Sign Regularity Preserving Linear Operators

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2408.02428
• Title: Sign Regularity Preserving Linear Operators
• Authors: Projesh Nath Choudhury, Shivangi Yadav
• Classification: math.FA (Functional Analysis)
• Publication Date: October 14, 2025 (arXiv version)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.02428

Abstract

A matrix $A\in \mathbb{R}^{m \times n}$ is called strictly sign regular (SSR) or sign regular (SR) if for each $1 \leq k \leq \min\{m,n\}$, all (nonzero) $k\times k$ minors have the same sign. This class of matrices includes completely positive matrices, originally studied by Schoenberg in 1930 to characterize variation diminishing, a fundamental property in the theory of total positivity. This paper classifies all surjective linear maps $\mathcal{L}:\mathbb{R}^{m\times n}\to\mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$ that preserve: (i) sign regularity; (ii) sign regularity with a given sign pattern; and (iii) the strict versions of these properties.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Total Positivity Theory: Sign regular matrices are important concepts in total positivity theory, which includes completely positive matrices as a special case. These matrices have significant applications across multiple mathematical branches including analysis, approximation theory, combinatorics, differential equations, and probability theory.
2. Variation Diminishing Property: A fundamental property of sign regular matrices is the variation diminishing (VD) property: if matrix A acts on vector x, then the number of sign changes in the coordinates of Ax does not exceed the number of sign changes in x.
3. Linear Preserving Problems: Linear preserving problems aim to describe the general form of linear transformations that leave certain functions, subsets, relations, etc. invariant. This has been an important research direction in analysis and operator theory over the past century.

Research Motivation

1. Theoretical Completeness: Although the linear preserving problem for completely positive matrices has been solved by Berman-Hershkowitz-Johnson, the more general problem for sign regular matrices remains incomplete.
2. Generalization Requirements: Existing results are limited to square matrices; this paper extends results to matrices of arbitrary dimensions.
3. Sign Pattern Classification: The goal is not only to classify linear maps preserving sign regularity but also to classify those preserving specific sign patterns.

Core Contributions

1. Complete Classification Theorem: Provides a complete classification of all linear maps preserving sign regularity, including both strict and non-strict versions.
2. Dimension Reduction: Proves that classifying sign regularity preserving maps reduces to classifying SR₂ preserving maps, significantly simplifying the problem.
3. Sign Pattern Preservation: First classification of linear maps preserving sign regularity with a given sign pattern.
4. Generalization to Arbitrary Dimensions: Extends existing results for square matrices to arbitrary $m \times n$ matrices.
5. Special Case Analysis: Provides detailed treatment of the $2 \times 2$ case, discovering additional map types that do not exist in higher dimensions.

Methodology Details

Core Concept Definitions

Definition 1.1 (Sign Regular Matrices):

• A matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m×n}$ is k-th order strictly sign regular (SSRₖ) if for all $1 \leq r \leq k$, there exists a sign sequence $\epsilon_r \in \{1,-1\}$ such that every $r \times r$ minor of A has sign $\epsilon_r$.
• If zero minors are allowed, it is called k-th order sign regular (SRₖ).
• When $k = \min\{m,n\}$, it is simply called SSR or SR matrix.

Sign Pattern: For an SSR (SR) matrix A, its sign pattern is the ordered tuple $\epsilon = (\epsilon_1, \ldots, \epsilon_{\min\{m,n\}})$.

Main Theorems

Theorem A (Classification of Sign Regularity Preserving Maps): Let $L : \mathbb{R}^{m×n} \to \mathbb{R}^{m×n}$ be a linear transformation where $m,n \geq 2$ and $\max\{m,n\} \geq 3$. The following are equivalent:

1. L maps the class of $m×n$ SR matrices to itself
2. L maps the class of $m×n$ SR₂ matrices to itself
3. L is a composition of the following transformations:
   • (a) $A \mapsto FAE$, where F, E are positive diagonal matrices
   • (b) $A \mapsto -A$
   • (c) $A \mapsto P_mA$, where $P_m$ is a permutation matrix
   • (d) $A \mapsto AP_n$
   • (e) $A \mapsto A^T$ (when $m=n$)

Theorem B (Special Treatment for the $2×2$ Case): For $L : \mathbb{R}^{2×2} \to \mathbb{R}^{2×2}$, in addition to the transformations in Theorem A, there are additional transformations: $\begin{pmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} \\ a_{21} & a_{22} \end{pmatrix} \mapsto \begin{pmatrix} a_{11} & a_{12} \\ a_{22} & a_{21} \end{pmatrix}$

Theorem C (Preserving Maps with Given Sign Pattern): Let $\epsilon$ be a given sign pattern and $L : \mathbb{R}^{m×n} \to \mathbb{R}^{m×n}$ be a linear transformation. The following are equivalent:

1. L maps the class of $m×n$ SR($\epsilon$) matrices to itself
2. L maps the class of $m×n$ SR₂($\epsilon$) matrices to itself
3. L is a composition of the following transformations:
   • (a) $A \mapsto FAE$, where F, E are positive diagonal matrices
   • (b) $A \mapsto P_mAP_n$, where $P_m, P_n$ are permutation matrices
   • (c) $A \mapsto A^T$ (when $m=n$)

Proof Strategy

1. Injectivity Analysis: Proves that the matrix representation of linear preserving maps is a monomial matrix.
2. Inductive Construction: Uses mathematical induction to progressively extend from low-dimensional cases to the general case.
3. Test Matrix Method: Constructs special test matrices (such as variations of all-ones matrices) to constrain the form of the maps.
4. Sign Analysis: Eliminates impossible map forms through careful analysis of sign variations in minors.

Technical Innovations

1. Dimension Reduction Technique

Key Insight: Proves that classifying SR preserving maps is equivalent to classifying SR₂ preserving maps. This greatly simplifies the problem by requiring only consideration of the signs of $2×2$ minors.

2. Application of Density Theorem

Utilizes the Gantmacher-Krein density theorem: SSRₖ($\epsilon$) matrices are dense in SRₖ($\epsilon$) matrices, thus reducing the SSR preserving problem to the SR preserving problem.

3. Monomial Matrix Characterization

Lemma 2.2: For a subset S of a finite-dimensional real vector space V, we have $P(S) \subseteq P(\overline{S}) \subseteq P(\text{span}(S))$.

Proposition 2.5: The matrix representation of a linear SR₂ preserving map is a monomial matrix, i.e., every row and column contains exactly one nonzero positive element.

4. Test Matrix Construction

Constructs parametrized matrix families of the form $J(c)$, controlling the signs of minors by adjusting parameter c to constrain the possible forms of preserving maps.

Experimental Verification and Applications

Theoretical Verification

The paper is primarily pure mathematical theory, verified through rigorous mathematical proofs rather than numerical experiments.

Special Case Verification

• $2×2$ Matrices: Detailed analysis of all 24 possible combinations of elementary map compositions
• $3×3$ Matrices: Complete analysis as the base case for induction
• Rectangular Matrices: Separate treatment of cases where $m>n$ and $m<n$

Generalization of Known Results

By taking $m=n$ and $\epsilon_k=1$ (for all k), Theorem C yields linear preserving maps for completely positive and completely nonnegative matrices as special cases, consistent with the classical results of Berman-Hershkowitz-Johnson.

Related Work

Historical Development

1. Frobenius (1897): First result on linear preserving problems, characterizing determinant preserving linear maps
2. Schoenberg (1930): First study of sign regular matrices and their variation diminishing property
3. Gantmacher-Krein (1950): Established density theorems and characterization of variation diminishing
4. Berman-Hershkowitz-Johnson (1985): Classified linear preserving maps for completely positive matrices

Modern Developments

• Shitov (2021-2023): Recently characterized copositive matrices and completely positive rank preserving linear maps
• Positive Semidefinite Matrices: Linear preserving maps remain incompletely classified, an active research area

Positioning of This Paper's Contribution

This paper completes the linear preserving problem for sign regular matrices, an important matrix class, in some sense "concluding" this research direction.

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Complete Classification: Provides a complete classification of all sign regularity preserving linear maps
2. Unified Framework: Unifies multiple related results under a single framework
3. Dimension Reduction: Proves that higher-order sign regularity can be completely characterized through the second-order case

Theoretical Significance

1. Total Positivity Theory: Provides important structural results for total positivity theory
2. Linear Preserving Theory: Enriches the theoretical framework of linear preserving problems
3. Matrix Theory: Deepens understanding of the structure of sign regular matrices

Application Prospects

1. Numerical Analysis: Applications in designing numerical algorithms that preserve special matrix structures
2. Optimization Theory: Potential applications in convex optimization and semidefinite programming
3. Combinatorics: Provides new tools in combinatorial matrix theory

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Theoretical Completeness: Provides a complete solution to the sign regularity preserving problem, filling a theoretical gap
2. Technical Innovation: The dimension reduction technique is elegant and powerful, significantly simplifying problem complexity
3. Rigorous Proofs: Mathematical proofs are strict and complete with clear logic
4. Unified Results: Treats multiple known results as special cases in a unified framework

Technical Highlights

1. Monomial Matrix Characterization: Simplifies analysis by exploiting the structural properties of monomial matrices
2. Inductive Construction: Clever inductive design, progressively building from low to high dimensions
3. Sign Analysis: Eliminates impossible cases through sophisticated sign analysis

Limitations

1. Pure Theory: Primarily theoretical results lacking direct algorithmic or numerical applications
2. Complex Special Cases: The $2×2$ case requires special treatment, indicating some lack of unified theoretical elegance
3. Computational Complexity: Does not discuss the computational complexity of determining whether a matrix is sign regular

Impact Assessment

1. Academic Value: Possesses important theoretical value in matrix theory and functional analysis
2. Completeness: Essentially completes research on this problem; subsequent work may shift to related problems
3. Methodological Contribution: Provided techniques may apply to linear preserving problems for other matrix classes

Applicable Scenarios

1. Theoretical Research: Provides methods and insights for studying linear preserving problems for other matrix classes
2. Educational Use: Serves as a classical case study in linear preserving theory
3. Algorithm Design: Provides theoretical foundations for designing algorithms that preserve special matrix structures

References

The paper cites 35 relevant references covering classical and contemporary works in total positivity theory, linear preserving problems, and matrix theory, with comprehensive and accurate literature review.

Overall Assessment: This is a high-quality pure mathematics theory paper that completely solves the linear preserving problem for sign regular matrices. The paper features prominent technical innovations, rigorous proofs, and results of significant theoretical value. Although primarily a theoretical contribution, it provides a solid mathematical foundation for related applied fields.