Simple stochastic processes behind Menzerath's Law

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2409.00279
• Title: Simple stochastic processes behind Menzerath's Law
• Author: Jiří Milička (Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)
• Classification: cs.CL (Computational Linguistics)
• Publication Time/Conference: QUALICO 2023, Lausanne
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00279

Abstract

This paper revisits Menzerath's Law (also known as the Menzerath-Altmann Law), which describes the relationship between the length of linguistic constructions and the average length of their constituent components. Recent research has demonstrated that simple stochastic processes can exhibit Menzerath behavior, yet existing models fail to accurately reflect real-world data. By adopting the fundamental principle that lexical items can vary in length across both syllabic and phonemic dimensions, where correlations between these variables are imperfect and variations exhibit multiplicative properties, we obtain a bivariate lognormal distribution. This paper demonstrates that from this remarkably simple principle, we can derive the classical Altmann model. By independently modeling joint distributions and marginal distributions separately, we can obtain more accurate models using Gaussian copulas.

Research Background and Motivation

1. Problem to be Addressed: Menzerath's Law is an important principle in linguistics describing the inverse relationship between the length of linguistic constructions (such as lexical items) and the average length of their constituent components. Although the law has been extensively verified empirically, it lacks satisfactory theoretical explanation and stochastic process foundations.
2. Importance of the Problem: Menzerath's Law has attracted considerable attention in quantitative linguistics due to its universality and ability to integrate different segmentation levels into a unified framework. Understanding the stochastic processes underlying it is significant for theories of language evolution and quantitative linguistics.
3. Limitations of Existing Approaches:
   • Torre et al. (2021) demonstrated that simple stochastic processes can exhibit Menzerath behavior, but the models do not conform to real data
   • The classical Altmann model (1980) lacks stochastic process derivation and parameter interpretation
   • Existing models primarily focus on text generation processes while neglecting the mechanisms determining lexical length variation in language evolution
4. Research Motivation: The author argues that Menzerath's Law should be understood from the perspective of language evolution rather than text generation, and proposes explaining the stochastic process foundations of the law through joint distribution modeling.

Core Contributions

1. Theoretical Contribution: Derives the classical Altmann model from bivariate lognormal distribution, providing explicit parameter interpretation
2. Methodological Innovation: Proposes using Gaussian copulas to separately model joint and marginal distributions, obtaining more accurate models
3. Empirical Validation: Validates the proposed models on multiple datasets, including different languages and linguistic levels
4. Theoretical Insight: Explains the phenomenon of negative parameter b (growth trend) in Menzerath's Law

Methodology Details

Task Definition

Investigates the joint distribution between linguistic construction length (such as the number of syllables x in lexical items) and constituent component length (such as the number of phonemes y), and derives the form of Menzerath's Law from this distribution.

Model Architecture

1. Bivariate Lognormal Distribution Model

Basic Principle: Assumes that lexical length variation exhibits multiplicative properties, meaning longer words are more likely to undergo length changes than shorter words.

Mathematical Derivation:

• Begins with linear regression of log-transformed variables:

log z = α + β log x

where z = xy

• Parameter interpretation:

β = ρ_log x,log z × (s_log z / s_log x)
α = log z̅ - β log x̅

• Derives the classical Altmann model:

y = ax^(-b)

where:

b = 1 - β = 1 - ρ_log x,log xy × (s_log xy / s_log x)
a = log xy̅ - (1-b) log x̅

2. Gaussian Copula Model

Design Rationale: Decouples joint distribution from marginal distributions, focusing on modeling correlations between variables.

Implementation Method:

• Uses copula functions to connect marginal distributions
• Requires only marginal distributions and correlation coefficients for fitting
• Can handle both increasing and decreasing trends

3. Segmental Boundary Model

Motivation: Addresses gaps in joint distributions (e.g., words with 3 syllables and 2 phonemes are impossible)

Transformation Formula:

x' = x - 1  (syllable boundary count)
y' = y - x  (non-syllabic phoneme boundary count)

Technical Innovation Points

1. Multiplicative Process Assumption: Unlike traditional additive models, proposes that lexical length variation follows multiplicative principles
2. Joint Distribution Perspective: Understands Menzerath's Law from the perspective of joint distribution rather than conditional expectation
3. Parameter Interpretability: Provides explicit statistical interpretation for parameters in the classical Altmann model
4. Model Flexibility: Can handle both positive and negative trends, addressing limitations of traditional models

Experimental Setup

Datasets

1. Menzerath's Original Data (1954): German lexical syllable-phoneme relationships
2. Greek Data (Mikros & Milička 2014): Phoneme-syllable-lexical levels
3. Czech Data (Milička 2015):
   • Phoneme-morpheme-lexical levels
   • Morpheme-lexical-clause levels
   • Lexical-clause-sentence levels
4. Arabic Data (Milička 2015):
   • Phoneme-morpheme-lexical levels
   • Morpheme-lexical-clause levels

Evaluation Metrics

• Residual Sum of Squares (RSS): Used to compare fitting performance across datasets of equal length
• Visual Fit: Compares model predictions with empirical data through graphical representation

Comparison Methods

• Classical Altmann model: y = ax^(-b)
• Hyperbolic model: y = a/x + b
• Bivariate normal distribution model

Experimental Results

Main Results

1. Bivariate Lognormal Distribution:
   • Successfully derives the form of the classical Altmann model
   • Provides statistical interpretation of parameters
   • Visually fits empirical data well
2. Gaussian Copula Model:
   • Demonstrates superior performance across multiple datasets
   • Can handle both increasing and decreasing trends
   • RSS metrics indicate good fitting performance
3. Cross-linguistic Validation:
   • Effective across German, Greek, Czech, and Arabic
   • Applicable across different linguistic levels (phoneme, syllable, morpheme, lexical, clause, sentence)

Important Findings

1. Negative Parameter Interpretation: When β > 1, parameter b becomes negative, resulting in growth trends, which indeed exist in empirical data
2. Limitations of Segmental Boundary Method: Although theoretically cleaner, practical performance is inferior to the original segmental method
3. Log Transformation Effects: Applying log transformation to copulas did not yield improvements

Case Analysis

The paper presents fitting results for eight different datasets, including:

• Visualization of complete joint distributions
• Menzerath's Law curve comparisons
• RSS comparisons with classical models

Related Work

Main Research Trajectory

1. Menzerath (1954): Initially proposed the law and measured joint distributions
2. Altmann (1980): Formalized the law and proposed the classical formula
3. Torre et al. (2021): Demonstrated that simple stochastic processes can exhibit Menzerath behavior
4. Milička (2023): Proposed regression-to-the-mean interpretation

Advantages Relative to Prior Work

1. Provides stochastic process foundations for the classical model
2. Parameters have explicit statistical significance
3. More flexible models capable of handling multiple trends
4. Validated across multiple datasets

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Bivariate Lognormal Distribution represents a linguistically reasonable stochastic principle capable of modeling construction length variation across constituent and sub-constituent components
2. Gaussian Copula is an effective tool for modeling joint distributions, demonstrating superior performance when focused on joint distribution modeling
3. Joint Distribution Modeling should be prioritized over mean modeling, providing more information
4. In practical applications, one should consider using robust parameter estimates of marginal distributions and correlation coefficients

Limitations

1. Level-Specific Characteristics: Different linguistic levels may require different stochastic process models
2. Temporal Scale Issues: Lexical-level processes occur during language evolution, while clause/sentence-level processes may occur during communication
3. Model Selection: Although multiple methods are provided, clear selection criteria are lacking
4. Limited Empirical Validation: Primarily based on visual fitting and RSS, lacking more rigorous statistical tests

Future Directions

1. Unified Theory: Seek reasonable stochastic processes that encompass all linguistic levels
2. Alternative Copulas: Explore applications of Gumbel or Clayton copulas, though linguistic interpretation is needed
3. Poisson Distribution: Explore applications of bivariate Poisson distribution
4. Practical Applications: Apply models to stylometry or text analysis

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Significant Theoretical Contribution: First to provide rigorous stochastic process derivation for the classical Altmann model
2. Strong Methodological Innovation: Pioneering application of copula methods in linguistics
3. Sufficient Empirical Validation: Validates models across multiple languages and linguistic levels
4. Parameter Interpretability: Resolves long-standing questions about parameter significance
5. Clear Presentation: Rigorous mathematical derivation with clear logic

Weaknesses

1. Insufficient Statistical Testing: Primarily relies on visual judgment and RSS, lacking formal statistical significance tests
2. Limited Model Comparison: Does not compare with more advanced statistical models
3. Inadequate Theoretical Validation: Multiplicative process assumption lacks direct linguistic evidence
4. Insufficient Practical Assessment: Does not adequately discuss model advantages in practical applications

Impact

1. High Theoretical Value: Provides theoretical foundation for an important principle in quantitative linguistics
2. Methodological Contribution: Introduces new statistical modeling methods
3. Interdisciplinary Significance: Bridges statistics and linguistics
4. Good Reproducibility: Detailed method descriptions facilitate reproduction

Applicable Scenarios

1. Quantitative Linguistics Research: Provides new tools for linguistic structure analysis
2. Language Evolution Research: Understands stochastic mechanisms of language change
3. Text Analysis: Applicable to stylometry and author identification
4. Cross-linguistic Comparison: Provides standardized analytical framework

References

Key references include:

1. Altmann, G. (1980). Prolegomena to Menzerath's law
2. Menzerath, P. (1954). Die Architektonik des deutschen Wortschatzes
3. Torre, I. G., et al. (2021). Can Menzerath's law be a criterion of complexity in communication?
4. Milička, J. (2023). Menzerath's law: Is it just regression toward the mean?

This paper makes important theoretical contributions to Menzerath's Law research, providing new perspectives for understanding the classical law through stochastic process modeling, possessing considerable academic value and practical significance.