There exist no contact Anosov diffeomorphisms

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2408.06965
• Title: There exist no contact Anosov diffeomorphisms
• Authors: Masayuki Asaoka (Doshisha University), Yoshihiko Mitsumatsu (Chuo University)
• Classification: math.DS (Dynamical Systems), math.GT (Geometric Topology), math.SG (Symplectic Geometry)
• Publication Date: August 2024 (arXiv preprint, v2 updated October 15, 2025)
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.06965

Abstract

For any Anosov diffeomorphism defined on a closed odd-dimensional manifold, there exists no invariant contact structure.

Research Background and Motivation

Core Problem

This paper investigates a fundamental question in geometric dynamical systems: does there exist a mapping that is simultaneously an Anosov diffeomorphism and preserves a contact structure?

Problem Significance

1. Theoretical Importance: This is a fundamental problem at the intersection of contact geometry and hyperbolic dynamical systems
2. Comparative Perspective: While numerous contact-preserving Anosov flows exist (such as geodesic flows on negatively curved manifolds), research on the discrete case (diffeomorphisms) remains relatively limited
3. Dimensional Constraints: Due to dimensional characteristics of stable and unstable foliations, contact Anosov diffeomorphisms should theoretically not exist

Research Motivation

The paper's motivation stems from two related problems concerning contact diffeomorphisms:

1. Convex Hypersurface Approximation Problem: In contact manifolds of dimension 5 and higher, do there exist hypersurfaces that can be $C^r$-approximated by convex hypersurfaces?
2. Contact Diffeomorphism Approximation Problem: Can a given diffeomorphism on a closed odd-dimensional manifold be approximated by a contact diffeomorphism of some contact structure?

Core Contributions

1. Main Theorem: Proves that on any closed odd-dimensional manifold, there exists no $C^2$ Anosov diffeomorphism that preserves a contact structure
2. Technical Innovation: Provides an elegant and profound proof combining the hyperbolicity of Anosov systems with the non-degeneracy of contact geometry
3. Theoretical Completion: Fills an important gap in the theory of contact geometry and hyperbolic dynamical systems
4. Applied Value: Provides theoretical support for related approximation problems

Methodology Details

Problem Setup

Let $M$ be a $(2m+1)$-dimensional closed manifold, and $f: M \to M$ be a $C^2$ Anosov diffeomorphism with Anosov decomposition $TM = E^s \oplus E^u$, where $E^s$ and $E^u$ are the stable and unstable subbundles, respectively. The question is: does there exist a contact structure $\xi$ on $M$ such that $f$ preserves $\xi$?

Core Lemma

Lemma 2.1: Let $\zeta \subset TM$ be a continuous distribution of rank $\ell$ on $M$ that is invariant under $f$. If at a point $p \in M$ we have $E^s(p) \subset \zeta(p)$, then at any point $x$ in the stable manifold $W^s(p)$ of $p$, we have $E^s(x) \subset \zeta(x)$. An analogous conclusion holds for the unstable bundle.

Proof Strategy

The proof employs proof by contradiction, consisting of three main steps:

Step 1: Existence Assertion

Assertion 2.2: Define the sets

• $S = \{p \in M | E^s(p) \subset \xi(p)\}$
• $U = \{p \in M | E^u(p) \subset \xi(p)\}$

Then both $S$ and $U$ are non-empty.

Proof Outline: Assume $S$ is empty and construct a one-dimensional subbundle $\eta(p)$ as the orthogonal complement of $\xi(p) \cap E^s(p)$ in $E^s(p)$. Using the contractivity of the Anosov property and properties of the contact form, a contradiction is derived.

Step 2: Dimensional Analysis

Without loss of generality, assume $m^s = \dim E^s \geq m + 1$ (otherwise consider $f^{-1}$).

Step 3: Non-degeneracy Contradiction

Take $p \in S$, so $E^s(p) \subset \xi(p)$. For arbitrary vectors $v, w \in E^s(p)$, using the $C^r$ structure of the stable manifold, we can find vector fields $X, Y$ such that:

• $X(p) = v, Y(p) = w$
• On the local stable manifold, $X(q), Y(q) \in E^s(q)$

Key Computation: $d\alpha_p(v, w) = X(\alpha(Y))(p) - Y(\alpha(X))(p) - \alpha([X,Y])(p) = 0$

This shows that $d\alpha$ vanishes identically on $E^s(p)$, which contradicts the non-degeneracy of the contact structure, since $\dim \xi = 2m$ while $\dim E^s \geq m + 1$.

Technical Innovations

1. Geometric-Dynamical Synthesis: Cleverly combines the hyperbolicity of Anosov systems with the symplectic nature of contact geometry
2. Dimensional Argument: Exploits the dimensional relationship ($\dim E^s \geq m+1 > \frac{1}{2}\dim \xi$) to reveal the essential contradiction
3. Manifold Techniques: Employs stable manifold theorem and vector field theory for local analysis

Experimental Setup

This is purely theoretical work with no numerical experiments or data analysis.

Experimental Results

Main Results

Theorem 1.1: Let $M$ be a closed odd-dimensional manifold and $f$ be a $C^2$ Anosov diffeomorphism on $M$. Then $f$ does not preserve any contact structure on $M$.

Theoretical Findings

1. Complete Negativity: The result is a complete negative theorem with no exceptions
2. Regularity Requirements: The proof requires only $C^2$ regularity
3. Dimension Independence: The result holds for all odd dimensions

Related Work

Comparative Studies

1. Anosov Flows: Numerous contact-preserving Anosov flows exist, including:
   • Anosov Reeb flows on hyperbolic 3-manifolds FH
   • Geodesic flows on negatively curved manifolds
2. Contact Geometry: Related convexity problems:
   • Giroux's results in dimension 3 G
   • $C^0$ approximation results by Honda-Huang and Eliashberg-Pancholi in higher dimensions HH, EP

Contribution of This Paper

This paper is the first to completely resolve the discrete case (diffeomorphisms), contrasting sharply with the continuous case (flows).

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

On any closed odd-dimensional manifold, Anosov diffeomorphisms and contact structures are incompatible. This is a complete negative result.

Theoretical Significance

1. Geometric Constraints: Reveals fundamental limitations between hyperbolic dynamical systems and contact geometry
2. Dimensional Effects: Demonstrates the crucial role of dimension in geometric dynamical systems
3. Discrete vs. Continuous: Highlights essential differences between discrete and continuous dynamical systems

Applied Value

1. Approximation Theory: Provides theoretical foundation for approximation problems of contact diffeomorphisms
2. Convexity Problems: Offers new perspectives on convex hypersurface problems in high-dimensional contact manifolds

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Problem Importance: Resolves a fundamental and important problem in geometric dynamical systems
2. Elegant Proof: Clear proof strategy with refined technical methods
3. Complete Results: Provides a complete negative answer with no ambiguity
4. Interdisciplinary Significance: Connects dynamical systems, differential geometry, and contact geometry

Technical Highlights

1. Critical Role of Lemma 2.1: Cleverly exploits the hyperbolicity of Anosov systems
2. Dimensional Analysis: Precise dimensional calculations reveal the essential contradiction
3. Local-Global Synthesis: Derives global conclusions from properties of local stable manifolds

Limitations

1. Regularity Requirements: Requires $C^2$ regularity; whether this can be lowered to $C^1$ remains unclear
2. Constructive Nature: As a negative result, it provides no constructive insights
3. Generalizability: Whether the result extends to other types of partially hyperbolic systems requires further investigation

Impact Assessment

1. Theoretical Completion: Fills an important gap in contact geometry theory
2. Methodological Value: Provides new methods for studying compatibility between geometric structures and dynamical systems
3. Future Research: May inspire similar investigations of other geometric structures (symplectic, complex structures)

Applicable Scenarios

This result applies to:

1. Theoretical research in contact geometry and dynamical systems
2. Rigidity problems in geometric topology
3. Studies of geometric properties of hyperbolic dynamical systems

References

The paper cites the following key references:

• FH Foulon & Hasselblatt: Contact Anosov flows on hyperbolic 3-manifolds
• G Giroux: Convexity in contact topology
• HH Honda & Huang: Convex hypersurface theory in contact topology
• N Newhouse: On codimension one Anosov diffeomorphisms
• S Shub: Global stability of dynamical systems

This paper resolves an important theoretical problem through an elegant proof, demonstrating the deep interplay between geometry and dynamical systems, and providing crucial theoretical foundations for related research areas.