity of the beams were analyzed through Schottky signal analysis, demonstrating that stacking only slightly increases the momentum spread of the combined beam. However, the intensity of the first beam decreased significantly. RF knockout is suspected as the source of beam loss.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Definition

1. High-Intensity Beam Requirements: Next-generation intensity-frontier machines require increasingly higher beam power, with applications in spallation neutron sources, neutrino physics, and muon colliders all demanding high peak and average beam power
2. Space Charge Limitations: Space charge tune shift at low energies limits the number of particles per cycle, representing a fundamental physical constraint on achieving high intensity
3. Technical Challenges: Conventional synchrotrons face technical limitations on repetition frequency, while space charge effects are strongest at injection energy

Research Motivation

• Beam Stacking Advantages: Stacking multiple beams at high energy increases the number of particles per user cycle while avoiding space charge limitations at injection energy
• FFA Advantages: Fixed Field Alternating Gradient accelerators use fixed magnetic fields with large momentum acceptance, enabling simultaneous acceleration of one beam and storage of another
• Application Value: Allows separation of user cycles and accelerator cycles, providing experimental flexibility for applications such as spallation neutron sources

Core Contributions

1. First successful demonstration of dual-beam stacking on an operational FFA facility
2. Development of beam momentum spread and intensity measurement methods based on Schottky signals
3. Determination of optimal stacking conditions through simulation and experiment, achieving minimal momentum spread growth
4. Identification and analysis of RF knockout effect as the primary mechanism for beam loss
5. Proposal of RF knockout mitigation strategy through multi-RF cavity phase compensation

Methodology Details

Task Definition

The objective of this research is to achieve longitudinal momentum space stacking of two proton beams at KURNS FFA, specifically including:

• Input: Negative hydrogen ion beam at 11 MeV injection energy
• Process: Acceleration to 35 MeV with two-beam stacking implementation
• Output: Combined stacked beam
• Constraints: Minimize momentum spread growth and maximize beam intensity retention

Stacking Process Design

Theoretical Foundation

According to Liouville's theorem, phase space density cannot be increased by adding particles; therefore, stacking techniques stack successive beams in the momentum direction:

$\Delta Q_x = -\frac{r_p n_t R}{\pi \beta^2 \gamma^3} \frac{1}{\sigma_x(\sigma_x + \sigma_y)Q_x B_f}$

where the space charge tune shift decreases rapidly with increasing $\beta^2\gamma^3$.

Stacking Strategy

1. Top Stacking: Second beam replaces the first beam's position in longitudinal phase space
2. Bottom Stacking: Second beam placed below the first beam in momentum space, avoiding phase shift scattering
3. Optimal Conditions: RF bucket area A = longitudinal emittance εL, energy separation ∆Esep = δEb

RF Control System

Arbitrary Waveform Generator (AWG) controls RF gymnastics:

• First Beam: Fixed 4 kV voltage, synchronous phase 20°, acceleration time 6.55 ms
• Second Beam: Variable acceleration time tacc,2 (6.96-7.08 ms) to adjust final energy
• Debunching: Adiabatic reduction of RF voltage to zero

Diagnostic Methods

Schottky Signal Measurement

Full-aperture bunch monitor (FAB) measures incoherent particle momentum distribution:

$\frac{\delta\omega}{\omega_0} = \eta \frac{\delta p}{p_0}$

where η = 1/γ² - 1/γt² is the slip factor.

Power Spectral Density (PSD) is calculated using the Welch method, with the eighth harmonic used for momentum distribution analysis.

Experimental Setup

KURNS FFA Parameters

Experimental Configuration

• Injection: Negative hydrogen ions through carbon stripping foil (20 μg/cm²)
• Acceleration: Moving RF bucket captures and accelerates beam
• Diagnostics: FAB monitor, position-sensitive bunch monitor
• Data Acquisition: Noise reduction processing, 50 ms acquisition window, 5 ms block analysis

Measurement Parameters

• Energy Separation Range: ∆Esep = -235 keV to +200 keV
• Stacking Energy: 35.0206 MeV
• Coast Time: 303 ms (Schottky measurement) or 1 ms (intensity measurement)

Experimental Results

Main Results

Momentum Spread Optimization

Experiments determined optimal energy separation as ∆Esep ≈ -180 keV, where:

• 90% Width: Approximately 5×10⁻³ (δp/p₀)
• Compared to Single Beam: Slightly higher than twice the single beam momentum spread
• Reproducibility: Multi-day measurements show consistent minimum position

Beam Intensity Analysis

Schottky signal integrated area ratios show:

• Second Beam/First Beam Ratio: 0.51±0.04 (∆Esep = -235 keV)
• Second Beam/First Beam Ratio: 0.47±0.05 (∆Esep = +180 keV)
• First Beam Loss: Approximately 50%, far exceeding expected lifetime losses (≤12%)

Beam Lifetime Measurement

Beam lifetime measured by two methods:

1. Bunched Beam: τ = 270±11 ms (integrated signal decay)
2. Coasting Beam: τ = 300-390 ms (Schottky signal decay)

Ablation Experiments

RF knockout mechanism confirmed through four different beam filling modes:

Results indicate that RF frequency sweep causes first beam intensity reduction regardless of whether the second RF bucket is filled.

RF Knockout Mechanism Verification

Theoretical Analysis

Coasting beam experiences voltage at RF cavity: $V_{gap} = V_0 \cos\left(2\pi\frac{\Delta\omega}{\omega_{rev}}n\right)$

When resonance condition is satisfied: $\frac{\Delta\omega}{\omega_{rev}} = \frac{\omega_{h\beta}}{\omega_{rev}} - Q_I$

This leads to coherent accumulation of transverse displacement and eventual beam loss.

6D Simulation Verification

6D phase space simulations using OPERA 3D magnetic field maps show:

• Emittance growth occurs when RF frequency equals horizontal tune
• Horizontal emittance increases significantly near resonance point
• Vertical phase space unaffected, consistent with theoretical predictions

Related Work

Historical Development

1. MURA FFA: First proposed and demonstrated beam stacking concept (1950s)
2. CERN ISR: Further development of stacking techniques
3. Modern Applications: Consideration for future spallation neutron source proton drivers

Technical Comparison

• Synchrotrons: Limited by time-varying magnetic fields, cannot implement beam stacking
• FFA Advantages: Fixed magnetic field, large momentum acceptance, high repetition rate (kHz level)
• Innovation in This Work: First optimization of stacking process on operational facility and identification of RF knockout mechanism

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Successful Demonstration: Dual-beam stacking successfully implemented at KURNS FFA
2. Momentum Spread Control: Minimal momentum spread growth achieved through RF program optimization
3. Loss Mechanism: RF knockout confirmed as primary source of beam loss
4. Mitigation Strategy: Multi-RF cavity phase compensation method proposed

Limitations

1. Beam Intensity Loss: Approximately 50% loss of first beam requires further optimization
2. Momentum Spread Growth: Still exceeds theoretical minimum, indicating non-adiabatic processes
3. Experimental Scale: Limited to dual-beam stacking; multi-beam stacking requires further investigation
4. High-Intensity Effects: Impact of space charge tune spread not fully investigated

Future Directions

1. RF Knockout Mitigation:
   • Multi-RF cavity phase compensation: $V_2 = 2V_1\cos\Delta\phi$, $V_3 = V_1$
   • RF voltage timing optimization
2. High-Intensity Studies: Stacking optimization under space charge effects
3. Multi-Beam Extension: Implementation of stacking with more beams
4. Application Development: Engineering for practical applications such as spallation neutron sources

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Innovation: First systematic study of beam stacking optimization on operational FFA facility
2. Complete Methodology: Combines theoretical simulation, experimental measurement, and mechanism analysis
3. Advanced Diagnostics: Schottky signal measurement provides high-precision momentum spread analysis
4. Mechanism Insights: Deep identification and analysis of RF knockout effect
5. Practical Value: Provides important technical foundation for future high-intensity accelerators

Weaknesses

1. High Loss Rate: 50% beam loss limits practical application value
2. Mitigation Strategy: RF knockout mitigation method only theoretically proposed, lacking experimental verification
3. Scale Limitation: Experiment involves only dual-beam stacking, gap remains to multi-beam stacking for practical applications
4. Environmental Effects: Day-to-day variations indicate system stability needs improvement

Impact

1. Academic Contribution: Provides important experimental benchmark for FFA beam stacking
2. Technology Advancement: Promotes development of high-intensity proton accelerator technology
3. Application Prospects: Provides technical pathway for major scientific facilities such as spallation neutron sources
4. International Collaboration: Demonstrates deep cooperation between Japan and UK in accelerator physics

Applicable Scenarios

1. Spallation Neutron Sources: Provides flexible repetition frequency and peak power
2. Muon Collider Drivers: High peak power proton beam requirements
3. FFA Accelerator Design: Provides important reference for future FFA designs
4. Beam Physics Research: RF knockout mechanism research valuable for other accelerators

References

This paper cites 30 important references covering FFA theoretical foundations, beam stacking historical development, Schottky diagnostic techniques, and RF knockout mechanisms, reflecting the comprehensiveness and depth of the research.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality experimental physics paper that achieves important progress in beam stacking technology. Despite technical challenges such as beam loss, it provides valuable experimental data and technical insights for future high-intensity accelerator development.