New results on the gamma-ray burst variability-luminosity relation

Basic Information

• Paper ID: 2409.01644
• Title: New results on the gamma-ray burst variability-luminosity relation
• Authors: C. Guidorzi, R. Maccary, A. Tsvetkova, S. Kobayashi, L. Amati, L. Bazzanini, M. Bulla, A. E. Camisasca, L. Ferro, D. Frederiks, F. Frontera, A. Lysenko, M. Maistrello, A. Ridnaia, D. Svinkin, M. Ulanov
• Classification: astro-ph.HE (High-Energy Astrophysics)
• Journal: Astronomy & Astrophysics
• Publication Date: September 5, 2024
• Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.01644

Abstract

This study re-examines the correlation between gamma-ray burst (GRB) variability and luminosity. In the early GRB afterglow era, researchers discovered a Cepheid-like correlation between temporal variability V and isotropic equivalent peak luminosity L_iso. Using approximately 200 long GRBs with spectroscopic redshift measurements, this paper re-tests this correlation using data from Swift, Fermi, and Konus/WIND detectors. The results show that the statistical significance of this correlation has weakened to ≲2%, primarily due to the emergence of numerous smooth and bright GRBs with relatively small V values. The study finds that luminosity is more tightly connected to the shortest timescale (measured by MVT) than to short-to-intermediate timescales (measured by V).

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Background

1. Historical Discovery: In the early GRB afterglow era, Reichart et al. (2001) and Fenimore & Ramirez-Ruiz (2000) discovered a correlation between GRB temporal variability V and isotropic peak luminosity L_iso, with the relation L_iso ∝ V^α, where α = 3.3^(+1.1)_(-0.9)
2. Early Confirmation: Guidorzi et al. (2005) confirmed this correlation based on a sample of approximately 30 GRBs, despite significant scatter
3. Theoretical Explanation: The correlation was interpreted as a result of internal dissipation processes, where the e±photosphere smooths out all dissipation events occurring below its radius

Research Motivation

1. Sample Expansion: The Swift and Fermi era provided nearly ten times more GRB samples, necessitating more statistically reliable testing
2. Method Comparison: First exploration of the relationship between V and minimum variability timescale (MVT), clarifying differences between two variability measures
3. Physical Understanding: Deeper understanding of the physical mechanisms of GRB variability and its relationship with luminosity

Core Contributions

1. Large-Sample Statistical Testing: Re-tests the V-L_iso correlation using a sample of 216 long GRBs, finding statistical significance reduced to ≲2%
2. Variability Measure Comparison: First systematic comparison of V and MVT variability measures, revealing weak correlation between the two
3. New Classification Indicators: Identifies that the combination of high variability (V≳0.1), low luminosity (L_iso≲10^51 erg s^-1), and short MVT (≲0.1 s) may be a good indicator of compact binary merger origin
4. External Shock Candidate Identification: Discovers smooth GRBs with single broad pulses and low V values that may originate from external shocks

Methodology Details

Data Selection Criteria

Swift/BAT Sample:

• Long GRBs detected between January 2005 and February 2024
• With spectroscopic redshift measurements
• Excluding short GRBs and short-extended emission GRBs
• Burst mode fully covering the light curve
• Requiring broadband spectral information (not only BAT 15-150 keV)

Fermi/GBM Sample:

• Long GRBs (T90 > 2 s) from July 14, 2008 to February 4, 2024
• With spectroscopic redshift measurements
• Excluding saturated and data-missing events

Variability Calculation Method

Variability V_f is calculated according to the original definition by Reichart et al. (2001):

Vf = Σ[(ri - sf,i)² - kf σi²] / Σ(ri² - σi²)

Where:

• r_i: net count rate in the i-th time bin
• s_f,i: smoothed light curve
• k_f = (1 - 1/n_f): noise variance correction factor
• f: fractional parameter of total net counts (0.1-0.9)

Key Steps:

1. Determine 7σ time window
2. Calculate characteristic smoothing timescale T_f
3. Generate smoothed light curve
4. Estimate fluctuations of original curve relative to smoothed version

Peak Luminosity Estimation

Data Source Priority:

1. Konus/WIND broadband modeling results (preferred)
2. Fermi/GBM spectral catalog data
3. Newly calculated L_iso values in this study

Calculation Method:

Liso,GBM = 4π dL² k φp,8-900

Where d_L is luminosity distance, k is k-correction, and φ_p,8-900 is peak flux in the 8-900 keV energy band

Experimental Setup

Dataset Scale

• Swift/BAT Sample: 278 GRBs
• Fermi/GBM Sample: 136 GRBs
• Combined Sample: 216 GRBs with significant V and L_iso estimates
• Long-duration Merger Candidates: 4 (GRB 060614, 191019A, 211211A, 230307A)

Parameter Settings

• Time Resolution: Δt = 64(1+z)^β ms, β = 0-1 (interval 0.2)
• Energy Band: BAT 15-150 keV, GBM 8-900 keV
• Signal-to-Noise Ratio Threshold: Total net counts S/N ≥ 30
• Significance Level: 90% confidence interval

Evaluation Metrics

• Correlation Coefficients: Pearson's r, Spearman's ρ, Kendall's τ
• Statistical Tests: p-value calculation and effective p-value estimation
• Multiple Testing Correction: Effective p-values determined through 10^4 simulations

Experimental Results

Main Findings

Reduced Correlation Significance:

• Best correlation: f = 0.8 with 212 GRB sample
• p-values: r(3.1×10^-4), ρ(4.9×10^-3), τ(5.7×10^-3)
• Effective p-values: ≲2% (after multiple testing correction)

Comparison with Historical Results:

• At f = 0.45 (parameters used in G05), correlation nearly disappears
• p-values increase to 3.6% and 25%
• Primary reason: emergence of numerous smooth GRBs with low V and high L_iso

Key Observational Results

Variability-Luminosity Distribution:

• 25% of GRBs have V_f < 0.05, predominantly with 1-2 peak smooth profiles
• These low-variability GRBs have comparable luminosities to high-variability GRBs
• Identified 6 possible external shock origin candidates

Merger Candidate Characteristics:

• 3/4 of long-duration merger candidates located in high V (>0.1), low L_iso (<10^51 erg s^-1) region
• All candidates exhibit multi-peak structures (14-54 peaks)

V and MVT Relationship

Weak Correlation:

• Weak correlation between V and MVT
• High V values (≳0.1) correspond to MVT range 0.01-30 seconds
• GRBs with low V values (≲0.02) typically have MVT≳several seconds

Physical Interpretation Differences:

• MVT: shortest significant timescale of variation
• V: power ratio of short-to-intermediate timescales relative to long timescales

Related Work

Early Studies

• Reichart et al. (2001): First discovery of V-L_iso correlation based on 12 GRBs
• Fenimore & Ramirez-Ruiz (2000): Similar results using different V definition
• Guidorzi et al. (2005): Confirmation of correlation with 30 GRB sample

Swift/Fermi Era Development

• MVT Studies: MacLachlan et al. (2012, 2013), Golkhou & Butler (2014)
• MVT-Γ Anti-correlation: Sonbas et al. (2015), Camisasca et al. (2023a)
• MVT-L_iso Anti-correlation: Established after considering selection effects

Theoretical Models

• Internal Shock Model: Kobayashi et al. (2002)
• Photosphere Effect: Mészáros et al. (2002)
• Jet Opening Angle-Mass Relation: Explaining V-L_iso correlation

Conclusions and Discussion

Main Conclusions

1. Weakened Correlation: The statistical significance of V-L_iso correlation has weakened from early strong correlation to ≲2%
2. MVT More Sensitive: Luminosity is more tightly connected to shortest timescale (MVT) than to V
3. New Classification Indicators: High V, low L_iso, and short MVT combination may indicate merger origin
4. External Shock Candidates: Identified possible external shock origin GRBs

Physical Mechanism Discussion

Photosphere Effect Model:

• Internal dissipation occurring within the e±photosphere is smoothed out
• Slower jets (small Γ) experience stronger photosphere smoothing effects
• MVT may be determined by curvature timescale at photosphere: MVT ~ R±/cΓ²

Power Spectrum Characteristics:

• Average power spectrum slope for long GRBs α ~ -5/3
• Significant break at 1 Hz
• V primarily affected by long timescale components

Limitations

1. Sample Selection Effects: Differences in redshift measurement capabilities across different eras
2. Lorentz Factor Estimation Errors: Uncertainties in Γ estimation based on afterglow onset time
3. Intrinsic Variability Differences: Shell separation distributions {D} may differ significantly among different GRBs
4. External Shock Contamination: Possible external shock origin GRBs may dilute the internal shock sample

Future Directions

1. Larger Samples: Extend sample size using future observations
2. Multi-wavelength Analysis: Combine X-ray and optical afterglow data
3. Theoretical Model Refinement: Improve internal shock and photosphere models
4. Machine Learning Applications: Develop automated GRB classification methods

In-Depth Evaluation

Strengths

1. Sample Scale: Uses the largest GRB variability-luminosity study sample to date (216 GRBs)
2. Rigorous Methodology: Strictly calculates variability according to original definitions, ensuring result comparability
3. Statistical Reliability: Determines effective p-values through extensive simulations, addressing multiple testing issues
4. Physical Insights: First systematic comparison of V and MVT, clarifying physical meanings of both measures
5. New Discoveries: Identifies new characteristics of merger candidates and possible external shock origin GRBs

Limitations

1. Energy Band Dependence: While studying energy band dependence, analysis is relatively simple
2. Theoretical Explanation: Physical mechanisms explaining correlation weakening require further refinement
3. External Shock Candidates: Requires more detailed multi-wavelength analysis to verify external shock origin hypothesis
4. Systematic Errors: Systematic errors from different detectors and eras may affect results

Impact

Scientific Contributions:

• Challenges classical correlations in GRB physics
• Provides new observational indicators for GRB classification
• Advances understanding of physical mechanisms of GRB variability

Practical Value:

• Provides methodological reference for studying other transient sources such as fast radio bursts
• Guides observational strategies for future GRB detection missions
• Facilitates identification of electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave events

Applicable Scenarios

1. GRB Classification: Distinguishing stellar collapse from compact binary merger origins
2. Transient Source Research: Variability analysis methods generalizable to other high-energy transient phenomena
3. Multi-messenger Astrophysics: Source classification combined with gravitational wave observations
4. Theoretical Model Testing: Provides observational constraints for internal shock and photosphere models

References

Main references include:

• Reichart et al. (2001): Original V-L_iso correlation discovery
• Guidorzi et al. (2005): Early correlation confirmation study
• Kobayashi et al. (2002): Internal shock theoretical model
• Camisasca et al. (2023a): MVT-luminosity anti-correlation study
• Tsvetkova et al. (2017, 2021): Konus/WIND GRB spectral catalog

This study re-examines classical correlations in GRB physics through large-sample statistical analysis, not only challenging conventional wisdom but also providing new observational clues for understanding GRB diversity and physical mechanisms, with significant implications for high-energy astrophysics.