2025-11-22T13:49:16.309918

New Algorithm for Combinatorial $n$-folds and Applications

Jansen, Kahler, Pirotton et al.
Block-structured integer linear programs (ILPs) play an important role in various application fields. We address $n$-fold ILPs where the matrix $\mathcal{A}$ has a specific structure, i.e., where the blocks in the lower part of $\mathcal{A}$ consist only of the row vectors $(1,\dots,1)$. In this paper, we propose an approach tailored to exactly these combinatorial $n$-folds. We utilize a divide and conquer approach to separate the original problem such that the right-hand side iteratively decreases in size. We show that this decrease in size can be calculated such that we only need to consider a bounded amount of possible right-hand sides. This, in turn, lets us efficiently combine solutions of the smaller right-hand sides to solve the original problem. We can decide the feasibility of, and also optimally solve, such problems in time $(n r Δ)^{O(r)} \log(\|b\|_\infty),$ where $n$ is the number of blocks, $r$ the number of rows in the upper blocks and $Δ=\|A\|_\infty$. We complement the algorithm by discussing applications of the $n$-fold ILPs with the specific structure we require. We consider the problems of (i) scheduling on uniform machines, (ii) closest string and (iii) (graph) imbalance. Regarding (i), our algorithm results in running times of $p_{\max}^{O(d)}|I|^{O(1)},$ matching a lower bound derived via ETH. For (ii) we achieve running times matching the current state-of-the-art in the general case. In contrast to the state-of-the-art, our result can leverage a bounded number of column-types to yield an improved running time. For (iii), we improve the parameter dependency on the size of the vertex cover.
academic

New Algorithm for Combinatorial nn-folds and Applications

Basic Information

  • Paper ID: 2409.04212
  • Title: New Algorithm for Combinatorial nn-folds and Applications
  • Authors: Klaus Jansen, Kai Kahler, Lis Pirotton, Malte Tutas (Kiel University)
  • Classification: cs.DS (Data Structures and Algorithms)
  • Publication Date: September 2024 (arXiv preprint)
  • Paper Link: https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04212

Abstract

This paper investigates combinatorial nn-fold integer linear programming (ILP) problems with special structure, where the lower portion of matrix AA consists solely of (1,…,1)(1,\ldots,1) vectors. The authors propose a divide-and-conquer approach that decomposes the original problem by iteratively reducing the size of the right-hand-side vector. The algorithm determines feasibility and solves the optimization problem in time complexity (nrΔ)O(r)log⁡(∥b∥∞)(nr\Delta)^{O(r)}\log(\|b\|_\infty), where nn is the number of blocks, rr is the number of rows in the upper block, and Δ=∥A∥∞\Delta=\|A\|_\infty. The paper demonstrates the algorithm's effectiveness in three important applications: (1) uniform machine scheduling, (2) closest string problem, and (3) graph imbalance problem.

Research Background and Motivation

Problem Importance

Integer linear programming is one of the core NP-hard problems in computer science, included by Karp among 21 classical NP-complete problems. Although general ILP problems are computationally challenging, specialized subclasses of ILP with particular structures can be solved with more efficient algorithms.

Limitations of Existing Methods

For nn-fold ILP, the current best algorithm has time complexity (nt)(1+o(1))⋅2O(rs2)(rsΔ)O(r2s+s2)(nt)^{(1+o(1))} \cdot 2^{O(rs^2)}(rs\Delta)^{O(r^2s+s^2)}. For combinatorial nn-fold ILP (the case s=1s=1), existing algorithms have parameter dependence (rΔ)O(r2)(r\Delta)^{O(r^2)}.

Research Motivation

The authors observe that the special structure of combinatorial nn-fold ILP (lower blocks containing only all-ones vectors) can be exploited to design more efficient algorithms. Through divide-and-conquer strategy and dynamic programming, the parameter dependence can be improved from O(r2)O(r^2) to O(r)O(r).

Core Contributions

  1. Novel Algorithm Design: Proposes a divide-and-conquer algorithm specifically for combinatorial nn-fold ILP with time complexity (nrΔ)O(r)log⁡(bdef)(nr\Delta)^{O(r)}\log(b_{\text{def}})
  2. Theoretical Improvement: Improves parameter dependence from (rΔ)O(r2)(r\Delta)^{O(r^2)} to (nrΔ)O(r)(nr\Delta)^{O(r)}
  3. Application Verification: Validates the algorithm on three important problems:
    • Uniform machine scheduling: achieves pmax⁡O(d)∣I∣O(1)p_{\max}^{O(d)}|I|^{O(1)}, matching ETH-derived lower bounds
    • Closest string problem: obtains improvements under bounded column types
    • Graph imbalance problem: improves vertex cover parameter dependence
  4. Technical Innovation: Introduces novel solution structure analysis and combinatorial methods

Methodology Details

Problem Definition

Combinatorial nn-fold ILP is defined as: max⁡{cTx∣Ax=b,x∈Z≥0h}\max\{c^T x | Ax = b, x \in \mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}^h\}

where the constraint matrix AA has special structure:

A_1 & A_2 & \cdots & A_n \\ \mathbf{1}_{t_1}^T & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ 0 & \mathbf{1}_{t_2}^T & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & \cdots & \mathbf{1}_{t_n}^T \end{pmatrix}$$ ### Core Algorithm Architecture #### 1. Divide-and-Conquer Strategy The algorithm employs a top-down divide-and-conquer approach that recursively decomposes the original problem: - Each iteration halves the upper right-hand-side vector $b^{\uparrow}$ - Decomposes the problem into two subproblems: parity constraint problem and small-scale problem - Reaches the base case through $I = O(\log b_{\max}^{\downarrow})$ iterations #### 2. Solution Structure Analysis Key technical insights: - **Support Bound**: Utilizing the Eisenbrand-Shmonin theorem, the support size of each block is bounded: $|supp(x_k)| \leq K = 2(r+1)\log(4(r+1)\Delta)$ - **Lower RHS Determinism**: The lower right-hand-side vector of each iteration is uniquely determined by formula (3) - **Upper RHS Boundedness**: The upper RHS of small subproblems is bounded by $D = nK\Delta$ #### 3. Dynamic Programming Combination Algorithm 1 implements efficient subproblem combination: - **Base Table (BT)**: Stores feasibility of all possible configurations for each block - **Dynamic Table (DT)**: Combines subproblem solutions through Boolean convolution - **FFT Optimization**: Uses fast Fourier transform to accelerate convolution operations ### Technical Innovation Points 1. **Iterative Reduction Strategy**: Ensures algorithm convergence by precisely calculating RHS reduction at each iteration 2. **Parity Handling**: Cleverly manages parity constraints on solution vectors, enabling problem bisection 3. **Negative Coefficient Conversion**: Converts problems with negative coefficients to non-negative form in linear time 4. **Optimization Objective Extension**: Extends from feasibility checking to optimization problems ## Experimental Setup ### Theoretical Analysis Framework The paper primarily conducts theoretical analysis, validating algorithm performance through: 1. **Time Complexity Analysis**: Detailed analysis of each algorithm component's time complexity 2. **Parameter Dependence Comparison**: Theoretical comparison with existing best algorithms 3. **Application Problem Modeling**: Models three concrete problems as combinatorial $n$-fold ILP ### Application Problem Verification #### Uniform Machine Scheduling - **Problem Scale**: $d$ job types, $\tau$ machine types - **Parameter Bounds**: $\Delta \leq p_{\max}^{O(1)}$ (via Rohwedder's technique) - **Objectives**: Minimize maximum completion time (Cmax) and maximize minimum completion time (Cmin) #### Closest String Problem - **Input**: $k$ strings of length $L$, distance threshold $d$ - **Column Types**: $T$ (possibly bounded) - **ILP Dimension**: $T$ blocks, each with $k$ rows and $k$ columns #### Graph Imbalance Problem - **Parameterization**: Vertex cover size $k$ - **Vertex Type Count**: $T \leq 2^k$ - **Objective**: Minimize total imbalance of vertex ordering ## Experimental Results ### Main Theoretical Results #### 1. Core Algorithm Performance **Theorem 1**: Combinatorial $n$-fold ILP can be solved in time $(nr\Delta)^{O(r)}\log(b_{\text{def}})$ Comparison with existing methods: - Jansen-Rohwedder algorithm: $O(\sqrt{r+n\Delta})^{2(r+n)+O(h\cdot(r+n))}$ - Current best algorithm: $(n\|t\|_\infty)^{(1+o(1))} \cdot 2^{O(r)}(r\Delta)^{O(r^2)}$ #### 2. Application Problem Results **Uniform Machine Scheduling** (Theorem 2): - Time Complexity: $p_{\max}^{O(d)}|I|^{O(1)}$ - **Significance**: Matches ETH-derived lower bound $p_{\max}^{O(d^{1-\delta})}$, nearly optimal **Closest String Problem** (Corollary 3): - General case: $((T+1)k)^{O(k)}\log(L)$, matching existing best result $k^{O(k^2)}O(\log(L))$ - Bounded column types: When $T = k^{O(1)}$, exponential dependence reduces from $O(k^2)$ to $O(k)$ **Graph Imbalance Problem** (Corollary 4): - Time Complexity: $((T+2)k)^{O(k)}\log(kn)$ - **Improvement**: Parameter dependence improves from $k^{k^2}$ to $2^{k^2}$ (when $T \leq 2^k$) ### Technical Analysis Results 1. **Support Bound Verification**: Confirms support upper bound of $K = O(r\log(r\Delta))$ 2. **Iteration Count Analysis**: Total iterations $I = O(\log b_{\max}^{\downarrow})$ 3. **Space Complexity**: Each iteration stores $(D+1)^r$ candidate solutions ## Related Work ### Development History of $n$-fold ILP - **Origins**: De Loera et al. (2008) first introduced the $n$-fold concept - **Algorithm Improvements**: From Hemmecke-Onn-Romanchuk's cubic-time algorithm to current near-linear-time algorithms - **Application Extensions**: Widespread application in scheduling, configuration problems, string problems, etc. ### Related Work on Scheduling Problems - **Knop-Koutecký**: First applied $n$-fold techniques to uniform machine scheduling - **Koutecký-Zink**: Improved parameter dependence to $p_{\max}^{O(d^2)}$ - **Rohwedder**: Recently achieved $p_{\max}^{O(d)}$; this paper independently obtains similar results ### String and Graph Problems - **Gramm et al.**: Earliest exponential-time algorithms - **Knop et al.**: Current best $k^{O(k^2)}$ algorithm - **Parameterized Complexity**: FPT algorithm research under various parameters ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. **Theoretical Breakthrough**: First achieves $(nr\Delta)^{O(r)}$ time complexity for combinatorial $n$-fold ILP 2. **Application Success**: Obtains theoretically optimal or significantly improved results on three important problems 3. **Technical Innovation**: Divide-and-conquer strategy and structure analysis provide new insights for related problems ### Limitations 1. **Structural Restrictions**: Only applies to special $n$-fold ILP where lower blocks are all-ones vectors 2. **Practical Effectiveness**: Paper primarily provides theoretical analysis, lacking performance evaluation from actual implementation 3. **Constant Factors**: Hidden constants in time complexity may be large ### Future Directions 1. **Algorithm Implementation**: Develop efficient practical implementations and conduct experimental evaluation 2. **Structural Extension**: Study $n$-fold ILP with more general structures 3. **Application Expansion**: Explore more problems that can be modeled as combinatorial $n$-fold ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Significant Theoretical Contribution**: Achieves important breakthrough in parametric complexity, improving from $O(r^2)$ to $O(r)$ 2. **Strong Method Innovation**: Novel and effective approach combining divide-and-conquer strategy with structure analysis 3. **High Application Value**: Achieves theoretical optimal bounds on practical problems like scheduling 4. **Technical Rigor**: Detailed mathematical proofs and complete algorithm analysis ### Weaknesses 1. **Limited Applicability**: Only addresses $n$-fold ILP with specific structure; generalizability needs improvement 2. **Insufficient Experimental Validation**: Lacks performance comparison on real data and algorithm implementation 3. **Missing Constant Analysis**: Lacks in-depth analysis of algorithm constants, potentially affecting practical performance ### Impact 1. **Academic Value**: Provides new theoretical tools and analysis framework for $n$-fold ILP research 2. **Practical Potential**: Important application prospects in scheduling optimization and related fields 3. **Methodological Inspiration**: Divide-and-conquer ideas may apply to other structured optimization problems ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Large-Scale Scheduling**: Suitable for scheduling problems with multiple job and machine types 2. **Combinatorial Optimization**: Various problems modelable as combinatorial $n$-fold structures 3. **Parameterized Algorithms**: Particularly effective when problem parameters are small ## References The paper cites 39 related references, covering: - $n$-fold ILP theoretical foundations [33, 8, 9, 17, 21, 31] - Scheduling problem research [30, 32, 28, 38] - Parameterized complexity [14, 29, 34, 35] - Integer programming foundational theory [22, 23, 37, 13] --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality theoretical computer science paper that achieves important progress in combinatorial $n$-fold ILP algorithm design. While the applicable scope is relatively specific, it demonstrates excellence in both theoretical analysis depth and application breadth, providing a solid foundation for subsequent research in related fields.