Igusa proved in 1958 that the polynomial determining the supersingularity of elliptic curve in Legendre form is separable. In this paper, we get an analogous result for curves of genus $2$ in Rosenhain form. More precisely we show that the ideal determining the superspeciality of the curve has multiplicity one at every superspecial point. Igusa used a Picard-Fucks differential operator annihilating a Gauà hypergeometric series. We shall use Lauricella system (of type D) of hypergeometric differential equations in three variables.
Paper ID : 2409.13212Title : The multiplicity-one theorem for the superspeciality of curves of genus twoAuthors : Shushi Harashita (Yokohama National University), Yuya Yamamoto (Yokohama National University)Classification : math.AG (Algebraic Geometry)Publication Date : October 14, 2025 (arXiv preprint)Paper Link : https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.13212 This paper investigates the superspeciality of genus two curves. In 1958, Igusa proved that the polynomial determining the supersingularity of elliptic curves in Legendre form is separable. This paper obtains analogous results for genus two curves in Rosenhain form, specifically proving that the ideal determining the superspeciality of curves has multiplicity one at each superspecial point. While Igusa employed the Picard-Fuchs differential operator annihilating the Gauß hypergeometric series, this paper utilizes the three-variable Lauricella D-type hypergeometric differential equation system.
Problems to be Addressed :Generalize Igusa's classical result on elliptic curves (genus one) to genus two curves Prove that the ideal determining superspeciality of genus two curves has multiplicity one at all superspecial points Establish deep connections between the Cartier-Manin matrix and Lauricella hypergeometric series Significance of the Problem :Superspecial curves occupy an important position in algebraic geometry and number theory The Jacobians of such curves are isomorphic to products of supersingular elliptic curves Understanding their distribution and properties is fundamental for studying algebraic curves over finite fields Limitations of Existing Methods :Igusa's method is based on univariate Gauß hypergeometric series and cannot be directly generalized to higher genus cases Previous research on genus two curves has been largely limited to smaller families, lacking results for complete families Research Motivation :Develop new technical tools to handle superspeciality problems in higher genus cases Establish bridges between multivariate hypergeometric theory and algebraic curve theory Established connections between Cartier-Manin matrix elements and Lauricella D-type hypergeometric series Proved Main Theorem A : All elements of the Cartier-Manin matrix satisfy the Lauricella hypergeometric differential equation systemProved Main Theorem B : The superspecial locus is defined by a reduced scheme (multiplicity-one theorem)Developed contiguity relation theory , establishing differential relationships between different matrix elementsGeneralized Igusa's classical result from genus one to genus two , laying the foundation for research on higher genus casesConsider a genus two curve over a field K K K of characteristic p > 2 p > 2 p > 2 :
C : y 2 = f ( x ) : = x ( x − 1 ) ( x − λ 1 ) ( x − λ 2 ) ( x − λ 3 ) C: y^2 = f(x) := x(x-1)(x-\lambda_1)(x-\lambda_2)(x-\lambda_3) C : y 2 = f ( x ) := x ( x − 1 ) ( x − λ 1 ) ( x − λ 2 ) ( x − λ 3 )
where { 0 , 1 , λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 } \{0,1,\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3\} { 0 , 1 , λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 } are five distinct elements.
Objective : Prove that the ideal I = ( c p − 1 , c p − 2 , c 2 p − 1 , c 2 p − 2 ) I = (c_{p-1}, c_{p-2}, c_{2p-1}, c_{2p-2}) I = ( c p − 1 , c p − 2 , c 2 p − 1 , c 2 p − 2 ) determining C C C 's superspeciality is reduced at all its zeros in F p [ λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 ] \mathbb{F}_p[\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3] F p [ λ 1 , λ 2 , λ 3 ] .
Define the three-variable Lauricella hypergeometric series:
F ( a , b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , c ; z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ) : = ∑ n 1 = 0 ∞ ∑ n 2 = 0 ∞ ∑ n 3 = 0 ∞ A n 1 , n 2 , n 3 z 1 n 1 z 2 n 2 z 3 n 3 F(a,b_1,b_2,b_3,c;z_1,z_2,z_3) := \sum_{n_1=0}^{\infty}\sum_{n_2=0}^{\infty}\sum_{n_3=0}^{\infty} A_{n_1,n_2,n_3}z_1^{n_1}z_2^{n_2}z_3^{n_3} F ( a , b 1 , b 2 , b 3 , c ; z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ) := ∑ n 1 = 0 ∞ ∑ n 2 = 0 ∞ ∑ n 3 = 0 ∞ A n 1 , n 2 , n 3 z 1 n 1 z 2 n 2 z 3 n 3
where the coefficients are:
A n 1 , n 2 , n 3 : = ( a ; ∑ k = 1 3 n k ) ∏ k = 1 3 ( b k ; n k ) ( c ; ∑ k = 1 3 n k ) ∏ k = 1 3 ( 1 ; n k ) A_{n_1,n_2,n_3} := \frac{(a;\sum_{k=1}^3 n_k)\prod_{k=1}^3(b_k;n_k)}{(c;\sum_{k=1}^3 n_k)\prod_{k=1}^3(1;n_k)} A n 1 , n 2 , n 3 := ( c ; ∑ k = 1 3 n k ) ∏ k = 1 3 ( 1 ; n k ) ( a ; ∑ k = 1 3 n k ) ∏ k = 1 3 ( b k ; n k )
This series satisfies the partial differential equation system:
D ℓ w = 0 D_\ell w = 0 D ℓ w = 0 for ℓ = 1 , 2 , 3 \ell = 1,2,3 ℓ = 1 , 2 , 3 D ℓ , m w = 0 D_{\ell,m} w = 0 D ℓ , m w = 0 for 1 ≤ ℓ < m ≤ 3 1 \leq \ell < m \leq 3 1 ≤ ℓ < m ≤ 3 where D ℓ D_\ell D ℓ and D ℓ , m D_{\ell,m} D ℓ , m are specific second-order partial differential operators.
For curve C C C , its Cartier-Manin matrix is:
M = ( c p − 1 c p − 2 c 2 p − 1 c 2 p − 2 ) M = \begin{pmatrix} c_{p-1} & c_{p-2} \\ c_{2p-1} & c_{2p-2} \end{pmatrix} M = ( c p − 1 c 2 p − 1 c p − 2 c 2 p − 2 )
where c k c_k c k is the coefficient of x k x^k x k in the expansion of f ( x ) ( p − 1 ) / 2 f(x)^{(p-1)/2} f ( x ) ( p − 1 ) /2 .
Truncated Hypergeometric Series Theory : Through the work of Ohashi-Harashita, established precise relationships between Cartier-Manin matrix elements and truncated Lauricella series:
c i p − j = ( c ′ ; d ′ ) ( a ′ ; d ′ ) F ~ i , j c_{ip-j} = \frac{(c';d')}{(a';d')} \tilde{F}_{i,j} c i p − j = ( a ′ ; d ′ ) ( c ′ ; d ′ ) F ~ i , j Contiguity Relations : Discovered key differential relationships:( ∑ k = 1 3 ( z k 2 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 1 = − 1 2 ( z 1 + z 2 + z 3 − 2 ) c i p − 1 − 1 2 c i p − 2 \left(\sum_{k=1}^3 (z_k^2-z_k)\partial_k\right)c_{ip-1} = -\frac{1}{2}(z_1+z_2+z_3-2)c_{ip-1} - \frac{1}{2}c_{ip-2} ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( z k 2 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 1 = − 2 1 ( z 1 + z 2 + z 3 − 2 ) c i p − 1 − 2 1 c i p − 2 ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( 1 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 2 = 1 2 ( c i p − 1 + c i p − 2 ) \left(\sum_{k=1}^3 (1-z_k)\partial_k\right)c_{ip-2} = \frac{1}{2}(c_{ip-1}+c_{ip-2}) ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( 1 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 2 = 2 1 ( c i p − 1 + c i p − 2 ) Jacobian Matrix Analysis : Utilized contiguity relations to prove the full rank of the Jacobian matrix at superspecial points.This paper employs purely theoretical proof methods, primarily including:
Differential Equation Verification : Direct computation verifying that Cartier-Manin matrix elements satisfy the Lauricella differential equation systemRecurrence Relation Analysis : Utilization of standard recurrence relations and contiguity relationsJacobian Criterion Application : Use of the Jacobian criterion from algebraic geometry to determine the multiplicity of singular pointsStep One : Prove that c i p − j c_{ip-j} c i p − j satisfies the corresponding partial differential equation system (Theorem A)Step Two : Establish contiguity relations connecting different matrix elementsStep Three : Analyze the rank of the Jacobian matrix and apply the Jacobian criterion to prove reducedness (Theorem B)Statement : For each i , j ∈ { 1 , 2 } i,j \in \{1,2\} i , j ∈ { 1 , 2 } , the elements c i p − j c_{ip-j} c i p − j of the Cartier-Manin matrix satisfy:
D ℓ ( j ) c i p − j = 0 D_\ell^{(j)} c_{ip-j} = 0 D ℓ ( j ) c i p − j = 0 for ℓ = 1 , 2 , 3 \ell = 1,2,3 ℓ = 1 , 2 , 3 D ℓ , m c i p − j = 0 D_{\ell,m} c_{ip-j} = 0 D ℓ , m c i p − j = 0 for 1 ≤ ℓ < m ≤ 3 1 \leq \ell < m \leq 3 1 ≤ ℓ < m ≤ 3 Proof Outline :
Utilize the relationship between truncated series F ~ i , j \tilde{F}_{i,j} F ~ i , j and complete Lauricella series Divide the proof into five cases through support set analysis Key challenge lies in handling boundary cases, particularly when indices reach ( p − 1 ) / 2 (p-1)/2 ( p − 1 ) /2 modulo p p p Statement : The scheme defined by the ideal ( c p − 1 , c 2 p − 1 , c p − 2 , c 2 p − 2 ) (c_{p-1}, c_{2p-1}, c_{p-2}, c_{2p-2}) ( c p − 1 , c 2 p − 1 , c p − 2 , c 2 p − 2 ) in F p [ z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ] \mathbb{F}_p[z_1,z_2,z_3] F p [ z 1 , z 2 , z 3 ] is reduced.
Proof Strategy :
Jacobian Matrix Construction :
J = ( ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 1 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 1 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 1 ∂ c 2 p − 2 ∂ z 1 ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 2 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 2 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 2 ∂ c 2 p − 2 ∂ z 2 ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 3 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 3 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 3 ∂ c 2 p − 2 ∂ z 3 ) J = \begin{pmatrix}
\frac{\partial c_{p-1}}{\partial z_1} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-1}}{\partial z_1} & \frac{\partial c_{p-2}}{\partial z_1} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-2}}{\partial z_1} \\
\frac{\partial c_{p-1}}{\partial z_2} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-1}}{\partial z_2} & \frac{\partial c_{p-2}}{\partial z_2} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-2}}{\partial z_2} \\
\frac{\partial c_{p-1}}{\partial z_3} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-1}}{\partial z_3} & \frac{\partial c_{p-2}}{\partial z_3} & \frac{\partial c_{2p-2}}{\partial z_3}
\end{pmatrix} J = ∂ z 1 ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 2 ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 3 ∂ c p − 1 ∂ z 1 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 2 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 3 ∂ c 2 p − 1 ∂ z 1 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 2 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 3 ∂ c p − 2 ∂ z 1 ∂ c 2 p − 2 ∂ z 2 ∂ c 2 p − 2 ∂ z 3 ∂ c 2 p − 2 Rank Analysis : Utilize contiguity relations to prove rank ( J ) = 3 \text{rank}(J) = 3 rank ( J ) = 3 , thereby applying the Jacobian criterionTwo key differential relationships are established:
Relation 1 : ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( z k 2 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 1 = − 1 2 ( z 1 + z 2 + z 3 − 2 ) c i p − 1 − 1 2 c i p − 2 \left(\sum_{k=1}^3 (z_k^2-z_k)\partial_k\right)c_{ip-1} = -\frac{1}{2}(z_1+z_2+z_3-2)c_{ip-1} - \frac{1}{2}c_{ip-2} ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( z k 2 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 1 = − 2 1 ( z 1 + z 2 + z 3 − 2 ) c i p − 1 − 2 1 c i p − 2 Relation 2 : ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( 1 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 2 = 1 2 ( c i p − 1 + c i p − 2 ) \left(\sum_{k=1}^3 (1-z_k)\partial_k\right)c_{ip-2} = \frac{1}{2}(c_{ip-1}+c_{ip-2}) ( ∑ k = 1 3 ( 1 − z k ) ∂ k ) c i p − 2 = 2 1 ( c i p − 1 + c i p − 2 ) The proofs of these relations involve complex combinatorial calculations and fine analysis of index sets.
Igusa (1958) : Proved that the polynomial H p ( t ) H_p(t) H p ( t ) determining supersingularity of elliptic curves is separableDeuring (1941) : Established foundational theory of elliptic curve supersingularityIbukiyama-Katsura-Oort (1986) : Studied supersingular genus two curves in smaller familiesOhashi-Harashita (2023) : Established connections between hypergeometric series and the Cartier operatorComplete Family Treatment : First to establish the multiplicity-one theorem for complete families of genus two curvesMultivariate Techniques : Developed new methods based on Lauricella seriesSystematic Generalization : Provides a template for research on higher genus casesSuccessful Generalization : Extended Igusa's classical result from elliptic curves to genus two curvesTechnical Breakthrough : Established deep connections between multivariate hypergeometric theory and algebraic curve superspecialityCompleteness : Established the multiplicity-one property for the entire family of genus two curvesCharacteristic Restriction : The method requires p > 2 p > 2 p > 2 , cannot handle characteristic 2Genus Restriction : Currently applicable only to genus two curves; generalization to higher genus requires new techniquesComputational Complexity : Proofs of contiguity relations involve substantial technical calculationsHigher Genus Generalization : Study analogous problems for genus three and higher curvesCharacteristic 2 Case : Develop theory applicable to characteristic 2Algorithmic Implementation : Convert theoretical results into practical computational algorithmsApplication Extension : Explore applications in cryptography and coding theoryTheoretical Depth : Establishes profound connections between algebraic geometry and special function theoryTechnical Innovation : Develops new tools and methods for handling multivariate casesCompleteness : Provides a complete theoretical framework with rigorous proofsGeneralization Value : Provides important theoretical foundation for subsequent researchTechnical Threshold : Requires deep background in algebraic geometry and special function theoryComputational Complexity : Some proof steps involve substantial technical calculationsApplication Scope : Currently primarily theoretical results; practical applications remain to be developedAcademic Contribution : Possesses significant theoretical value in algebraic geometryMethodological Significance : Provides new technical pathways for research on related problemsLong-term Impact : Likely to become an important foundation for research on superspeciality of higher genus curvesTheoretical Research : Algebraic geometry, number theory, special function theoryCryptography : Theoretical foundations of elliptic curve cryptographyCoding Theory : Construction and analysis of algebraic geometry codesIgusa, J.: Class number of a definite quaternion with prime discriminant (1958) Ohashi, R. and Harashita, S.: Differential forms on the curves associated to Appell-Lauricella hypergeometric series (2023) Matsumoto, K.: Appell and Lauricella Hypergeometric Functions (2020) Silverman, J.H.: The Arithmetic of Elliptic Curves (2009) This paper achieves important theoretical breakthroughs, successfully generalizing Igusa's classical result to the genus two case and opening new directions for research on superspecial curves in algebraic geometry. While demanding in technical requirements, its theoretical value and methodological significance make it an important contribution to the field.