This paper constructs traveling wave solutions to the two-phase Euler equations with vortex sheets present at the two-phase interface. The inner phase exhibits uniform vorticity distribution, possibly representing a vacuum, forming so-called hollow vortices. These traveling waves manifest as ring-shaped vortices with small cross-sectional radius, termed slender rings. The construction is based on the implicit function theorem, which also guarantees local uniqueness of solutions. Furthermore, asymptotic formulas for the ring velocity are derived, generalizing the celebrated Kelvin-Hicks formula to include surface tension effects.
Construct axisymmetric steady traveling wave solutions satisfying:
Transform the problem into an elliptic boundary value problem for the stream function :
\xi r & \text{in } \Omega \\ 0 & \text{in } \Omega^c \end{cases}$$ #### 2. Overdetermined Boundary Problem Key innovation: formulate the vortex sheet condition as an overdetermined boundary problem: - Dirichlet condition: $\psi - \frac{\bar{W}}{2}r^2 = \bar{\gamma}$ on $\partial\Omega$ - Jump condition: $[\rho(\frac{1}{r}\partial_n\psi - \bar{c}n \cdot e_r)^2] + 2\bar{\sigma}H = \bar{B}$ on $\partial\Omega$ #### 3. Small Parameter Expansion Introduce small parameter $\epsilon = \epsilon/R \ll 1$, using blow-up variables: $$q(r,z) = \frac{1}{\epsilon}(r-R, z)$$ ### Technical Innovations #### 1. Integral Equation Method Reformulate the exterior problem as an integral equation: $$\int_{\partial\Omega_\theta} K_{\theta,\epsilon}(y,\tilde{y}) \mu_{\theta,\epsilon}(\tilde{y}) d\mathcal{H}^1(\tilde{y}) = \frac{W}{2}(1+\epsilon(\chi_\theta)_1(y))^2 + \gamma$$ where the kernel $K_{\theta,\epsilon}$ is based on the fundamental solution of the elliptic operator. #### 2. Lyapunov-Schmidt Reduction Handle degeneracy caused by translation invariance: - Decompose the jump condition as $F = F_1 + F_2$ - $F_1$: Projection onto the $y_1$ direction, handled via reduction parameter $S$ - $F_2$: Orthogonal complement space, apply implicit function theorem #### 3. Asymptotic Analysis Fine asymptotic expansion of the kernel function: $$K_{\theta,\epsilon}(y,\tilde{y}) = \frac{1}{2\pi}\left(\log\frac{1}{|y-\tilde{y}|} + \log\frac{1}{\epsilon} + \log(8) - 2\right) + O(\epsilon)$$ ## Experimental Setup ### Parameter Ranges - **Aspect Ratio**: $\epsilon = \epsilon/R \ll 1$ - **Density Ratio**: $\rho = \frac{1}{(4\pi)^2}\frac{\bar{\Gamma}_{int}^2}{\bar{\Gamma}_{ext}^2}\frac{\rho_{int}}{\rho_{ext}} \geq 0$ - **Weber Number**: $\text{We} = \frac{\rho_{ext}\bar{\Gamma}_{ext}^2}{\epsilon\bar{\sigma}}$, satisfying specific growth conditions ### Function Space Setup - Geometric perturbation: $\theta \in H^k(\partial B)$ with $k \geq 5$ - Stream function: $\varphi_{int} \in H^{k+1/2}(\Omega_\theta)$, $\varphi_{ext} \in H^k(H_{1/\epsilon})$ - Constraints: Volume conservation, fixed center of mass, symmetry ## Main Results ### Existence Theorem (Theorem 1.3) For parameters satisfying the conditions, there exists $\epsilon_0 > 0$ such that for all $\epsilon \in (0,\epsilon_0)$, there exists a solution $(\theta, \varphi_{int}, \varphi_{ext}, W, \gamma, \nu)$. ### Asymptotic Formula The velocity of the ring satisfies the generalized Kelvin-Hicks formula: $$W = \frac{1}{4\pi}\left(\log\frac{8R}{\epsilon} - \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{4}\frac{\bar{\Gamma}_{int}^2}{\bar{\Gamma}_{ext}^2}\frac{\rho_{int}}{\rho_{ext}}\right) + \frac{\pi R}{\bar{\Gamma}_{ext}\rho_{ext}}\epsilon\bar{\sigma}_\epsilon + o(1)$$ ### Uniqueness In the appropriate solution class, the solution is locally unique, guaranteed by the implicit function theorem. ## Technical Details ### Key Estimates 1. **Kernel Function Bound**: $\|K_{\theta,\epsilon}f\|_{H^k} \lesssim |\log\epsilon|\|f\|_{H^{k-1}}$ 2. **Geometric Quantity Regularity**: Curvature $h_{\theta,\epsilon}$ is smooth in $H^{k-2}(\partial B)$ 3. **Error Estimate**: $\|E_{\theta,\epsilon}(S)\|_{H^{k-1}} \lesssim (1+|S|)|\log\epsilon|(\epsilon^2 + \|\theta\|_{H^k}^2)$ ### Degeneracy Handling Fourier symbol of the linearized operator: $$\lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \frac{1}{\beta_\epsilon}\left(8\rho + \frac{1}{2\pi^2}\right)(1-|k|) - 1 + k^2$$ Degeneracy is avoided through condition (1.43). ## Related Work ### Historical Development 1. **Hill (1894)**: First explicit spherical vortex solution 2. **Fraenkel (1970)**: Slender ring vortices with small cross-section 3. **Norbury (1972)**: Thick ring vortices 4. **Recent Progress**: Contributions by Cao et al., Burton, Ambrosetti-Struwe, and others ### Technical Comparison - **Advantages**: First treatment of surface tension and hollow vortices - **Methods**: Overdetermined boundary problems vs. variational methods - **Scope**: Generalization of classical Kelvin-Hicks formula ## Conclusions and Discussion ### Main Conclusions 1. Successfully constructed ring-shaped vortex sheet solutions with surface tension 2. Established asymptotic velocity formulas including surface tension effects 3. Proved local existence, uniqueness, and smoothness of solutions ### Limitations 1. **Small Cross-Section Restriction**: Method applies only to $\epsilon \ll 1$ 2. **Parameter Constraints**: Weber number must satisfy specific growth conditions 3. **Local Nature**: Only guarantees local existence and uniqueness ### Future Directions 1. **Bifurcation Analysis**: Study bifurcation phenomena at critical Weber numbers 2. **Stability Analysis**: Analyze linear stability of solutions 3. **Numerical Verification**: Develop high-precision numerical methods to verify theoretical results ## In-Depth Evaluation ### Strengths 1. **Theoretical Breakthrough**: First rigorous treatment of vortex sheet problems with surface tension 2. **Technical Innovation**: Development of systematic methods for handling singular integral kernels 3. **Mathematical Rigor**: Complete theory of existence, uniqueness, and regularity 4. **Physical Significance**: Provides mathematical explanation for natural phenomena ### Weaknesses 1. **Technical Complexity**: Requires advanced Sobolev space theory, potentially limiting applications 2. **Parameter Restrictions**: Multiple technical assumptions may be overly restrictive 3. **Computational Verification**: Lacks numerical experiments supporting theoretical results ### Impact 1. **Academic Value**: Provides new perspective on classical problems in fluid mechanics 2. **Methodological Contribution**: Techniques for handling overdetermined boundary problems have general applicability 3. **Application Potential**: Lays foundation for engineering applications of vortex dynamics ### Applicable Scenarios 1. **Theoretical Fluid Mechanics**: Mathematical theory of vortex dynamics 2. **Oceanography**: Modeling of oceanic vortex structures 3. **Atmospheric Science**: Theoretical analysis of atmospheric vortices ## References The paper contains 57 references, spanning from classical works by Hill, Kelvin, and Hicks to modern partial differential equation theory, reflecting both deep historical heritage and integration of contemporary mathematical techniques. --- **Overall Assessment**: This is a high-quality mathematical analysis paper that successfully resolves a classical problem in fluid mechanics. While technically demanding, its theoretical contributions and methodological innovations possess significant academic value.